Monitoring the Session

SB 1300

Flores ‘Organized’ Retail Theft Bill Needs No Organization

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: Smells

SmellsNeeds review
Sen. Pete FloresRSenate 24
Both charges, and why
Dragnet

THE CAPTION

“relating to the prosecution and punishment of the criminal offense”…

Caption, introduced version (I)

THE TEXT

“on two or more occasions within a 180-day period,”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption pitches organized retail theft, but this element reaches a single person acting alone who takes property from a business twice in 180 days, with no group or organization required. The new definition of merchant as any business that sells items to the public, and the reach to money or other property, widen it further.

Dragnet
Already a crime

THE TEXT

“Sections 31.03(b) and (c) apply to the offense for”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill borrows the general theft rules of Section 31.03, which, as a matter of general knowledge of Texas law, already makes unlawfully taking property an offense, so much of the new conduct is already covered and is mainly being punished more harshly.

Already a crime

Needs review · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the prosecution and punishment of the criminal offense of organized retail theft; increasing criminal penalties.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

One person, two thefts in 180 days, no group needed. Every penalty tier rises one level!

The bill rewrites the Texas offense of organized retail theft so it covers people who take merchandise, money, or other property from a merchant, either while acting with others or on two or more occasions within 180 days. It makes prosecution easier by letting charges name only the merchant and a value range, allowing evidence of other theft offenses, and treating price tags as proof of value and ownership. It also raises every penalty tier by one level, adds a 15-to-99-year range for $300,000 or more, and takes effect September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: BUZZER BEATER. Final vote May 30, 2025: the Senate concurred in the House amendments. 3 days before the session ended Jun 2, 2025.ACROSS THE AISLE. Joint authors: 5 Republicans, 1 Democrat. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB1300 · 2025-02-14

SOLD BY

+ 3 more authors, 11 coauthors

ITEM

relating to the prosecution and punishment of the criminal offense of organized retail theft; increasing criminal penalties.

WHAT IT DOES

One person, two thefts in 180 days, no group needed. Every penalty tier rises one level!

The bill rewrites the Texas offense of organized retail theft so it covers people who take merchandise, money, or other property from a merchant, either while acting with others or on two or more occasions within 180 days. It makes prosecution easier by letting charges name only the merchant and a value range, allowing evidence of other theft offenses, and treating price tags as proof of value and ownership. It also raises every penalty tier by one level, adds a 15-to-99-year range for $300,000 or more, and takes effect September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[x] DRAGNETanalysis confidence 65%

THE CAPTION

“relating to the prosecution and punishment of the criminal offense”…

Caption, introduced version (I)

THE TEXT

“on two or more occasions within a 180-day period,”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption pitches organized retail theft, but this element reaches a single person acting alone who takes property from a business twice in 180 days, with no group or organization required. The new definition of merchant as any business that sells items to the public, and the reach to money or other property, widen it further.

[x] ALREADY A CRIMEanalysis confidence 45%

THE TEXT

“Sections 31.03(b) and (c) apply to the offense for”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill borrows the general theft rules of Section 31.03, which, as a matter of general knowledge of Texas law, already makes unlawfully taking property an offense, so much of the new conduct is already covered and is mainly being punished more harshly.

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 28, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Co-author authorized
  4. Read first time
  5. Referred to Criminal Justice
  6. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  7. Considered in public hearing
  8. Testimony taken in committee
  9. Vote taken in committee
  10. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  11. Committee report printed and distributed
  12. Co-author authorized
  13. Placed on intent calendar
  14. Co-author authorized
  15. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  16. Record vote
  17. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  18. Record vote
  19. Three day rule suspended
  20. Record vote
  21. Read 3rd time
  22. Passed
  23. Record vote
  24. Statement(s) submitted
  25. Reported engrossed
  26. Received from the Senate
  27. Read first time
  28. Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence
  29. Considered in formal meeting
  30. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  31. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  32. Committee report distributed
  33. Committee report sent to Calendars
  34. Considered in Calendars
  35. Placed on General State Calendar
  36. Read 2nd time
  37. Passed to 3rd reading
  38. Record vote RV#3791
  39. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  40. Read 3rd time
  41. Amended 1-Walle and Cook
  42. Passed as amended
  43. Record vote RV#3894
  44. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  45. House passage as amended reported
  46. House amendment(s) laid before the Senate
  47. Read
  48. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)
  49. Record vote
  50. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)-reported
  51. Reported enrolled
  52. Signed in the Senate
  53. Signed in the House
  54. Sent to the Governor
  55. Signed by the Governor
  56. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 110 yea · 31 nay

