Monitoring the Session

SB 14

King Bill Builds A New Office To Cut Rules

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: Smells

SmellsReviewed
Sen. Phil KingRSenate 10
Why it's charged
New fee, fund, board or appointees

THE TEXT

…“Regulatory Efficiency Office is established as an office within the”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

A bill sold as regulatory reform and efficiency builds a new office in the governor's office plus a new seven-member appointed panel with expense reimbursement. The new bodies are aimed at cutting rules, so this adds government but does not contradict the pitch.

New fee, fund, board or appointees

Reviewed · Nov 1, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to reforming the procedure by which state agencies adopt rules and impose regulatory requirements and the deference given to the interpretation of laws and rules by state agencies in certain judicial proceedings.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

It sits in the governor’s office, with a 7-member panel. Judges need not defer to agencies.

The bill creates a new Texas Regulatory Efficiency Office inside the governor's office and a seven-member appointed advisory panel to help state agencies cut rules, set rule-reduction goals, publish guides, and report every two years. It changes how all state agencies propose rules by requiring plain-language rule text, a request for cost data from the public, and a searchable statewide rules website. It also tells courts they do not have to defer to an agency's reading of a law or rule, so judges decide those legal questions fresh, though they may still consider a reasonable agency view.

Labels

Labels: ACROSS THE AISLE. Joint authors: 15 Republicans, 1 Democrat. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB14 · 2025-03-06

SOLD BY

+ 13 more authors, 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to reforming the procedure by which state agencies adopt rules and impose regulatory requirements and the deference given to the interpretation of laws and rules by state agencies in certain judicial proceedings.

WHAT IT DOES

It sits in the governor’s office, with a 7-member panel. Judges need not defer to agencies.

The bill creates a new Texas Regulatory Efficiency Office inside the governor's office and a seven-member appointed advisory panel to help state agencies cut rules, set rule-reduction goals, publish guides, and report every two years. It changes how all state agencies propose rules by requiring plain-language rule text, a request for cost data from the public, and a searchable statewide rules website. It also tells courts they do not have to defer to an agency's reading of a law or rule, so judges decide those legal questions fresh, though they may still consider a reasonable agency view.

CHARGES

[x] NEW FEE, FUND, BOARD OR APPOINTEESanalysis confidence 75%

THE TEXT

…“Regulatory Efficiency Office is established as an office within the”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

A bill sold as regulatory reform and efficiency builds a new office in the governor's office plus a new seven-member appointed panel with expense reimbursement. The new bodies are aimed at cutting rules, so this adds government but does not contradict the pitch.

TOTAL

Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($5,361,861)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version E · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · April 3, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB14, As Engrossed: a negative impact of ($9,693,240) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The Office of the Governor, Department of Information Resources, the Texas Regulatory Efficiency Office, and the Secretary of State are required to implement certain provisions of the bill only if the legislature appropriates money specifically for that purpose. If the legislature does not appropriate money specifically for that purpose, these entities may, but are not required to, implement a provision of the bill using other appropriations available for that purpose. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($5,361,861)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Economic Development
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Vote taken in committee
  9. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  10. Committee report printed and distributed
  11. Co-author authorized
  12. Placed on intent calendar
  13. Not again placed on intent calendar
  14. Placed on intent calendar
  15. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  16. Record vote
  17. Read 2nd time
  18. Amendment(s) offered FA1 King
  19. Amendment to amendment offered FA2 Alvarado
  20. Amendment amended
  21. Vote recorded in Journal
  22. Amendment to amendment offered FA3 Alvarado
  23. Amendment amended
  24. Vote recorded in Journal
  25. Amendment adopted as amended FA1 King
  26. Vote recorded in Journal
  27. Passed to engrossment as amended
  28. Record vote
  29. Three day rule suspended
  30. Record vote
  31. Read 3rd time
  32. Passed
  33. Record vote
  34. Reported engrossed
  35. Received from the Senate
  36. Read first time
  37. Referred to Delivery of Government Efficiency
  38. Considered in formal meeting
  39. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  40. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  41. Committee report distributed
  42. Committee report sent to Calendars
  43. Laid out in lieu of companion HB 10
  44. Read 2nd time
  45. Point of order overruled Rule 8, Section 1(a)(1)
  46. Amendment tabled 1-Rodríguez Ramos
  47. Record vote RV#78
  48. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  49. Point of order overruled Rule 8, Section 3; Article III, Section 35(a)
  50. Amendment tabled 2-Rodríguez Ramos
  51. Record vote RV#79
  52. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  53. Amendment tabled 3-Rodríguez Ramos
  54. Record vote RV#80
  55. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  56. Passed to 3rd reading
  57. Record vote RV#81
  58. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  59. Rules suspended
  60. Additional sponsor(s) authorized
  61. Read 3rd time
  62. Passed
  63. Record vote RV#91
  64. House passage reported
  65. Reported enrolled
  66. Signed in the Senate
  67. Signed in the House
  68. Sent to the Governor
  69. Signed by the Governor
  70. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

