88R HB 188
by Rep. Moody, different lead author · Did not pass · same text
Introduced textLast action, Apr 24, 2023: Received from the House
Relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case.
Caption, 88R bill history
SB 1094
Died in committee
Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade
relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Ends the 10-juror rule on dangerousness and mitigation answers.
The bill changes the jury instructions in Texas death penalty sentencing so that any juror who does not agree to a death-supporting answer forces the other answer, ending the current rule that a "no" on future dangerousness or a "yes" on mitigation needs 10 jurors. It touches defendants facing a capital sentence, prosecutors, judges and jurors in capital trials. On the ground, a single holdout juror would produce the answer that leads to a life sentence, and the rule applies to proceedings that start on or after September 1, 2025.
Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 188 by Rep. Moody (Did not pass) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 188 by Rep. Moody (Did not pass). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Feb 4, 2025 and referred to the Senate Criminal Justice committee. No public hearing. The bill died.
89R-SB1094 · 2025-02-04
relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case.
Ends the 10-juror rule on dangerousness and mitigation answers.
The bill changes the jury instructions in Texas death penalty sentencing so that any juror who does not agree to a death-supporting answer forces the other answer, ending the current rule that a "no" on future dangerousness or a "yes" on mitigation needs 10 jurors. It touches defendants facing a capital sentence, prosecutors, judges and jurors in capital trials. On the ground, a single holdout juror would produce the answer that leads to a life sentence, and the rule applies to proceedings that start on or after September 1, 2025.
[ ] NONE FOUND
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
No verified beat found.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Not tied to this bill.
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
$72,700.00
Also funds 3 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Dec 9, 2024 to Sep 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
Derived itemized flow · Dec 16, 2025 to Aug 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101011018, 101057658.
$60,000.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Nov 11, 2024 to Aug 31, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100959783, 100987492, 101011018, 101035338, 101057658.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
$72,700.00
Also funds 3 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Dec 9, 2024 to Sep 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.
Derived itemized flow · Dec 16, 2025 to Aug 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101011018, 101057658.
$60,000.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamDerived itemized flow · Nov 11, 2024 to Aug 31, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100959783, 100987492, 101011018, 101035338, 101057658.
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.
Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.
by Rep. Moody, different lead author · Did not pass · same text
Introduced textLast action, Apr 24, 2023: Received from the House
Relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case.
Caption, 88R bill history
Texas Senate · Filed Feb 4, 2025
02/24/2025 S Referred to Criminal Justice
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
Senate committee · Criminal Justice · Final status: Died in committee
HB 578 by Moody (identical)
Courts--Juries
Crimes--Capital Punishment
Criminal Procedure--Sentencing & Punishment
The text as introduced · 394 words
89R4508 MEW-D By: Zaffirini S.B. No. 1094 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Sections 2(d) and (f), Article 37.071, Code of Criminal Procedure, are amended to read as follows: (d) The court shall charge the jury that: (1) in deliberating on the issues submitted under Subsection (b) [ of this article ], the jury [ it ] shall consider all evidence admitted at the guilt or innocence stage and the punishment stage, including evidence of the defendant's background or character or the circumstances of the offense that militates for or mitigates against the imposition of the death penalty; (2) the jury [ it ] may not answer any issue submitted under Subsection (b) [ of this article ] "yes" unless the jury [ it ] agrees unanimously , and unless the jury answers an issue "yes" unanimously, the jury shall [ it may not ] answer the [ any ] issue "no" [ unless 10 or more jurors agree ]; and (3) members of the jury need not agree on what particular evidence supports a negative answer to any issue submitted under Subsection (b) [ of this article ]. (f) The court shall charge the jury that in answering the issue submitted under Subsection (e) [ of this article ], the jury: (1) shall answer the issue "yes" or "no"; (2) may not answer the issue "no" unless the jury [ it ] agrees unanimously , and unless the jury answers the issue "no" unanimously, the jury shall [ may not ] answer the issue "yes" [ unless 10 or more jurors agree ]; (3) need not agree on what particular evidence supports an affirmative finding on the issue; and (4) shall consider mitigating evidence to be evidence that a juror might regard as reducing the defendant's moral blameworthiness. SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only to a criminal proceeding that commences on or after the effective date of this Act. A criminal proceeding that commenced before the effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the proceeding commenced, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.