Monitoring the Session

HB 1151

Hull’s bill on what counts as neglect

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Lacey HullRHouse 138

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to neglect of a child and the grounds for termination of the parent-child relationship and possession of a child by the Department of Family and Protective Services.

Caption from analyzed text · version E.

Summary

Refusing psychotropic drugs for a child is not neglect.

The bill says a parent's refusal of psychotropic drugs or psychiatric treatment for a child, or a choice of a recognized alternative or nonstandard therapy, is not neglect. It also bars the Department of Family and Protective Services from removing a child, or a court from ending parental rights, on those grounds alone, and bars removal over a parent's positive marihuana test unless the child's health or development is significantly impaired. Parents facing CPS cases filed on or after September 1, 2025 get these protections, unless the decision poses a substantial risk of death, disfigurement, or bodily injury, or causes observable and material harm to the child.

Labels

Labels: DO-OVER. Reworked text of a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 2716 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.CROSS-PARTY HANDOFF. Lead author Lacey Hull (R) in the House. Lead sponsor Royce West (D) in the Senate. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB1151 · 2024-11-12

SOLD BY

+ 6 coauthors

ITEM

relating to neglect of a child and the grounds for termination of the parent-child relationship and possession of a child by the Department of Family and Protective Services.

WHAT IT DOES

Refusing psychotropic drugs for a child is not neglect.

The bill says a parent's refusal of psychotropic drugs or psychiatric treatment for a child, or a choice of a recognized alternative or nonstandard therapy, is not neglect. It also bars the Department of Family and Protective Services from removing a child, or a court from ending parental rights, on those grounds alone, and bars removal over a parent's positive marihuana test unless the child's health or development is significantly impaired. Parents facing CPS cases filed on or after September 1, 2025 get these protections, unless the decision poses a substantial risk of death, disfigurement, or bodily injury, or causes observable and material harm to the child.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 5, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Human Services
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in public hearing
  9. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  10. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  11. Committee report distributed
  12. Committee report sent to Calendars
  13. Considered in Calendars
  14. Placed on General State Calendar
  15. Read 2nd time
  16. Passed to engrossment
  17. Record vote RV#204
  18. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  19. Read 3rd time
  20. Passed
  21. Record vote RV#222
  22. Reported engrossed
  23. Received from the House
  24. Read first time
  25. Referred to Health & Human Services
  26. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  27. Considered in public hearing
  28. Testimony taken in committee
  29. Left pending in committee
  30. Considered in public hearing
  31. Vote taken in committee
  32. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  33. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  34. Committee report printed and distributed
  35. Placed on intent calendar
  36. Co-sponsor authorized
  37. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  38. Read 2nd time & passed to 3rd reading
  39. Vote recorded in Journal
  40. Three day rule suspended
  41. Record vote
  42. Read 3rd time
  43. Passed
  44. Record vote
  45. Senate passage reported
  46. Reported enrolled
  47. Signed in the House
  48. Signed in the Senate
  49. Sent to the Governor
  50. Signed by the Governor
  51. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 145 yea · 1 nay

Senate · 31 yea · 0 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · Apr 16, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · May 14, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$595,376.10

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$595,376.10

Cash
$80,000.00
Paid by others
$515,376.10
Total
$595,376.10
mail $216,305.25advertising $185,974.50Other filed descriptions $66,286.00polling $46,810.35

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 30, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101010359, 101033114, 101035066, 101040912, 101044098, 101069436, 101072848.

Texas Conservative Majority PAC$483,456.00

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$483,456.00

Cash
$150,000.00
Paid by others
$333,456.00
Total
$483,456.00
canvassing $316,956.00polling $16,500.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Feb 13, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101040912, 101069436, 101072848.

Texas Sands PAC$244,600.00

Texas Sands PAC

$244,600.00

Cash
$234,000.00
Paid by others
$10,600.00
Total
$244,600.00
polling $10,600.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jan 14, 2026 to Sep 25, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101035066, 101040912, 101072848.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$595,376.10

Cash
$80,000.00
Paid by others
$515,376.10
Total
$595,376.10
mail $216,305.25advertising $185,974.50Other filed descriptions $66,286.00polling $46,810.35

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 30, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101010359, 101033114, 101035066, 101040912, 101044098, 101069436, 101072848.

×

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$483,456.00

Cash
$150,000.00
Paid by others
$333,456.00
Total
$483,456.00
canvassing $316,956.00polling $16,500.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Feb 13, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101040912, 101069436, 101072848.

×

Texas Sands PAC

$244,600.00

Cash
$234,000.00
Paid by others
$10,600.00
Total
$244,600.00
polling $10,600.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jan 14, 2026 to Sep 25, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101035066, 101040912, 101072848.

