HB 1959
bill letting health plans steer patients with lower copays
Died in committee
Verdict: No flags
Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade
Caption
relating to certain practices of health benefit plan issuers to encourage the use of certain physicians and health care providers and rank physicians.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Summary
Plans that steer or tier doctors owe patients a fiduciary duty.
The bill lets HMOs and insurers use lower deductibles, copays or other cost-sharing to steer patients toward certain doctors and providers, and says any plan that steers patients or sorts doctors into tiers owes the patient or group a fiduciary duty to do so mainly for their benefit. It also rewrites the rules for how health plans may rank or tier doctors: the standards must come from an organization the insurance commissioner designates, and doctors get 45 days' notice and a simple way to flag errors that the plan must fix. The old formal reconsideration hearing for doctors is deleted, and the specific ban on publishing doctor ratings without that process is dropped, so plans can rank and publish more easily but must correct proven errors within 30 days or by publication, whichever is later.
Receipt
The receipt
89R-HB1959 · 2025-01-22
SOLD BY
ITEM
relating to certain practices of health benefit plan issuers to encourage the use of certain physicians and health care providers and rank physicians.
WHAT IT DOES
Plans that steer or tier doctors owe patients a fiduciary duty.
The bill lets HMOs and insurers use lower deductibles, copays or other cost-sharing to steer patients toward certain doctors and providers, and says any plan that steers patients or sorts doctors into tiers owes the patient or group a fiduciary duty to do so mainly for their benefit. It also rewrites the rules for how health plans may rank or tier doctors: the standards must come from an organization the insurance commissioner designates, and doctors get 45 days' notice and a simple way to flag errors that the plan must fix. The old formal reconsideration hearing for doctors is deleted, and the specific ban on publishing doctor ratings without that process is dropped, so plans can rank and publish more easily but must correct proven errors within 30 days or by publication, whichever is later.
CHARGES
[ ] NONE FOUND
TOTAL
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source
Sources
Fiscal note · version I · March 25, 2025
No first-year general revenue figure available here.
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
HISTORY
- Filed
- Read first time
- Referred to Insurance
- Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
- Considered in public hearing
- Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
- Left pending in committee
FILED UNDER
No verified beat found.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$20,000.00
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$20,000.00
- Cash
- $20,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $20,000.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Jun 30, 2025 to Oct 19, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101007594, 101028399, 101073104.
Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas$10,000.00
Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas
$10,000.00
- Cash
- $10,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $10,000.00
Also funds 53 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Aug 15, 2024 to Sep 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Nov 25, 2024 to Aug 18, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100992188, 101068805.
PROVIDER COALITION FOR CARE PAC (NURSING HOME COALITION)$5,000.00
PROVIDER COALITION FOR CARE PAC (NURSING HOME COALITION)
$5,000.00
- Cash
- $5,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $5,000.00
Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · on Sep 19, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
Sources
Derived itemized flow · on Sep 19, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101028399.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$20,000.00
- Cash
- $20,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $20,000.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Jun 30, 2025 to Oct 19, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101007594, 101028399, 101073104.
Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas
$10,000.00
- Cash
- $10,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $10,000.00
Also funds 53 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Aug 15, 2024 to Sep 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Nov 25, 2024 to Aug 18, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100992188, 101068805.
PROVIDER COALITION FOR CARE PAC (NURSING HOME COALITION)
$5,000.00
- Cash
- $5,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $5,000.00
Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · on Sep 19, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
Sources
Derived itemized flow · on Sep 19, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101028399.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Fiscal
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source
Sources
Fiscal note · version I · March 25, 2025
No first-year general revenue figure available here.
