Monitoring the Session

HB 2322

Schofield Bill Ties Judges’ Pay To Inflation Starting 2027

Did not pass

Verdict: Smells

SmellsReviewed
Rep. Mike SchofieldRHouse 132
Why it's charged
Delayed start

THE TEXT

…“applies beginning with the state fiscal biennium beginning September 1, 2027”

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The Act takes effect in 2025, but the inflation raise does not apply until September 2027, after the November 2026 election and two years after the session. The delay lines up with the state's two-year budget cycle, so it does not hide the promise.

Delayed start

Reviewed · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the annual base salary from the state of a district judge.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Appeals and high court pay rides along. Prices fall? Pay never goes down!

The bill ties the state base pay of district judges and business court judges to inflation, so each two-year budget period their pay rises by the average change in the Consumer Price Index from the prior period. Because appeals court and high court salaries are already set as percentages of the district judge salary, those judges' pay would rise with it. The automatic raises start with the budget period beginning September 1, 2027, and pay can never go down when prices fall.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 438 (Died in committee) and this bill (Did not pass). Checked against 88R only.DO-OVER. Reworked text of a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 438 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.ACROSS THE AISLE. Joint authors: 4 Republicans, 1 Democrat. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.STALLED AFTER COMMITTEE. Voted out of the House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence committee 10-0 on Apr 24, 2025. Never placed on a calendar. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB2322 · 2025-02-03

SOLD BY

+ 2 more authors

ITEM

relating to the annual base salary from the state of a district judge.

WHAT IT DOES

Appeals and high court pay rides along. Prices fall? Pay never goes down!

The bill ties the state base pay of district judges and business court judges to inflation, so each two-year budget period their pay rises by the average change in the Consumer Price Index from the prior period. Because appeals court and high court salaries are already set as percentages of the district judge salary, those judges' pay would rise with it. The automatic raises start with the budget period beginning September 1, 2027, and pay can never go down when prices fall.

CHARGES

[x] DELAYED STARTanalysis confidence 55%

THE TEXT

…“applies beginning with the state fiscal biennium beginning September 1, 2027”

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The Act takes effect in 2025, but the inflation raise does not apply until September 2027, after the November 2026 election and two years after the session. The delay lines up with the state's two-year budget cycle, so it does not hide the promise.

TOTAL

Net to General Revenue · FY 2026$0

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version I · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 8, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2322, As Introduced: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. However, there will be an impact of ($4,602,846) to GR beginning in FY 2028. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · $0

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in formal meeting
  9. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  10. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  11. Committee report distributed
  12. Committee report sent to Calendars
FILED UNDER

GOVERNMENT GROWTH UNDER A CONSERVATIVE BANNER

THE TEXT

…“the annual base salary described by Subdivision (1) multiplied by the average percentage change during the preceding state fiscal biennium in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill changes government pay by building automatic inflation raises into judges' state salaries without a new vote each session.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$432,937.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$432,937.00

Cash
$212,000.00
Paid by others
$220,937.00
Total
$432,937.00
advertising $185,677.00Other filed descriptions $22,000.00polling $13,260.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 23, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101006866, 101027356, 101057804, 101070463, 101071373.

Texas Conservative Majority PAC$331,750.00

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$331,750.00

Cash
$200,000.00
Paid by others
$131,750.00
Total
$331,750.00
canvassing $102,500.00polling $24,250.00Other filed descriptions $5,000.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 24, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101070463, 101071373.

Republican Party of Texas$254,625.06

Republican Party of Texas

$254,625.06

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$254,625.06
Total
$254,625.06
mail $254,625.06

Also funds 12 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Oct 31, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 23, 2026 to Oct 19, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101070463, 101071373.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$432,937.00

Cash
$212,000.00
Paid by others
$220,937.00
Total
$432,937.00
advertising $185,677.00Other filed descriptions $22,000.00polling $13,260.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 23, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101006866, 101027356, 101057804, 101070463, 101071373.

×

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$331,750.00

Cash
$200,000.00
Paid by others
$131,750.00
Total
$331,750.00
canvassing $102,500.00polling $24,250.00Other filed descriptions $5,000.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 24, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101070463, 101071373.

