Monitoring the Session

HB 4876

Lambert Escrow Bill Lets Condo Developers Spend Buyers’ Deposits

Did not pass

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Stan LambertRHouse 71

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the withdrawal of certain deposits placed in escrow in connection with the purchase or reservation of a condominium unit.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

After construction starts, with a bond or insurance. The escrow holder owes buyers no duty to watch.

The bill lets a condo developer pull a buyer's deposit out of escrow once construction starts and spend it on actual building and site costs. It applies only when the purchase contract says so in bold or underlined type and the developer buys a bond or insurance covering the withdrawn amount for the buyer. Buyers' money can now fund construction instead of sitting untouched, and the escrow holder who releases the funds owes buyers no duty to watch how the money is spent.

Labels

Labels: STALLED AFTER COMMITTEE. Voted out of the House Trade, Workforce & Economic Development committee 10-0 on May 2, 2025. Placed on the General State Calendar on May 13, 2025. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB4876 · 2025-03-13

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the withdrawal of certain deposits placed in escrow in connection with the purchase or reservation of a condominium unit.

WHAT IT DOES

After construction starts, with a bond or insurance. The escrow holder owes buyers no duty to watch.

The bill lets a condo developer pull a buyer's deposit out of escrow once construction starts and spend it on actual building and site costs. It applies only when the purchase contract says so in bold or underlined type and the developer buys a bond or insurance covering the withdrawn amount for the buyer. Buyers' money can now fund construction instead of sitting untouched, and the escrow holder who releases the funds owes buyers no duty to watch how the money is spent.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 6, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Trade, Workforce & Economic Development
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Withdrawn from schedule
  6. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  7. Considered in public hearing
  8. Committee substitute considered in committee
  9. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  10. Left pending in committee
  11. Considered in formal meeting
  12. Committee substitute considered in committee
  13. Reported favorably as substituted
  14. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  15. Committee report distributed
  16. Committee report sent to Calendars
  17. Considered in Calendars
  18. Placed on General State Calendar
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“declarant and is not liable to any purchaser for the release of”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill shields the escrow holder from buyer lawsuits over releasing deposits to the developer and says it has no duty to monitor how the money is spent.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Douglas Robison$5,000Kurt Arnold$5,000Jason Itkin$5,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Nov 7, 2024 to Jun 23, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Douglas Robison$5,000.00
Kurt Arnold$5,000.00
Jason Itkin$5,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Witnesses14
For
12
Against
0
On
2
Names

For

  • Condos for Texas2 registrations
  • Howard Hughes Holdings, Inc. - Vice President1 registration
  • Hunt Realty Investments1 registration
  • Intercorp Texas1 registration
  • Self5 registrations
  • Self; Marsh McLennan Agency1 registration
  • Texas Association of Builders1 registration

On

  • Self1 registration
  • Texas Mortgage Bankers Association1 registration
Sources

14 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 6, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 13, 2025

05/13/2025 H Placed on General State Calendar

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Trade, Workforce & Economic Development · Committee vote 10 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Companion

SB 1407 by Parker (identical)

Subjects

Housing--General

Insurance--Property & Casualty

Property Interests--Real Property

ESCROW

Text

The text as introduced · 469 words

89R8904 JBD-D

By: Lambert
H.B. No. 4876

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the withdrawal of certain deposits placed in escrow in

connection with the purchase or reservation of a condominium unit.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 82.158, Property Code, is amended to

read as follows:

Sec. 82.158. ESCROW OF DEPOSITS. (a) Except as provided by

Subsection (b), a [ A ] deposit made in connection with the purchase

or reservation of a unit from a declarant shall be placed in escrow

and held in this state in an account designated for that purpose by

a real estate broker, an attorney, a title insurance company

licensed in this state, an independent bonded escrow company, or an

institution whose accounts are insured by a governmental agency or

instrumentality until delivered to the declarant at closing,

delivered to the declarant because of the purchaser's default under

a contract to purchase the unit, or refunded to the purchaser.

Escrow deposits may be placed in interest-bearing accounts, and the

interest is payable as may be agreed in writing between the

declarant and the purchaser.

(b) If a contract to purchase a unit provides that the

deposit made in connection with the purchase or reservation of the

unit may be used for construction costs and the declarant obtains

and maintains a surety bond or insurance as described by Subsection

(c), the declarant may withdraw escrow funds when construction of

improvements begins. The funds may be used only for actual building

and construction costs of the project in which the unit is located.

(c) The bond or insurance required under Subsection (b) must

be issued by an insurer licensed in this state in favor of the

purchaser in an amount adequate to cover the amount of the deposit

to be withdrawn from escrow funds under Subsection (b). The

declarant may not withdraw an amount from the escrow funds greater

than the face amount of the bond or the insurance coverage amount.

The bond or insurance must be payable to the purchaser if the

purchaser obtains a final judgment against the declarant requiring

the declarant to return the deposit under the purchase agreement.

The bond or insurance may be either in the form of an individual

bond or policy for each deposit accepted by the declarant or in the

form of a blanket bond or policy assuring the return of all deposits

received by the declarant.

(d) The party holding escrow funds who releases any portion

of the funds to the declarant has no obligation to monitor the

progress of construction or the expenditure of the funds by the

declarant and is not liable to any purchaser for the release of

funds under this section.

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.