Monitoring the Session

HB 4502

Court security plans and committees get new rules

Did not pass

Verdict: No flags

No flagsReviewed
Rep. John T. SmitheeRHouse 86

Editor's call: No flags. On Nov 1, 2026 the editor checked this charge against the bill's caption and removed it.

Corrected Nov 1, 2026

Corrected Nov 1, 2026 · We checked this summary against the bill text and fixed it.

Reviewed · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to court security, including the development of a court emergency management plan, the duties and composition of a court security committee, and increasing the criminal penalty for harassment of a court employee or judge.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Committees leave open meetings law. Local officials still control security spending.

The bill requires every court security committee, for county trial courts and city courts, to write a court emergency management plan, and tells the state's judicial security division to draft a model plan they can use. It changes committee recommendations on security spending from optional to required, adds a sheriff's and constable's representative to county committees, tells county and city governments to prioritize those recommendations when spending court security funds, and states that these committees are not governmental bodies under the open meetings chapter. It also raises the penalty for harassing a person the actor knows is a court employee or judge: Class A misdemeanor for a court employee, state jail felony for a judge or a repeat case against a court employee, and third degree felony for a repeat case against a judge.

Labels

Labels: STALLED AFTER COMMITTEE. Voted out of the House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence committee 9-0 on May 1, 2025. Never placed on a calendar. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB4502 · 2025-03-12

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to court security, including the development of a court emergency management plan, the duties and composition of a court security committee, and increasing the criminal penalty for harassment of a court employee or judge.

WHAT IT DOES

Committees leave open meetings law. Local officials still control security spending.

The bill requires every court security committee, for county trial courts and city courts, to write a court emergency management plan, and tells the state's judicial security division to draft a model plan they can use. It changes committee recommendations on security spending from optional to required, adds a sheriff's and constable's representative to county committees, tells county and city governments to prioritize those recommendations when spending court security funds, and states that these committees are not governmental bodies under the open meetings chapter. It also raises the penalty for harassing a person the actor knows is a court employee or judge: Class A misdemeanor for a court employee, state jail felony for a judge or a repeat case against a court employee, and third degree felony for a repeat case against a judge.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 5, 2025

The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to the unknown number of offenses which would be subject to enhanced penalties under the provisions of the bill.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in formal meeting
  9. Committee substitute considered in committee
  10. Reported favorably as substituted
  11. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  12. Committee report distributed
  13. Committee report sent to Calendars
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Aug 19, 2024 to Jun 24, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of TX$5,000.00

Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of TX

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Aug 28, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Aug 28, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100968332.

Richard Weekley$5,000.00
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$5,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Jun 24, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101011601.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of TX

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Aug 28, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Aug 28, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100968332.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Jun 24, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101011601.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Witnesses2
For
0
Against
0
On
2
Names

On

  • Dallas County Commissioners Court1 registration
  • Office of Court Administration1 registration
Sources

2 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 5, 2025

The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to the unknown number of offenses which would be subject to enhanced penalties under the provisions of the bill.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 12, 2025

05/10/2025 H Committee report sent to Calendars

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 6:27 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Committee vote 9 aye, 0 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Companion

SB 1575 by Zaffirini (identical)

Subjects

Courts--Administration

Courts--Judges

Courts--Municipal

Courts--Personnel

Crimes--Against Persons--General

Disaster Preparedness & Relief

Safety

CONSTABLES

HARASSMENT

COURT ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF

Text

The text as introduced · 1,429 words

2025S0127-T 02/21/25

By: Smithee
H.B. No. 4502

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the development and implementation of an all-hazards

court security plan, composition and recommendations of court

security committees, and increasing the penalty for certain

criminal offenses committed against an employee of a court or the

office.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 29.014, Government Code, is amended by

amending Subsections (c) and (d) and adding Subsection (e) to read

as follows:

(c) The committee shall establish the policies and

procedures including a court emergency management plan necessary to

provide adequate security to the municipal courts served by the

presiding or municipal judge, as applicable.

(d) A committee shall [ may ] recommend to the municipality

the uses of resources and expenditures of money for courthouse

security, but may not direct the assignment of those resources or

the expenditure of those funds. The municipality shall give

preference to the court security committee's recommendations

regarding the expenditures of funds when considering use of funds

collected under the Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 102.017.

(e) A court security committee established under Sec.

74.092(13) is not a governmental body as defined under Sec.

551.001(3).

SECTION 2. Section 30.00007, Government Code, is amended by

amending Subsections (b) and (c) and adding Subsection (d) to read

as follows:

(b) The presiding judge shall:

(1) maintain a central docket for cases filed within

the territorial limits of the municipality over which the municipal

courts of record have jurisdiction;

(2) provide for the distribution of cases from the

central docket to the individual municipal judges to equalize the

distribution of business in the courts;

(3) request the jurors needed for cases that are set

for trial by jury;

(4) temporarily assign judges or substitute judges to

exchange benches and to act for each other in a proceeding pending

in a court if necessary for the expeditious disposition of business

in the courts;

(5) supervise and control the operation and clerical

functions of the administrative department of each court, including

the court's personnel, during the proceedings of the court; and

(6) establish a court security committee to adopt

security policies and procedures including a court emergency

management plan for the courts served by the presiding judge that is

composed of:

(A) the presiding judge, or the presiding judge's

designee, who serves as presiding officer of the committee;

(B) a representative of the law enforcement

agency or other entity that provides the primary security for the

court;

(C) a representative of the municipality; and

(D) any other person the committee determines

necessary to assist the committee.