×

Republican Party of Texas

$254,625.06

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$254,625.06
Total
$254,625.06
mail $254,625.06

Also funds 12 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Oct 31, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 23, 2026 to Oct 19, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101070463, 101071373.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Witnesses23
For
17
Against
0
On
6
Names

For

  • Self6 registrations
  • Self; Legislative Chair Judicial Section State Bar1 registration
  • Self; State Bar of Texas Judicial Section1 registration
  • Self; Texas Assoc. of District Judges1 registration
  • Self; Texas Association for District Judges1 registration
  • Self; Texas association of district judges1 registration
  • Self; TEXAS TRIAL LAWYERS ASSOCIATION1 registration
  • Stautory Probate Judges of Texas1 registration
  • Texans for Lawsuit Reform1 registration
  • Texas Association of Senior, Retired and Former Judges, Inc1 registration
  • Texas Civil Justice League1 registration
  • Texas Family Law Foundation1 registration

On

  • Employees Retirement System of Texas1 registration
  • Office of Court Administration1 registration
  • Self3 registrations
  • Texas-El Paso Judiciary1 registration
Sources

23 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal
Net to General Revenue · FY 2026$0

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version I · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 8, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2322, As Introduced: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. However, there will be an impact of ($4,602,846) to GR beginning in FY 2028. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · $0

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 438

by Rep. Schofield, same lead author · Died in committee · reworked

Introduced text

Last action, May 4, 2023: Referred to Finance

Relating to the annual base salary from the state of a district judge.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Feb 3, 2025

05/01/2025 H Committee report sent to Calendars

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 3:11 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Committee vote 10 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Subjects

Courts--Judges

Salaries & Expenses

Text

The text as introduced · 754 words

89R1125 JTZ-D

By: Schofield
H.B. No. 2322

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the annual base salary from the state of a district

judge.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 659.012, Government Code, is amended by

amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsections (b-2) and (b-3) to

read as follows:

(a) Notwithstanding Section 659.011 and subject to

Subsections (b) , [ and ] (b-1) , and (b-2) :

(1) a judge of a district court or a division of the

business court is entitled to an annual base salary from the state

as set by the General Appropriations Act in an amount equal to at

least $140,000, except that the combined base salary of a district

judge or judge of a division of the business court from all state

and county sources, including compensation for any extrajudicial

services performed on behalf of the county, may not exceed the

amount that is $5,000 less than the maximum combined base salary

from all state and county sources for a justice of a court of

appeals other than a chief justice as determined under this

subsection;

(2) except as provided by Subdivision (3), a justice

of a court of appeals other than the chief justice is entitled to an

annual base salary from the state in the amount equal to 110 percent

of the state base salary of a district judge as set by the General

Appropriations Act, except that the combined base salary of a

justice of the court of appeals other than the chief justice from

all state and county sources, including compensation for any

extrajudicial services performed on behalf of the county, may not

exceed the amount that is $5,000 less than the base salary for a

justice of the supreme court as determined under this subsection;

(3) a justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fifteenth

Court of Appeals District other than the chief justice is entitled

to an annual base salary from the state in the amount equal to

$5,000 less than 120 percent of the state base salary of a district

judge as set by the General Appropriations Act;

(4) a justice of the supreme court other than the chief

justice or a judge of the court of criminal appeals other than the

presiding judge is entitled to an annual base salary from the state

in the amount equal to 120 percent of the state base salary of a

district judge as set by the General Appropriations Act; and

(5) the chief justice or presiding judge of an

appellate court is entitled to an annual base salary from the state

in the amount equal to $2,500 more than the state base salary

provided for the other justices or judges of the court, except that

the combined base salary of the chief justice of a court of appeals

from all state and county sources may not exceed the amount equal to

$2,500 less than the base salary for a justice of the supreme court

as determined under this subsection.

(b-2) The annual base salary from the state to which a judge

of a district court or a division of the business court is entitled

under Subsection (a)(1) for each year of a state fiscal biennium is

the amount equal to the sum of:

(1) the annual base salary from the state under

Subsection (a)(1) paid to a judge of a district court or a division

of the business court under that subdivision in the preceding state

fiscal biennium; and

(2) subject to Subsection (b-3), the annual base

salary described by Subdivision (1) multiplied by the average

percentage change during the preceding state fiscal biennium in the

Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the

United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or,

if that index is discontinued or superseded, a similar index the

comptroller selects or uses for calculation.

(b-3) For purposes of Subsection (b-2)(2), if the average

percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban

Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor,

Bureau of Labor Statistics, or, if that index is discontinued or

superseded, a similar index the comptroller selects or uses for

calculation, during the period prescribed by that subdivision

equals zero or less, the percentage change is calculated as zero.

SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies

beginning with the state fiscal biennium beginning September 1,

2027.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.