Monitoring the Session

HB 5050

agencies pay fees when private parties win contested cases

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Brian HarrisonRHouse 10

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs in connection with certain contested cases.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Up to $1M when the agency acted in bad faith.

The bill requires a court reviewing a state agency contested case to award attorney's fees and costs to a private party who wins on judicial review, and it requires an administrative law judge to award up to $1 million in fees when a person wins and the agency's action was frivolous, in bad faith, or outside its legal authority. It touches state agencies that bring regulatory actions and the people and businesses who defend against them. On the ground, winning against an agency now carries a mandatory fee award instead of an optional one, except when the agency only acted as a neutral referee between other parties or when a law change removed its standing in the case.

Labels

Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Mar 13, 2025 and referred to the House Delivery of Government Efficiency committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB5050 · 2025-03-13

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs in connection with certain contested cases.

WHAT IT DOES

Up to $1M when the agency acted in bad faith.

The bill requires a court reviewing a state agency contested case to award attorney's fees and costs to a private party who wins on judicial review, and it requires an administrative law judge to award up to $1 million in fees when a person wins and the agency's action was frivolous, in bad faith, or outside its legal authority. It touches state agencies that bring regulatory actions and the people and businesses who defend against them. On the ground, winning against an agency now carries a mandatory fee award instead of an optional one, except when the agency only acted as a neutral referee between other parties or when a law change removed its standing in the case.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Delivery of Government Efficiency
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$38KMichael Rydin$25,000Ed Harrison$16,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Nov 1, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$37,500.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$37,500.00

Cash
$37,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$37,500.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 22, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101013450, 101032507, 101072627.

Michael Rydin$25,000.00
Ed Harrison$16,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$37,500.00

Cash
$37,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$37,500.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 22, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101013450, 101032507, 101072627.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 13, 2025

04/03/2025 H Referred to Delivery of Government Efficiency: Apr 3 2025 12:38PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Delivery of Government Efficiency · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Courts--General

State Agencies, Boards & Commissions--Admin. Procedure

ATTORNEY'S FEES

Text

The text as introduced · 443 words

By: Harrison
H.B. No. 5050

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs in

connection with certain contested cases.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subchapter G, Chapter 2001, Government Code, is

amended by adding Section 2001.1765 to read as follows:

Sec. 2001.1765. STATE AGENCY PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND

COSTS IN CONTESTED CASES UNDER JUDICIAL REVIEW. (a) Except as

provided by Subsection (b), a court reviewing a decision in a

contested case shall award a nongovernmental party to the case

under review, in addition to all other costs allowed by law or

rule, reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in defending

the case if the nongovernmental party prevails under judicial

review.

(b) A reviewing court may not order a state agency to pay the

reasonable attorney's fees and costs of a prevailing

nongovernmental party in a contested case if:

(1) the agency's only involvement in the case is to

serve as an arbiter of the legal rights, duties, or privileges of

two or more parties; or

(2) the agency's position as a party to the case is no

longer authorized as a result of an intervening amendment to

applicable law.

SECTION 2. Section 2001.903, Government Code, is amended to

read as follows:

Sec. 2001.903. RECOVERY OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS IN

CONTESTED CASES INVOLVING [ FRIVOLOUS ] REGULATORY ACTION. The

administrative law judge in a contested case shall [ may ] award a

person, in addition to all other costs allowed by law or rule, an

amount not to exceed $1 million for reasonable attorney's fees and

costs incurred in defending against a [ frivolous ] regulatory action

during the case if there is no judicial review of the decision in

the case and:

(1) the person prevails in the case; and

(2) there is a final determination that :

(A) the regulatory action is frivolous or

groundless;

(B) the state agency pursued the regulatory

action in bad faith;

(C) the regulatory action is not authorized by a

state or federal statute or rule; or

(D) the agency failed to demonstrate the action

is within the authority granted to the agency under state or

federal law .

SECTION 3. The change in law made by this Act applies only

to an action commenced on or after the effective date of this Act.

An action commenced before the effective date of this Act is

governed by the law in effect on the date the action was commenced,

and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.

SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.