Monitoring the Session

HB 1006

Schoolcraft Bill Lets Owners Of 67% Of Lots Rewrite Deed Restrictions

Did not pass

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Rep. Alan SchoolcraftRHouse 44
Why it's charged
Bracket bill

THE TEXT

“with a population of 30,000 or more; and”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

This population test sits on top of a pre-1965 plat, more than 900 lots, two or more cities, a city in at least three counties, and zoning that conflicts with the restrictions. Stacked together, these tests likely aim the chapter at very few places. The caption does admit it covers only "certain subdivisions."

Bracket bill
Corrected Nov 3, 2026

Corrected Nov 3, 2026 · We checked this summary against the bill text and fixed it.

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the amendment of restrictive covenants applicable to certain subdivisions.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Binds every lot in the area. Must be pre-1965, over 900 lots, across two or more cities.

The bill creates a special way to change the old deed restrictions on a narrow class of large, old subdivisions that cross city lines. Owners of 67 percent of the lots in a chosen area can vote by mailed written ballot to rewrite the restrictions, and the change binds every lot in that area. Owners who object cannot argue in court that the change is invalid because it does not apply to the whole subdivision, and the rule reaches covenants already on the books.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 2153 by Rep. Kuempel (Died in committee) and this bill (Did not pass). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 2153 by Rep. Kuempel (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.STALLED AFTER COMMITTEE. Voted out of the House Trade, Workforce & Economic Development committee 9-0 on Apr 9, 2025. Taken up on the floor on Apr 29, 2025 and failed. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB1006 · 2024-11-12

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the amendment of restrictive covenants applicable to certain subdivisions.

WHAT IT DOES

Binds every lot in the area. Must be pre-1965, over 900 lots, across two or more cities.

The bill creates a special way to change the old deed restrictions on a narrow class of large, old subdivisions that cross city lines. Owners of 67 percent of the lots in a chosen area can vote by mailed written ballot to rewrite the restrictions, and the change binds every lot in that area. Owners who object cannot argue in court that the change is invalid because it does not apply to the whole subdivision, and the rule reaches covenants already on the books.

CHARGES

[x] BRACKET BILLanalysis confidence 60%

THE TEXT

“with a population of 30,000 or more; and”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

This population test sits on top of a pre-1965 plat, more than 900 lots, two or more cities, a city in at least three counties, and zoning that conflicts with the restrictions. Stacked together, these tests likely aim the chapter at very few places. The caption does admit it covers only "certain subdivisions."

TOTAL

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · March 21, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Trade, Workforce & Economic Development
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Left pending in committee
  7. Considered in public hearing
  8. Recommended to be sent to Local & Consent
  9. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  10. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  11. Committee report distributed
  12. Comm. report sent to Local & Consent Calendar
  13. Considered in Local & Consent Calendars
  14. Transferred to Calendars Committee
  15. Committee report sent to Calendars
  16. Considered in Calendars
  17. Placed on General State Calendar
  18. Read 2nd time
  19. Failed to pass to engrossment
  20. Record vote RV#877
  21. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  22. 1 hr. notice-for reconsideration
  23. Motion to reconsider fails
  24. Record vote RV#973
  25. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“may not claim in any judicial proceeding that the amendment is not enforceable on the grounds that the amendment is not applicable to all of the property in the subdivision”

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill takes away a legal defense that lot owners could otherwise raise against a covenant change that applies to only part of the subdivision.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$55,250.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$55,250.00

Cash
$55,000.00
Paid by others
$250.00
Total
$55,250.00
fundraiser $250.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 30, 2024 to Dec 17, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986880, 101012418, 101032822.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$12,500.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$12,500.00

Cash
$12,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$12,500.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 27, 2024 to Aug 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986880, 101068954.

Dustin Burrows Campaign$10,000.00

Dustin Burrows Campaign

$10,000.00

Cash
$10,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$10,000.00

Also funds 39 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 13, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Feb 10, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101041197.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$55,250.00

Cash
$55,000.00
Paid by others
$250.00
Total
$55,250.00
fundraiser $250.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 30, 2024 to Dec 17, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986880, 101012418, 101032822.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$12,500.00

Cash
$12,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$12,500.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 27, 2024 to Aug 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986880, 101068954.

×

Dustin Burrows Campaign

$10,000.00

Cash
$10,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$10,000.00

Also funds 39 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 13, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Feb 10, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101041197.