Votes5

Senate May 14, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator West moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that HB 1151 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0. The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 14, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator West moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that HB 1151 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 14, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to third reading by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Apr 16, 2025

Yea
145
Nay
1
Present, not voting
1
Absent
3
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 222

HB 1151 was passed by (Record 222): 145 Yeas, 1 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 145 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 3 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Apr 15, 2025

Yea
144
Nay
2
Present, not voting
1
Absent
1
Excused
2
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 204

HB 1151 was passed to engrossment by (Record 204): 144 Yeas, 2 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 144 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 1 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 2 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses25
For
23
Against
1
On
1
Names

For

  • ACLU of Texas1 registration
  • Buckner International1 registration
  • Citizens Commission on Human Rights2 registrations
  • Parent Guidance Center1 registration
  • Self8 registrations
  • Self; Austin Justice Coalition1 registration
  • Self; Austin justice coalition1 registration
  • Self; Family Freedom Project2 registrations
  • Self; Southern Baptists of Texas Convention1 registration
  • Self; Texans for Medical Freedom1 registration
  • Self; Texans for medical freedom1 registration
  • Self; Texas Association of Family Defense Attorneys.1 registration
  • Self; Texas Eagle Forum, President1 registration
  • Self; Texas Right To Know1 registration

Against

  • Self; 106th Judicial District Attorney1 registration

On

  • National Association of Social Workers- Texas Chapter1 registration
Sources

25 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 5, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version E by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 2716

by Rep. Hull, same lead author · Died in committee · reworked

Introduced text

Last action, May 11, 2023: Referred to Health & Human Services

Relating to neglect of a child and the grounds for termination of the parent-child relationship and possession of a child by the Department of Family and Protective Services.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Nov 12, 2024

05/28/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report · Engrossed · Senate Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors
Cosponsors

House committee · Human Services · Committee vote 11 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Senate committee · Health & Human Services · Committee vote 8 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Subjects

Family--Child Protection

Family--Parent & Child

Mental Health & Substance Abuse

MEDICINE & PRESCRIPTION DRUGS

FAMILY & PROTECTIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF

Text

The text as introduced · 1,600 words

89R3843 MM-F

By: Hull
H.B. No. 1151

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to neglect of a child and the grounds for termination of

the parent-child relationship and possession of a child by the

Department of Family and Protective Services.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 161.001(c), Family Code, is amended to

read as follows:

(c) Evidence of one or more of the following does not

constitute clear and convincing evidence sufficient for a court to

make a finding under Subsection (b) and order termination of the

parent-child relationship:

(1) the parent homeschooled the child;

(2) the parent is economically disadvantaged;

(3) the parent has been charged with a nonviolent

misdemeanor offense other than:

(A) an offense under Title 5, Penal Code;

(B) an offense under Title 6, Penal Code; or

(C) an offense that involves family violence, as

defined by Section 71.004 of this code;

(4) the parent provided or administered low-THC

cannabis to a child for whom the low-THC cannabis was prescribed

under Chapter 169, Occupations Code;

(5) the parent declined immunization for the child for

reasons of conscience, including a religious belief;

(6) the parent sought an opinion from more than one

medical provider relating to the child's medical care, transferred

the child's medical care to a new medical provider, or transferred

the child to another health care facility; [ or ]

(7) the parent allowed the child to engage in

independent activities that are appropriate and typical for the

child's level of maturity, physical condition, developmental

abilities, or culture ;

(8) the parent refused to administer or consent to the

administration of a psychotropic medication to the child, or to

consent to any other psychiatric or psychological treatment of the

child, unless the refusal:

(A) presents a substantial risk of death,

disfigurement, or bodily injury to the child; or

(B) results in an observable and material

impairment to the growth, development, or functioning of the child;

or

(9) the parent chose a recognized alternative health

care treatment or therapy for the child that could be considered as

new, emerging, or nonstandard, unless the treatment or therapy:

(A) presents a substantial risk of death,

disfigurement, or bodily injury to the child; or

(B) results in an observable and material

impairment to the growth, development, or functioning of the child .

SECTION 2. Section 261.001(4), Family Code, is amended to

read as follows:

(4) "Neglect" means an act or failure to act by a

person responsible for a child's care, custody, or welfare

evidencing the person's blatant disregard for the consequences of

the act or failure to act that results in harm to the child or that

creates an immediate danger to the child's physical health or

safety and:

(A) includes:

(i) the leaving of a child in a situation

where the child would be exposed to an immediate danger of physical

or mental harm, without arranging for necessary care for the child,

and the demonstration of an intent not to return by a parent,

guardian, or managing or possessory conservator of the child;

(ii) the following acts or omissions by a

person:

(a) placing a child in or failing to

remove a child from a situation that a reasonable person would

realize requires judgment or actions beyond the child's level of

maturity, physical condition, or mental abilities and that results

in bodily injury or an immediate danger of harm to the child;

