Monitoring the Session

HB 1915

bill rewriting custody factors for children under three

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. David CookRHouse 96

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to orders for possession of and access to a child in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Courts adopt the parents’ agreement unless it hurts the child.

The bill rewrites the factors a Texas family court must weigh when setting custody and visitation for a child under three, and tells the court to adopt the parents' own agreement unless it finds the agreement is not in the child's best interest. It touches divorcing or separated parents of babies and toddlers, plus the judges who write their possession orders. On the ground, courts will look at things like minimal or inconsistent contact, who lives in each home, and whether a graduated schedule is needed, and a parent can now request written reasons when a baby's schedule varies from the standard order.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 1120 (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 1120 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Jan 16, 2025 and referred to the House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence subcommittee on Family & Fiduciary Relationships. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB1915 · 2025-01-16

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to orders for possession of and access to a child in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

WHAT IT DOES

Courts adopt the parents’ agreement unless it hurts the child.

The bill rewrites the factors a Texas family court must weigh when setting custody and visitation for a child under three, and tells the court to adopt the parents' own agreement unless it finds the agreement is not in the child's best interest. It touches divorcing or separated parents of babies and toddlers, plus the judges who write their possession orders. On the ground, courts will look at things like minimal or inconsistent contact, who lives in each home, and whether a graduated schedule is needed, and a parent can now request written reasons when a baby's schedule varies from the standard order.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to s/c on Family & Fiduciary Relationships by Speaker
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$350,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$350,000.00

Cash
$350,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$350,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 24, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012315, 101037124, 101037559, 101066332, 101070691.

GOPAC Election Fund$115,000.00

GOPAC Election Fund

$115,000.00

Cash
$115,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$115,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101066332.

Texas REALTORS Political Action Committee$60,000.00

Texas REALTORS Political Action Committee

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 140 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 2, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 12, 2025 to Jul 16, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101037124, 101037559, 101066332.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$350,000.00

Cash
$350,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$350,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 24, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012315, 101037124, 101037559, 101066332, 101070691.

×

GOPAC Election Fund

$115,000.00

Cash
$115,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$115,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101066332.

×

Texas REALTORS Political Action Committee

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 140 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 2, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 12, 2025 to Jul 16, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101037124, 101037559, 101066332.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 1120

by Rep. Cook, same lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, May 16, 2023: Referred to State Affairs

Relating to orders for possession of and access to a child in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Jan 16, 2025

03/14/2025 H Referred to s/c on Family & Fiduciary Relationships by Speaker: Mar 14 2025 2:36PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Courts--General

Family--Parent & Child

CHILD CUSTODY

Text

The text as introduced · 745 words

89R4379 MLH-F

By: Cook
H.B. No. 1915

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to orders for possession of and access to a child in a suit

affecting the parent-child relationship.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 153.253, Family Code, is amended to read

as follows:

Sec. 153.253. STANDARD POSSESSION ORDER INAPPROPRIATE OR

UNWORKABLE. The court shall render an order that grants periods of

possession of the child as similar as possible to those provided by

the standard possession order if the work schedule or other special

circumstances of the managing conservator, the possessory

conservator, or the child, or the year-round school schedule of the

child, make the standard possession order unworkable or

inappropriate.

SECTION 2. Section 153.254, Family Code, is amended by

amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsections (b) and (c) to read

as follows:

(a) The court shall render an order appropriate under the

circumstances for possession of a child less than three years of

age. In rendering the order, the court shall consider evidence of

all relevant factors, including:

(1) the preexisting parent-child relationship,

including whether there has been minimal or inconsistent contact

with the child and the child's siblings, if applicable [ caregiving

provided to the child before and during the current suit ];

(2) [ the effect on the child that may result from

separation from either party;

[ (3) ] the personal availability of the parties as

caregivers [ and the willingness of the parties to personally care

for the child ];

(3) [ (4) ] the present and immediate physical,

medical, behavioral, or [ and ] developmental needs of the child;

(4) any [ (5) the ] physical, medical, behavioral

[ emotional ], economic, or [ and ] social conditions of the parties;

(5) [ (6) ] the impact and influence of each individual

residing in a residence with a party to the suit or having

considerable interaction with the child [ individuals, other than

the parties, who will be present ] during a party's periods of

possession;

(6) the present and proposed environments in which

possession and access has occurred or is to occur;

(7) the presence or absence of siblings during periods

of possession;

(8) the child's need to develop healthy attachments to

each party, if possible [ both parents ];

(9) the child's need for continuity of routine;

(10) the location and proximity of the residences of

the parties;

(11) the need for a graduated [ temporary ] possession

schedule when there has been [ that incrementally shifts to the

schedule provided in the prospective order under Subsection (d)

based on:

[ (A) the age of the child; or

[ (B) ] minimal or inconsistent contact with the

child [ by a party ];

(12) the ability of the parties to share in the

responsibilities, rights, and duties of caring for the child

[ parenting ]; and

(13) any other issue consistent with [ evidence of ] the

best interest of the child , taking into consideration the

circumstances of the parties .

(b) The court shall render an order for periods of

possession of a child less than three years of age based on the

agreement of the parties, unless the court determines the agreement

is not in the best interest of the child.

(c) Section 153.258 applies to an order rendered under this

section.

SECTION 3. The heading to Section 153.258, Family Code, is

amended to read as follows:

Sec. 153.258. REQUEST FOR FINDINGS WHEN ORDER VARIES FROM

STANDARD POSSESSION ORDER.

SECTION 4. Section 153.258(a), Family Code, is amended to

read as follows:

(a) In all cases in which possession of a child by a parent

is contested and the possession of the child varies from the

standard possession order, including a possession order for a child

under three years of age, on request by a party, the court shall

state in writing the specific reasons for the variance from the

standard possession order.

SECTION 5. The changes in law made by this Act to Section

153.254, Family Code, apply only to a suit affecting the

parent-child relationship that is filed on or after the effective

date of this Act. A suit filed before the effective date of this Act

is governed by the law in effect on the date the suit is filed, and

the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.

SECTION 6. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.