Monitoring the Session

SB 1094

Zaffirini’s bill lets one juror block death-supporting answers

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Judith ZaffiriniDSenate 21

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Ends the 10-juror rule on dangerousness and mitigation answers.

The bill changes the jury instructions in Texas death penalty sentencing so that any juror who does not agree to a death-supporting answer forces the other answer, ending the current rule that a "no" on future dangerousness or a "yes" on mitigation needs 10 jurors. It touches defendants facing a capital sentence, prosecutors, judges and jurors in capital trials. On the ground, a single holdout juror would produce the answer that leads to a life sentence, and the rule applies to proceedings that start on or after September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 188 by Rep. Moody (Did not pass) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 188 by Rep. Moody (Did not pass). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Feb 4, 2025 and referred to the Senate Criminal Justice committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB1094 · 2025-02-04

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case.

WHAT IT DOES

Ends the 10-juror rule on dangerousness and mitigation answers.

The bill changes the jury instructions in Texas death penalty sentencing so that any juror who does not agree to a death-supporting answer forces the other answer, ending the current rule that a "no" on future dangerousness or a "yes" on mitigation needs 10 jurors. It touches defendants facing a capital sentence, prosecutors, judges and jurors in capital trials. On the ground, a single holdout juror would produce the answer that leads to a life sentence, and the rule applies to proceedings that start on or after September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Criminal Justice
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Carlos M. Zaffirini Jr$110,000.00
Killam Development Ltd.$72,700.00

Killam Development Ltd.

$72,700.00

Cash
$10,000.00
Paid by others
$62,700.00
Total
$72,700.00
advertising $33,000.00media $29,700.00

Also funds 3 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Dec 9, 2024 to Sep 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 16, 2025 to Aug 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101011018, 101057658.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$60,000.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 11, 2024 to Aug 31, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100959783, 100987492, 101011018, 101035338, 101057658.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Killam Development Ltd.

$72,700.00

Cash
$10,000.00
Paid by others
$62,700.00
Total
$72,700.00
advertising $33,000.00media $29,700.00

Also funds 3 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Dec 9, 2024 to Sep 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 16, 2025 to Aug 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101011018, 101057658.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 11, 2024 to Aug 31, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100959783, 100987492, 101011018, 101035338, 101057658.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 188

by Rep. Moody, different lead author · Did not pass · same text

Introduced text

Last action, Apr 24, 2023: Received from the House

Relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Feb 4, 2025

02/24/2025 S Referred to Criminal Justice

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Senate committee · Criminal Justice · Final status: Died in committee

Companion

HB 578 by Moody (identical)

Subjects

Courts--Juries

Crimes--Capital Punishment

Criminal Procedure--Sentencing & Punishment

Text

The text as introduced · 394 words

89R4508 MEW-D

By: Zaffirini
S.B. No. 1094

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to certain sentencing procedures in a capital case.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Sections 2(d) and (f), Article 37.071, Code of

Criminal Procedure, are amended to read as follows:

(d) The court shall charge the jury that:

(1) in deliberating on the issues submitted under

Subsection (b) [ of this article ], the jury [ it ] shall consider all

evidence admitted at the guilt or innocence stage and the

punishment stage, including evidence of the defendant's background

or character or the circumstances of the offense that militates for

or mitigates against the imposition of the death penalty;

(2) the jury [ it ] may not answer any issue submitted

under Subsection (b) [ of this article ] "yes" unless the jury [ it ]

agrees unanimously , and unless the jury answers an issue "yes"

unanimously, the jury shall [ it may not ] answer the [ any ] issue "no"

[ unless 10 or more jurors agree ]; and

(3) members of the jury need not agree on what

particular evidence supports a negative answer to any issue

submitted under Subsection (b) [ of this article ].

(f) The court shall charge the jury that in answering the

issue submitted under Subsection (e) [ of this article ], the jury:

(1) shall answer the issue "yes" or "no";

(2) may not answer the issue "no" unless the jury [ it ]

agrees unanimously , and unless the jury answers the issue "no"

unanimously, the jury shall [ may not ] answer the issue "yes"

[ unless 10 or more jurors agree ];

(3) need not agree on what particular evidence

supports an affirmative finding on the issue; and

(4) shall consider mitigating evidence to be evidence

that a juror might regard as reducing the defendant's moral

blameworthiness.

SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only

to a criminal proceeding that commences on or after the effective

date of this Act. A criminal proceeding that commenced before the

effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the

date the proceeding commenced, and the former law is continued in

effect for that purpose.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.