(b) failing to seek, obtain, or follow

through with medical care for a child, with the failure resulting in

or presenting an immediate danger of death, disfigurement, or

bodily injury or with the failure resulting in an observable and

material impairment to the growth, development, or functioning of

the child;

(c) the failure to provide a child

with food, clothing, or shelter necessary to sustain the life or

health of the child, excluding failure caused primarily by

financial inability unless relief services had been offered and

refused;

(d) placing a child in or failing to

remove the child from a situation in which the child would be

exposed to an immediate danger of sexual conduct harmful to the

child; or

(e) placing a child in or failing to

remove the child from a situation in which the child would be

exposed to acts or omissions that constitute abuse under

Subdivision (1)(E), (F), (G), (H), or (K) committed against another

child;

(iii) the failure by the person responsible

for a child's care, custody, or welfare to permit the child to

return to the child's home without arranging for the necessary care

for the child after the child has been absent from the home for any

reason, including having been in residential placement or having

run away; or

(iv) a negligent act or omission by an

employee, volunteer, or other individual working under the auspices

of a facility or program, including failure to comply with an

individual treatment plan, plan of care, or individualized service

plan, that causes or may cause substantial emotional harm or

physical injury to, or the death of, a child served by the facility

or program as further described by rule or policy; and

(B) does not include:

(i) the refusal by a person responsible for

a child's care, custody, or welfare to permit the child to remain in

or return to the child's home resulting in the placement of the

child in the conservatorship of the department if:

(a) the child has a severe emotional

disturbance;

(b) the person's refusal is based

solely on the person's inability to obtain mental health services

necessary to protect the safety and well-being of the child; and

(c) the person has exhausted all

reasonable means available to the person to obtain the mental

health services described by Sub-subparagraph (b);

(ii) allowing the child to engage in

independent activities that are appropriate and typical for the

child's level of maturity, physical condition, developmental

abilities, or culture; [ or ]

(iii) a decision by a person responsible

for a child's care, custody, or welfare to:

(a) obtain an opinion from more than

one medical provider relating to the child's medical care;

(b) transfer the child's medical care

to a new medical provider; or

(c) transfer the child to another

health care facility ;

(iv) the refusal by a person responsible

for a child's care, custody, or welfare to administer or consent to

the administration of a psychotropic medication to the child, or to

consent to any other psychiatric or psychological treatment of the

child, unless the refusal:

(a) presents a substantial risk of

death, disfigurement, or bodily injury to the child; or

(b) results in an observable and

material impairment to the growth, development, or functioning of

the child; or

(v) choosing a recognized alternative

health care treatment or therapy for the child that could be

considered as new, emerging, or nonstandard, unless the treatment

or therapy:

(a) presents a substantial risk of

death, disfigurement, or bodily injury to the child; or

(b) results in an observable and

material impairment to the growth, development, or functioning of

the child .

SECTION 3. Section 262.116(a), Family Code, is amended to

read as follows:

(a) The Department of Family and Protective Services may not

take possession of a child under this subchapter based on evidence

that the parent:

(1) homeschooled the child;

(2) is economically disadvantaged;

(3) has been charged with a nonviolent misdemeanor

offense other than:

(A) an offense under Title 5, Penal Code;

(B) an offense under Title 6, Penal Code; or

(C) an offense that involves family violence, as

defined by Section 71.004 of this code;

(4) provided or administered low-THC cannabis to a

child for whom the low-THC cannabis was prescribed under Chapter

169, Occupations Code;

(5) declined immunization for the child for reasons of

conscience, including a religious belief;

(6) sought an opinion from more than one medical

provider relating to the child's medical care, transferred the

child's medical care to a new medical provider, or transferred the

child to another health care facility;

(7) allowed the child to engage in independent

activities that are appropriate and typical for the child's level

of maturity, physical condition, developmental abilities, or

culture; [ or ]

(8) tested positive for marihuana, unless the

department has evidence that the parent's use of marihuana has

caused significant impairment to the child's physical or mental

health or emotional development ;

(9) refused to administer or consent to the

administration of a psychotropic medication to the child, or to

consent to any other psychiatric or psychological treatment of the

child, unless the refusal:

(A) presents a substantial risk of death,

disfigurement, or bodily injury to the child; or

(B) results in an observable and material

impairment to the growth, development, or functioning of the child;

or

(10) chose a recognized alternative health care

treatment or therapy for the child that could be considered as new,

emerging, or nonstandard, unless the treatment or therapy:

(A) presents a substantial risk of death,

disfigurement, or bodily injury to the child; or

(B) results in an observable and material

impairment to the growth, development, or functioning of the child .

SECTION 4. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to

a suit filed by the Department of Family and Protective Services on

or after the effective date of this Act. A suit filed by the

department before that date is governed by the law in effect on the

date the suit was filed, and the former law is continued in effect

for that purpose.

SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.