Monitoring the Session

HB 444

bill easing habeas for new scientific evidence

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Joe MoodyDHouse 78

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to an application for a writ of habeas corpus based on certain relevant scientific evidence that was not available at the applicant's trial.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Standard drops to a reasonable likelihood it affected the conviction.

The bill makes it easier for a convicted person to get a new look at their case when new scientific evidence surfaces that was not available at trial, lowering the standard to a reasonable likelihood the evidence could have affected the conviction or sentence. It touches convicted people, trial courts, and the Court of Criminal Appeals: poor defendants raising these claims get a court-appointed lawyer, and the high court must issue a written decision on the substance before denying one. It also lets a person file a later claim of this kind unless a lawyer already raised it, and it applies only to applications filed on or after December 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 205 (Did not pass) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.DO-OVER. Reworked text of a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 205 (Did not pass). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Nov 12, 2024 and referred to the House Criminal Jurisprudence committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB444 · 2024-11-12

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to an application for a writ of habeas corpus based on certain relevant scientific evidence that was not available at the applicant's trial.

WHAT IT DOES

Standard drops to a reasonable likelihood it affected the conviction.

The bill makes it easier for a convicted person to get a new look at their case when new scientific evidence surfaces that was not available at trial, lowering the standard to a reasonable likelihood the evidence could have affected the conviction or sentence. It touches convicted people, trial courts, and the Court of Criminal Appeals: poor defendants raising these claims get a court-appointed lawyer, and the high court must issue a written decision on the substance before denying one. It also lets a person file a later claim of this kind unless a lawyer already raised it, and it applies only to applications filed on or after December 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 9, 2024 to Jun 29, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$85,000.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$85,000.00

Cash
$85,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$85,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 8, 2024 to Jun 17, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100979067, 101003930, 101054759.

Texans for Truth and Liberty PAC$25,000.00

Texans for Truth and Liberty PAC

$25,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$25,000.00

Also funds 44 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jun 24, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Jun 24, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101003930.

Texas Sands PAC$14,000.00

Texas Sands PAC

$14,000.00

Cash
$14,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$14,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 1, 2024 to May 18, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100979067, 101024872, 101054759.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$85,000.00

Cash
$85,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$85,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 8, 2024 to Jun 17, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100979067, 101003930, 101054759.

×

Texans for Truth and Liberty PAC

$25,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$25,000.00

Also funds 44 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jun 24, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Jun 24, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101003930.

×

Texas Sands PAC

$14,000.00

Cash
$14,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$14,000.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 1, 2024 to May 18, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100979067, 101024872, 101054759.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 205

by Rep. Moody, same lead author · Did not pass · reworked

Introduced text

Last action, Apr 12, 2023: Received from the House

Relating to an application for a writ of habeas corpus based on certain relevant scientific evidence that was not available at the applicant's trial.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Nov 12, 2024

02/28/2025 H Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence: Feb 28 2025 11:02AM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Criminal Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Criminal Procedure--Sentencing & Punishment

EVIDENCE

HABEAS CORPUS

Text

The text as introduced · 718 words

By: Moody
H.B. No. 444

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to an application for a writ of habeas corpus based on

certain relevant scientific evidence that was not available at the

applicant's trial.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Article 1.051(d), Code of Criminal Procedure, is

amended to read as follows:

(d) An eligible indigent defendant is entitled to have the

trial court appoint an attorney to represent him in the following

appellate and postconviction habeas corpus matters:

(1) an appeal to a court of appeals;

(2) an appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals if the appeal

is made directly from the trial court or if a petition for

discretionary review has been granted;

(3) a habeas corpus proceeding if the court concludes that

the interests of justice require representation or the defendant

raises a claim under Article 11.073 ; and

(4) any other appellate proceeding if the court concludes

that the interests of justice require representation.

SECTION 2. Article 11.07, Sec. 5, Code of Criminal

Procedure, is amended to read as follows:

Sec. 5. The Court of Criminal Appeals may deny relief upon

the findings and conclusions of the hearing judge without docketing

the cause, or may direct that the cause be docketed and heard as

though originally presented to said court or as an appeal. Upon

reviewing the record the court shall enter its judgment remanding

the applicant to custody or ordering his release, as the law and

facts may justify. The mandate of the court shall issue to the court

issuing the writ, as in other criminal cases. After conviction the

procedure outlined in this Act shall be exclusive and any other

proceeding shall be void and of no force and effect in discharging

the prisoner. The court may not deny relief under Article 11.073

except by written decision addressing the substance of the claim.

SECTION 3. Article 11.073(a)-(c), Code of Criminal

Procedure, are amended to read as follows:

(a) This article applies to relevant scientific evidence

that:

(1) was not reasonably available to be offered by a

convicted person at the convicted person's trial; or

(2) contradicts or tends to negate scientific evidence

relied on by the state at trial.

(b) A court may grant a convicted person relief on an

application for a writ of habeas corpus if:

(1) the convicted person files an application, in the

manner provided by Article 11.07, 11.071, or 11.072, containing

specific facts indicating that:

(A) relevant scientific evidence is currently

available and was not available at the time of the convicted

person's trial because the evidence was not ascertainable through

the exercise of reasonable diligence by the convicted person before

the date of or during the convicted person's trial; and

(B) the scientific evidence would be admissible

under the Texas Rules of Evidence at a trial held on the date of the

application; and

(2) the court makes the findings described by

Subdivisions (1)(A) and (B) and also finds that, had the scientific

evidence been presented at trial, [ on the preponderance of the

evidence ] there is a reasonable likelihood the scientific evidence

could have affected the person's conviction or the punishment the

person received.

(c) [ For purposes of ] Section 4(a), Article 11.07, Section

5(a), Article 11.071, and Section 9(a), Article 11.072, only apply

to a claim under this article if the claim has been presented

previously in an application filed by an attorney [ a claim or issue

could not have been presented previously in an original application

or in a previously considered application if the claim or issue is

based on relevant scientific evidence that was not ascertainable

through the exercise of reasonable diligence by the convicted

person on or before the date on which the original application or a

previously considered application, as applicable, was filed ].

SECTION 4. The changes in law made by the Act apply only to

an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed on or after the

effective date of this Act. An application filed before the

effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect when the

application was filed, and the former law is continued in effect for

that purpose.

SECTION 5. This Act takes effect December 1, 2025.