Votes2

House Apr 30, 2025

Yea
61
Nay
80
Present, not voting
2
Absent
1
Excused
6
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 973

Representative Virdell moved to reconsider the vote by which HB 1006 failed to pass to engrossment by Record No. 877 on Tuesday, April 29. The motion to reconsider was lost by (Record 973): 61 Yeas, 80 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 61 (published)
  • Nay: 80 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 1 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 6 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Apr 29, 2025

Yea
54
Nay
92
Present, not voting
2
Absent
2
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 877

HB 1006 failed to pass to engrossment by (Record 877): 54 Yeas, 92 Nays, 2 Present, not voting. (The vote was reconsidered on April 30, and HB 1006 failed to pass to engrossment by Record No. 973.)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 54 (published)
  • Nay: 92 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 2 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Fiscal

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · March 21, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 2153

by Rep. Kuempel, different lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, May 2, 2023: Referred to Local Government

Relating to the amendment of restrictive covenants applicable to certain subdivisions.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Nov 12, 2024

04/30/2025 H Motion to reconsider fails

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Nov 3, 2026 at 3:26 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Trade, Workforce & Economic Development · Committee vote 9 aye, 0 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Subjects

City Government--Land Use & Zoning

Property Interests--Property Owners Association

Property Interests--Real Property

PLATTING

RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS

Text

The text as introduced · 681 words

By: Schoolcraft
H.B. No. 1006

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the amendment of restrictive covenants applicable to

certain subdivisions.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Title 11, Property Code, is amended by adding

Chapter 213 to read as follows:

CHAPTER 213. AMENDMENT OF RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN

MULTI-ZONED SUBDIVISIONS

Sec. 213.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Lot" means any designated parcel of land located

in a subdivision.

(2) "Multi-zoned subdivision" means a subdivision:

(A) that:

(i) was platted before 1965;

(ii) has more than 900 lots; and

(iii) is located in two or more separately

incorporated municipalities; and

(B) at least one portion of the plat of which is

zoned for a use other than a use permitted by the applicable

restrictions.

(3) "Real property records" and "restrictions" have

the meanings assigned by Section 201.003.

Sec. 213.002. APPLICABILITY. This chapter applies only to

a multi-zoned subdivision located in whole or in part in a

municipality:

(1) with a population of 30,000 or more; and

(2) located in at least three counties.

Sec. 213.003. AMENDMENTOFRESTRICTIONS.

(a) Notwithstanding any other law, restrictions applicable to

property in a multi-zoned subdivision may be amended as provided by

this chapter.

(b) An amendment under this chapter may apply to all or part

of the subdivision. Restrictions may be amended under this chapter

to affect different portions of the subdivision differently.

(c) An amendment approved under this chapter is effective

and applies to each separately owned lot in the area designated as

subject to the amendment.

Sec. 213.004. VOTE REQUIRED. (a) An amendment of

restrictions under this chapter must be approved by the owners of

at least 67 percent of the lots in the area of the subdivision

designated in the relevant ballot as subject to the proposed

amendment.

(b) Only one vote may be cast for each lot. The vote of

multiple owners of a property may be reflected by the signature or

vote of one of the owners.

Sec. 213.005. BALLOT REQUIREMENTS. (a) A ballot for a

vote under this chapter must:

(1) be in writing;

(2) state the substance of the proposed amendment of

the restrictions;

(3) designate the area of the subdivision to which the

proposed amendment applies; and

(4) specify the date by which the ballot must be

returned to be counted.

(b) A ballot for a vote under this chapter must be mailed to

each owner of a lot in the area of the subdivision to which the

proposed amendment applies at the address shown in the online

records of the appraisal district in which the lot is located.

(c) Before a vote is held under this section, a copy of the

ballot must be recorded in the real property records of each county

in which the subdivision is located.

Sec. 213.006. CERTIFICATION OF VOTE; RECORDING REQUIRED.

(a) If an amendment of the restrictions of a subdivision is

approved under this chapter, a document certifying the approval

must be recorded in the real property records of each county in

which the subdivision is located.

(b) A document filed under this section is prima facie

evidence that the required vote was attained and the required

procedures for the vote were followed.

Sec. 213.007. CLAIM OF LACK OF MUTUALITY PROHIBITED. If an

amendment of a subdivision's restrictions is approved under this

chapter, an owner of property within the subdivision to which the

amended restrictions apply may not claim in any judicial proceeding

that the amendment is not enforceable on the grounds that the

amendment is not applicable to all of the property in the

subdivision.

SECTION 2. Chapter 213, Property Code, as added by this Act,

applies to a restrictive covenant enacted before, on, or after the

effective date of this Act.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.