Monitoring the Session

HB 2078

bill requiring plain language in groundwater management plans

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Stan GerdesRHouse 17

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the joint planning of desired future conditions in groundwater management areas.

Caption from analyzed text · version E.

Summary

Districts explain how well they met the aquifer goals.

The bill requires groundwater conservation districts to explain in plain language, in their management plans, how they track and how well they have met the aquifer goals set in joint planning. It touches the districts and their representatives in each groundwater management area, who must review each district's plan at least once every five years, set long-range aquifer goals for each roughly 50-year planning period, and set interim checkpoints no more than 10 years apart. On the ground, the five-year explanatory report must now say why an aquifer goal changed and summarize how each district is performing, so the public can see whether goals are being met.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB2078 · 2025-01-24

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the joint planning of desired future conditions in groundwater management areas.

WHAT IT DOES

Districts explain how well they met the aquifer goals.

The bill requires groundwater conservation districts to explain in plain language, in their management plans, how they track and how well they have met the aquifer goals set in joint planning. It touches the districts and their representatives in each groundwater management area, who must review each district's plan at least once every five years, set long-range aquifer goals for each roughly 50-year planning period, and set interim checkpoints no more than 10 years apart. On the ground, the five-year explanatory report must now say why an aquifer goal changed and summarize how each district is performing, so the public can see whether goals are being met.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 23, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Natural Resources
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in formal meeting
  9. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  10. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  11. Committee report distributed
  12. Committee report sent to Calendars
  13. Considered in Calendars
  14. Placed on General State Calendar
  15. Read 2nd time
  16. Amended 1-Gerdes
  17. Passed to engrossment as amended
  18. Record vote RV#2753
  19. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  20. Read 3rd time
  21. Passed
  22. Record vote RV#2863
  23. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  24. Reported engrossed
  25. Received from the House
  26. Read first time
  27. Referred to Water, Agriculture, & Rural Affairs
  28. Posting rule suspended
  29. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  30. Considered in public hearing
  31. Testimony taken in committee
  32. Vote taken in committee
  33. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  34. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  35. Committee report printed and distributed
  36. Placed on intent calendar
  37. Placed on local & uncontested calendar
  38. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  39. Read 2nd time & passed to 3rd reading
  40. Vote recorded in Journal
  41. Three day rule suspended
  42. Record vote
  43. Read 3rd time
  44. Passed
  45. Record vote
  46. Senate passage reported
  47. Reported enrolled
  48. Signed in the House
  49. Signed in the Senate
  50. Sent to the Governor
  51. Signed by the Governor
  52. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 97 yea · 18 nay

Senate · 30 yea · 1 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 16, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · May 27, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 30, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$316,248.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$316,248.00

Cash
$220,000.00
Paid by others
$96,248.00
Total
$316,248.00
advertising $74,698.00polling $21,550.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 25, 2025 to Sep 29, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101010282, 101029052, 101035831, 101036569, 101070133.

Dustin Burrows Campaign$88,800.00

Dustin Burrows Campaign

$88,800.00

Cash
$75,000.00
Paid by others
$13,800.00
Total
$88,800.00
polling $13,800.00

Also funds 39 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 13, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 29, 2025 to Jan 26, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101029052, 101035831, 101036569.

Texas Conservative Majority PAC$67,750.00

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$67,750.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$42,750.00
Total
$67,750.00
canvassing $35,000.00polling $7,750.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Feb 13, 2026 to Feb 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101036569.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$316,248.00

Cash
$220,000.00
Paid by others
$96,248.00
Total
$316,248.00
advertising $74,698.00polling $21,550.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 25, 2025 to Sep 29, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101010282, 101029052, 101035831, 101036569, 101070133.

×

Dustin Burrows Campaign

$88,800.00

Cash
$75,000.00
Paid by others
$13,800.00
Total
$88,800.00
polling $13,800.00

Also funds 39 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 13, 2025 to Sep 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 29, 2025 to Jan 26, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101029052, 101035831, 101036569.