(c) A court security committee shall [ may ] recommend to the

governing body the uses of resources and expenditures of money for

courthouse security, but may not direct the assignment of those

resources or the expenditure of those funds. The municipality

shall give preference to the court security committee's

recommendations regarding the expenditures of funds when

considering use of funds collected under Code of Criminal Procedure

Art. 102.017.

(d) A court security committee established under Sec.

74.092(13) is not a governmental body as defined under Sec.

551.001(3).

SECTION 3. Section 72.015(c), Government Code, is amended

to read as follows:

(c) The judicial security division shall:

(1) serve as a central resource for information on

local and national best practices for court security and the safety

of court personnel;

(2) provide an expert opinion on the technical aspects

of court security; [ and ]

(3) keep abreast of and provide training on recent

court security improvements ; and

(4) develop a model court emergency management plan as

a resource for court security committees .

SECTION 4. Section 74.092, Government Code, is amended to

read as follows:

Sec. 74.092. DUTIES OF LOCAL ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE. (a) A

local administrative judge, for the courts for which the judge

serves as local administrative judge, shall:

(1) implement and execute the local rules of

administration, including the assignment, docketing, transfer, and

hearing of cases;

(2) appoint any special or standing committees

necessary or desirable for court management and administration;

(3) promulgate local rules of administration if the

other judges do not act by a majority vote;

(4) recommend to the regional presiding judge any

needs for assignment from outside the county to dispose of court

caseloads;

(5) supervise the expeditious movement of court

caseloads, subject to local, regional, and state rules of

administration;

(6) provide the supreme court and the office of court

administration requested statistical and management information;

(7) set the hours and places for holding court in the

county;

(8) supervise the employment and performance of

nonjudicial personnel;

(9) supervise the budget and fiscal matters of the

local courts, subject to local rules of administration;

(10) coordinate and cooperate with any other local

administrative judge in the district in the assignment of cases in

the courts' concurrent jurisdiction for the efficient operation of

the court system and the effective administration of justice;

(11) if requested by the courts the judge serves,

establish and maintain the lists required by Section 37.003 and

ensure appointments are made from the lists in accordance with

Section 37.004;

(12) perform other duties as may be directed by the

chief justice or a regional presiding judge; and

(13) establish a court security committee to adopt

security policies and procedures including a court emergency

management plan for the state and county trial courts in the county

[ courts served by the local administrative district judge ] that is

composed of:

(A) the local administrative district judge, or

the judge's designee, who serves as presiding officer of the

committee;

(B) a representative of the sheriff's office;

(C) a representative of a constable's office;

(D) a representative of the county commissioners

court;

(E) [ (D) ] one judge of each type of court in the

county other than a municipal court or a municipal court of record;

(F) [ (E) ] a representative of any county

attorney's office, district attorney's office, or criminal district

attorney's office that serves in the applicable courts; and

(G) [ (F) ] any other person the committee

determines necessary to assist the committee.

(b) A court security committee shall [ may ] recommend to the

county commissioners court the uses of resources and expenditures

of money for courthouse security, but may not direct the assignment

of those resources or the expenditure of those funds. The

commissioners court shall give preference to a court security

committee's recommendations regarding the expenditures of funds

when considering use of funds collected under Code of Criminal

Procedure Art. 102.017.

(c) A court security committee established under Sec.

74.092(13) is not a governmental body as defined under Sec.

551.001(3).

SECTION 5. Section 1.07(a), Penal Code, is amended by

adding Subdivision (14-a) to read as follows:

(14-a) "Court personnel" is an employee whose duties

are performed on behalf of the administration of a court, including

but not limited to a court clerk, court coordinator, court

administrator, law clerk, and staff attorney.

SECTION 6. Section 42.07, Penal Code, is amended by adding

Subsection (c-1) to read as follows:

(c-1) Notwithstanding Subsection (c), an offense under this

section is:

(1) a Class A misdemeanor if the offense was committed

against court personnel;

(2) a state jail felony if the offense was committed:

(A) against court personnel and the actor has

been previously convicted under this section; or

(B) against a judge; or

(3) a third-degree felony if the offense was committed

against a judge and the actor has been previously convicted under

this section.

SECTION 7. The changes in law made by this Act to Sections

1.07(a) and 42.07, Penal Code, apply only to an offense committed on

or after the effective date of this Act. An offense committed

before the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in

effect on the date the offense was committed, and the former law is

continued in effect for that purpose. For purposes of this section,

an offense was committed before the effective date of this Act if

any element of the offense occurred before that date.

SECTION 8. As soon as practicable after the effective date

of this Act, a court security committee shall develop an

all-hazards court security plan as required by Section 29.014,

30.00007, or 74.092, Government Code, as amended by this Act.

SECTION 9. To the extent of any conflict, this Act prevails

over another Act of the 89th Legislature, Regular Session, 2025,

relating to nonsubstantive additions to and corrections in enacted

codes.

SECTION 10. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.