Monitoring the Session

SB 1458

bill ending automatic jury sequestration on request

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Brent HagenbuchRSenate 30

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the sequestration of a jury in a criminal case.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

A request now gets a hearing. Judge needs good cause.

The bill ends the rule that a judge must lock down a criminal jury after the charge whenever either side asks. Instead, a party's request triggers a hearing, and the jury is kept together only if the judge finds good cause, with the request due at least 10 days before jury selection unless late filing is justified. Prosecutors, defendants and jurors in criminal trials are affected, and fewer juries will be sequestered by automatic demand starting with cases that begin after September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: ZOMBIE BILL. Died 2 times: 88R HB 469 by Rep. Smith (Died in committee) and this bill (Died in committee). Checked against 88R only.BACK FROM THE DEAD. Same text as a bill filed before that died: 88R HB 469 by Rep. Smith (Died in committee). Filed in 2 sessions, counting this one. Checked against 88R only.TRY NO. 2. Filed in 2 sessions: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Feb 19, 2025 and referred to the Senate Criminal Justice committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB1458 · 2025-02-19

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the sequestration of a jury in a criminal case.

WHAT IT DOES

A request now gets a hearing. Judge needs good cause.

The bill ends the rule that a judge must lock down a criminal jury after the charge whenever either side asks. Instead, a party's request triggers a hearing, and the jury is kept together only if the judge finds good cause, with the request due at least 10 days before jury selection unless late filing is justified. Prosecutors, defendants and jurors in criminal trials are affected, and fewer juries will be sequestered by automatic demand starting with cases that begin after September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Criminal Justice
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$50,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$50,000.00

Cash
$50,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$50,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 23, 2025 to Sep 8, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101010787, 101032653.

Denton County Republican Lincoln Cabinet PAC$25,000.00

Denton County Republican Lincoln Cabinet PAC

$25,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$25,000.00

Also funds 1 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Apr 8, 2026 to Apr 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Apr 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101058859.

John Kleinheinz$25,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$50,000.00

Cash
$50,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$50,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jun 23, 2025 to Sep 8, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101010787, 101032653.

×

Denton County Republican Lincoln Cabinet PAC

$25,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$25,000.00

Also funds 1 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Apr 8, 2026 to Apr 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Apr 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101058859.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

FILED BEFORE

Filed 2 times: 88R and 89R. Checked against 88R only.

88R HB 469

by Rep. Smith, different lead author · Died in committee · same text

Introduced text

Last action, May 5, 2023: Referred to Criminal Justice

Relating to the sequestration of a jury in a criminal case.

Caption, 88R bill history

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Feb 19, 2025

03/06/2025 S Referred to Criminal Justice

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Senate committee · Criminal Justice · Final status: Died in committee

Companion

HB 3206 by Hayes (identical)

Subjects

Courts--Juries

Criminal Procedure--General

Text

The text as introduced · 462 words

89R11670 JDK-F

By: Hagenbuch
S.B. No. 1458

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the sequestration of a jury in a criminal case.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Article 35.23, Code of Criminal Procedure, is

amended to read as follows:

Art. 35.23. JURORS MAY SEPARATE. (a) The court may adjourn

veniremen to any day of the term. When jurors have been sworn in a

felony case, the court may, at its discretion, permit the jurors to

separate until the court has given its charge to the jury.

(b) The court on its own motion may [ and on the motion of

either party shall ], after having given its charge to the jury,

order that the jury not be allowed to separate, after which the jury

shall be kept together [ , and not permitted to separate except to

the extent of housing female jurors separate and apart from male

jurors, ] until a verdict has been rendered or the jury finally

discharged.

(c) The court, on the motion of either party requesting that

the jury not be allowed to separate after the court has given its

charge to the jury, shall hold a hearing to determine whether good

cause exists to order that the jury not be allowed to separate. On a

finding of good cause, the court shall enter an order described by

Subsection (b). A motion by a party requesting that the jury not be

allowed to separate must be filed not less than 10 days before the

date jury selection begins unless the requesting party shows good

cause exists for filing the motion after that period.

(d) Any person who makes known to the jury which party made

the motion not to allow separation of the jury shall be punished for

contempt of court.

(e) If [ such ] jurors ordered not to separate are kept

overnight, facilities shall be provided for female jurors separate

and apart from the facilities provided for male jurors.

(f) In misdemeanor cases the court may, at its discretion,

permit the jurors to separate at any time before the verdict.

(g) In any case in which the jury is permitted to separate,

the court shall first give the jurors proper instructions with

regard to their conduct as jurors when so separated.

SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only

to a criminal proceeding that commences on or after the effective

date of this Act. A criminal proceeding that commences before the

effective date of this Act is governed by the law in effect on the

date the proceeding commenced, and the former law is continued in

effect for that purpose.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.