Monitoring the Session

HB 872

bill flipping the burden of proof in ESG shareholder suits

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Brian HarrisonRHouse 10

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the burden of proof in certain derivative proceedings.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

The corporation has to prove it acted in its own best interest.

This bill changes who has to prove what in a shareholder lawsuit brought on behalf of a corporation that claims the company improperly weighed environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria. It touches Texas corporations, their directors and officers, and shareholders who bring these derivative suits. In those cases, the corporation must prove its act or omission was in its own best interest, instead of the shareholder having to prove it was not, for suits filed on or after September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 4794 (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 4794 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB872 · 2024-11-12

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the burden of proof in certain derivative proceedings.

WHAT IT DOES

The corporation has to prove it acted in its own best interest.

This bill changes who has to prove what in a shareholder lawsuit brought on behalf of a corporation that claims the company improperly weighed environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria. It touches Texas corporations, their directors and officers, and shareholders who bring these derivative suits. In those cases, the corporation must prove its act or omission was in its own best interest, instead of the shareholder having to prove it was not, for suits filed on or after September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 19, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
  4. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  5. No action taken in committee
  6. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  7. Considered in public hearing
  8. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  9. Left pending in committee
  10. Considered in formal meeting
  11. Failed to receive affirmative vote in comm.
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“the burden of proof is on the corporation to prove the act or omission was in the best interest of the corporation”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill makes shareholder suits over ESG decisions easier to win by putting the burden of proof on the corporation.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$38KMichael Rydin$25,000Ed Harrison$16,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Nov 1, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$37,500.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$37,500.00

Cash
$37,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$37,500.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 22, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101013450, 101032507, 101072627.

Michael Rydin$25,000.00
Ed Harrison$16,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$37,500.00

Cash
$37,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$37,500.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 22, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101013450, 101032507, 101072627.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 19, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 4794

by Rep. Harrison, same lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, Mar 22, 2023: Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Relating to the burden of proof in certain derivative proceedings.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Nov 12, 2024

05/08/2025 H Failed to receive affirmative vote in comm.

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:19 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Business & Commerce--General

Text

The text as introduced · 194 words

89R1267 SRA-D

By: Harrison
H.B. No. 872

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the burden of proof in certain derivative proceedings.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subchapter L, Chapter 21, Business Organizations

Code, is amended by adding Section 21.5525 to read as follows:

Sec. 21.5525. BURDEN OF PROOF IN CERTAIN DERIVATIVE

PROCEEDINGS. Notwithstanding any other law, in a derivative

proceeding by a shareholder that alleges an act or omission related

to the improper consideration of environmental, social, and

governance criteria in the performance of the act or omission, the

burden of proof is on the corporation to prove the act or omission

was in the best interest of the corporation.

SECTION 2. Section 21.5525, Business Organizations Code, as

added by this Act, applies only to an action commenced on or after

the effective date of this Act. An action commenced before the

effective date of this Act is governed by the law as it existed

immediately before the effective date of this Act, and the former

law is continued in effect for that purpose.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.