Monitoring the Session

HB 3996

bill ties child-welfare case extensions to a parent’s request

Did not pass

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Harold V. Dutton Jr.DHouse 142

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to extensions of the mandatory dismissal date in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship involving the Department of Family and Protective Services.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

A parent asks in open court, and the judge can extend.

The bill rewrites the rule on when a judge can push back the automatic dismissal date in a child-welfare case brought by the Department of Family and Protective Services, tying an extension to a parent asking for one in open court. It touches parents whose children are in temporary state custody, the department, and family court judges. On the ground, a judge must find extraordinary circumstances, and allow up to 180 more days, when a parent is making a good faith effort on the service plan but needs more time, including time to finish a court-ordered substance abuse treatment program, and the judge plans to return the child.

Labels

Labels: STALLED AFTER COMMITTEE. Voted out of the House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence committee 10-0 on May 8, 2025. Placed on the General State Calendar on May 15, 2025. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB3996 · 2025-03-06

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to extensions of the mandatory dismissal date in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship involving the Department of Family and Protective Services.

WHAT IT DOES

A parent asks in open court, and the judge can extend.

The bill rewrites the rule on when a judge can push back the automatic dismissal date in a child-welfare case brought by the Department of Family and Protective Services, tying an extension to a parent asking for one in open court. It touches parents whose children are in temporary state custody, the department, and family court judges. On the ground, a judge must find extraordinary circumstances, and allow up to 180 more days, when a parent is making a good faith effort on the service plan but needs more time, including time to finish a court-ordered substance abuse treatment program, and the judge plans to return the child.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 9, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to s/c on Family & Fiduciary Relationships by Speaker
  4. Scheduled for public hearing in s/c on . . .
  5. Considered by s/c in public hearing
  6. Committee substitute considered in s/c
  7. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in subcommittee
  8. Left pending in subcommittee
  9. Recalled from subcommittee
  10. Considered in formal meeting
  11. Committee substitute considered in committee
  12. Reported favorably as substituted
  13. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  14. Committee report distributed
  15. Committee report sent to Calendars
  16. Considered in Calendars
  17. Placed on General State Calendar
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 29, 2024 to Oct 17, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$65,748.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$65,748.00

Cash
$32,500.00
Paid by others
$33,248.00
Total
$65,748.00
mail $33,248.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 10, 2024 to Oct 17, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986461, 101011085, 101033172, 101044523, 101044526, 101072841.

Texas Sands PAC$58,000.00

Texas Sands PAC

$58,000.00

Cash
$58,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$58,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 10, 2024 to Feb 3, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986461, 101044526.

Charter Schools Now PAC$36,000.00

Charter Schools Now PAC

$36,000.00

Cash
$1,000.00
Paid by others
$35,000.00
Total
$36,000.00
Other filed descriptions $35,000.00

Also funds 89 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Oct 29, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jan 22, 2026 to Feb 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101044523, 101061631.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$65,748.00

Cash
$32,500.00
Paid by others
$33,248.00
Total
$65,748.00
mail $33,248.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 10, 2024 to Oct 17, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986461, 101011085, 101033172, 101044523, 101044526, 101072841.

×

Texas Sands PAC

$58,000.00

Cash
$58,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$58,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 10, 2024 to Feb 3, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100986461, 101044526.

×

Charter Schools Now PAC

$36,000.00

Cash
$1,000.00
Paid by others
$35,000.00
Total
$36,000.00
Other filed descriptions $35,000.00

Also funds 89 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Oct 29, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jan 22, 2026 to Feb 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101044523, 101061631.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Witnesses3
For
2
Against
1
On
0
Names

For

  • Self1 registration
  • Self; TAFDA1 registration

Against

  • Self1 registration
Sources

3 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 9, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 6, 2025

05/15/2025 H Placed on General State Calendar

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Committee vote 10 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Subjects

Alcoholism & Drug Abuse

Family--Child Protection

Family--Parent & Child

Text

The text as introduced · 369 words

89R13645 MM-D

By: Dutton
H.B. No. 3996

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to extensions of the mandatory dismissal date in certain

suits affecting the parent-child relationship involving the

Department of Family and Protective Services.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Sections 263.401(b) and (b-3), Family Code, are

amended to read as follows:

(b) Unless the court has commenced the trial on the merits,

the court may not retain the suit on the court's docket after the

time described by Subsection (a) unless the parent in open court

requests an extension of time and the court finds that

extraordinary circumstances necessitate the child remaining in the

temporary managing conservatorship of the department and that

continuing the appointment of the department as temporary managing

conservator is in the best interest of the child. If the court

makes those findings, the court may retain the suit on the court's

docket for a period not to exceed 180 days after the time described

by Subsection (a). If the court retains the suit on the court's

docket, the court shall render an order in which the court:

(1) schedules the new date on which the suit will be

automatically dismissed if the trial on the merits has not

commenced, which date must be not later than the 180th day after the

time described by Subsection (a);

(2) makes further temporary orders for the safety and

welfare of the child as necessary to avoid further delay in

resolving the suit; and

(3) sets the trial on the merits on a date not later

than the date specified under Subdivision (1).

(b-3) A court shall find under Subsection (b) that

extraordinary circumstances necessitate the child remaining in the

temporary managing conservatorship of the department if:

(1) a parent of a child has made a good faith effort to

successfully complete the service plan but needs additional time ,

including additional time to complete a substance abuse treatment

program that was ordered as part of the service plan ; and

(2) on completion of the service plan the court

intends to order the child returned to the parent.

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.