Beats not yet reviewed.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 97 yea · 51 nay

Senate · 26 yea · 5 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · Apr 9, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · Mar 26, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$30KErle Nye, Jr.$20,000Gideon Powell$20,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$30,300.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$30,300.00

Cash
$30,000.00
Paid by others
$300.00
Total
$30,300.00
fundraiser $300.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Sep 26, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982783, 101007450, 101026985.

Erle Nye, Jr.$20,000.00
Gideon Powell$20,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$30,300.00

Cash
$30,000.00
Paid by others
$300.00
Total
$30,300.00
fundraiser $300.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Sep 26, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982783, 101007450, 101026985.

Votes9

House Apr 9, 2025

Yea
97
Nay
51
Present, not voting
1
Absent
0
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 91

SB 14 was passed by (Record 91): 97 Yeas, 51 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 97 (published)
  • Nay: 51 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Apr 8, 2025

Yea
97
Nay
51
Present, not voting
1
Absent
1
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 81

SB 14 was passed to third reading by (Record 81): 97 Yeas, 51 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 97 (published)
  • Nay: 51 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 1 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Apr 8, 2025

Yea
88
Nay
59
Present, not voting
2
Absent
1
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 80

Representative Capriglione moved to table Amendment No. 3. The motion to table prevailed by (Record 80): 88 Yeas, 59 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 88 (published)
  • Nay: 59 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 1 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Apr 8, 2025

Yea
92
Nay
56
Present, not voting
1
Absent
1
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 79

Representative Capriglione moved to table Amendment No. 2. The motion to table prevailed by (Record 79): 92 Yeas, 56 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 92 (published)
  • Nay: 56 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 1 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Apr 8, 2025

Yea
98
Nay
50
Present, not voting
1
Absent
1
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 78

Representative Capriglione moved to table Amendment No. 1. The motion to table prevailed by (Record 78): 98 Yeas, 50 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 98 (published)
  • Nay: 50 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 1 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 26, 2025

Yea
26
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 26, Nays 5. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 26, 2025

Yea
26
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator King moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that SB 14 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 26, Nays 5.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 26, 2025

Yea
26
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

SB 14 as amended was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 26, Nays 5.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Mar 26, 2025

Yea
25
Nay
6
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator King moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration SB 14 at this time on its second reading: SB 14, Relating to reforming the procedure by which state agencies adopt rules and impose regulatory requirements and the deference given to the interpretation of laws and rules by state agencies in certain judicial proceedings. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 25, Nays 6.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 25 (published)
  • Nay: 6 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses19
For
17
Against
0
On
2
Names

For

  • Austin Chamber of Commerce1 registration
  • Cicero Action1 registration
  • Coalition for Regulatory Efficiency and Reform2 registrations
  • FGA Action1 registration
  • Goldwater Institute1 registration
  • Greater Houston Partnership1 registration
  • NFIB1 registration
  • Panhandle Producers and Royalty Owners Association1 registration
  • Self; Americans for Prosperity1 registration
  • Texans for Free Enterprise1 registration
  • Texans for Lawsuit Reform1 registration
  • Texas 20361 registration
  • Texas Assoc of School Boards1 registration
  • Texas Association of Builders1 registration
  • Texas Association of Business1 registration
  • Texas Public Policy Foundation1 registration

On

  • Self1 registration
  • Texas Department of Information Resources1 registration
Sources

