Monitoring the Session

HB 1998

Spiller Bill Doubles Competitive Bidding Threshold To $100K

Companion SB 1173 became law

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. David SpillerRHouse 68

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the amount of an expenditure made by certain political subdivisions for which a competitive procurement method may be required.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Purchases from $50K to $100K skip formal bids! Cities, counties and school districts included.

The bill doubles the dollar amount at which school districts, emergency services district boards, cities and counties must use competitive bidding or a similar competitive method, raising it from $50,000 to $100,000. It also raises the matching thresholds for construction contracts, certificate-of-obligation issuers, county road purchases and the county one-supplier rule. Purchases between $50,000 and $100,000 can now be made without formal competitive bids, and cities must contact historically underutilized businesses on purchases up to $100,000 instead of $50,000.

Labels

Labels: BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 1132 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB1998 · 2025-01-22

SOLD BY

+ 2 coauthors

ITEM

relating to the amount of an expenditure made by certain political subdivisions for which a competitive procurement method may be required.

WHAT IT DOES

Purchases from $50K to $100K skip formal bids! Cities, counties and school districts included.

The bill doubles the dollar amount at which school districts, emergency services district boards, cities and counties must use competitive bidding or a similar competitive method, raising it from $50,000 to $100,000. It also raises the matching thresholds for construction contracts, certificate-of-obligation issuers, county road purchases and the county one-supplier rule. Purchases between $50,000 and $100,000 can now be made without formal competitive bids, and cities must contact historically underutilized businesses on purchases up to $100,000 instead of $50,000.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 6, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Committee substitute considered in committee
  7. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in formal meeting
  10. Committee substitute considered in committee
  11. Reported favorably as substituted
  12. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  13. Committee report distributed
  14. Committee report sent to Calendars
  15. Considered in Calendars
  16. Placed on General State Calendar
  17. Companion considered in lieu of SB 1173
  18. Laid on the table subject to call
FILED UNDER

DEI BY ANOTHER NAME

THE TEXT

“A municipality, in making an expenditure of more than $3,000 but less than $100,000 [ $50,000 ],”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

Raising the threshold also widens the range of city purchases that carry a mandatory duty to contact historically underutilized businesses, from up to $50,000 to up to $100,000.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$40,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$40,000.00

Cash
$40,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$40,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 24, 2025 to Oct 18, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101009978, 101031338, 101071836.

Max Poynor$10,000.00
Texas REALTORS Political Action Committee$10,000.00

Texas REALTORS Political Action Committee

$10,000.00

Cash
$10,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$10,000.00

Also funds 140 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 2, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100987103, 101057871.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$40,000.00

Cash
$40,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$40,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 24, 2025 to Oct 18, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101009978, 101031338, 101071836.

×

Texas REALTORS Political Action Committee

$10,000.00

Cash
$10,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$10,000.00

Also funds 140 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 2, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100987103, 101057871.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Witnesses31
For
30
Against
1
On
0
Names

For

  • Alamo Colleges District1 registration
  • Brownwood Area Chamber of Commerce1 registration
  • City of Austin1 registration
  • City of Denton1 registration
  • City of Fort Worth1 registration
  • City of Garland, Texas1 registration
  • City of Houston1 registration
  • City of McKinney1 registration
  • City of San Antonio1 registration
  • City of Sugar Land, Texas1 registration
  • Conference of Urban Counties1 registration
  • County Judges and Commissioners Association1 registration
  • County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas1 registration
  • Dallas County1 registration
  • El Paso County1 registration
  • Harris County Commissioners Court1 registration
  • Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County1 registration
  • SAFE-D, the Texas State Association of Fire and Emergency Districts1 registration
  • San Antonio Water System (SAWS)1 registration
  • Self2 registrations
  • Self; Smith County1 registration
  • Self; Tecas county Judges and Commissioners1 registration
  • Self; Texas judges and commissioners association1 registration
  • Texas Association of School Administrators1 registration
  • Texas Council of Community Centers1 registration
  • Texas Hospital Association1 registration
  • Texas Municipal League1 registration
  • Texas State Association of Fire and Emergency Districts1 registration
  • Travis County Commissioners Court1 registration

Against

  • City of Buda1 registration
Sources

31 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 6, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 1132

by Rep. Spiller, same lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, May 21, 2023: Left pending in committee

Relating to the amount of an expenditure made by certain political subdivisions for which competitive bidding is required.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Jan 22, 2025

05/14/2025 H Laid on the table subject to call

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors

House committee · Intergovernmental Affairs · Committee vote 9 aye, 2 nay · Out of committee

Companion

SB 1173 by Perry (identical)

