Monitoring the Session

HB 2071

bill changing how outside doctors review child abuse cases

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Lacey HullRHouse 138

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to certain policies and procedures for health care specialty consultations in certain child abuse or neglect investigations and assessments.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Doctors who reported the case can’t review it.

The bill changes how the state child welfare department picks outside doctors to review suspected child abuse or neglect cases, barring any doctor who reported the case or helped review it on a review team. It also requires the department to give parents, legal guardians, or their lawyers all medical records and images used in the investigation before a referral, plus the names and opinions of doctors when the doctors disagree. The department, hospitals, and the medical network may not block parents from getting records or from having another doctor examine the child for a second opinion, starting September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: NO AUTOGRAPH. Became law without the governor's signature on Jun 20, 2025.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 475 (Did not pass). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.ACROSS THE AISLE. Joint authors: 3 Republicans, 2 Democrats. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB2071 · 2025-01-24

SOLD BY

+ 2 more authors, 3 coauthors

ITEM

relating to certain policies and procedures for health care specialty consultations in certain child abuse or neglect investigations and assessments.

WHAT IT DOES

Doctors who reported the case can’t review it.

The bill changes how the state child welfare department picks outside doctors to review suspected child abuse or neglect cases, barring any doctor who reported the case or helped review it on a review team. It also requires the department to give parents, legal guardians, or their lawyers all medical records and images used in the investigation before a referral, plus the names and opinions of doctors when the doctors disagree. The department, hospitals, and the medical network may not block parents from getting records or from having another doctor examine the child for a second opinion, starting September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 13, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Human Services
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in public hearing
  9. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  10. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  11. Committee report distributed
  12. Committee report sent to Calendars
  13. Considered in Calendars
  14. Considered in Calendars
  15. Placed on General State Calendar
  16. Read 2nd time
  17. Passed to engrossment
  18. Record vote RV#1546
  19. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  20. Read 3rd time
  21. Passed
  22. Record vote RV#1617
  23. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  24. Reported engrossed
  25. Received from the House
  26. Read first time
  27. Referred to Health & Human Services
  28. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  29. Considered in public hearing
  30. Testimony taken in committee
  31. Left pending in committee
  32. Considered in public hearing
  33. Vote taken in committee
  34. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  35. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  36. Committee report printed and distributed
  37. Co-sponsor authorized
  38. Placed on intent calendar
  39. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  40. Read 2nd time & passed to 3rd reading
  41. Vote recorded in Journal
  42. Three day rule suspended
  43. Record vote
  44. Read 3rd time
  45. Passed
  46. Record vote
  47. Senate passage reported
  48. Reported enrolled
  49. Signed in the House
  50. Signed in the Senate
  51. Sent to the Governor
  52. Filed without the Governor's signature
  53. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 141 yea · 1 nay

Senate · 31 yea · 0 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 7, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · May 20, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$595,376.10

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$595,376.10

Cash
$80,000.00
Paid by others
$515,376.10
Total
$595,376.10
mail $216,305.25advertising $185,974.50Other filed descriptions $66,286.00polling $46,810.35

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 30, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101010359, 101033114, 101035066, 101040912, 101044098, 101069436, 101072848.

Texas Conservative Majority PAC$483,456.00

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$483,456.00

Cash
$150,000.00
Paid by others
$333,456.00
Total
$483,456.00
canvassing $316,956.00polling $16,500.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Feb 13, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101040912, 101069436, 101072848.

Texas Sands PAC$244,600.00

Texas Sands PAC

$244,600.00

Cash
$234,000.00
Paid by others
$10,600.00
Total
$244,600.00
polling $10,600.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jan 14, 2026 to Sep 25, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101035066, 101040912, 101072848.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$595,376.10

Cash
$80,000.00
Paid by others
$515,376.10
Total
$595,376.10
mail $216,305.25advertising $185,974.50Other filed descriptions $66,286.00polling $46,810.35

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 30, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101010359, 101033114, 101035066, 101040912, 101044098, 101069436, 101072848.

×

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$483,456.00

Cash
$150,000.00
Paid by others
$333,456.00
Total
$483,456.00
canvassing $316,956.00polling $16,500.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Feb 13, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101040912, 101069436, 101072848.

×

Texas Sands PAC

$244,600.00

Cash
$234,000.00
Paid by others
$10,600.00
Total
$244,600.00
polling $10,600.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jan 14, 2026 to Sep 25, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101035066, 101040912, 101072848.