Senate · 28 yea · 2 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 28, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · Mar 24, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$55KMorris Jaffe$25,000Justin Jaffe$25,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 12, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$55,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$55,000.00

Cash
$55,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$55,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 13, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100985131, 101008112, 101072110.

Morris Jaffe$25,000.00
Justin Jaffe$25,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$55,000.00

Cash
$55,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$55,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 13, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100985131, 101008112, 101072110.

Votes7

Senate May 30, 2025

Yea
29
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Flores moved to concur in the House amendment to SB 1300. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 29, Nays 2.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 28, 2025

Yea
110
Nay
31
Present, not voting
2
Absent
0
Excused
7
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3894

SB 1300, as amended, was passed by (Record 3894): 110 Yeas, 31 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 110 (published)
  • Nay: 31 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 7 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
116
Nay
25
Present, not voting
1
Absent
5
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3791

SB 1300 was passed to third reading by (Record 3791): 116 Yeas, 25 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 116 (published)
  • Nay: 25 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 5 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 24, 2025

Yea
28
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 28, Nays 2. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 28 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 24, 2025

Yea
28
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Flores moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that SB 1300 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 28, Nays 2.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 28 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 24, 2025

Yea
28
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 28, Nays 2. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 28 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 24, 2025

Yea
28
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Flores moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration SB 1300 at this time on its second reading: SB 1300, Relating to the prosecution and punishment of the criminal offense of organized retail theft; increasing criminal penalties. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 28, Nays 2.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 28 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses25
For
22
Against
1
On
2
Names

For

  • City of Houston1 registration
  • Comal District Attorney1 registration
  • Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas (CLEAT)1 registration
  • CVS Health1 registration
  • Dallas County Criminal District Attorney John Creuzot1 registration
  • Harris County Deputies’ Organization FOP #391 registration
  • Harris County District Attorney’s Office1 registration
  • Houston Police Department1 registration
  • James Avery Craftsman1 registration
  • Lumbermen’s Association of Texas1 registration
  • San Antonio Police Department1 registration
  • Self2 registrations
  • Self; Houston Police Officers’ Union1 registration
  • Self; Smith County Criminal Disrtict Attorney1 registration
  • Self; Texas Bankers Association1 registration
  • Target Corporation1 registration
  • Texas Food & Fuel Association1 registration
  • Texas Municipal Police Association (TMPA)1 registration
  • Texas Retailers Association1 registration
  • The Home Depot1 registration
  • United Supermarkets1 registration

Against

  • Texas civil rights project1 registration

On

  • Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts1 registration
  • Texas Department of Public Safety1 registration
Sources

25 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 28, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Feb 14, 2025

06/20/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 2:08 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Criminal Jurisprudence · Committee vote 8 aye, 3 nay · Out of committee

Senate committee · Criminal Justice · Committee vote 7 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Companion

HB 3167 by Cook (identical)

Subjects

Crimes--Against Property

Criminal Procedure--Sentencing & Punishment

EVIDENCE

MANDATORY & COMMUNITY SUPERVISION

ORGANIZED CRIME

Text

The text as introduced · 1,724 words

89R9191 JRR-F

By: Flores, et al.
S.B. No. 1300

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the prosecution and punishment of the criminal offense

of organized retail theft; increasing criminal penalties.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Chapter 21, Code of Criminal Procedure, is

amended by adding Article 21.155 to read as follows:

Art. 21.155. ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT. (a) In this article,

"merchant" has the meaning assigned by Section 31.01, Penal Code.

