Monitoring the Session

HB 1698

Schoolcraft Covenant Bill Reaches A Handful Of Subdivisions, Likely One

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Rep. Alan SchoolcraftRHouse 44
Why it's charged
Bracket bill

THE TEXT

“(i) was platted before 1965;”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

This age cutoff stacks with other limits: more than 900 lots, two or more cities, and a host city of 30,000 or more that sits in at least three counties. Together they narrow a statewide Property Code chapter to a handful of subdivisions, likely one. The caption's word "certain" admits the bill is narrow but never says where it lands.

Bracket bill

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the amendment of restrictive covenants applicable to certain subdivisions.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Pre-1965, 900-plus lots, two-plus cities. Owners of 67 percent of the lots can rewrite the deed rules.

The bill creates a new process that lets lot owners rewrite old deed restrictions in a narrow class of large, old subdivisions that cross city lines and have zoning that conflicts with those restrictions. An amendment passes with written mail ballots from owners of at least 67 percent of the lots in the area the ballot names, and it can cover all or just part of the subdivision. Once approved and recorded, the change binds every lot in the named area, and owners there cannot sue to block it on the grounds that it does not apply to the whole subdivision.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 2153 by Rep. Kuempel (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 2153 by Rep. Kuempel (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Dec 20, 2024 and referred to the House Trade, Workforce & Economic Development committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB1698 · 2024-12-20

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the amendment of restrictive covenants applicable to certain subdivisions.

WHAT IT DOES

Pre-1965, 900-plus lots, two-plus cities. Owners of 67 percent of the lots can rewrite the deed rules.

The bill creates a new process that lets lot owners rewrite old deed restrictions in a narrow class of large, old subdivisions that cross city lines and have zoning that conflicts with those restrictions. An amendment passes with written mail ballots from owners of at least 67 percent of the lots in the area the ballot names, and it can cover all or just part of the subdivision. Once approved and recorded, the change binds every lot in the named area, and owners there cannot sue to block it on the grounds that it does not apply to the whole subdivision.

CHARGES

[x] BRACKET BILLanalysis confidence 80%

THE TEXT

“(i) was platted before 1965;”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

This age cutoff stacks with other limits: more than 900 lots, two or more cities, and a host city of 30,000 or more that sits in at least three counties. Together they narrow a statewide Property Code chapter to a handful of subdivisions, likely one. The caption's word "certain" admits the bill is narrow but never says where it lands.

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Trade, Workforce & Economic Development
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“may not claim in any judicial proceeding that the amendment is not enforceable on the grounds that the amendment is not applicable to all of the property in the subdivision”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill takes away a legal defense that owners could otherwise raise in court against a partial amendment of their deed restrictions.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$55,250.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$55,250.00

Cash
$55,000.00
Paid by others
$250.00
Total
$55,250.00
fundraiser $250.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 30, 2024 to Dec 17, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986880, 101012418, 101032822.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$12,500.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$12,500.00

Cash
$12,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$12,500.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 27, 2024 to Aug 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986880, 101068954.

Dustin Burrows Campaign$10,000.00

Dustin Burrows Campaign

$10,000.00

Cash
$10,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$10,000.00

Also funds 39 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 13, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Feb 10, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101041197.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$55,250.00

Cash
$55,000.00
Paid by others
$250.00
Total
$55,250.00
fundraiser $250.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 30, 2024 to Dec 17, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986880, 101012418, 101032822.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$12,500.00

Cash
$12,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$12,500.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 27, 2024 to Aug 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986880, 101068954.

×

Dustin Burrows Campaign

$10,000.00

Cash
$10,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$10,000.00

Also funds 39 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 13, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Feb 10, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101041197.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 2153

by Rep. Kuempel, different lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, May 2, 2023: Referred to Local Government

Relating to the amendment of restrictive covenants applicable to certain subdivisions.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Dec 20, 2024

03/12/2025 H Referred to Trade, Workforce & Economic Development: Mar 12 2025 11:15AM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Trade, Workforce & Economic Development · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Property Interests--Property Owners Association

Property Interests--Real Property

PLATTING

RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS

Text

The text as introduced · 681 words

By: Schoolcraft
H.B. No. 1698

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the amendment of restrictive covenants applicable to

certain subdivisions.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Title 11, Property Code, is amended by adding

Chapter 213 to read as follows:

CHAPTER 213. AMENDMENT OF RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN

MULTI-ZONED SUBDIVISIONS

Sec. 213.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Lot" means any designated parcel of land located

in a subdivision.

(2) "Multi-zoned subdivision" means a subdivision:

(A) that:

(i) was platted before 1965;

(ii) has more than 900 lots; and

(iii) is located in two or more separately

incorporated municipalities; and

(B) at least one portion of the plat of which is

zoned for a use other than a use permitted by the applicable

restrictions.

(3) "Real property records" and "restrictions" have

the meanings assigned by Section 201.003.

Sec. 213.002. APPLICABILITY. This chapter applies only to

a multi-zoned subdivision located wholly or partly in a

municipality:

(1) with a population of 30,000 or more; and

(2) located in at least three counties.

Sec. 213.003. AMENDMENT OF RESTRICTIONS. (a)

Notwithstanding any other law, restrictions applicable to property

in a multi-zoned subdivision may be amended as provided by this

chapter.

(b) An amendment under this chapter may apply to all or part

of the subdivision. Restrictions may be amended under this chapter

to affect different portions of the subdivision differently.

(c) An amendment approved under this chapter is effective

and applies to each separately owned lot in the area designated as

subject to the amendment.

Sec. 213.004. VOTE REQUIRED. (a) An amendment of

restrictions under this chapter must be approved by the owners of at

least 67 percent of the lots in the area of the subdivision

designated in the relevant ballot as subject to the proposed

amendment.

(b) Only one vote may be cast for each lot. The vote of

multiple owners of a property may be reflected by the signature or

vote of one of the owners.

Sec. 213.005. BALLOT REQUIREMENTS. (a) A ballot for a vote

under this chapter must:

(1) be in writing;

(2) state the substance of the proposed amendment of

the restrictions;

(3) designate the area of the subdivision to which the

proposed amendment applies; and

(4) specify the date by which the ballot must be

returned to be counted.

(b) A ballot for a vote under this chapter must be mailed to

each owner of a lot in the area of the subdivision to which the

proposed amendment applies at the address shown in the online

records of the appraisal district in which the lot is located.

(c) Before a vote is held under this section, a copy of the

ballot must be recorded in the real property records of each county

in which the subdivision is located.

Sec. 213.006. CERTIFICATION OF VOTE; RECORDING REQUIRED.

(a) If an amendment of the restrictions of a subdivision is

approved under this chapter, a document certifying the approval

must be recorded in the real property records of each county in

which the subdivision is located.

(b) A document filed under this section is prima facie

evidence that the required vote was attained and the required

procedures for the vote were followed.

Sec. 213.007. CLAIM OF LACK OF MUTUALITY PROHIBITED. If an

amendment of a subdivision's restrictions is approved under this

chapter, an owner of property within the subdivision to which the

amended restrictions apply may not claim in any judicial proceeding

that the amendment is not enforceable on the grounds that the

amendment is not applicable to all of the property in the

subdivision.

SECTION 2. Chapter 213, Property Code, as added by this Act,

applies to a restrictive covenant enacted before, on, or after the

effective date of this Act.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.