Monitoring the Session

HB 349

bill extending the Good Samaritan car shield to pets

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Lulu FloresDHouse 51

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to civil liability for removing certain individuals or animals from a motor vehicle.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Break into a car to rescue a dog or cat, no lawsuit.

The bill extends the existing Good Samaritan shield, which protects people from being sued for breaking into a car to rescue a young child or vulnerable person, so it also covers rescuing a dog, cat or other household pet. It touches bystanders who see a pet trapped in a hot or locked car, and vehicle owners who would otherwise sue for the damage. A rescuer who confirms the car is locked, believes harm is imminent, calls 911 or police first, uses no more force than needed, and waits nearby with the animal cannot be sued for damages, unless police told them not to go in.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 3756 (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.DO-OVER. Reworked text of a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 3756 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.ACROSS THE AISLE. Joint authors: 3 Republicans, 2 Democrats. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.GOT HALFWAY. Passed the House on May 1, 2025. Died in the Senate: never got out of the State Affairs committee.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB349 · 2024-11-12

SOLD BY

+ 2 more authors, 11 coauthors

ITEM

relating to civil liability for removing certain individuals or animals from a motor vehicle.

WHAT IT DOES

Break into a car to rescue a dog or cat, no lawsuit.

The bill extends the existing Good Samaritan shield, which protects people from being sued for breaking into a car to rescue a young child or vulnerable person, so it also covers rescuing a dog, cat or other household pet. It touches bystanders who see a pet trapped in a hot or locked car, and vehicle owners who would otherwise sue for the damage. A rescuer who confirms the car is locked, believes harm is imminent, calls 911 or police first, uses no more force than needed, and waits nearby with the animal cannot be sued for damages, unless police told them not to go in.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · March 10, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in public hearing
  9. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  10. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  11. Committee report distributed
  12. Committee report sent to Calendars
  13. Considered in Calendars
  14. Considered in Calendars
  15. Placed on General State Calendar
  16. Read 2nd time
  17. Passed to engrossment
  18. Record vote RV#1077
  19. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  20. Read 3rd time
  21. Passed
  22. Record vote RV#1121
  23. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  24. Reported engrossed
  25. Received from the House
  26. Read first time
  27. Referred to State Affairs
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 86 yea · 50 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 1, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texas Trial Lawyers Assocation PAC$23KMichael Brickman$15,000Johann Moonesinghe$10,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Aug 5, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texas Trial Lawyers Assocation PAC$22,500.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Assocation PAC

$22,500.00

Cash
$22,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$22,500.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 20, 2024 to Jun 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 20, 2024 to Jun 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100985004, 101007867, 101059825.

Michael Brickman$15,000.00
Johann Moonesinghe$10,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Assocation PAC

$22,500.00

Cash
$22,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$22,500.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 20, 2024 to Jun 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 20, 2024 to Jun 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100985004, 101007867, 101059825.

Votes2

House May 1, 2025

Yea
86
Nay
50
Present, not voting
1
Absent
5
Excused
8
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 1121

HB 349 was passed by (Record 1121): 86 Yeas, 50 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 86 (published)
  • Nay: 50 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 5 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 8 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Apr 30, 2025

Yea
93
Nay
45
Present, not voting
2
Absent
4
Excused
6
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 1077

HB 349 was passed to engrossment by (Record 1077): 93 Yeas, 45 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 93 (published)
  • Nay: 45 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 4 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 6 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses1
For
1
Against
0
On
0
Names

For

  • City of Houston1 registration
Sources

1 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · March 10, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 3756

by Rep. Flores, same lead author · Died in committee · reworked

Introduced text

Last action, May 1, 2023: Referred to State Affairs

Relating to civil liability for removing certain individuals or animals from a motor vehicle.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Nov 12, 2024

05/05/2025 S Referred to State Affairs

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report · Engrossed

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors

House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Committee vote 7 aye, 1 nay, 3 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · State Affairs · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Animals

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

Vehicles & Traffic--General

Text

The text as introduced · 508 words

89R2339 AMF-D

By: Flores
H.B. No. 349

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to civil liability for removing certain individuals or

animals from a motor vehicle.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. The heading to Chapter 92A, Civil Practice and

Remedies Code, is amended to read as follows:

CHAPTER 92A. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR REMOVING CERTAIN

INDIVIDUALS OR ANIMALS FROM MOTOR VEHICLE

SECTION 2. Section 92A.001, Civil Practice and Remedies

Code, is amended to read as follows:

Sec. 92A.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Domestic animal" means a dog, cat, or other

domesticated animal that may be kept as a household pet. The term

does not include a livestock animal, as defined by Section 87.001.

(2) "Motor vehicle" means a vehicle that is

self-propelled or a trailer or semitrailer designed for use with a

self-propelled vehicle.

(3) [ (2) ] "Vulnerable individual" means:

(A) a child younger than seven years of age; or

(B) an individual who by reason of age or

physical or mental disease, defect, or injury is substantially

unable to protect the individual's self from harm.

SECTION 3. Section 92A.002, Civil Practice and Remedies

Code, is amended to read as follows:

Sec. 92A.002. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. (a) A person who,

by force or otherwise, enters a motor vehicle for the purpose of

removing a vulnerable individual or a domestic animal from the

vehicle is immune from civil liability for damages resulting from

that entry or removal if the person:

(1) determines that:

(A) the motor vehicle is locked; or

(B) there is no reasonable method for the

individual or animal to exit the motor vehicle without assistance;

(2) has a good faith and reasonable belief, based on

known circumstances, that entry into the motor vehicle is necessary

to avoid imminent harm to the individual or animal ;

(3) before entering the motor vehicle, ensures that

law enforcement is notified or 911 is called if the person is not a

law enforcement officer or other first responder;

(4) uses no more force to enter the motor vehicle and

remove the individual or animal than is necessary; and

(5) remains with the individual or animal in a safe

location that is in reasonable proximity to the motor vehicle until

a law enforcement officer or other first responder arrives .

(b) A person is not immune from civil liability for entering

a motor vehicle under this section if the person, upon notifying law

enforcement or calling 911, was advised by law enforcement

personnel to not enter the motor vehicle .

SECTION 4. The change in law made by this Act applies only

to a cause of action that accrues on or after the effective date of

this Act. A cause of action that accrued before the effective date

of this Act is governed by the law applicable to the cause of action

immediately before the effective date of this Act, and that law is

continued in effect for that purpose.

SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.