19 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal
Net to General Revenue · FY 2026($5,361,861)

LBB estimate, flow · fiscal note version E · ( ) = negative · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · April 3, 2025

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for SB14, As Engrossed: a negative impact of ($9,693,240) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The Office of the Governor, Department of Information Resources, the Texas Regulatory Efficiency Office, and the Secretary of State are required to implement certain provisions of the bill only if the legislature appropriates money specifically for that purpose. If the legislature does not appropriate money specifically for that purpose, these entities may, but are not required to, implement a provision of the bill using other appropriations available for that purpose. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

First year · FY 2026 · ($5,361,861)

Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 19, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 6, 2025

04/23/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Nov 1, 2026 at 3:15 PM CST. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors
Cosponsors

House committee · Delivery of Government Efficiency · Committee vote 11 aye, 0 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Economic Development · Committee vote 3 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Companion

HB 10 by Capriglione (similar)

Subjects

Business & Commerce--General

Courts--General

Governor

State Agencies, Boards & Commissions

State Agencies, Boards & Commissions--Admin. Procedure

State Agencies, Boards & Commissions--Newly Proposed

REGULATORY REFORM & EFFICIENCY ACT (PP2QE)

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE

STATE AGENCIES' RULES

INFORMATION RESOURCES, DEPARTMENT OF

SECRETARY OF STATE

TEXAS REGULATORY EFFICIENCY ADVISORY PANEL (VA9GP)

TEXAS REGULATORY EFFICIENCY OFFICE (VO98M)

Text

The text as introduced · 2,845 words

89R17002 CS-F

By: King, et al.
S.B. No. 14

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to reforming the procedure by which state agencies adopt

rules and impose regulatory requirements and the deference given to

the interpretation of laws and rules by state agencies in certain

judicial proceedings.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. This Act may be cited as the Regulatory Reform

and Efficiency Act.

SECTION 2. Subtitle E, Title 4, Government Code, is amended

by adding Chapter 465 to read as follows:

CHAPTER 465. REGULATORY AND RULEMAKING EFFICIENCY

SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 465.0001. DEFINITIONS. (a) The definitions in

Chapter 2001 apply to this chapter.

(b) In this chapter:

(1) "Institution of higher education" has the meaning

assigned by Section 61.003, Education Code.

(2) "Office" means the Texas Regulatory Efficiency

Office.

(3) "Panel" means the Texas Regulatory Efficiency

Advisory Panel.

Sec. 465.0002. APPLICATION OF SUNSET ACT TO OFFICE AND

PANEL. (a) The Texas Regulatory Efficiency Office and the Texas

Regulatory Efficiency Advisory Panel are subject to Chapter 325

(Texas Sunset Act).

(b) Unless continued in existence as provided by Chapter 325

(Texas Sunset Act), the office and panel are abolished September 1,

2037.

SUBCHAPTER B. TEXAS REGULATORY EFFICIENCY OFFICE

Sec. 465.0051. ESTABLISHMENT OF OFFICE. The Texas

Regulatory Efficiency Office is established as an office within the

office of the governor.

Sec. 465.0052. PURPOSES OF OFFICE. (a) The office is

established to:

(1) identify and expand opportunities for

implementing efficiencies in:

(A) the process by which state agencies adopt

rules;

(B) the regulatory review process; and

(C) the manner in which contested cases are

conducted;

(2) assist state agencies in identifying:

(A) unnecessary and ineffective rules;

(B) the effect and cost to this state and

regulated persons of the agencies' rules and proposed rules; and

(C) opportunities to repeal or amend rules to

provide effective protection to the public with the least cost and

inconvenience to regulated persons;

(3) coordinate with the secretary of state, the

Department of Information Resources, and other state agencies in

the secretary of state's efforts under Section 2001.007 to:

(A) improve public access to information

regarding state agency rules, forms, and filings; and

(B) create an interactive Internet website for

use by the public to search and obtain information regarding rules,

forms, and filings applicable to specific regulated occupations,

industries, professions, and activities;

(4) establish a goal for each state agency to reduce

rules or other regulatory requirements, including by:

(A) eliminating unnecessary or ineffective rules

or other regulatory requirements; and

(B) reducing the inefficiencies resulting from

rules or other regulatory requirements adopted by the agency by:

(i) reducing required training hours;

(ii) reducing the number of forms a

regulated person is required to complete;

(iii) reducing the amount of information

required by forms that a regulated person is required to complete;

(iv) reducing the amount of or eliminating

fees imposed by the rules;

(v) reducing the number of activities

covered by the rules; or

(vi) creating waivers for or exemptions

from the rules under certain circumstances; and

(5) prepare and publish written manuals, guides, or

other publications as required by this chapter.

