Monitoring the Session

HB 2805

DeAyala Bill Limits Legal Fee Wins For Groundwater Districts

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Mano DeAyalaRHouse 133

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to civil actions related to groundwater conservation districts.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Districts get fees only for groundless, bad-faith suits. Board members lose their immunity from being sued.

The bill changes the rules for lawsuits and appeals involving groundwater conservation districts. Today a district can recover its legal fees whenever it wins; under this bill it can recover them only when a court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the case against it was groundless and brought in bad faith, and a groundwater rights owner can now recover fees when a district is found to have intentionally violated that owner's rights. Board members keep their shield from personal liability only to the extent their votes and actions follow conflict-of-interest, abuse-of-office and constitutional rules, and they lose their stated immunity from being sued at all.

Labels

Labels: PENDING FOREVER. Heard by the House Natural Resources committee on Apr 9, 2025 and left pending. Never voted out. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB2805 · 2025-02-13

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to civil actions related to groundwater conservation districts.

WHAT IT DOES

Districts get fees only for groundless, bad-faith suits. Board members lose their immunity from being sued.

The bill changes the rules for lawsuits and appeals involving groundwater conservation districts. Today a district can recover its legal fees whenever it wins; under this bill it can recover them only when a court finds, by clear and convincing evidence, that the case against it was groundless and brought in bad faith, and a groundwater rights owner can now recover fees when a district is found to have intentionally violated that owner's rights. Board members keep their shield from personal liability only to the extent their votes and actions follow conflict-of-interest, abuse-of-office and constitutional rules, and they lose their stated immunity from being sued at all.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 6, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Natural Resources
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Left pending in committee
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“evidence that a district has intentionally violated the statutory”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill pulls back a fee-shifting shield that favored districts in court and adds a fee recovery path for groundwater rights owners who prove an intentional rights violation.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$865,510.35

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$865,510.35

Cash
$50,000.00
Paid by others
$815,510.35
Total
$865,510.35
advertising $805,200.00polling $10,310.35

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 23, 2025 to Oct 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101009776, 101017937, 101062872, 101069959, 101072290.

Texas Conservative Majority PAC$305,800.00

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$305,800.00

Cash
$75,000.00
Paid by others
$230,800.00
Total
$305,800.00
canvassing $175,000.00advertising $50,000.00polling $5,800.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 8, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101069959, 101072290.

Associated Republicans of Texas Campaign Fund$271,400.04

Associated Republicans of Texas Campaign Fund

$271,400.04

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$271,400.04
Total
$271,400.04
advertising $136,000.00mailers $70,417.04television $30,000.00polling $16,400.00Other filed descriptions $10,583.00digital $8,000.00

Also funds 20 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Nov 4, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 25, 2025 to Oct 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101009776, 101069959, 101072290.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$865,510.35

Cash
$50,000.00
Paid by others
$815,510.35
Total
$865,510.35
advertising $805,200.00polling $10,310.35

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 23, 2025 to Oct 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101009776, 101017937, 101062872, 101069959, 101072290.

×

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$305,800.00

Cash
$75,000.00
Paid by others
$230,800.00
Total
$305,800.00
canvassing $175,000.00advertising $50,000.00polling $5,800.00

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 8, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101069959, 101072290.

×

Associated Republicans of Texas Campaign Fund

$271,400.04

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$271,400.04
Total
$271,400.04
advertising $136,000.00mailers $70,417.04television $30,000.00polling $16,400.00Other filed descriptions $10,583.00digital $8,000.00

Also funds 20 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Nov 4, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 25, 2025 to Oct 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101009776, 101069959, 101072290.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 6, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Feb 13, 2025

04/09/2025 H Left pending in committee

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Natural Resources · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

Courts--Civil Procedure

Special Districts & Authorities--Groundwater Conserve Dist.

Special Districts & Authorities--Water & Utility

Water--Conservation (I097L)

Text

The text as introduced · 524 words

89R13809 JBD-D

By: DeAyala
H.B. No. 2805

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to civil actions related to groundwater conservation

districts.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 36.066, Water Code, is amended by

amending Subsections (a), (g), and (h) and adding Subsection (g-1)

to read as follows:

(a) A district may sue and be sued in the courts of this

state in the name of the district by and through its board. A

district board member is immune from personal [ suit and immune

from ] liability for official votes and official actions. To the

extent an official vote or official action conforms to laws

relating to conflicts of interest, abuse of office, or

constitutional obligations, this subsection provides immunity for

those actions. All courts shall take judicial notice of the

creation of the district and of its boundaries.

(g) If the trial court finds by clear and convincing

evidence that an administrative proceeding brought against a

district and appealed to the court or a suit brought against a

district was groundless and brought in bad faith [ district prevails

in any suit other than a suit in which it voluntarily intervenes ],

the district may seek and the court shall grant, in the interests of

justice and as provided by Subsection (h), in the same action,

recovery for reasonable and necessary attorney's fees, costs for

expert witnesses and depositions , and other costs incurred by the

district in the proceeding or suit [ before the court ].

(g-1) If the trial court finds by clear and convincing

evidence that a district has intentionally violated the statutory

or constitutional rights of a groundwater rights owner, the rights

owner may seek and the court shall grant, in the interests of

justice and as provided by Subsection (h), in the same action,

recovery for reasonable and necessary attorney's fees, costs for

expert witnesses and depositions, and other costs incurred by the

rights owner in:

(1) an administrative proceeding appealed to the court

and arising from the rights violation; and

(2) a suit arising from the rights violation. [ The

amount of the attorney's fees shall be fixed by the court. ]

(h) The court shall determine the amount of attorney's fees

awarded under this section. If the district or groundwater rights

owner prevails on some, but not all, of the issues in the proceeding

or suit, the court shall award attorney's fees and costs under this

section only for those issues on which the district or rights owner

prevails. The district or rights owner, as applicable, has the

burden of segregating the attorney's fees and costs in order for the

court to make an award.

SECTION 2. Section 36.066, Water Code, as amended by this

Act, applies only to an action filed on or after the effective date

of this Act. An action filed before the effective date of this Act

is governed by the law as it existed immediately before the

effective date of this Act, and that law is continued in effect for

that purpose.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.