Monitoring the Session

SB 1210

Texas Supreme Court gets the final constitutional say

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Bryan HughesRSenate 1

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the jurisdiction of the Texas Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

When it and the Court of Criminal Appeals disagree.

The bill gives the Texas Supreme Court the final say when it and the Court of Criminal Appeals disagree about what a provision of the Texas Constitution means, either through a party's writ of certiorari or a question certified by a federal court. It touches the state's two high courts, the lawyers and parties in criminal cases, and the new Fifteenth Court of Appeals, which is cut out of criminal jurisdiction. On the ground, a criminal case can now end up at the Supreme Court on a constitutional conflict, the Court of Criminal Appeals can no longer take up a case for discretionary review on its own motion, and the change applies to pending matters starting immediately or September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R SB 1196 (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R SB 1196 (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on Apr 10, 2025. Died in the House: left pending in the Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence committee.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB1210 · 2025-02-10

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the jurisdiction of the Texas Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals.

WHAT IT DOES

When it and the Court of Criminal Appeals disagree.

The bill gives the Texas Supreme Court the final say when it and the Court of Criminal Appeals disagree about what a provision of the Texas Constitution means, either through a party's writ of certiorari or a question certified by a federal court. It touches the state's two high courts, the lawyers and parties in criminal cases, and the new Fifteenth Court of Appeals, which is cut out of criminal jurisdiction. On the ground, a criminal case can now end up at the Supreme Court on a constitutional conflict, the Court of Criminal Appeals can no longer take up a case for discretionary review on its own motion, and the change applies to pending matters starting immediately or September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · March 17, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to State Affairs
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  12. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  13. Committee report printed and distributed
  14. Placed on intent calendar
  15. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  16. Record vote
  17. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  18. Record vote
  19. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  20. Record vote
  21. Read 3rd time
  22. Passed
  23. Record vote
  24. Reported engrossed
  25. Received from the Senate
  26. Read first time
  27. Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
  28. Considered in public hearing
  29. Left pending in committee
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 21 yea · 9 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · Apr 10, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

GOPAC Election Fund$250,000.00

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)$100,000.00

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC$100,000.00

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

×

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

×

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Votes4

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Yea
21
Nay
9
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 21, Nays 9. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 21 (published)
  • Nay: 9 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Yea
21
Nay
9
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Hughes moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration SB 1210 at this time on its third reading and final passage: SB 1210, Relating to the jurisdiction of the Texas Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 21, Nays 9.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 21 (published)
  • Nay: 9 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Yea
21
Nay
9
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 21, Nays 9. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 21 (published)
  • Nay: 9 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Yea
21
Nay
9
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Hughes moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration SB 1210 at this time on its second reading: SB 1210, Relating to the jurisdiction of the Texas Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 21, Nays 9.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 21 (published)
  • Nay: 9 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses12
For
2
Against
10
On
0
Names

For

  • Self2 registrations

Against

  • Common Cause Texas1 registration
  • Dallas Criminal District Attorney John Creuzot1 registration
  • Galveston County Criminal District Attorney1 registration
  • Self5 registrations
  • Self; 106th Judicial District Attorney1 registration
  • Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association1 registration
Sources

12 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · March 17, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R SB 1196

by Sen. Hughes, same lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, Mar 9, 2023: Referred to State Affairs

Relating to the jurisdiction of the Texas Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Feb 10, 2025

05/21/2025 H Left pending in committee

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee

Senate committee · State Affairs · Committee vote 10 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Companion

HB 933 by Spiller (identical)

Subjects

Courts--Appellate

Courts--General

CRIMINAL APPEALS, COURT OF

SUPREME COURT

Text

The text as introduced · 957 words

89R3234 TSS-F

By: Hughes
S.B. No. 1210

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the jurisdiction of the Texas Supreme Court and the

Court of Criminal Appeals.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Article 4.01, Code of Criminal Procedure, is

amended to read as follows:

Art. 4.01. WHAT COURTS HAVE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION. The

following courts have jurisdiction in criminal actions:

1. The Court of Criminal Appeals;

2. The Texas Supreme Court in a conflict described by

Section 22.001(a-1), Government Code;

3. Courts of appeals, other than the Court of Appeals

for the Fifteenth Court of Appeals District;

