Monitoring the Session

HB 2821

Schatzline’s bill banning county diversity, equity, and inclusion spending

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Nate SchatzlineRHouse 93

Initial review · graded Oct 19, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to county diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

No public money for DEI programs, staff, vendors or trainings.

This bill bars Texas counties from spending public money on diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, staff, vendors, trainings, conferences, scholarships, media, and groups that exclude or favor people by race, color, religion, national origin, or ethnicity, except where federal law requires it. It touches county commissioners courts, county employees, and the vendors, nonprofits, and scholarship programs that counties fund. The attorney general can sue a county that breaks the rule, and a county that loses is held to its no-new-revenue tax rate for three years and loses state grant money for two years, starting September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Feb 13, 2025 and referred to the House State Affairs committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB2821 · 2025-02-13

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to county diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

WHAT IT DOES

No public money for DEI programs, staff, vendors or trainings.

This bill bars Texas counties from spending public money on diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, staff, vendors, trainings, conferences, scholarships, media, and groups that exclude or favor people by race, color, religion, national origin, or ethnicity, except where federal law requires it. It touches county commissioners courts, county employees, and the vendors, nonprofits, and scholarship programs that counties fund. The attorney general can sue a county that breaks the rule, and a county that loses is held to its no-new-revenue tax rate for three years and loses state grant money for two years, starting September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to State Affairs
ALSO NOTED · NOT CHARGED (1)

CAPTION MISMATCH · analysis confidence 35%

THE TEXT

…“restorative practices, to address conflict or wrongdoing in the”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption covers only county DEI initiatives, but the body also bans counties from using restorative or other alternative discipline practices in the workplace. That is a separate rule the caption does not name, though it is a small piece of the bill.

FILED UNDER

Beats not yet reviewed.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC Austin TX$55,000
Texans United for a Conservative Majority Victoria TX$10,000
Dan Patrick Campaign Austin TX$5,000

Derived from itemized gifts, Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

$113,206 raised in 4 of 4 reports since Oct 27, 2024. Derived sum of published report totals. Flow, Oct 27, 2024 through Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026. 4 of 4 filed reports carry a published figure. Partial total. Regular reports do not cover Jul 9, 2025 to Aug 15, 2025, Aug 15, 2025 to Sep 4, 2025.

$220,212 spent since Oct 27, 2024. Derived sum of published report totals. Flow, Oct 27, 2024 through Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026. 4 of 4 filed reports carry a published figure.

$54,238 cash on hand. Published report total. Stock, as of Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026.

$0 loans outstanding. Published report total. Stock, as of Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived sum of itemized contributions in regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Unitemized contributions are not included. Flow, Oct 27, 2024 through Jun 30, 2026. State filing data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 19, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Feb 13, 2025

03/19/2025 H Referred to State Affairs: Mar 19 2025 12:35PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · State Affairs · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

County Government--Finance

County Government--General

Human Relations

DISCRIMINATION

Text

The text as introduced · 887 words

89R13437 JBD-D

By: Schatzline
H.B. No. 2821

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to county diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subtitle B, Title 5, Local Government Code, is

amended by adding Chapter 162 to read as follows:

CHAPTER 162. PROHIBITION ON COUNTY DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND

INCLUSION INITIATIVES

Sec. 162.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Diversity, equity, and inclusion initiative"

means an initiative that:

(A) is based on the belief that identity

classifications are central to understanding social, professional,

and political disparities;

(B) requires, encourages, or otherwise promotes

organizational practices such as employee hiring and promotion,

resource allocation, or policy formulation to achieve proportional

representation of identity classification groups or to eliminate

perceived systemic differences between them; or

(C) otherwise promotes discriminatory treatment

of a person on the basis of the person's identity classification.

(2) "Identity classification" means a classification

of a person based on the race, color, religion, national origin, or

ethnicity of the person.

Sec. 162.002. PROHIBITION ON COUNTY SPENDING OF PUBLIC

MONEY ON DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION INITIATIVES. Except as

required by federal law, a county may not spend public money or

provide compensation in any manner to directly or indirectly:

(1) fund a department, program, or committee, or pay

compensation to a person associated with a department, program, or

committee, that is focused on formulating, promoting, or

implementing a diversity, equity, and inclusion initiative;

(2) hire or contract with an independent vendor or

contractor to formulate, promote, or implement a diversity, equity,

and inclusion initiative;

(3) promote an event, meeting, or club that excludes

the participation of a person on the basis of the person's identity

classification or that advocates for the preferential treatment of

the person on the basis of the person's identity classification;

(4) require or encourage an employee of the county to

participate in a workforce training or professional development

training that promotes a diversity, equity, and inclusion

initiative;

(5) provide funding to enable an employee or a member

of the commissioners court of the county to attend a conference that

promotes or teaches a diversity, equity, and inclusion initiative;

(6) provide funding to a business, nonprofit

organization, association, or other similar organization if that

organization:

(A) excludes the participation of a person in the

organization on the basis of the person's identity classification;

or

(B) advocates for the preferential treatment of a

person on the basis of the person's identity classification;

(7) provide funding to an education scholarship

program that:

(A) promotes a diversity, equity, and inclusion

initiative;

(B) awards a scholarship to a recipient on the

basis of the person's identity classification; or

(C) advocates for the preferential treatment of a

person on the basis of the person's identity classification;

(8) provide funding for the development or promotion

of a film, advertisement, or other media that promotes a diversity,

equity, and inclusion initiative, or that is made for the benefit of

a certain identity classification group; or

(9) promote or seek to implement a diversity, equity,

and inclusion initiative when working with a business or other

organization whose purpose is to provide or attract economic

development or tourism to the county.

Sec. 162.003. DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION INITIATIVES

AFFECTING COUNTY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES. (a) To the maximum extent

permitted by law, the commissioners court of a county shall

promote, encourage, and implement policies that:

(1) avoid explicitly considering an identity

classification in organizational decision making such as employee

hiring and promotion, resource allocation, or policy formulation;

and

(2) rely on consideration of individual merit in

organizational decision making such as employee hiring and

promotion, resource allocation, or policy formulation.

(b) Except as required by federal law, the commissioners

court of a county may not:

(1) adopt or enforce an order or other measure that:

(A) implements or advocates for a diversity,

equity, and inclusion initiative; or

(B) seeks to discriminate on the basis of

identity classification to attempt to rectify past wrongs;

(2) discriminate on the basis of identity

classification in adopting or implementing organizational

disciplinary procedures; or

(3) use alternative discipline practices, including

restorative practices, to address conflict or wrongdoing in the

workplace.

Sec. 162.004. ENFORCEMENT. (a) In this section:

(1) "No-new-revenue tax rate" means the

no-new-revenue tax rate calculated under Chapter 26, Tax Code.

(2) "Tax year" has the meaning assigned by Section

1.04, Tax Code.

(b) The attorney general may bring an action to enjoin a

violation under this chapter in a district court in:

(1) Travis County; or

(2) the county in which the violation occurs.

(c) Notwithstanding any other law, if it is determined in an

action under Subsection (b) that a county has violated a provision

of this chapter, the county may not adopt an ad valorem tax rate

that exceeds the county's no-new-revenue tax rate for the three tax

years that begin on or after the date of the determination.

(d) A county that is determined in an action under

Subsection (b) to have violated this chapter may not receive state

grant funds for a period of two years following the date of the

determination. The comptroller shall adopt rules to implement this

subsection uniformly among the state agencies from which state

grant funds are distributed to counties.

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.