Monitoring the Session

HB 5128

Leach Bill Swaps Administrative Judges’ $5K For Percentage Bonuses

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Jeff LeachRHouse 67

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to court administration, including the term of a local administrative judge, court administration training, and the compensation of certain administrative judges.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

3, 5 or 7 percent, by number of district courts. Fixed two-year terms, no seniority picks.

The bill sets a fixed two-year term for the judge each multi-court county picks to run its district courts, bars picking that judge by rotation or seniority, and lets the regional presiding judge break a tie. It requires the state court administration office to hold a yearly training meeting for regional and local administrative judges and court administrators, with travel paid back only if money is set aside for it. It replaces the flat $5,000 extra pay for local administrative judges in counties with more than five district courts with a 3, 5 or 7 percent bonus based on how many district courts the county has, and gives the business court's administrative presiding judge the top 7 percent bonus.

Labels

Labels: PENDING FOREVER. Heard by the House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence committee on Apr 24, 2025 and left pending. Never voted out. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB5128 · 2025-03-13

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to court administration, including the term of a local administrative judge, court administration training, and the compensation of certain administrative judges.

WHAT IT DOES

3, 5 or 7 percent, by number of district courts. Fixed two-year terms, no seniority picks.

The bill sets a fixed two-year term for the judge each multi-court county picks to run its district courts, bars picking that judge by rotation or seniority, and lets the regional presiding judge break a tie. It requires the state court administration office to hold a yearly training meeting for regional and local administrative judges and court administrators, with travel paid back only if money is set aside for it. It replaces the flat $5,000 extra pay for local administrative judges in counties with more than five district courts with a 3, 5 or 7 percent bonus based on how many district courts the county has, and gives the business court's administrative presiding judge the top 7 percent bonus.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($425,789)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version I · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 22, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB5128, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($851,578) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($425,789)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. Considered in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  7. Left pending in committee
FILED UNDER

GOVERNMENT GROWTH UNDER A CONSERVATIVE BANNER

THE TEXT

“in a county with 10 or more district courts, seven percent of the annual base salary for a judge of a district court”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill raises and widens state-paid extra salary for local administrative judges and the business court's administrative presiding judge.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$1,141,482.69

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$1,141,482.69

Cash
$555,000.00
Paid by others
$586,482.69
Total
$1,141,482.69
digital $316,766.74mail $154,662.95advertising $89,953.00polling $25,100.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 25, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101004498, 101024562, 101039760, 101044787, 101067510, 101072948.

Texas Conservative Majority PAC$273,017.05

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$273,017.05

Cash
$35,000.00
Paid by others
$238,017.05
Total
$273,017.05
canvassing $150,000.00digital $70,627.07Other filed descriptions $16,666.67texting $723.31

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Feb 9, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101039760, 101044787, 101067510, 101072948.

Republican Party of Texas$182,117.94

Republican Party of Texas

$182,117.94

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$182,117.94
Total
$182,117.94
mail $182,117.94

Also funds 12 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Oct 31, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101072948.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$1,141,482.69

Cash
$555,000.00
Paid by others
$586,482.69
Total
$1,141,482.69
digital $316,766.74mail $154,662.95advertising $89,953.00polling $25,100.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 25, 2025 to Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101004498, 101024562, 101039760, 101044787, 101067510, 101072948.

×

Texas Conservative Majority PAC

$273,017.05

Cash
$35,000.00
Paid by others
$238,017.05
Total
$273,017.05
canvassing $150,000.00digital $70,627.07Other filed descriptions $16,666.67texting $723.31

Also funds 42 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jan 23, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Feb 9, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101039760, 101044787, 101067510, 101072948.

×

Republican Party of Texas

$182,117.94

Cash
$0.00
Paid by others
$182,117.94
Total
$182,117.94
mail $182,117.94

Also funds 12 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Oct 31, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101072948.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal
Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($425,789)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version I · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 22, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB5128, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($851,578) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($425,789)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 13, 2025

04/24/2025 H Left pending in committee

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee

Companion

SB 2070 by Zaffirini (identical)

Subjects

Courts--Administration

Courts--District

Courts--Judges

Salaries & Expenses

COURT ADMINISTRATION, OFFICE OF

Text

The text as introduced · 670 words

By: Leach
H.B. No. 5128

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to court administration, including the term of a local

administrative judge, court administration training, and the

compensation of certain administrative judges.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 74.091, Government Code, is amended by

amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsection (b-1) to read as

follows:

(b) In a county with two or more district courts the judges

of those courts shall elect a district judge as local

administrative district judge :

(1) for a term of [ not more than ] two years ; or

(2) if the district judge's term ends before the second

anniversary of the date the district judge is elected as local

administrative judge, for the remainder of the district judge's

term .

(b-1) The local administrative district judge may not be

elected on the basis of rotation or seniority.

(b-2) If a majority of the judges cannot agree on the

selection of a judge to serve as local administrative district

judge, one of the judges shall notify the regional presiding judge

who shall cast the deciding vote. A local administrative judge

elected pursuant to this subsection shall serve for a term, set by

the regional presiding judge, of no more than two years.

SECTION 2. Chapter 74, Government Code, is amended by

adding Subchapter D-1 to read as follows:

SUBCHAPTER D-1. COURT LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE

Sec. 74.0981. COURT LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE. The Office of

Court Administration of the Texas Judicial System shall hold an

annual meeting to provide information to presiding judges of

administrative regions, local administrative judges, and court

administrators related to:

(1) court budgets and operational funding;

(2) court activity statistics and case-level

information on the amount and character of the business transacted

by the state trial courts;

(3) the duties of a local administrative judge; and

(4) other matters related to court administration.

Sec. 74.0982. REIMBURSEMENT. The Office of Court

Administration of the Texas Judicial System may reimburse a

presiding judge of an administrative region, a local administrative

judge, or a court administrator, for the expense of attending the

meeting described by Section 74.0981 to the extent money is

appropriated to the office for that purpose.

SECTION 3. Section 659.012, Government Code, is amended by

amending Subsection (d) and adding Subsection (d-1) to read as

follows:

(d) Notwithstanding any other provision in this section or

other law, [ in a county with more than five district courts, ] a

district judge who serves as a local administrative district judge

under Section 74.091 is entitled to an annual base salary from the

state in the amount provided under Subsection (a) or (b) and an

additional annual [ in the ] amount from the state equal to :

(1) in a county with three or four district courts,

three percent of the annual base [ $5,000 more than the maximum ]

salary for a judge of a district court [ from the state to which the

judge is otherwise entitled ] under Subsection (a) ;

(2) in a county with more than four but fewer than 10

district courts, five percent of the annual base salary for a judge

of a district court under Subsection (a); or

(3) in a county with 10 or more district courts, seven

percent of the annual base salary for a judge of a district court

under Subsection (a) [ or (b) ].

(d-1) Notwithstanding any other provision in this section

or other law, a judge of a division of the business court who serves

as administrative presiding judge under Section 25A.009 is entitled

to an annual base salary from the state in the amount provided under

Subsection (a) or (b) and an additional annual amount equal to the

amount provided under Subsection (d)(3).

SECTION 4. Section 74.091, Government Code, as amended by

this Act, applies only to a local administrative judge elected on or

after the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.