Monitoring the Session

HB 905

bill banning tolls on Fairmont Parkway in Harris County

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Rep. Briscoe CainRHouse 128

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the imposition of tolls on Fairmont Parkway in Harris County.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Fairmont Parkway East leaves the toll project list too.

The bill removes Fairmont Parkway East from the list of toll projects a county may build under a specific Transportation Code section, and it adds a flat rule that no toll project entity may charge a toll on any part of Fairmont Parkway in Harris County. It touches Harris County, any toll authority that might operate there, and drivers who use Fairmont Parkway. Starting September 1, 2025, Fairmont Parkway cannot be tolled.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 922 (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 922 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.PENDING FOREVER. Heard by the House Transportation subcommittee on Transportation Funding on Mar 31, 2025 and left pending. Never voted out. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-HB905 · 2024-11-12

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the imposition of tolls on Fairmont Parkway in Harris County.

WHAT IT DOES

Fairmont Parkway East leaves the toll project list too.

The bill removes Fairmont Parkway East from the list of toll projects a county may build under a specific Transportation Code section, and it adds a flat rule that no toll project entity may charge a toll on any part of Fairmont Parkway in Harris County. It touches Harris County, any toll authority that might operate there, and drivers who use Fairmont Parkway. Starting September 1, 2025, Fairmont Parkway cannot be tolled.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · March 28, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Filed
  2. Read first time
  3. Referred to s/c on Transportation Funding by Speaker
  4. Scheduled for public hearing in s/c on . . .
  5. Considered by s/c in public hearing
  6. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in subcommittee
  7. Left pending in subcommittee
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Adam Loewy$7,500Emerson Hankamer$5,205Teans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$5K

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 28, 2024 to May 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Adam Loewy$7,500.00
Emerson Hankamer$5,205.08
Teans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$5,000.00

Teans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Jul 3, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Jul 3, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101033926.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Teans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$5,000.00

Cash
$5,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$5,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Jul 3, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Jul 3, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101033926.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · March 28, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 922

by Rep. Cain, same lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, Mar 2, 2023: Referred to Transportation

Relating to the imposition of tolls on Fairmont Parkway in Harris County.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas House · Filed Nov 12, 2024

03/31/2025 H Left pending in subcommittee

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Transportation · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

HARRIS COUNTY

Highways

TOLL ROADS & TOLL BRIDGES

Text

The text as introduced · 348 words

89R1017 CMO-D

By: Cain
H.B. No. 905

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the imposition of tolls on Fairmont Parkway in Harris

County.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 228.011(a), Transportation Code, is

amended to read as follows:

(a) This section applies only to a county acting under

Chapter 284 for:

(1) the widening, expansion, reconstruction, and

continued operation of existing toll projects of the county; or

(2) the development, construction, and operation of

all or a portion of any of the following toll projects, a component

of that project, or the functional equivalent of that project:

(A) Beltway 8 Tollway East, between US 59 North

and US 90 East;

(B) Hardy Downtown Connector, consisting of the

proposed direct connection from the Hardy Toll Road southern

terminus at Loop 610 to downtown Houston;

(C) State Highway 288, between US 59 and Grand

Parkway South (State Highway 99);

(D) US 290 Toll Lanes, between IH 610 West and the

Grand Parkway Northwest (State Highway 99);

(E) [ Fairmont Parkway East, between Beltway 8

East and Grand Parkway East (State Highway 99);

[ (F) ] South Post Oak Road Extension, between IH

610 South and near the intersection of Beltway 8 and Hillcroft in

the vicinity of the Fort Bend Parkway Tollway;

(F) [ (G) ] Westpark Toll Road Phase II, between

Grand Parkway (State Highway 99) and FM 1463;

(G) [ (H) ] Fort Bend Parkway, between State

Highway 6 and the Brazos River; and

(H) [ (I) ] Montgomery County Parkway, between

State Highway 242 and the Grand Parkway (State Highway 99), and if

the Grand Parkway project has not begun construction, a nontolled

extension of the Montgomery County Parkway to allow a connection to

Interstate Highway 45.

SECTION 2. Subchapter B, Chapter 372, Transportation Code,

is amended by adding Section 372.060 to read as follows:

Sec. 372.060. FAIRMONT PARKWAY. A toll project entity may

not impose a toll on any portion of Fairmont Parkway in Harris

County.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.