(b) Notwithstanding Article 21.09, an indictment or

information in the prosecution of an offense under Section 31.16,

Penal Code, shall not be held insufficient for failure to name or

describe each item of property stolen. It shall be sufficient to

name the merchant and, if the offense level is based on a value of

the property stolen, the aggregate value range of the stolen

property applicable to the offense being alleged.

SECTION 2. Chapter 38, Code of Criminal Procedure, is

amended by adding Article 38.51 to read as follows:

Art. 38.51. EVIDENCE IN PROSECUTION FOR ORGANIZED RETAIL

THEFT. (a) In this article, "merchant" and "retail merchandise"

have the meanings assigned by Section 31.01, Penal Code.

(b) In the prosecution of an offense under Section 31.16,

Penal Code:

(1) if issues of intent, knowledge, and whether the

defendant was acting in concert with one or more other persons are

raised by the defendant's plea of not guilty, evidence that the

defendant has participated in any theft offense, other than a theft

offense that forms the basis of the offense under Section 31.16,

Penal Code, on which the prosecution is based, is admissible:

(A) for the purpose of showing intent or

knowledge; or

(B) as evidence that the defendant was acting in

concert with one or more other persons;

(2) the unaltered price tag or other marking on retail

merchandise identifying the price of the retail merchandise is

prima facie evidence of the value of the retail merchandise for

purposes of Section 31.08(a-1), Penal Code; and

(3) a price tag or other marking described by

Subdivision (2) that identifies or is unique to a merchant is prima

facie evidence of the merchant's ownership of the retail

merchandise.

SECTION 3. Section 31.01, Penal Code, is amended by

amending Subdivision (11) and adding Subdivision (15) to read as

follows:

(11) "Retail merchandise" means one or more items of

tangible personal property displayed, held, stored, or offered for

sale by a merchant [ in a retail establishment ]. The term includes a

gift card.

(15) "Merchant" means any business that sells items to

the public.

SECTION 4. Section 31.08, Penal Code, is amended by

amending Subsections (a), (c), and (d) and adding Subsection (a-1)

to read as follows:

(a) Subject to the additional criteria of Subsections

(a-1), (b) , and (c), value under this chapter is:

(1) the fair market value of the property or service at

the time and place of the offense; or

(2) if the fair market value of the property cannot be

ascertained, the cost of replacing the property within a reasonable

time after the theft.

(a-1) In the prosecution of an offense under Section 31.16

involving retail merchandise stolen from a merchant, the value of

the stolen retail merchandise is:

(1) the sales price of the retail merchandise as

stated, posted, or advertised by the merchant, including applicable

sales tax, at the time of the offense; or

(2) the rental price of the retail merchandise as

stated, posted, or advertised by the merchant, including applicable

sales tax, at the time of the offense plus the cost of replacing the

retail merchandise within a reasonable time after the offense.

(c) If property or service has value that cannot be

reasonably ascertained by the criteria set forth in Subsections

(a) , (a-1), and (b), the property or service is deemed to have a

value of $750 or more but less than $2,500.

(d) If the actor proves by a preponderance of the evidence

that the actor [ he ] gave consideration for or had a legal interest

in the property or service stolen, the amount of the consideration

or the value of the interest so proven shall be deducted from the

value of the property or service ascertained under Subsection (a),

(a-1), (b), or (c) to determine value for purposes of this chapter.

SECTION 5. Section 31.16, Penal Code, is amended to read as

follows:

Sec. 31.16. ORGANIZED RETAIL THEFT. (a) [ (b) ] A person

commits an offense if the person :

(1) acting in concert with one or more other persons,

unlawfully appropriates retail merchandise, money, or other

property from a merchant with the intent to deprive the merchant of

the property;

(2) on two or more occasions within a 180-day period,

unlawfully appropriates retail merchandise, money, or other

property from a merchant with the intent to deprive the merchant of

the property;

(3) knowingly obtains a benefit from conduct

constituting an offense under Subdivision (1) or (2) that was

committed by another person; or

(4) knowingly acts in concert with one or more other

persons to overwhelm the security response of a merchant or a peace

officer for the purpose of committing an offense under Subdivision

(1) or (2) or avoiding detection or apprehension for the offense

[ intentionally conducts, promotes, or facilitates an activity in

which the person receives, possesses, conceals, stores, barters,

sells, or disposes of:

[ (1) stolen retail merchandise; or

[ (2) merchandise explicitly represented to the person

as being stolen retail merchandise ].

