HB 4978
bill ending shortcuts to MUDs without city consent
Died in committee
Verdict: No flags
Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade
Caption
relating to the creation of municipal utility districts in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of a municipality.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Summary
No automatic consent when a city fails to act. No appeals around a refusal.
The bill ends the shortcuts that let developers create a municipal utility district near a city without the city's real consent: no more automatic consent when a city fails to act, and no more appeal to the state environmental agency or court to override a city's refusal. It touches landowners and developers who want to form these districts in a city's extraterritorial jurisdiction, the cities that must approve them, and the counties where they sit. On the ground, a city's written consent becomes the gate, the old protections against city-imposed conditions on districts not served by the city are deleted, and any approved district must sign an agreement with the city and county on how water and road services will be provided.
Labels
Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Mar 13, 2025 and referred to the House Land & Resource Management committee. No public hearing. The bill died.
Receipt
The receipt
89R-HB4978 · 2025-03-13
SOLD BY
ITEM
relating to the creation of municipal utility districts in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of a municipality.
WHAT IT DOES
No automatic consent when a city fails to act. No appeals around a refusal.
The bill ends the shortcuts that let developers create a municipal utility district near a city without the city's real consent: no more automatic consent when a city fails to act, and no more appeal to the state environmental agency or court to override a city's refusal. It touches landowners and developers who want to form these districts in a city's extraterritorial jurisdiction, the cities that must approve them, and the counties where they sit. On the ground, a city's written consent becomes the gate, the old protections against city-imposed conditions on districts not served by the city are deleted, and any approved district must sign an agreement with the city and county on how water and road services will be provided.
CHARGES
[ ] NONE FOUND
TOTAL
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source
Sources
Fiscal note · version I · April 29, 2025
No first-year general revenue figure available here.
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
HISTORY
- Filed
- Read first time
- Referred to Land & Resource Management
- Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
- Withdrawn from schedule
FILED UNDER
THE TEXT
“This subsection does not apply to the creation of a municipal utility district.”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill takes away the automatic-consent and state-appeal routes for creating municipal utility districts near cities, so fewer of these districts can form without the city's approval.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Oct 31, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$310,226.49
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$310,226.49
- Cash
- $50,000.00
- Paid by others
- $260,226.49
- Total
- $310,226.49
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Jun 30, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101005755, 101019808, 101048921, 101069141, 101072319.
Texas Conservative Majority PAC$135,152.00
Texas Conservative Majority PAC
$135,152.00
- Cash
- $10,000.00
- Paid by others
- $125,152.00
- Total
- $135,152.00
Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Sep 8, 2026 to Sep 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101069141.
Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC$25,000.00
Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC
$25,000.00
- Cash
- $25,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $25,000.00
Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · on Sep 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101069141.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$310,226.49
- Cash
- $50,000.00
- Paid by others
- $260,226.49
- Total
- $310,226.49
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Jun 30, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101005755, 101019808, 101048921, 101069141, 101072319.
Texas Conservative Majority PAC
$135,152.00
- Cash
- $10,000.00
- Paid by others
- $125,152.00
- Total
- $135,152.00
Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Sep 8, 2026 to Sep 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101069141.
Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC
$25,000.00
- Cash
- $25,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $25,000.00
Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · on Sep 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101069141.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Fiscal
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source
Sources
Fiscal note · version I · April 29, 2025
No first-year general revenue figure available here.
