88R HB 956
by Rep. Dutton, same lead author · Did not pass · same text
Introduced textLast action, May 2, 2023: Considered in Calendars
Relating to a suit for possession of or access to a child by a grandparent.
Caption, 88R bill history
HB 2645
Died in committee
Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade
relating to a suit for possession of or access to a child by a grandparent.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Easier court-ordered time with a grandchild, over a parent’s objection.
This bill makes it easier for grandparents to win court-ordered time with a grandchild over a parent's objection. It drops the old rule that the grandparent's own child must be in jail, found incompetent, dead, or cut off from the child, and it says grandparents do not need expert testimony or expert opinion in their sworn filing to prove the child would be harmed. It also requires the judge to appoint a guardian ad litem for the grandchild whenever a grandparent who is a party asks, and that guardian must give the court a written recommendation, with the change applying to pending and new cases starting September 1, 2025.
Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 956 (Did not pass) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 956 (Did not pass). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Feb 11, 2025 and referred to the House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence subcommittee on Family & Fiduciary Relationships. No public hearing. The bill died.
89R-HB2645 · 2025-02-11
relating to a suit for possession of or access to a child by a grandparent.
Easier court-ordered time with a grandchild, over a parent’s objection.
This bill makes it easier for grandparents to win court-ordered time with a grandchild over a parent's objection. It drops the old rule that the grandparent's own child must be in jail, found incompetent, dead, or cut off from the child, and it says grandparents do not need expert testimony or expert opinion in their sworn filing to prove the child would be harmed. It also requires the judge to appoint a guardian ad litem for the grandchild whenever a grandparent who is a party asks, and that guardian must give the court a written recommendation, with the change applying to pending and new cases starting September 1, 2025.
[ ] NONE FOUND
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
No verified beat found.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Not tied to this bill.
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Jul 29, 2024 to Oct 17, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
$65,748.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Dec 10, 2024 to Oct 17, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100986461, 101011085, 101033172, 101044523, 101044526, 101072841.
$58,000.00
Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Dec 10, 2024 to Feb 3, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100986461, 101044526.
$36,000.00
Also funds 89 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Oct 29, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Jan 22, 2026 to Feb 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101044523, 101061631.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
$65,748.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Dec 10, 2024 to Oct 17, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100986461, 101011085, 101033172, 101044523, 101044526, 101072841.
$58,000.00
Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Dec 10, 2024 to Feb 3, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100986461, 101044526.
$36,000.00
Also funds 89 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Oct 29, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Jan 22, 2026 to Feb 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101044523, 101061631.
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.
Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.
by Rep. Dutton, same lead author · Did not pass · same text
Introduced textLast action, May 2, 2023: Considered in Calendars
Relating to a suit for possession of or access to a child by a grandparent.
Caption, 88R bill history
Texas House · Filed Feb 11, 2025
03/18/2025 H Referred to s/c on Family & Fiduciary Relationships by Speaker: Mar 18 2025 11:56AM
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee
Family--Parent & Child
GRANDPARENTS
GUARDIANS & WARDS
The text as introduced · 660 words
89R11458 KRM-D By: Dutton H.B. No. 2645 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to a suit for possession of or access to a child by a grandparent. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Part 2, Subchapter B, Chapter 107, Family Code, is amended by adding Section 107.024 to read as follows: Sec. 107.024. APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM IN SUIT FOR POSSESSION OR ACCESS BY GRANDPARENT. (a) In a suit filed under Section 153.432 requesting possession of or access to a grandchild, the court shall appoint a guardian ad litem for the grandchild at the request of a grandparent who is a party to the suit. (b) Notwithstanding Section 107.002(e), a guardian ad litem appointed under this section shall submit to the court a report regarding the guardian ad litem's recommendations relating to: (1) the grandparent's possession of or access to the grandchild in accordance with Section 153.433; and (2) the bases for the guardian ad litem's recommendations. SECTION 2. Section 153.432, Family Code, is amended by adding Subsection (d) to read as follows: (d) An affidavit submitted under Subsection (c) is not required to contain expert opinion. SECTION 3. Section 153.433, Family Code, is amended to read as follows: Sec. 153.433. POSSESSION OF OR ACCESS TO GRANDCHILD. (a) The court may order reasonable possession of or access to a grandchild by a grandparent if: (1) at the time the relief is requested, at least one biological or adoptive parent of the child has not had that parent's parental rights terminated; and (2) the grandparent requesting possession of or access to the child overcomes the presumption that a parent acts in the best interest of the parent's child by proving by a preponderance of the evidence that denial of possession of or access to the child would significantly impair the child's physical health or emotional well-being[ ; and [ (3) the grandparent requesting possession of or access to the child is a parent of a parent of the child and that parent of the child: [ (A) has been incarcerated in jail or prison during the three-month period preceding the filing of the petition; [ (B) has been found by a court to be incompetent; [ (C) is dead; or [ (D) does not have actual or court-ordered possession of or access to the child ]. (a-1) To meet the burden of proof under Subsection (a)(2), a grandparent requesting possession of or access to a grandchild is not required to offer expert testimony. (b) An order granting possession of or access to a child by a grandparent that is rendered over a parent's objections must state, with specificity , that: (1) at the time the relief was requested, at least one biological or adoptive parent of the child had not had that parent's parental rights terminated; and (2) the grandparent requesting possession of or access to the child has overcome the presumption that a parent acts in the best interest of the parent's child by proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the denial of possession of or access to the child would significantly impair the child's physical health or emotional well-being[ ; and [ (3) the grandparent requesting possession of or access to the child is a parent of a parent of the child and that parent of the child: [ (A) has been incarcerated in jail or prison during the three-month period preceding the filing of the petition; [ (B) has been found by a court to be incompetent; [ (C) is dead; or [ (D) does not have actual or court-ordered possession of or access to the child ]. SECTION 4. The change in law made by this Act applies to a suit affecting the parent-child relationship that is pending in a trial court on the effective date of this Act or filed on or after that date. SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.