Monitoring the Session

SB 1379

Flores bill raising penalties for forgery

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Pete FloresRSenate 24

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to increasing the criminal penalties for forgery.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Basic forgery becomes a state jail felony, up from a Class A misdemeanor.

The bill raises the punishment level for forgery under the Penal Code by one step across the board, making basic forgery a state jail felony instead of a Class A misdemeanor. It touches anyone prosecuted for forging writings, from checks and deeds to government records and money, with value-based tiers also bumped up and the top first-degree felony tier now starting at $150,000 instead of $300,000. Starting September 1, 2025, forgery offenses committed on or after that date carry heavier sentences, while earlier offenses stay under the old law.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB1379 · 2025-02-18

SOLD BY

+ 2 coauthors

ITEM

relating to increasing the criminal penalties for forgery.

WHAT IT DOES

Basic forgery becomes a state jail felony, up from a Class A misdemeanor.

The bill raises the punishment level for forgery under the Penal Code by one step across the board, making basic forgery a state jail felony instead of a Class A misdemeanor. It touches anyone prosecuted for forging writings, from checks and deeds to government records and money, with value-based tiers also bumped up and the top first-degree felony tier now starting at $150,000 instead of $300,000. Starting September 1, 2025, forgery offenses committed on or after that date carry heavier sentences, while earlier offenses stay under the old law.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

Net to General Revenue · FY 2026$959

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version I · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · March 11, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB1379, As Introduced: a positive impact of $158,250 through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · $959

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Criminal Justice
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Vote taken in committee
  9. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  10. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  11. Committee report printed and distributed
  12. Co-author authorized
  13. Placed on intent calendar
  14. Not again placed on intent calendar
  15. Placed on intent calendar
  16. Co-author authorized
  17. Not again placed on intent calendar
  18. Placed on intent calendar
  19. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  20. Vote recorded in Journal
  21. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  22. Vote recorded in Journal
  23. Three day rule suspended
  24. Record vote
  25. Read 3rd time
  26. Passed
  27. Record vote
  28. Statement(s) submitted
  29. Reported engrossed
  30. Received from the Senate
  31. Read first time
  32. Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence
  33. Referred directly to subcommittee by chair
  34. Scheduled for public hearing in s/c on . . .
  35. Considered by s/c in public hearing
  36. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in subcommittee
  37. Left pending in subcommittee
  38. Recalled from subcommittee
  39. Considered in formal meeting
  40. Left pending in committee
  41. Considered in formal meeting
  42. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  43. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  44. Committee report distributed
  45. Committee report sent to Calendars
  46. Considered in Calendars
  47. Placed on General State Calendar
  48. Read 2nd time
  49. Passed to 3rd reading
  50. Record vote RV#3298
  51. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  52. Read 3rd time
  53. Passed
  54. Record vote RV#3374
  55. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  56. House passage reported
  57. Reported enrolled
  58. Signed in the Senate
  59. Signed in the House
  60. Sent to the Governor
  61. Signed by the Governor
  62. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 98 yea · 43 nay

Senate · 29 yea · 2 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 23, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · Mar 26, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$55KMorris Jaffe$25,000Justin Jaffe$25,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 12, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$55,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$55,000.00

Cash
$55,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$55,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 13, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100985131, 101008112, 101072110.

Morris Jaffe$25,000.00
Justin Jaffe$25,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$55,000.00

Cash
$55,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$55,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 13, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100985131, 101008112, 101072110.

Votes5

House May 23, 2025

Yea
98
Nay
43
Present, not voting
1
Absent
1
Excused
7
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3374

SB 1379 was passed by (Record 3374): 98 Yeas, 43 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 98 (published)
  • Nay: 43 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 1 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 7 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 22, 2025

Yea
94
Nay
47
Present, not voting
2
Absent
4
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3298

SB 1379 was passed to third reading by (Record 3298): 94 Yeas, 47 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 94 (published)
  • Nay: 47 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 4 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 26, 2025

Yea
29
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 29, Nays 2. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 26, 2025

Yea
29
Nay
2
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Flores moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that SB 1379 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 29, Nays 2.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 26, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

Senator Flores moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration SB 1379 at this time on its second reading: SB 1379, Relating to increasing the criminal penalties for forgery. The motion prevailed. Senators Cook and Eckhardt asked to be recorded as voting "Nay" on suspension of the regular order of business. The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses31
For
30
Against
1
On
0
Names