×

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$67,750.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$42,750.00
Total
$67,750.00
canvassing $35,000.00polling $7,750.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Feb 13, 2026 to Feb 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101036569.

Votes5

Senate May 27, 2025

Yea
30
Nay
1
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 30, Nays 1. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 30 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 27, 2025

Yea
30
Nay
1
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Sources

Senator Perry moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that HB 2078 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 30, Nays 1.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 30 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 27, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

Senator Perry moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration HB 2078 at this time on its second reading: HB 2078, Relating to the joint planning of desired future conditions in groundwater management areas. The motion prevailed. Senator Creighton asked to be recorded as voting "Nay" on suspension of the regular order of business. The bill was read second time and was passed to third reading by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 16, 2025

Yea
97
Nay
18
Present, not voting
3
Absent
7
Excused
25
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 2863

HB 2078 was passed by (Record 2863): 97 Yeas, 18 Nays, 3 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 97 (published)
  • Nay: 18 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 3 (published)
  • Absent: 7 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 25 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 15, 2025

Yea
120
Nay
16
Present, not voting
2
Absent
7
Excused
5
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 2753

HB 2078, as amended, was passed to engrossment by (Record 2753): 120 Yeas, 16 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 120 (published)
  • Nay: 16 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 7 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 5 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses26
For
19
Against
3
On
4
Names

For

  • Chispa Texas1 registration
  • City of Houston1 registration
  • Environmental Defense Action Fund2 registrations
  • Groundwater conservation district clients of the firm.1 registration
  • Lone Star Chapter Sierra Club1 registration
  • Middle Trinity GCD, Clearwater UWCD, Central Texas GCD, North Texas GCD, Middle Pecos GCD1 registration
  • Middle Trinity GCD, Clearwater UWCD, Middle Pecos GCD, North Texas GCD, Northern Trinity GCD, Central Texas GCD1 registration
  • Self; Farm and Ranch Freedom Alliance1 registration
  • Self; Groundwater Conservation District clients of the firm.1 registration
  • Self; Post Oak Savannah Groundwater Conservation District1 registration
  • Self; Simsboro Aquifer Water Defense Fund1 registration
  • Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association1 registration
  • Texas 20362 registrations
  • Texas Public Policy Foundation1 registration
  • Upper Trinity GCD, Prairielands GCD, Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Conservation District1 registration
  • Upper Trinity GCD; Prairielands GCD; Barton Springs Edwards Aquifer Conservation District1 registration
  • Upper Trinity Groundwater Conservation District1 registration

Against

  • Brazos Valley GCD1 registration
  • City of College Station1 registration
  • Self; Brazos Valley GCD, Evergreen UWCD, Panhandle GCD, Trinity Glen Rose GCD, Cow Creek GCD1 registration

On

  • Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts1 registration
  • Texas Commission on Environmental Quality1 registration
  • Texas Water Development Board1 registration
  • TWDB1 registration
Sources

26 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · May 23, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version E by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Jan 24, 2025

06/20/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report · Engrossed · Senate Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Sponsors

House committee · Natural Resources · Committee vote 12 aye, 1 nay · Out of committee

Senate committee · Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs · Committee vote 8 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Subjects

Environment--Water

Special Districts & Authorities--Groundwater Conserve Dist.

Special Districts & Authorities--Water & Utility

Water--Conservation (I097L)

Water--Development

Text

The text as introduced · 1,048 words

89R2804 ANG-F

By: Gerdes
H.B. No. 2078

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the joint planning of desired future conditions in

groundwater management areas.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 36.1071(e), Water Code, is amended to

read as follows:

(e) In the management plan described under Subsection (a),

the district shall:

(1) identify the performance standards and management

objectives under which the district will operate to achieve the

management goals identified under Subsection (a);

(2) specify, in as much detail as possible, the

actions, procedures, performance, and avoidance that are or may be

necessary to effect the plan, including specifications and proposed

rules;

(3) include estimates of the following:

(A) modeled available groundwater in the

district based on the desired future condition established under

Section 36.108;

(B) the amount of groundwater being used within

the district on an annual basis;

