Monitoring the Session

HB 1755

bill making judges explain protective order options

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Christian ManuelDHouse 22

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to certain duties of the court regarding the restrictions that may be included in a protective order on a person found to have committed family violence.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Judges must ask applicants directly about location restrictions on the abuser.

The bill requires judges at protective order hearings involving alleged family violence to explain to the applicant what restrictions the court can impose, specifically including the location restrictions on the abuser. The judge must also directly ask the applicant whether they want one or both of those location restrictions in the order. When deciding whether to include those restrictions, the court must consider what the applicant said, starting with hearings held on or after September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 2095 (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 2095 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Jan 7, 2025 and referred to the House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence subcommittee on Family & Fiduciary Relationships. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB1755 · 2025-01-07

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to certain duties of the court regarding the restrictions that may be included in a protective order on a person found to have committed family violence.

WHAT IT DOES

Judges must ask applicants directly about location restrictions on the abuser.

The bill requires judges at protective order hearings involving alleged family violence to explain to the applicant what restrictions the court can impose, specifically including the location restrictions on the abuser. The judge must also directly ask the applicant whether they want one or both of those location restrictions in the order. When deciding whether to include those restrictions, the court must consider what the applicant said, starting with hearings held on or after September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to s/c on Family & Fiduciary Relationships by Speaker
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 23, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

ENPAC Texas$5,000.00

ENPAC Texas

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 27 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 26, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Nov 10, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101033978.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$5,000.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 7, 2025 to Oct 1, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101033978.

Texas Sands PAC$4,000.00

Texas Sands PAC

$4,000.00

Cash
$4,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$4,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on May 18, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101061945.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

ENPAC Texas

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 27 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 26, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Nov 10, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101033978.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 7, 2025 to Oct 1, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101033978.

×

Texas Sands PAC

$4,000.00

Cash
$4,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$4,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on May 18, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101061945.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 2095

by Rep. Manuel, same lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, May 5, 2023: Referred to State Affairs

Relating to the restrictions that may be included in a protective order on a person found to have committed family violence.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Jan 7, 2025

03/14/2025 H Referred to s/c on Family & Fiduciary Relationships by Speaker: Mar 14 2025 2:36PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Crimes--Against Persons--General

Crimes--Against Persons--Sexual

Family--Family Violence

PROTECTIVE ORDERS

Text

The text as introduced · 346 words

89R2572 AMF-D

By: Manuel
H.B. No. 1755

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to certain duties of the court regarding the restrictions

that may be included in a protective order on a person found to have

committed family violence.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 84, Family Code, is amended by adding

Section 84.007 to read as follows:

Sec. 84.007. NOTICE TO AND INQUIRY OF APPLICANT REGARDING

RESTRICTIONS UNDER PROTECTIVE ORDER. In a hearing on an

application for a protective order, if the applicant has alleged

that family violence has occurred, the court shall:

(1) inform the applicant of the restrictions that the

court may impose in a protective order on a person found to have

committed family violence, including by specifically discussing

with the applicant the location restrictions described by Sections

85.022(b)(3) and (4); and

(2) specifically ask the applicant if the applicant

wishes the court to include one or both of the location restrictions

described by Sections 85.022(b)(3) and (4) in the court's order if

the court finds that the respondent has committed family violence

and that family violence is likely to occur in the future.

SECTION 2. Section 85.022, Family Code, is amended by

adding Subsection (b-1) to read as follows:

(b-1) In determining whether to include in a protective

order the location restrictions described by Subsections (b)(3) and

(4), the court must consider any wishes expressed by the applicant

in response to the court's question to the applicant under Section

84.007(2) regarding the inclusion of those restrictions in the

court's order.

SECTION 3. Section 84.007, Family Code, as added by this

Act, applies to a hearing on an application for a protective order

held on or after the effective date of this Act regardless of the

date the application is filed.

SECTION 4. Section 85.022(b-1), Family Code, as added by

this Act, applies only to a protective order for which a hearing is

held on or after the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.