(b) The office shall coordinate with the panel, state

agencies, and the governor's office to accomplish the purposes of

the office.

Sec. 465.0053. REGULATORY ECONOMIC ANALYSIS MANUAL. (a)

The office shall prepare and publish a regulatory economic analysis

manual.

(b) The manual required by Subsection (a) must identify and

describe best practices for state agencies related to:

(1) preparing a local employment impact statement

under Section 2001.022;

(2) conducting a regulatory analysis under Section

2001.0225;

(3) preparing a fiscal note under Section 2001.024;

and

(4) preparing a note regarding public benefits and

costs under Section 2001.024.

(c) The office shall ensure that the manual required by

Subsection (a) is written in plain language that may be easily

understood by the public.

Sec. 465.0054. REGULATORY REDUCTION GUIDE. (a) The office

shall prepare and publish a regulatory reduction guide.

(b) The purpose of the guide required by Subsection (a) is

to assist each state agency to:

(1) meet the goal established by the agency under

Section 465.0052(a)(4); and

(2) document that the agency met the goal described by

Subdivision (1).

(c) The office shall ensure that the guide required by

Subsection (a) is written in plain language that may be easily

understood by the public.

Sec. 465.0055. RULEMAKING AND REGULATORY EFFICIENCY FORUM.

The office shall establish a forum for interested persons described

by Section 2001.021(d) to assist the office and the panel to

accomplish the purposes of the office and panel.

SUBCHAPTER C. TEXAS REGULATORY EFFICIENCY ADVISORY PANEL

Sec. 465.0101. ESTABLISHMENT OF PANEL. The Texas

Regulatory Efficiency Advisory Panel is established as an advisory

panel to the governor's office, including the office established

under this chapter.

Sec. 465.0102. ADMINISTRATIVE ATTACHMENT AND SUPPORT. (a)

The panel is administratively attached to the office of the

governor.

(b) The office established under this chapter shall provide

staff, facilities, and other administrative support necessary to

assist the panel in performing the panel's duties under this

chapter.

Sec. 465.0103. COMPOSITION OF PANEL. (a) The panel is

composed of the following seven members:

(1) two members appointed by the governor from a list

provided by the speaker of the house of representatives, including:

(A) one member who represents regulated small

businesses; and

(B) one member of the public;

(2) two members appointed by the lieutenant governor,

including:

(A) one member who represents regulated large

businesses; and

(B) one member of the public; and

(3) three members appointed by the governor,

including:

(A) one member who holds an occupational license

issued by a state agency;

(B) one member employed by an institution of

higher education who conducts research at the institution and has

experience addressing issues related to state agency rules; and

(C) one member who represents state agencies that

adopt rules.

(b) The governor may reject one or more of the nominees on a

list submitted by the speaker of the house of representatives under

Subsection (a)(1) and request a new list of different nominees.

(c) In making appointments under Subsection (a), priority

shall be given to individuals with expertise in state agency rules

and the rulemaking process, including expertise in regulatory

research, compliance, cost, and impact analysis, and related law

and procedure.

Sec. 465.0104. TERMS; VACANCY. (a) Members of the panel

serve two-year terms.

(b) A vacancy on the panel shall be filled in the same manner

and is subject to the same qualifications as the original

appointment. A panel member appointed to fill a vacancy on the

panel shall serve the remainder of the unexpired term.

Sec. 465.0105. REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXPENSES. Members of the

panel serve without compensation but are entitled to reimbursement

for actual and necessary expenses incurred in performing official

duties under this chapter.

Sec. 465.0106. PRESIDING OFFICER. The governor shall

appoint one member of the panel to serve as the panel's presiding

officer.