Votes5

Senate May 20, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator Kolkhorst moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that HB 2071 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0. The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 20, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator Kolkhorst moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that HB 2071 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 20, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to third reading by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 7, 2025

Yea
141
Nay
1
Present, not voting
1
Absent
5
Excused
2
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 1617

HB 2071 was passed by (Record 1617): 141 Yeas, 1 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 141 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 5 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 2 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 6, 2025

Yea
139
Nay
2
Present, not voting
2
Absent
2
Excused
5
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 1546

HB 2071 was passed to engrossment by (Record 1546): 139 Yeas, 2 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 139 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 2 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 5 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses22
For
18
Against
2
On
2
Names

For

  • Family Freedom Project1 registration
  • Parent Guidance Center2 registrations
  • Self7 registrations
  • Self; Austin Justice Coalition1 registration
  • Self; Austin justin coalition1 registration
  • Self; Family Freedom Project1 registration
  • Self; Texas Association of Family Defense Attorneys2 registrations
  • Texas Family Law Foundation1 registration
  • Texas Public Policy Foundation2 registrations

Against

  • Dallas Criminal District Attorney John Creuzot1 registration
  • Smith County Criminal District Attorneys Office1 registration

On

  • Department of Family and Protective Services1 registration
  • DFPS Resource Witness1 registration
Sources

22 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 13, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 475

by Rep. Hull, same lead author · Did not pass · same text

Introduced text

Last action, May 3, 2023: Received from the House

Relating to certain policies and procedures for health care specialty consultations in certain child abuse or neglect investigations and assessments.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Jan 24, 2025

06/20/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report · Engrossed · Senate Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors
Cosponsors

House committee · Human Services · Committee vote 11 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Senate committee · Health & Human Services · Committee vote 7 aye, 0 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Subjects

Family--Child Protection

Health Care Providers

MEDICAL RECORDS

FAMILY & PROTECTIVE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF

Text

The text as introduced · 691 words

89R8021 MM-F

By: Hull
H.B. No. 2071

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to certain policies and procedures for health care

specialty consultations in certain child abuse or neglect

investigations and assessments.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 261.3017, Family Code, is amended by

amending Subsections (c-1) and (d) and adding Subsections (c-3) and

(e-1) to read as follows:

(c-1) For a case in which a specialty consultation is

required by Subsection (c), the department shall refer the case to a

physician who:

(1) is licensed to practice medicine in this state

under Subtitle B, Title 3, Occupations Code;

(2) is board certified in a field or specialty

relevant to diagnosing and treating the conditions described by

Subsection (b); [ and ]

(3) was not involved with the report of suspected

abuse or neglect ; and

(4) was not involved in reviewing the case, including

as a member of a review team under Section 261.312 or a

multidisciplinary team under Subchapter E, Chapter 264 .

(c-3) Before referring a child's case under Subsection (c),

the department shall provide to the child's parent or legal

guardian or, if represented by an attorney, the attorney of the

parent or legal guardian all medical records, including

radiographs, images, and other documents used by the department and

the network during the abuse or neglect investigation.

(d) In providing assessments to the department as provided

by Subsection (b), the network and the system must use a blind peer

review process to resolve cases where physicians in the network or

system disagree in the assessment of the causes of a child's

injuries or in the presence of a condition listed under Subsection

(b). The department shall provide to the child's parent or legal

guardian or, if represented by an attorney, the attorney of the

parent or legal guardian the information used to resolve a case

described by this subsection, including the names of the

physicians, the physicians' opinions, the possible conflicting

conditions, all assessments conducted on the child who is the

subject of the case, and all medical records related to the child.

(e-1) The department, a referring provider, including a

hospital, and the network may not obstruct, prevent, or inhibit a

child's parent or legal guardian or, if represented by an attorney,

the attorney of the parent or legal guardian from obtaining all

medical records and documentation necessary to request an

alternative opinion, including access to the child for that purpose

by a health care professional providing an alternative or second

opinion or performing diagnostic testing.

SECTION 2. Sections 261.30175(b), (c), and (d), Family

Code, are amended to read as follows:

(b) A health care practitioner who reports suspected abuse

or neglect of a child or was involved in reviewing the case,

including as a member of a review team under Section 261.312 or a

multidisciplinary team under Subchapter E, Chapter 264, may not

provide forensic assessment services in connection with an

investigation resulting from the report. This subsection applies

regardless of whether the practitioner is a member of the network or

system.

(c) When referring a case for forensic assessment, the

department shall refer the case to a physician authorized to

practice medicine in this state under Subtitle B, Title 3,

Occupations Code, who was not involved :

(1) with the report of suspected abuse or neglect ; or

(2) in reviewing the case, including as a member of a

review team under Section 261.312 or a multidisciplinary team under

Subchapter E, Chapter 264 .

(d) This section may not be construed to:

(1) prohibit the department from interviewing the

health care practitioner in the practitioner's capacity as a

principal or collateral source; [ or ]

(2) otherwise restrict the department's ability to

conduct an investigation as provided by this subchapter ; or

(3) restrict the ability of the child's parent or legal

guardian or, if represented by an attorney, the attorney of the

parent or legal guardian to receive all medical records and

documentation relating to a case in which the network is consulted .

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.