(b) In the prosecution of an offense under this section:

(1) Sections 31.03(b) and (c) apply to the offense for

purposes of determining whether property was unlawfully

appropriated from a merchant; and

(2) a person is presumed to have acted with the intent

to deprive a merchant of retail merchandise if the person:

(A) altered or removed a label, universal product

code, price tag, or retail theft detector for retail merchandise;

or

(B) transferred retail merchandise from the

merchandise's packaging into other packaging.

(c) It is not a defense to prosecution under this section

that:

(1) a person who acted in concert with the actor has

not been charged, convicted, apprehended, or identified;

(2) the offense occurred as a result of a deception or

strategy on the part of a law enforcement agency, including the use

of an undercover operative or peace officer;

(3) the actor was provided by a law enforcement agency

with a facility in which to commit the offense or an opportunity to

engage in conduct constituting the offense; or

(4) the actor was solicited to commit the offense by a

peace officer, and the solicitation was of a type that would

encourage a person predisposed to commit the offense to actually

commit the offense but would not encourage a person not predisposed

to commit the offense to actually commit the offense.

(d) An offense under this section is:

(1) a Class B [ C ] misdemeanor if the total value of the

property [ merchandise ] involved in the offense [ activity ] is less

than $100;

(2) a Class A [ B ] misdemeanor if the total value of the

property [ merchandise ] involved in the offense [ activity ] is $100

or more but less than $750;

(3) a state jail felony [ Class A misdemeanor ] if the

total value of the property [ merchandise ] involved in the offense

[ activity ] is $750 or more but less than $2,500;

(4) a [ state jail ] felony of the third degree if the

total value of the property [ merchandise ] involved in the offense

[ activity ] is $2,500 or more but less than $30,000;

(5) a felony of the second [ third ] degree if the total

value of the property [ merchandise ] involved in the offense

[ activity ] is $30,000 or more but less than $150,000;

(6) a felony of the first [ second ] degree if the total

value of the property [ merchandise ] involved in the offense

[ activity ] is $150,000 or more but less than $300,000; or

(7) a felony of the first degree punishable by

imprisonment in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for life

or for any term of not more than 99 years or less than 15 years, and

a fine not to exceed $250,000, if the total value of the property

[ merchandise ] involved in the offense [ activity ] is $300,000 or

more.

(e) For purposes of enhancement of penalties under

Subchapter D, Chapter 12, a person is considered to have been

convicted of an offense under this section if the person was

adjudged guilty of the offense or entered a plea of guilty or nolo

contendere in return for a grant of deferred adjudication community

supervision, regardless of whether the sentence for the offense was

ever imposed or whether the sentence was probated and the person was

subsequently discharged from community supervision

[ (d) An offense described for purposes of punishment by

Subsections (c)(1)-(6) is increased to the next higher category of

offense if it is shown on the trial of the offense that:

[ (1) the person organized, supervised, financed, or

managed one or more other persons engaged in an activity described

by Subsection (b); or

[ (2) during the commission of the offense, a person

engaged in an activity described by Subsection (b) intentionally,

knowingly, or recklessly:

[ (A) caused a fire exit alarm to sound or

otherwise become activated;

[ (B) deactivated or otherwise prevented a fire

exit alarm or retail theft detector from sounding; or

[ (C) used a shielding or deactivation instrument

to prevent or attempt to prevent detection of the offense by a

retail theft detector ].

SECTION 6. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to

an offense committed on or after the effective date of this Act. An

offense committed before the effective date of this Act is governed

by the law in effect on the date the offense was committed, and the

former law is continued in effect for that purpose. For purposes of

this section, an offense was committed before the effective date of

this Act if any element of the offense occurred before that date.

SECTION 7. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.