Sec. 465.0107. MEETINGS. The panel shall meet at the call

of the panel's presiding officer.

Sec. 465.0108. PURPOSES OF PANEL. The panel is established

to:

(1) use the knowledge and expertise of regulated

persons, small and large businesses, institutions of higher

education, and state agencies to identify and expand opportunities

for implementing efficiencies in:

(A) the process by which state agencies adopt

rules;

(B) the regulatory review process; and

(C) the manner in which contested cases are

conducted; and

(2) assist the office and state agencies in

identifying:

(A) unnecessary and ineffective rules;

(B) the effect and cost to this state and

regulated persons of the agencies' rules and proposed rules; and

(C) opportunities to repeal or amend rules to

provide effective protection to the public with the least cost and

inconvenience to regulated persons.

Sec. 465.0109. APPLICATION OF OTHER LAW. Chapter 2110 does

not apply to the panel.

SUBCHAPTER D. REPORTING REQUIREMENT

Sec. 465.0151. BIENNIAL REPORT. (a) Not later than

December 1 of each even-numbered year, the office shall prepare and

submit to the governor and the Legislative Budget Board a written

report that describes:

(1) the activities undertaken by the office during the

two-year period preceding the date of the report to accomplish the

purposes of the office;

(2) any findings and recommendations of the office

related to the office's purposes under this chapter; and

(3) any legislative recommendations of the office to

accomplish and further the findings and recommendations described

by Subdivision (2).

(b) The panel may assist the office in preparing the report

required by Subsection (a).

SECTION 3. Section 2001.007, Government Code, is amended by

adding Subsection (e) to read as follows:

(e) The secretary of state, Department of Information

Resources, and Texas Regulatory Efficiency Office shall jointly

coordinate with each other state agency to establish an Internet

website that allows a person to search the rules and related

information made available by state agencies under Subsection (a)

by:

(1) the general topic of the rule;

(2) the type of activity or business regulated by the

rule; and

(3) if applicable, the North American Industry

Classification System (NAICS) sector code for the type of activity

or business regulated by the rule.

SECTION 4. Section 2001.024, Government Code, is amended by

amending Subsection (a) and adding Subsection (e) to read as

follows:

(a) The notice of a proposed rule must include:

(1) a brief explanation of the proposed rule;

(2) the text of the proposed rule, except any portion

omitted under Section 2002.014, prepared in a manner to indicate

any words to be added or deleted from the current text and, to the

extent practicable, written in plain language ;

(3) a statement of the statutory or other authority

under which the rule is proposed to be adopted, including:

(A) a concise explanation of the particular

statutory or other provisions under which the rule is proposed;

(B) the section or article of the code affected;

(C) if applicable, the bill number for the

legislation that enacted the statutory authority under which the

rule is proposed to be adopted if the legislation was enacted during

the four-year period preceding the date notice of the proposed rule

is given; and

(D) a certification that the proposed rule has

been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the state

agency's authority to adopt;

(4) a fiscal note showing the name and title of the

officer or employee responsible for preparing or approving the note

and stating for each year of the first five years that the rule will

be in effect:

(A) the additional estimated cost to the state

and to local governments expected as a result of enforcing or

administering the rule;

(B) the estimated reductions in costs to the

state and to local governments as a result of enforcing or

administering the rule;

(C) the estimated loss or increase in revenue to

the state or to local governments as a result of enforcing or

administering the rule; and

(D) if applicable, that enforcing or

administering the rule does not have foreseeable implications

relating to cost or revenues of the state or local governments;

(5) a note about public benefits and costs showing the

name and title of the officer or employee responsible for preparing

or approving the note and stating for each year of the first five

years that the rule will be in effect:

(A) the public benefits expected as a result of

adoption of the proposed rule; and

(B) the probable economic cost to persons

required to comply with the rule;

(6) the local employment impact statement prepared

under Section 2001.022, if required;

(7) a request for comments on the proposed rule from

any interested person; [ and ]

(8) a request for information related to the cost,

benefit, or effect of the proposed rule, including any applicable

data, research, or analysis, from any person required to comply

with the proposed rule or any other interested person; and

(9) any other statement required by law.

