Monitoring the Session

SB 1037

Sparks’s bill limits local borrowing through anticipation notes

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Kevin SparksRSenate 31

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the issuance of certain anticipation notes and certificates of obligation.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Longer wait for certificates of obligation too.

The bill puts new limits on when cities, counties and other local governments can borrow through anticipation notes, and it lengthens the waiting period for certificates of obligation. A local government could not use an anticipation note for a project voters rejected in a bond election within the last five years, for an amount above five percent of its outstanding bonded debt, or after five percent of registered voters sign a petition protesting it, except in emergencies or to fix a notified state or federal compliance problem. For certificates of obligation, the lookback after a failed bond election grows from three years to five, so local officials have fewer ways to borrow around voters starting with debt authorized on or after September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R SB 1810 (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R SB 1810 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Jan 31, 2025 and referred to the Senate Local Government committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB1037 · 2025-01-31

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the issuance of certain anticipation notes and certificates of obligation.

WHAT IT DOES

Longer wait for certificates of obligation too.

The bill puts new limits on when cities, counties and other local governments can borrow through anticipation notes, and it lengthens the waiting period for certificates of obligation. A local government could not use an anticipation note for a project voters rejected in a bond election within the last five years, for an amount above five percent of its outstanding bonded debt, or after five percent of registered voters sign a petition protesting it, except in emergencies or to fix a notified state or federal compliance problem. For certificates of obligation, the lookback after a failed bond election grows from three years to five, so local officials have fewer ways to borrow around voters starting with debt authorized on or after September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Local Government
FILED UNDER

DEBT AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS

THE TEXT

…“five percent of the governing body's total outstanding bonded”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill caps and restricts local debt that is issued without a vote, and it lets voters block anticipation notes by petition.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$60KKyle & Jamie Stallings$25,000Tim Dunn$25,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 25, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$60,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 15, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012623, 101029380, 101072732.

Kyle & Jamie Stallings$25,000.00
Tim Dunn$25,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Oct 15, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101012623, 101029380, 101072732.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R SB 1810

by Sen. Sparks, same lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, Apr 11, 2023: Left pending in committee

Relating to the issuance of certain anticipation notes and certificates of obligation.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Jan 31, 2025

02/24/2025 S Referred to Local Government

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Senate committee · Local Government · Final status: Died in committee

Companion

HB 3688 by Smithee (identical)

Subjects

City Government--Employees/Officers

City Government--Finance

Financial--General

BONDS

Text

The text as introduced · 588 words

2025S0047-1 01/29/25

By: Sparks
S.B. No. 1037

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the issuance of certain anticipation notes and

certificates of obligation.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 1431.002, Government Code, is amended by

adding Subsections (d) and (e) to read as follows:

(d) Except as provided by Subsection (e), the governing body

of an issuer may not authorize an anticipation note to pay a

contractual obligation to be incurred if:

(1) a bond proposition to authorize the issuance of

bonds for the same purpose was submitted to the voters during the

preceding five years and failed to be approved;

(2) the total amount of the anticipation note exceeds

five percent of the governing body's total outstanding bonded

indebtedness at the time of the issuance, including the amount of

principal and interest to be paid on the outstanding bonds until

maturity; or

(3) the municipal secretary or clerk or person with

similar authority receives a petition signed by at least five

percent of the registered voters of the issuer that protests the

issuance of the anticipation note before the later of the date

tentatively set for the adoption of the order or ordinance to

authorize the anticipation note or the date the order or ordinance

is adopted.

(e) The governing body of an issuer may authorize an

anticipation note that the governing body is otherwise prohibited

from authorizing under Subsection (d):

(1) in a case described by Section 271.056(1), (2), or

(3), Local Government Code; and

(2) to comply with a state or federal law, rule, or

regulation if the issuer has been officially notified of

noncompliance with the law, rule, or regulation.

SECTION 2. Section 1431.003(b), Government Code, is amended

to read as follows:

(b) Notwithstanding anything in this chapter to the

contrary and except as provided by Section 1431.002(d) , the

governing body may exercise the authority granted to the governing

body of an issuer with regard to issuance of obligations under

Chapter 1371, except that the prohibition in that chapter on the

repayment of an obligation with ad valorem taxes does not apply to

an issuer exercising the authority granted by this section.

SECTION 3. Section 271.047(d), Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

(d) Except as provided by this subsection, the governing

body of an issuer may not authorize a certificate to pay a

contractual obligation to be incurred if a bond proposition to

authorize the issuance of bonds for the same purpose was submitted

to the voters during the preceding five [ three ] years and failed to

be approved. A governing body may authorize a certificate that the

governing body is otherwise prohibited from authorizing under this

subsection:

(1) in a case described by Section 271.056(1), (2), or

(3) [ Sections 271.056(1)-(3) ]; and

(2) to comply with a state or federal law, rule, or

regulation if the political subdivision has been officially

notified of noncompliance with the law, rule, or regulation.

SECTION 4. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to

an anticipation note or certificate of obligation authorized to be

issued on or after the effective date of this Act. An anticipation

note or certificate of obligation authorized to be issued before

the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect

immediately before the effective date of this Act, and the former

law is continued in effect for that purpose.

SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.