4. [ 3. ] The district courts;

5. [ 4. ] The criminal district courts;

6. [ 5. ] The magistrates appointed by the judges of the

district courts of Bexar County, Dallas County, Tarrant County, or

Travis County that give preference to criminal cases and the

magistrates appointed by the judges of the criminal district courts

of Dallas County or Tarrant County;

7. [ 6. ] The county courts;

8. [ 7. ] All county courts at law with criminal

jurisdiction;

9. [ 8. ] County criminal courts;

10. [ 9. ] Justice courts;

11. [ 10. ] Municipal courts;

12. [ 11. ] The magistrates appointed by the judges of

the district courts of Lubbock County;

13. [ 12. ] The magistrates appointed by the El Paso

Council of Judges;

14. [ 13. ] The magistrates appointed by the Collin

County Commissioners Court;

15. [ 14. ] The magistrates appointed by the Brazoria

County Commissioners Court or the local administrative judge for

Brazoria County;

16. [ 15. ] The magistrates appointed by the judges of

the district courts of Tom Green County;

17. [ 16. ] The magistrates appointed by the judges of

the district and statutory county courts of Denton County; and

18. [ 17. ] The magistrates appointed by the judges of

the district and statutory county courts of Grayson County.

SECTION 2. Article 4.04, Code of Criminal Procedure, is

amended to read as follows:

Art. 4.04. COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Sec. 1. The Court of Criminal Appeals and each judge thereof

shall have, and is hereby given, the power and authority to grant

and issue and cause the issuance of writs of habeas corpus, and, in

criminal law matters, other writs, including the writs of mandamus,

procedendo, prohibition, and certiorari , [ . The court and each

judge thereof shall have, and is hereby given, the power and

authority to grant and issue and cause the issuance of such other

writs ] as may be necessary to protect its jurisdiction or enforce

its judgments.

Sec. 2. Except as provided by Section 22.001(a-1),

Government Code, the [ The ] Court of Criminal Appeals shall have,

and is hereby given, final appellate and review jurisdiction in

criminal cases coextensive with the limits of the state, and its

determinations shall be final. The appeal of all cases in which the

death penalty has been assessed shall be to the Court of Criminal

Appeals. In addition, the Court of Criminal Appeals may [ , ] on [ its

own motion, with or without ] a petition for such discretionary

review being filed by one of the parties, review any decision of a

court of appeals in a criminal case other than a conflict described

by Section 22.001(a-1), Government Code . Discretionary review by

the Court of Criminal Appeals is not a matter of right, but of sound

judicial discretion.

SECTION 3. Section 22.001, Government Code, is amended by

amending Subsections (a) and (b) and adding Subsection (a-1) to

read as follows:

(a) The supreme court has appellate jurisdiction, except in

criminal law matters other than a conflict described by Subsection

(a-1) , of an appealable order or judgment of the trial courts if the

court determines that the appeal presents a question of law that is

important to the jurisprudence of the state.

(a-1) The supreme court has appellate jurisdiction to

finally resolve a conflict between the supreme court and the court

of criminal appeals regarding the interpretation of a provision of

the Texas Constitution on:

(1) submission of a writ of certiorari to the supreme

court by a party to any proceeding in any court of this state; or

(2) certification of a question of law from any

federal court [ The supreme court's jurisdiction does not include

cases in which the jurisdiction of the court of appeals is made

final by statute ].

(b) Except as provided by Subsection (a-1), a [ A ] case over

which the court has jurisdiction under Subsection (a) may be

carried to the supreme court by petition for review.

SECTION 4. It is the intent of the legislature that:

(1) the jurisdiction of the Texas Supreme Court as

amended by this Act is "as otherwise provided . . . by law" within

the meaning of Section 3(a), Article V, Texas Constitution; and

(2) the jurisdiction of the Court of Criminal Appeals

as amended by this Act is "with such exceptions and under such

regulations . . . as prescribed by law" within the meaning of

Section 5(a), Article V, Texas Constitution.

SECTION 5. The changes in law made by this Act apply to any

matter described by Section 22.001(a-1), Government Code, as added

by this Act, pending before any court of this state on or after the

effective date of this Act.

SECTION 6. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.