Subjects

City Government--Finance

County Government--Finance

Education--School Districts

Purchasing--Local

Special Districts & Authorities--Hospital

COMPETITIVE BIDDING

Text

The text as introduced · 874 words

89R9528 JBD-D

By: Spiller
H.B. No. 1998

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the amount of an expenditure made by certain political

subdivisions for which a competitive procurement method may be

required.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 44.031(a), Education Code, is amended to

read as follows:

(a) Except as provided by this subchapter, all school

district contracts for the purchase of goods and services, except

contracts for the purchase of produce or vehicle fuel, valued at

$100,000 [ $50,000 ] or more in the aggregate for each 12-month

period shall be made by the method, of the following methods, that

provides the best value for the district:

(1) competitive bidding for services other than

construction services;

(2) competitive sealed proposals for services other

than construction services;

(3) a request for proposals, for services other than

construction services;

(4) an interlocal contract;

(5) a method provided by Chapter 2269, Government

Code, for construction services;

(6) the reverse auction procedure as defined by

Section 2155.062(d), Government Code; or

(7) the formation of a political subdivision

corporation under Section 304.001, Local Government Code.

SECTION 2. Section 252.021(a), Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

(a) Before a municipality may enter into a contract that

requires an expenditure of more than $100,000 [ $50,000 ] from one or

more municipal funds, the municipality must:

(1) comply with the procedure prescribed by this

subchapter and Subchapter C for competitive sealed bidding or

competitive sealed proposals;

(2) use the reverse auction procedure, as defined by

Section 2155.062(d), Government Code, for purchasing; or

(3) comply with a method described by Chapter 2269,

Government Code.

SECTION 3. Section 252.0215, Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

Sec. 252.0215. COMPETITIVE BIDDING IN RELATION TO

HISTORICALLY UNDERUTILIZED BUSINESS. A municipality, in making an

expenditure of more than $3,000 but less than $100,000 [ $50,000 ],

shall contact at least two historically underutilized businesses on

a rotating basis, based on information provided by the comptroller

pursuant to Chapter 2161, Government Code. If the list fails to

identify a historically underutilized business in the county in

which the municipality is situated, the municipality is exempt from

this section.

SECTION 4. Section 262.003(a), Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

(a) Any law that requires a county to follow a competitive

procurement procedure in making a purchase requiring the

expenditure of $100,000 [ $50,000 ] or less does not apply to the

purchase of an item available for purchase from only one supplier.

SECTION 5. Section 262.023(a), Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

(a) Before a county may purchase one or more items under a

contract that will require an expenditure exceeding $100,000

[ $50,000 ], the commissioners court of the county must:

(1) comply with the competitive bidding or competitive

proposal procedures prescribed by this subchapter;

(2) use the reverse auction procedure, as defined by

Section 2155.062(d), Government Code, for purchasing; or

(3) comply with a method described by Chapter 2269,

Government Code.

SECTION 6. Section 271.024, Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

Sec. 271.024. COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT PROCEDURE APPLICABLE

TO CONTRACT. If a governmental entity is required by statute to

award a contract for the construction, repair, or renovation of a

structure, road, highway, or other improvement or addition to real

property on the basis of competitive bids, and if the contract

requires the expenditure of more than $100,000 [ $50,000 ] from the

funds of the entity, the bidding on the contract must be

accomplished in the manner provided by this subchapter.

SECTION 7. Section 271.054, Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

Sec. 271.054. COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENT. Before

the governing body of an issuer may enter into a contract requiring

an expenditure by or imposing an obligation or liability on the

issuer, or on a subdivision of the issuer if the issuer is a county,

of more than $100,000 [ $50,000 ], the governing body must:

(1) submit the proposed contract to competitive

procurement; or

(2) use an alternate method of project delivery

authorized by Chapter 2269, Government Code.

SECTION 8. Sections 252.312(b) and (c), Transportation

Code, are amended to read as follows:

(b) If the county road engineer so recommends and the

commissioners court considers it to be in the best interest of the

county, a purchase in an amount of $100,000 [ $50,000 ] or less may be

made through negotiation by the commissioners court or the court's

authorized representative on requisition to be approved by the

commissioners court or the county auditor without advertising for

competitive bids.

(c) A purchase may not be divided or reduced to avoid the

competitive bidding requirement on a purchase that would otherwise

cost more than $100,000 [ $50,000 ].

SECTION 9. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to

a purchase made on or after the effective date of this Act. A

purchase made before the effective date of this Act is governed by

the law as it existed immediately before the effective date of this

Act, and that law is continued in effect for that purpose.

SECTION 10. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.