Monitoring the Session

HB 580

bill barring discriminatory peremptory strikes of jurors

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Lulu FloresDHouse 51

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to prohibited disqualification of and peremptory challenges to certain prospective jurors.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

No strikes over race, sex, disability or economic status, civil or otherwise.

The bill bars lawyers in both civil and criminal trials from using peremptory strikes to remove potential jurors because of race, ethnicity, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability status, national origin, or economic status. It lets either side, not just a criminal defendant, ask the judge to throw out the jury pool and call a new one if the other side's lawyer struck jurors for one of those reasons, and it removes the old rule that kept the burden of persuasion on the defendant. It also says no person may be disqualified from jury service on those grounds, subject to existing disability-related juror rules, starting September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 4946 (Did not pass) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 4946 (Did not pass). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Nov 12, 2024 and referred to the House Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB580 · 2024-11-12

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to prohibited disqualification of and peremptory challenges to certain prospective jurors.

WHAT IT DOES

No strikes over race, sex, disability or economic status, civil or otherwise.

The bill bars lawyers in both civil and criminal trials from using peremptory strikes to remove potential jurors because of race, ethnicity, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability status, national origin, or economic status. It lets either side, not just a criminal defendant, ask the judge to throw out the jury pool and call a new one if the other side's lawyer struck jurors for one of those reasons, and it removes the old rule that kept the burden of persuasion on the defendant. It also says no person may be disqualified from jury service on those grounds, subject to existing disability-related juror rules, starting September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texas Trial Lawyers Assocation PAC$23KMichael Brickman$15,000Johann Moonesinghe$10,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Aug 5, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texas Trial Lawyers Assocation PAC$22,500.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Assocation PAC

$22,500.00

Cash
$22,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$22,500.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 20, 2024 to Jun 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 20, 2024 to Jun 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100985004, 101007867, 101059825.

Michael Brickman$15,000.00
Johann Moonesinghe$10,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Assocation PAC

$22,500.00

Cash
$22,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$22,500.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 20, 2024 to Jun 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Sep 20, 2024 to Jun 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100985004, 101007867, 101059825.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 4946

by Rep. Flores, same lead author · Did not pass · same text

Introduced text

Last action, May 11, 2023: Placed on General State Calendar

Relating to prohibited disqualification of and peremptory challenges to certain prospective jurors.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Nov 12, 2024

03/03/2025 H Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence: Mar 3 2025 2:24PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Courts--Juries

DISCRIMINATION

Text

The text as introduced · 668 words

89R4277 BCH-D

By: Flores
H.B. No. 580

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to prohibited disqualification of and peremptory

challenges to certain prospective jurors.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 30, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, is

amended by adding Section 30.023 to read as follows:

Sec. 30.023. PROHIBITED PEREMPTORY JURY CHALLENGES. (a)

After the parties to a case deliver jury lists to the court clerk

and before the court impanels the jury, either party may request the

court to dismiss the array of jurors and call a new array in the

case.

(b) The court shall grant the motion of a complaining party

for dismissal of the array of jurors if the court finds:

(1) the attorney representing the opposing party

exercised peremptory challenges for the purpose of excluding

prospective jurors from the jury based on their actual or perceived

race, ethnicity, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation,

disability status, national origin, or economic status; and

(2) the complaining party has offered evidence of

relevant facts that tend to show the attorney representing the

opposing party made peremptory challenges for a reason described by

Subdivision (1).

(c) If the complaining party establishes a prima facie case

under Subsection (b), the burden shifts to the attorney

representing the opposing party to provide an explanation for the

peremptory challenges that is neutral to the classes described by

Subsection (b)(1).

(d) If the court finds that either attorney challenged

prospective jurors for a reason described by Subsection (b)(1), the

court shall call a new array in the case.

SECTION 2. Article 35.261, Code of Criminal Procedure, is

amended to read as follows:

Art. 35.261. PROHIBITED PEREMPTORY CHALLENGES BASED ON

CERTAIN CLASSES [ RACE PROHIBITED ]. (a) After the parties to a case

deliver [ have delivered ] their lists to the clerk under Article

35.26 of this code and before the court impanels [ has impanelled ]

the jury, either party [ the defendant ] may request the court to

dismiss the array and call a new array in the case.

(b) The court shall grant the motion of a party [ defendant ]

for dismissal of the array if the court finds:

(1) [ determines that the defendant is a member of an

identifiable racial group, that ] the attorney representing the

opposing party [ state ] exercised peremptory challenges for the

purpose of excluding persons from the jury based on [ the basis of ]

their actual or perceived race, ethnicity, sex, gender identity,

sexual orientation, disability status, national origin, or

economic status; and

(2) [ that ] the complaining party [ defendant ] has

offered evidence of relevant facts that tend to show that

challenges made by the attorney representing the opposing party

[ state ] were made for a reason described by Subdivision (1)

[ reasons based on race ].

(c) If the complaining party [ defendant ] establishes a

prima facie case under Subsection (b) , the burden [ then ] shifts to

the attorney representing the opposing party [ state ] to give an [ a

racially neutral ] explanation for the challenges that is neutral to

the classes described by Subsection (b)(1) . [ The burden of

persuasion remains with the defendant to establish purposeful

discrimination. ]

(d) [ (b) ] If the court finds [ determines ] that either [ the ]

attorney [ representing the state ] challenged prospective jurors

for a reason described by Subsection (b)(1) [ on the basis of race ],

the court shall call a new array in the case.

SECTION 3. Chapter 61, Government Code, is amended by

adding Section 61.004 to read as follows:

Sec. 61.004. PROHIBITED JUROR DISQUALIFICATIONS. Subject

to Sections 62.104 and 62.1041, a person may not be disqualified to

serve as a juror based on the person's actual or perceived race,

ethnicity, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability

status, national origin, or economic status.

SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.