Monitoring the Session

SB 1020

bill flags ankle monitor tampering to prosecutors and judges

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Joan HuffmanRSenate 17

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to personal bond offices, to the notification provided to a judge regarding tampering with an electronic monitoring device while released on bond or community supervision, and to the availability of certain information regarding a person required to submit to an electronic monitoring program.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Judges hear about a broken monitoring condition within 48 hours.

This bill makes personal bond offices send their monthly release records to prosecutors and defense lawyers, and it requires those records to note when a released person tampered with an ankle monitor. It also requires bond offices and probation officers to tell the judge within 48 hours when someone they supervise breaks an electronic monitoring condition. It touches people out on personal bond or probation with ankle monitors, the offices that watch them, and the judges. Information about people on electronic monitoring can no longer be withheld as private judicial work product.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB1020 · 2025-01-30

SOLD BY

+ 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to personal bond offices, to the notification provided to a judge regarding tampering with an electronic monitoring device while released on bond or community supervision, and to the availability of certain information regarding a person required to submit to an electronic monitoring program.

WHAT IT DOES

Judges hear about a broken monitoring condition within 48 hours.

This bill makes personal bond offices send their monthly release records to prosecutors and defense lawyers, and it requires those records to note when a released person tampered with an ankle monitor. It also requires bond offices and probation officers to tell the judge within 48 hours when someone they supervise breaks an electronic monitoring condition. It touches people out on personal bond or probation with ankle monitors, the offices that watch them, and the judges. Information about people on electronic monitoring can no longer be withheld as private judicial work product.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version S · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version S · April 16, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Criminal Justice
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Vote taken in committee
  9. Reported favorably as substituted
  10. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  11. Committee report printed and distributed
  12. Placed on intent calendar
  13. Co-author authorized
  14. Placed on local & uncontested calendar
  15. Laid before the Senate
  16. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  17. Vote recorded in Journal
  18. Three day rule suspended
  19. Record vote
  20. Read 3rd time
  21. Passed
  22. Record vote
  23. Reported engrossed
  24. Received from the Senate
  25. Read first time
  26. Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence
  27. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  28. Considered in public hearing
  29. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  30. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  31. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  32. Committee report distributed
  33. Committee report sent to Calendars
  34. Considered in Calendars
  35. Placed on General State Calendar
  36. Read 2nd time
  37. Passed to 3rd reading
  38. Record vote RV#2973
  39. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  40. Read 3rd time
  41. Passed
  42. Record vote RV#3044
  43. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  44. House passage reported
  45. Reported enrolled
  46. Signed in the Senate
  47. Signed in the House
  48. Sent to the Governor
  49. Signed by the Governor
  50. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 142 yea · 4 nay

Senate · 30 yea · 1 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 20, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · Apr 24, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Donors report through Texans for Joan Huffman.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes5

House May 20, 2025

Yea
142
Nay
4
Present, not voting
2
Absent
1
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3044

SB 1020 was passed by (Record 3044): 142 Yeas, 4 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 142 (published)
  • Nay: 4 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 1 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 19, 2025

Yea
134
Nay
7
Present, not voting
2
Absent
3
Excused
4
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 2973

SB 1020 was passed to third reading by (Record 2973): 134 Yeas, 7 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 134 (published)
  • Nay: 7 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 3 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 4 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 24, 2025

Final passage

Yea
30
Nay
1
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to engrossment, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records final passage. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Sources

CSSB 1020 (Huffman) Relating to personal bond offices, to the notification provided to a judge regarding tampering with an electronic monitoring device while released on bond or community supervision, and to the availability of certain information regarding a person required to submit to an electronic monitoring program or being supervised by a community supervision and corrections department. (viva voce vote) (30-1) "Nay" Cook (30-1) "Nay" Cook

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 30 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 24, 2025

Suspension of the three-day rule

Yea
30
Nay
1
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to engrossment, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records suspension of the three-day rule. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Sources

CSSB 1020 (Huffman) Relating to personal bond offices, to the notification provided to a judge regarding tampering with an electronic monitoring device while released on bond or community supervision, and to the availability of certain information regarding a person required to submit to an electronic monitoring program or being supervised by a community supervision and corrections department. (viva voce vote) (30-1) "Nay" Cook (30-1) "Nay" Cook

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 30 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 24, 2025

Passage to engrossment

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to engrossment, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records passage to engrossment. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

CSSB 1020 (Huffman) Relating to personal bond offices, to the notification provided to a judge regarding tampering with an electronic monitoring device while released on bond or community supervision, and to the availability of certain information regarding a person required to submit to an electronic monitoring program or being supervised by a community supervision and corrections department. (viva voce vote) (30-1) "Nay" Cook (30-1) "Nay" Cook

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses24
For
23
Against
0
On
1
Names