For

  • AARP Texas1 registration
  • Bank of America1 registration
  • Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas (CLEAT)1 registration
  • Credit Union Coalition of Texas2 registrations
  • Dallas County Criminal District Attorney John Creuzot1 registration
  • Game Warden Peace Officers Association1 registration
  • Harris County Deputies’ Organization FOP #391 registration
  • Houston Police Department1 registration
  • Houston Police Officers’ Union1 registration
  • IBAT, Independent Bankers Assoc of TX1 registration
  • JPMorgan Chase Holdings LLC1 registration
  • JPMorgan Chase Holdings, LLC1 registration
  • San Antonio Police Department1 registration
  • Self4 registrations
  • Self; Houston Police Officers’ Union1 registration
  • Self; Texas Bankers Association3 registrations
  • Sheriffs’ Association of Texas1 registration
  • Texas Bankers Association1 registration
  • Texas Bankers Association , First National Bank Texas1 registration
  • Texas Financial Crimes Intelligence Center1 registration
  • Texas Mortgage Bankers Association1 registration
  • Texas Municipal Police Association (TMPA)2 registrations
  • Texas Police Chiefs Association1 registration

Against

  • Self1 registration
Sources

31 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal
Net to General Revenue · FY 2026$959

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version I · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · March 11, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB1379, As Introduced: a positive impact of $158,250 through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · $959

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Feb 18, 2025

06/20/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Criminal Jurisprudence · Committee vote 7 aye, 4 nay · Out of committee

Senate committee · Criminal Justice · Committee vote 7 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Subjects

Crimes--Against Property

Criminal Procedure--Sentencing & Punishment

Financial--General

FORGERY

Text

The text as introduced · 592 words

89R6187 MZM-F

By: Flores
S.B. No. 1379

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to increasing the criminal penalties for forgery.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Sections 32.21(c), (d), (e), (e-1), and (e-2),

Penal Code, are amended to read as follows:

(c) Except as provided by Subsections (d), (e), and (e-1),

an offense under this section is a state jail felony [ Class A

misdemeanor ].

(d) Subject to Subsection (e-1), an offense under this

section is a [ state jail ] felony of the third degree if the writing

is or purports to be a will, codicil, deed, deed of trust, mortgage,

security instrument, security agreement, credit card, check,

authorization to debit an account at a financial institution, or

similar sight order for payment of money, contract, release, or

other commercial instrument.

(e) Subject to Subsection (e-1), an offense under this

section is a felony of the second [ third ] degree if the writing is

or purports to be:

(1) part of an issue of money, securities, postage or

revenue stamps;

(2) a government record listed in Section 37.01(2)(C);

or

(3) other instruments issued by a state or national

government or by a subdivision of either, or part of an issue of

stock, bonds, or other instruments representing interests in or

claims against another person.

(e-1) If it is shown on the trial of an offense under this

section that the actor engaged in the conduct to obtain or attempt

to obtain a property or service, an offense under this section is:

(1) a Class B [ C ] misdemeanor if the value of the

property or service is less than $100;

(2) a Class A [ B ] misdemeanor if the value of the

property or service is $100 or more but less than $750;

(3) a state jail felony [ Class A misdemeanor ] if the

value of the property or service is $750 or more but less than

$2,500;

(4) a [ state jail ] felony of the third degree if the

value of the property or service is $2,500 or more but less than

$30,000;

(5) a felony of the second [ third ] degree if the value

of the property or service is $30,000 or more but less than

$150,000; and

(6) a felony of the first [ second ] degree if the value

of the property or service is $150,000 or more [ but less than

$300,000; and

[ (7) a felony of the first degree if the value of the

property or service is $300,000 or more ].

(e-2) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section,

an offense under this section, other than an offense described for

purposes of punishment by Subsection (e-1)(6) [ (e-1)(7) ], is

increased to the next higher category of offense if it is shown on

the trial of the offense that the offense was committed against an

elderly individual as defined by Section 22.04.

SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only

to an offense committed on or after the effective date of this Act.

An offense committed before the effective date of this Act is

governed by the law in effect on the date the offense was committed,

and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. For

purposes of this section, an offense was committed before the

effective date of this Act if any element of the offense occurred

before that date.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.