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
How this was graded
Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas House · Filed Jan 22, 2025
03/26/2025 H Left pending in committee
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
House committee · Insurance · Final status: Died in committee
Companion
SB 926 by Hancock (identical)
Subjects
Health Care Providers
Insurance--Health & Accident
HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS
PHYSICIANS
Text
The text as introduced · 1,172 words
89R7882 DNC-F By: Frank H.B. No. 1959 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to certain practices of health benefit plan issuers to encourage the use of certain physicians and health care providers and rank physicians. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Subchapter I, Chapter 843, Insurance Code, is amended by adding Section 843.322 to read as follows: Sec. 843.322. INCENTIVES TO USE CERTAIN PHYSICIANS OR PROVIDERS. (a) A health maintenance organization may provide incentives for enrollees to use certain physicians or providers through modified deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing provisions. (b) A health maintenance organization that encourages an enrollee to obtain a health care service from a particular physician or provider, including offering incentives to encourage enrollees to use specific physicians or providers, or that introduces or modifies a tiered network plan or assigns physicians or providers into tiers, has a fiduciary duty to the enrollee or group contract holder to engage in that conduct only for the primary benefit of the enrollee or group contract holder. SECTION 2. Section 1301.0045(a), Insurance Code, is amended to read as follows: (a) Except as provided by Sections [ Section ] 1301.0046 and 1301.0047 , this chapter may not be construed to limit the level of reimbursement or the level of coverage, including deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing provisions, that are applicable to preferred providers or, for plans other than exclusive provider benefit plans, nonpreferred providers. SECTION 3. Subchapter A, Chapter 1301, Insurance Code, is amended by adding Section 1301.0047 to read as follows: Sec. 1301.0047. INCENTIVES TO USE CERTAIN PHYSICIANS OR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS. (a) An insurer may provide incentives for insureds to use certain physicians or health care providers through modified deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing provisions. (b) An insurer that encourages an insured to obtain a health care service from a particular physician or health care provider, including offering incentives to encourage insureds to use specific physicians or providers, or that introduces or modifies a tiered network plan or assigns physicians or providers into tiers, has a fiduciary duty to the insured or policyholder to engage in that conduct only for the primary benefit of the insured or policyholder. SECTION 4. Section 1460.003, Insurance Code, is amended by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsection (a-1) to read as follows: (a) A health benefit plan issuer, including a subsidiary or affiliate, may not rank physicians or [ , ] classify physicians into tiers based on performance[ , or publish physician-specific information that includes rankings, tiers, ratings, or other comparisons of a physician's performance against standards, measures, or other physicians, ] unless: (1) the standards used by the health benefit plan issuer to rank or classify are propagated or developed by an organization designated by the commissioner through rules adopted under Section 1460.005; (2) the ranking, comparison, or evaluation: (A) is disclosed to each affected physician at least 45 days before the date the ranking, comparison, or evaluation is released, published, or distributed to enrollees by the health benefit plan issuer; and (B) identifies which products or networks offered by the health benefit plan issuer the ranking, comparison, or evaluation will be used for; and (3) each affected physician is given an easy-to-use process to identify discrepancies between the standards and the ranking, comparison, or evaluation as propagated by the health benefit plan issuer [ the standards used by the health benefit plan issuer conform to nationally recognized standards and guidelines as required by rules adopted under Section 1460.005; [ (2) the standards and measurements to be used by the health benefit plan issuer are disclosed to each affected physician before any evaluation period used by the health benefit plan issuer; and [ (3) each affected physician is afforded, before any publication or other public dissemination, an opportunity to dispute the ranking or classification through a process that, at a minimum, includes due process protections that conform to the following protections: [ (A) the health benefit plan issuer provides at least 45 days' written notice to the physician of the proposed rating, ranking, tiering, or comparison, including the methodologies, data, and all other information utilized by the health benefit plan issuer in its rating, tiering, ranking, or comparison decision; [ (B) in addition to any written fair reconsideration process, the health benefit plan issuer, upon a request for review that is made within 30 days of receiving the notice under Paragraph (A), provides a fair reconsideration proceeding, at the physician's option: [ (i) by teleconference, at an agreed upon time; or [ (ii) in person, at an agreed upon time or between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday; [ (C) the physician has the right to provide information at a requested fair reconsideration proceeding for determination by a decision-maker, have a representative participate in the fair reconsideration proceeding, and submit a written statement at the conclusion of the fair reconsideration proceeding; and [ (D) the health benefit plan issuer provides a written communication of the outcome of a fair reconsideration proceeding prior to any publication or dissemination of the rating, ranking, tiering, or comparison. The written communication must include the specific reasons for the final decision ]. (a-1) If a physician submits information to a health benefit plan issuer under Subsection (a)(3) sufficient to establish a discrepancy, the health benefit plan issuer must remedy the discrepancy by the later of: (1) publication; or (2) the 30th day after the date the health benefit plan issuer receives the information. SECTION 5. Section 1460.005(c), Insurance Code, is amended to read as follows: (c) In adopting rules under this section, the commissioner may only designate [ shall consider the standards, guidelines, and measures prescribed by nationally recognized ] organizations that meet the following requirements: (1) the prescribing organization is bona fide and unbiased toward or against any medical provider; (2) the standards to be used in rankings, comparisons, or evaluations: (A) are nationally recognized, or based on expert-provider consensus or leading clinical evidence-based scholarship; (B) have a publicly transparent methodology; and (C) if based on clinical outcomes, are risk-adjusted; and (3) the prescribing organization has an easy-to-use process by which a medical provider may report data, evidentiary, factual, or mathematical errors for prompt investigation and, if appropriate, correction [ establish or promote guidelines and performance measures emphasizing quality of health care, including the National Quality Forum and the AQA Alliance. If neither the National Quality Forum nor the AQA Alliance has established standards or guidelines regarding an issue, the commissioner shall consider the standards, guidelines, and measures prescribed by the National Committee on Quality Assurance and other similar national organizations. If neither the National Quality Forum, nor the AQA Alliance, nor other national organizations have established standards or guidelines regarding an issue, the commissioner shall consider standards, guidelines, and measures based on other bona fide nationally recognized guidelines, expert-based physician consensus quality standards, or leading objective clinical evidence and scholarship ]. SECTION 6. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.