88R HB 438
by Rep. Schofield, same lead author · Died in committee · reworked
Introduced textLast action, May 4, 2023: Referred to Finance
Relating to the annual base salary from the state of a district judge.
Caption, 88R bill history
HB 2322
Did not pass
THE TEXT
…“applies beginning with the state fiscal biennium beginning September 1, 2027”
Bill text, House committee report version (H)
The Act takes effect in 2025, but the inflation raise does not apply until September 2027, after the November 2026 election and two years after the session. The delay lines up with the state's two-year budget cycle, so it does not hide the promise.
Delayed startReviewed · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade
relating to the annual base salary from the state of a district judge.
Caption from analyzed text · version H.
Appeals and high court pay rides along. Prices fall? Pay never goes down!
The bill ties the state base pay of district judges and business court judges to inflation, so each two-year budget period their pay rises by the average change in the Consumer Price Index from the prior period. Because appeals court and high court salaries are already set as percentages of the district judge salary, those judges' pay would rise with it. The automatic raises start with the budget period beginning September 1, 2027, and pay can never go down when prices fall.
Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 438 (Died in committee) and this bill (Did not pass). Checked against 88R only.DO-OVER. Reworked text of a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 438 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.STALLED AFTER COMMITTEE. Voted out of the House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence committee 10-0 on Apr 24, 2025. Never placed on a calendar. The bill died.
89R-HB2322 · 2025-02-03
+ 2 more authors
relating to the annual base salary from the state of a district judge.
Appeals and high court pay rides along. Prices fall? Pay never goes down!
The bill ties the state base pay of district judges and business court judges to inflation, so each two-year budget period their pay rises by the average change in the Consumer Price Index from the prior period. Because appeals court and high court salaries are already set as percentages of the district judge salary, those judges' pay would rise with it. The automatic raises start with the budget period beginning September 1, 2027, and pay can never go down when prices fall.
[x] DELAYED STARTanalysis confidence 55%
THE TEXT
…“applies beginning with the state fiscal biennium beginning September 1, 2027”
Bill text, House committee report version (H)
The Act takes effect in 2025, but the inflation raise does not apply until September 2027, after the November 2026 election and two years after the session. The delay lines up with the state's two-year budget cycle, so it does not hide the promise.
LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version I · ( ) = negative · source
Fiscal note · version I · April 8, 2025
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2322, As Introduced: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. However, there will be an impact of ($4,602,846) to GR beginning in FY 2028. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
First year · FY 2026 · $0
Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
GOVERNMENT GROWTH UNDER A CONSERVATIVE BANNER
THE TEXT
…“the annual base salary described by Subdivision (1) multiplied by the average percentage change during the preceding state fiscal biennium in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers”…
Bill text, House committee report version (H)
The bill changes government pay by building automatic inflation raises into judges' state salaries without a new vote each session.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Not tied to this bill.
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
$432,937.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Jun 23, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101006866, 101027356, 101057804, 101070463, 101071373.
$331,750.00
Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Jul 24, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101070463, 101071373.
$254,625.06
Also funds 12 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Oct 31, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Sep 23, 2026 to Oct 19, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101070463, 101071373.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
$432,937.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Jun 23, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101006866, 101027356, 101057804, 101070463, 101071373.
$331,750.00
Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Jul 24, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101070463, 101071373.
$254,625.06
Also funds 12 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Oct 31, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Sep 23, 2026 to Oct 19, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101070463, 101071373.
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
23 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.
Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.
House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.
LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version I · ( ) = negative · source
Fiscal note · version I · April 8, 2025
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2322, As Introduced: an impact of $0 through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. However, there will be an impact of ($4,602,846) to GR beginning in FY 2028. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
First year · FY 2026 · $0
Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.
Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.
by Rep. Schofield, same lead author · Died in committee · reworked
Introduced textLast action, May 4, 2023: Referred to Finance
Relating to the annual base salary from the state of a district judge.
Caption, 88R bill history
Texas House · Filed Feb 3, 2025
05/01/2025 H Committee report sent to Calendars
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report
Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 3:11 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Committee vote 10 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee
Courts--Judges
Salaries & Expenses
The text as introduced · 754 words
89R1125 JTZ-D By: Schofield H.B. No. 2322 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to the annual base salary from the state of a district judge. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Section 659.012, Government Code, is amended by amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsections (b-2) and (b-3) to read as follows: (a) Notwithstanding Section 659.011 and subject to Subsections (b) , [ and ] (b-1) , and (b-2) : (1) a judge of a district court or a division of the business court is entitled to an annual base salary from the state as set by the General Appropriations Act in an amount equal to at least $140,000, except that the combined base salary of a district judge or judge of a division of the business court from all state and county sources, including compensation for any extrajudicial services performed on behalf of the county, may not exceed the amount that is $5,000 less than the maximum combined base salary from all state and county sources for a justice of a court of appeals other than a chief justice as determined under this subsection; (2) except as provided by Subdivision (3), a justice of a court of appeals other than the chief justice is entitled to an annual base salary from the state in the amount equal to 110 percent of the state base salary of a district judge as set by the General Appropriations Act, except that the combined base salary of a justice of the court of appeals other than the chief justice from all state and county sources, including compensation for any extrajudicial services performed on behalf of the county, may not exceed the amount that is $5,000 less than the base salary for a justice of the supreme court as determined under this subsection; (3) a justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fifteenth Court of Appeals District other than the chief justice is entitled to an annual base salary from the state in the amount equal to $5,000 less than 120 percent of the state base salary of a district judge as set by the General Appropriations Act; (4) a justice of the supreme court other than the chief justice or a judge of the court of criminal appeals other than the presiding judge is entitled to an annual base salary from the state in the amount equal to 120 percent of the state base salary of a district judge as set by the General Appropriations Act; and (5) the chief justice or presiding judge of an appellate court is entitled to an annual base salary from the state in the amount equal to $2,500 more than the state base salary provided for the other justices or judges of the court, except that the combined base salary of the chief justice of a court of appeals from all state and county sources may not exceed the amount equal to $2,500 less than the base salary for a justice of the supreme court as determined under this subsection. (b-2) The annual base salary from the state to which a judge of a district court or a division of the business court is entitled under Subsection (a)(1) for each year of a state fiscal biennium is the amount equal to the sum of: (1) the annual base salary from the state under Subsection (a)(1) paid to a judge of a district court or a division of the business court under that subdivision in the preceding state fiscal biennium; and (2) subject to Subsection (b-3), the annual base salary described by Subdivision (1) multiplied by the average percentage change during the preceding state fiscal biennium in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or, if that index is discontinued or superseded, a similar index the comptroller selects or uses for calculation. (b-3) For purposes of Subsection (b-2)(2), if the average percentage change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or, if that index is discontinued or superseded, a similar index the comptroller selects or uses for calculation, during the period prescribed by that subdivision equals zero or less, the percentage change is calculated as zero. SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies beginning with the state fiscal biennium beginning September 1, 2027. SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.