(e) For purposes of Subsection (a)(2), the text of a

proposed rule is written in plain language if the text is written

using language the general public, including individuals with

limited English proficiency, can readily understand because the

language is concise and well-organized.

SECTION 5. Sections 2001.035(a) and (b), Government Code,

are amended to read as follows:

(a) A rule is voidable unless a state agency adopts it in

substantial compliance with Sections 2001.022 [ 2001.0225 ] through

2001.034.

(b) A person must initiate a proceeding to contest a rule on

the ground of noncompliance with the procedural requirements of

Sections 2001.022 [ 2001.0225 ] through 2001.034 not later than the

second anniversary of the effective date of the rule.

SECTION 6. Section 2001.040, Government Code, is amended to

read as follows:

Sec. 2001.040. SCOPE AND EFFECT OF ORDER INVALIDATING

AGENCY RULE. If a court finds that an agency has not substantially

complied with one or more procedural requirements of Sections

2001.022 [ 2001.0225 ] through 2001.034, the court may remand the

rule, or a portion of the rule, to the agency and, if it does so

remand, shall provide a reasonable time for the agency to either

revise or readopt the rule through established procedure. During

the remand period, the rule shall remain effective unless the court

finds good cause to invalidate the rule or a portion of the rule,

effective as of the date of the court's order.

SECTION 7. Subchapter B, Chapter 2001, Government Code, is

amended by adding Section 2001.042 to read as follows:

Sec. 2001.042. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF STATE AGENCY LEGAL

DETERMINATION REGARDING LAWS AND RULES. Notwithstanding any other

law, in a judicial proceeding in this state, including an action

subject to Section 2001.038, a court is not required to give

deference to a state agency's legal determination regarding the

construction, validity, or applicability of the law or a rule

adopted by the state agency responsible for the rule's

administration, implementation, or other enforcement. This

section does not prohibit a court from giving consideration to a

legal determination made by a state agency that is reasonable and

does not conflict with the plain language of the statute.

SECTION 8. Subchapter G, Chapter 2001, Government Code, is

amended by adding Section 2001.1721 to read as follows:

Sec. 2001.1721. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF QUESTION OF LAW. (a)

Except as provided by Subsection (b), in any matter brought under

this subchapter, the reviewing court shall review all questions of

law de novo, including the interpretation of constitutional or

statutory provisions or rules adopted by a state agency, without

giving deference to any legal determination by a state agency.

(b) Subsection (a) does not prohibit a reviewing court from

giving consideration to a legal determination made by a state

agency that is reasonable and does not conflict with the plain

language of the statute.

(c) Notwithstanding any other law, this section applies in

an action for judicial review of a contested case authorized by law

and other court actions authorized by law that involve a state

agency's legal determination of a constitutional or statutory

provision or a rule adopted by the state agency.

(d) A law may not exempt an action from the application of

this section except by specific reference to this section.

SECTION 9. Sections 2001.022(c) and 2001.0221(e),

Government Code, are repealed.

SECTION 10. (a) As soon as practicable after the effective

date of this Act, but not later than January 1, 2026, the governor

and lieutenant governor shall appoint the members of the Texas

Regulatory Efficiency Advisory Panel as required by Section

465.0103, Government Code, as added by this Act.

(b) Not later than the 60th day after the date the last

appointment is made to the Texas Regulatory Efficiency Advisory

Panel under Subsection (a) of this section, the panel shall hold its

first meeting.

SECTION 11. Sections 2001.024, 2001.035, and 2001.040,

Government Code, as amended by this Act, and the repeal by this Act

of Sections 2001.022(c) and 2001.0221(e), Government Code, apply

only to a rule proposed by a state agency on or after the effective

date of this Act. A rule proposed before the effective date of this

Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the rule was

proposed, and the former law is continued in effect for that

purpose.

SECTION 12. Sections 2001.042 and 2001.1721, Government

Code, as added by this Act, apply only to a petition for judicial

review, action for declaratory judgment, contested case, or other

proceeding initiated on or after the effective date of this Act. A

petition for judicial review, action for declaratory judgment,

contested case, or other proceeding initiated before the effective

date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the date the

proceeding was initiated, and the former law is continued in effect

for that purpose.

SECTION 13. This Act takes effect immediately if it

receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each

house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.

If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate

effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2025.