Monitoring the Session

HB 5595

bill presuming parents win custody fights with nonparents

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. David CookRHouse 96

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the determination of the best interest of the child and possession of or access to a child by a nonparent in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Courts must presume the parent acts in the child’s best interest.

The bill writes into Texas family law a rule that, in custody and visitation fights between a parent and a nonparent, courts must presume the parent acts in the child's best interest and that the child belongs with the parent. A nonparent can beat that presumption only with clear and convincing proof that denying their request would significantly impair the child's physical health or emotional development, and the bill sets out when an earlier court order counts as already having beaten it in a later modification case. It also repeals several existing Family Code sections, and it applies only to cases filed on or after September 1, 2025, without reopening existing orders.

Labels

Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Mar 14, 2025 and referred to the House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence subcommittee on Family & Fiduciary Relationships. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB5595 · 2025-03-14

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the determination of the best interest of the child and possession of or access to a child by a nonparent in certain suits affecting the parent-child relationship.

WHAT IT DOES

Courts must presume the parent acts in the child’s best interest.

The bill writes into Texas family law a rule that, in custody and visitation fights between a parent and a nonparent, courts must presume the parent acts in the child's best interest and that the child belongs with the parent. A nonparent can beat that presumption only with clear and convincing proof that denying their request would significantly impair the child's physical health or emotional development, and the bill sets out when an earlier court order counts as already having beaten it in a later modification case. It also repeals several existing Family Code sections, and it applies only to cases filed on or after September 1, 2025, without reopening existing orders.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to s/c on Family & Fiduciary Relationships by Speaker
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$350,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$350,000.00

Cash
$350,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$350,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 24, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012315, 101037124, 101037559, 101066332, 101070691.

GOPAC Election Fund$115,000.00

GOPAC Election Fund

$115,000.00

Cash
$115,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$115,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101066332.

Texas REALTORS Political Action Committee$60,000.00

Texas REALTORS Political Action Committee

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 140 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 2, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 12, 2025 to Jul 16, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101037124, 101037559, 101066332.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$350,000.00

Cash
$350,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$350,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 24, 2025 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012315, 101037124, 101037559, 101066332, 101070691.

×

GOPAC Election Fund

$115,000.00

Cash
$115,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$115,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101066332.

×

Texas REALTORS Political Action Committee

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 140 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 2, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 12, 2025 to Jul 16, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101037124, 101037559, 101066332.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas House · Filed Mar 14, 2025

04/07/2025 H Referred to s/c on Family & Fiduciary Relationships by Speaker: Apr 7 2025 5:28PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Family--Parent & Child

Text

The text as introduced · 619 words

89R3679 AMF-F

By: Cook
H.B. No. 5595

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the determination of the best interest of the child and

possession of or access to a child by a nonparent in certain suits

affecting the parent-child relationship.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 153.002, Family Code, is amended to read

as follows:

Sec. 153.002. BEST INTEREST OF CHILD. (a) The best

interest of the child shall always be the primary consideration of

the court in determining the issues of conservatorship and

possession of and access to the child.

(b) In a suit between a parent and a nonparent, it is a

rebuttable presumption that:

(1) a parent acts in the best interest of the parent's

child; and

(2) it is in the best interest of a child to be in the

care, custody, and control of a parent.

(c) In a suit between a parent and a nonparent, the

nonparent may overcome the presumption under Subsection (b) by

proving by clear and convincing evidence that denial of the relief

requested by the nonparent would significantly impair the child's

physical health or emotional development.

SECTION 2. Section 156.101, Family Code, is amended by

adding Subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f) to read as follows:

(c) Subject to Subsections (d) and (e), in determining the

best interest of a child under this section with respect to a

request to modify an order to grant possession of or access to the

child to a nonparent, the presumption under Section 153.002(b)

applies.

(d) Except as provided by Subsection (f), in a suit for

modification between a parent and a nonparent, the presumption

under Section 153.002(b) is rebutted with respect to the parent who

is a party to the suit if the order subject to modification:

(1) expressly states that the presumption was rebutted

with respect to the parent;

(2) appoints a nonparent as conservator of the child;

(3) subject to Subsection (e), grants a nonparent

possession of or access to the child; or

(4) is the result of the parent's voluntary

relinquishment of the actual care, control, or possession of the

child to a nonparent as described by Section 153.373.

(e) The presumption under Section 153.002(b) may be

rebutted as provided by Subsection (d)(3) only in a suit for

modification in which a nonparent seeks possession of or access to

the child. The presumption may not be rebutted as provided by that

subdivision in a suit for modification in which a nonparent seeks

conservatorship of the child.

(f) Subsection (d) does not apply:

(1) to a temporary order rendered under Section

156.006; or

(2) if the order subject to modification expressly

states that the parties agree the presumption under Section

153.002(b) is not rebutted.

SECTION 3. The following provisions of the Family Code are

repealed:

(1) Section 102.004(c);

(2) Sections 153.432, 153.433, and 153.434;

(3) Section 161.206(c); and

(4) Section 162.017(d).

SECTION 4. (a) The changes in law made by this Act apply

only to a suit affecting the parent-child relationship that is

filed on or after the effective date of this Act. A suit affecting

the parent-child relationship filed before the effective date of

this Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the suit was

filed, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.

(b) The enactment of this Act does not constitute a material

and substantial change of circumstances sufficient to warrant

modification of a court order or portion of a decree that provides

for the possession of or access to a child rendered before the

effective date of this Act.

SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.