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
How this was graded
Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas House · Filed Mar 13, 2025
05/01/2025 H Withdrawn from schedule
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
House committee · Land & Resource Management · Final status: Died in committee
Subjects
City Government--Roads
City Government--Utilities
County Government--General
County Government--Roads
Special Districts & Authorities--Municipal Utility Districts
Special Districts & Authorities--Water & Utility
Text
The text as introduced · 1,375 words
89R10466 MP-D By: Hickland H.B. No. 4978 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to the creation of municipal utility districts in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of a municipality. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Sections 42.042(c), (f), and (g), Local Government Code, are amended to read as follows: (c) If, within 120 days after the date the governing body receives the petition, the governing body fails to make a contract with a majority of the qualified voters of the area of the proposed political subdivision and the owners of at least 50 percent of the land in the proposed political subdivision to provide the services, that failure constitutes the governing body's consent to the creation of the proposed political subdivision. This subsection does not apply to the creation of a municipal utility district. (f) If the municipality fails or refuses to give its consent to the creation of the political subdivision, including a water district previously created by an act of the legislature, or fails or refuses to execute a contract providing for the water or sanitary sewer services requested within the time limits prescribed by this section, the applicant may petition the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality for the creation of the political subdivision or the inclusion of the land in a political subdivision. The commission shall allow creation or confirmation of the creation of the political subdivision or inclusion of the land in a proposed political subdivision on finding that the municipality either does not have the reasonable ability to serve or has failed to make a legally binding commitment with sufficient funds available to provide water and wastewater service adequate to serve the proposed development at a reasonable cost to the landowner. The commitment must provide that construction of the facilities necessary to serve the land will begin within two years and will be substantially completed within 4-1/2 years after the date the petition was filed with the municipality. This subsection does not apply to the creation of a municipal utility district. (g) On an appeal taken to the district court from the ruling of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, all parties to the commission hearing must be made parties to the appeal. The court shall hear the appeal within 120 days after the date the appeal is filed. If the case is continued or appealed to a higher court beyond the 120-day period, the court shall require the appealing party or party requesting the continuance to post a bond or other adequate security in the amount of damages that may be incurred by any party as a result of the appeal or delay from the commission action. The amount of the bond or other security shall be determined by the court after notice and hearing. On final disposition, a court may award damages, including any damages for delays, attorney's fees, and costs of court to the prevailing party. This subsection does not apply to the creation of a municipal utility district. SECTION 2. Section 54.016(a), Water Code, is amended to read as follows: (a) No land within the corporate limits of a city or within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of a city, shall be included in a district created under this chapter or by local law unless the city grants its written consent, by resolution or ordinance, to the inclusion of the land within the district in accordance with Section 42.042, Local Government Code, and this section. The request to a city for its written consent to the creation of a district, shall be signed by a majority in value of the holders of title of the land within the proposed district as indicated by the county tax rolls. A petition for the written consent of a city to the inclusion of land within a district shall describe the boundaries of the land to be included in the district by metes and bounds or by lot and block number, if there is a recorded map or plat and survey of the area, and state the general nature of the work proposed to be done, the necessity for the work, and the cost of the project as then estimated by those filing the petition. [ If, at the time a petition is filed with a city for creation of a district, the district proposes to connect to a city's water or sewer system or proposes to contract with a regional water and wastewater provider which has been designated as such by the commission as of the date such petition is filed, to which the city has made a capital contribution for the water and wastewater facilities serving the area, the proposed district shall be designated as a "city service district." If such proposed district does not meet the criteria for a city service district at the time the petition seeking creation is filed, such district shall be designated as a "noncity service district." The city's consent shall not place any restrictions or conditions on the creation of a noncity service district as defined by this chapter other than those expressly provided in Subsection (e) of this section and shall specifically not limit the amounts of the district's bonds. ] A city may not require annexation as a consent to creation of any district. A city shall not refuse to approve a district bond issue for any reason except that the district is not in compliance with valid consent requirements applicable to the district. [ If a city grants its written consent without the concurrence of the applicant to the creation of a noncity service district containing conditions or restrictions that the petitioning land owner or owners reasonably believe exceed the city's powers, such land owner or owners may petition the commission to create the district and to modify the conditions and restrictions of the city's consent. The commission may declare any provision of the consent to be null and void. The commission may approve the creation of a district that includes any portion of the land covered by the city's consent to creation of the district. The legislature may create and may validate the creation of a district that includes any portion of the land covered by the city's consent to the creation of the district. ] SECTION 3. Section 8324.107, Special District Local Laws Code, is amended to read as follows: Sec. 8324.107. LIMITATION ON ANNEXATION OF LAND BY DISTRICT. The [ Notwithstanding Section 54.016(d), Water Code, the ] district may not annex land that is located in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of a municipality unless the City of Weatherford provides written consent to that annexation. SECTION 4. Section 8325.107, Special District Local Laws Code, is amended to read as follows: Sec. 8325.107. LIMITATION ON ANNEXATION OF LAND BY DISTRICT. The [ Notwithstanding Section 54.016(d), Water Code, the ] district may not annex land that is located in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of a municipality unless the City of Weatherford provides written consent to that annexation. SECTION 5. Subchapter B, Chapter 54, Water Code, is amended by adding Section 54.017 to read as follows: Sec. 54.017. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN DISTRICT, MUNICIPALITY, AND COUNTY. (a) If a municipality approves the creation of a district within the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the municipality under Section 54.016, the district, municipality, and county in which the district will be located shall enter into a memorandum of understanding as to how services will be provided to the district. (b) The memorandum of understanding entered into under this section must detail the provision of: (1) water services; and (2) road services. SECTION 6. The following provisions of the Water Code are repealed: (1) Sections 54.016(c) and (d); and (2) Sections 54.0165(b) and (c). SECTION 7. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to the creation of a municipal utility district on or after the effective date of this Act. A petition for the creation of a municipal utility district pending before the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality on the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the petition was filed, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. SECTION 8. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.