For

  • Austin Police Association1 registration
  • Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas (CLEAT)2 registrations
  • Dallas County Criminal District Attorney - John Creuzot1 registration
  • Dallas Criminal District Attorney John Creuzot1 registration
  • Harris County CSCD and Texas Probation Association1 registration
  • Harris County Deputies' Organization FOP #392 registrations
  • San Antonio police officers association1 registration
  • SAPOA1 registration
  • Self4 registrations
  • Self; 106th Judicial District Attorney1 registration
  • Self; Comal County Criminal District Attorney1 registration
  • Self; Crime Stoppers Houston2 registrations
  • Self; Houston Police Officers’ Union2 registrations
  • Self; Sheriffs’ Association of Texas1 registration
  • Texas Municipal Police Association (TMPA)2 registrations

On

  • Self1 registration
Sources

24 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version S · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version S · April 16, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Jan 30, 2025

05/29/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Criminal Jurisprudence · Committee vote 8 aye, 0 nay, 3 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Criminal Justice · Committee vote 7 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Subjects

Corrections--Jails & Prisons

Courts--Judges

Crimes--Miscellaneous

Criminal Procedure--Bail & Pretrial Release

Criminal Procedure--General

Criminal Procedure--Pretrial Procedure

Criminal Procedure--Sentencing & Punishment

Electronic Information Systems

State Agencies, Boards & Commissions

ARREST WARRANTS

ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT

MANDATORY & COMMUNITY SUPERVISION

STATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

Text

The text as introduced · 690 words

89R5171 EAS-D

By: Huffman
S.B. No. 1020

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to personal bond offices, to the notification provided to

a judge regarding tampering with an electronic monitoring device

while released on bond or community supervision, and to the

availability of certain information regarding a person required to

submit to an electronic monitoring program.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Sections 5(a) and (b), Article 17.42, Code of

Criminal Procedure, are amended to read as follows:

(a) A personal bond pretrial release office established

under this article shall:

(1) prepare a record containing information about any

accused person identified by case number only who, after review by

the office, is released by a court on personal bond before

sentencing in a pending case;

(2) update the record on a monthly basis; [ and ]

(3) file a copy of the record with the district or

county clerk, as applicable based on court jurisdiction over the

categories of offenses addressed in the records, in any county

served by the office ; and

(4) submit a copy of the record to the attorney

representing the state and the accused person's attorney and, as

applicable based on whether the accused person violated a condition

of release on bond in the preceding month, an update to that record .

(b) In preparing a record under Subsection (a), the office

shall include in the record a statement of:

(1) the offense with which the person is charged;

(2) the dates of any court appearances scheduled in

the matter that were previously unattended by the person;

(3) whether a warrant has been issued for the person's

arrest for failure to appear in accordance with the terms of the

person's release;

(4) whether the person has failed to comply with

conditions of release on personal bond , including failing to comply

by tampering with an electronic monitoring device ; and

(5) the presiding judge or magistrate who authorized

the personal bond.

SECTION 2. Chapter 17, Code of Criminal Procedure, is

amended by adding Article 17.431 to read as follows:

Art. 17.431. NOTIFICATION BY PERSONAL BOND OFFICE REGARDING

ELECTRONIC MONITORING DEVICE VIOLATION. Not later than 48 hours

after a personal bond office established under Article 17.42

becomes aware that a defendant supervised by the office has

violated a condition of release on bond related to an electronic

monitoring device, the personal bond office shall notify the court

before whom the case is pending of that violation.

SECTION 3. Subchapter P, Chapter 42A, Code of Criminal

Procedure, is amended by adding Article 42A.7515 to read as

follows:

Art. 42A.7515. NOTIFICATION BY SUPERVISION OFFICER

REGARDING ELECTRONIC MONITORING DEVICE VIOLATION. Not later than

48 hours after a supervision officer becomes aware that a defendant

supervised by the officer has violated a condition of community

supervision related to an electronic monitoring device, the

supervision officer shall notify the judge of that violation.

SECTION 4. Section 21.013(a)(1), Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

(1) "Judicial work product" means written,

electronic, or oral material prepared or communications made in the

course of an adjudicatory proceeding before a court determining

legal rights, powers, duties, or privileges. The term includes all

drafts of opinions or orders and memoranda of law. The term does

not include information related to a person who is required to

submit to electronic monitoring of a person's location as part of an

electronic monitoring program under Article 42.035, Code of

Criminal Procedure, or as a condition of community supervision,

parole, mandatory supervision, or release on bail.

SECTION 5. Articles 17.431 and 42A.7515, Code of Criminal

Procedure, as added by this Act, apply only to a violation of a

condition of release on bond or a violation of a condition of

community supervision, as applicable, that occurs on or after the

effective date of this Act. A violation that occurs before the

effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the

date the violation occurred, and the former law is continued in

effect for that purpose.

SECTION 6. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.