(C) the annual amount of recharge from

precipitation, if any, to the groundwater resources within the

district;

(D) for each aquifer, the annual volume of water

that discharges from the aquifer to springs and any surface water

bodies, including lakes, streams, and rivers;

(E) the annual volume of flow into and out of the

district within each aquifer and between aquifers in the district,

if a groundwater availability model is available;

(F) the projected surface water supply in the

district according to the most recently adopted state water plan;

and

(G) the projected total demand for water in the

district according to the most recently adopted state water plan;

[ and ]

(4) consider the water supply needs and water

management strategies included in the adopted state water plan ; and

(5) include an explanation in plain language of how:

(A) the district is monitoring and tracking the

achievement of the desired future conditions established under

Section 36.108; and

(B) the district has performed in achieving the

desired future conditions established under Section 36.108 over the

preceding five-year joint planning period .

SECTION 2. Section 36.108, Water Code, is amended by

amending Subsections (c) and (d-3) and adding Subsections (c-1) and

(d-5) to read as follows:

(c) The district representatives shall meet at least

annually to conduct joint planning with the other districts in the

management area . The representatives shall [ and to ] review :

(1) [ the management plans, ] the accomplishments of the

management area ;

(2) [ , and ] proposals to adopt new or amend existing

desired future conditions ; and

(3) not less than once during each five-year period

described by Subsection (d), the management plans of each district

in the management area .

(c-1) In reviewing the management plans under Subsection

(c) , the districts shall consider:

(1) the goals of each management plan and its impact on

planning throughout the management area;

(2) the effectiveness of the measures established by

each district's management plan for conserving and protecting

groundwater and preventing waste, and the effectiveness of these

measures in the management area generally;

(3) any other matters that the boards consider

relevant to the protection and conservation of groundwater and the

prevention of waste in the management area; and

(4) the degree to which each district is achieving

[ management plan achieves ] the desired future conditions

established during the joint planning process through the

implementation of the district's management plan and rules .

(d-3) After each district has submitted to the district

representatives the information required under Subsection (d-2)

and made the information available for the required period of time

under Subsection (d-2a), the district representatives shall

reconvene for a joint planning meeting to review the information

required under Subsection (d-2), consider any district's suggested

revisions to the proposed desired future conditions, receive public

comment, and finally adopt the desired future conditions for the

management area. The desired future conditions must be approved by

a resolution adopted by a two-thirds vote of all the district

representatives not later than January 5, 2022. Subsequent desired

future conditions must be proposed and finally adopted by the

district representatives before the end of each successive

five-year period after that date. The district representatives

shall produce a desired future conditions explanatory report for

the management area and submit to the development board and each

district in the management area proof that notice was posted for the

joint planning meeting, a copy of the resolution, and a copy of the

explanatory report. The report must:

(1) identify each desired future condition;

(2) provide the policy and technical justifications

for each desired future condition;

(3) include documentation that the factors under

Subsection (d) were considered by the districts and a discussion of

how the adopted desired future conditions impact each factor;

(4) list other desired future condition options

considered, if any, and the reasons why those options were not

adopted; [ and ]

(5) discuss reasons why recommendations made by

advisory committees and relevant public comments received by the

districts during the public comment period or at the joint planning

meeting were or were not incorporated into the desired future

conditions ;

(6) include an explanation in plain language of why a

desired future condition adopted for an aquifer was changed if the

desired future condition is different from the desired future

condition adopted for the aquifer over the preceding five-year

joint planning period; and

(7) include a summary of how each district is

performing in achieving the desired future conditions .

(d-5) The districts and district representatives:

(1) shall adopt desired future conditions under this

section for each 50-year planning period identified by the

executive administrator for the preparation of state and regional

water plans;

(2) shall identify interim values for the desired

future conditions adopted under Subdivision (1) for time periods

not to exceed 10 years solely to assist the districts in monitoring

interim progress in achieving the desired future conditions adopted

for the 50-year planning period; and

(3) may adopt desired future conditions under this

section for other time periods.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.