New instruction mid-closing? Each side argues again.
The bill rewrites the rule on final jury instructions in criminal trials to use gender-neutral wording and adds one new requirement. If a judge gives the jury an additional instruction after closing arguments have started, the court must let each side argue to the jury again. This affects defendants, prosecutors and judges in criminal trials that begin on or after September 1, 2025.
Labels
Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 5159 (Did not pass) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 5159 (Did not pass). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Feb 12, 2025 and referred to the House Criminal Jurisprudence committee. No public hearing. The bill died.
relating to an argument before the jury after a subsequent jury
charge in a criminal case.
WHAT IT DOES
New instruction mid-closing? Each side argues again.
The bill rewrites the rule on final jury instructions in criminal trials to use gender-neutral wording and adds one new requirement. If a judge gives the jury an additional instruction after closing arguments have started, the court must let each side argue to the jury again. This affects defendants, prosecutors and judges in criminal trials that begin on or after September 1, 2025.
Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
House committee · Criminal Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee
Subjects
Courts--Juries
Criminal Procedure--Trial
Text
The text as introduced · 431 words
89R6112 CJD-D
By: Bhojani
H.B. No. 2726
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
AN ACT
relating to an argument before the jury after a subsequent jury
charge in a criminal case.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Article 36.16, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
amended to read as follows:
Art. 36.16. FINAL CHARGE. (a) After the judge shall have
received the objections to the judge's [ his ] main charge, together
with any special charges offered, the judge [ he ] may make those
[ such ] changes in the [ his ] main charge as the judge [ he ] may deem
proper, and the defendant or the defendant's [ his ] counsel shall
have the opportunity to present [ their ] objections to the main
charge [ thereto and ] in the same manner as [ is ] provided in Article
36.15 . The [ , and thereupon the ] judge shall read the [ his ] charge
to the jury as finally written, together with any special charges
given, and no further exception or objection shall be required of
the defendant [ in order ] to preserve any objections or exceptions
previously [ theretofore ] made.
(b) After the argument begins no further charge shall be
given to the jury unless required by the improper argument of
counsel or the request of the jury, or unless the judge shall, in
the judge's [ his ] discretion, permit the introduction of other
testimony, and in the event of a [ such ] further charge, the
defendant or the defendant's [ his ] counsel shall have the right to
present objections in the same manner as is prescribed in Article
36.15. The failure of the court to give the defendant or the
defendant's [ his ] counsel a reasonable time to examine the charge
and specify the ground of objection shall be subject to review
either in the trial court or in the appellate court.
(c) The court shall permit each party to present an argument
to the jury if the court delivers a further charge to the jury under
Subsection (b).
SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only
to a criminal proceeding that commences on or after the effective
date of this Act. A criminal proceeding that commences before the
effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the
date the proceeding commenced, and the former law is continued in
effect for that purpose.
SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.