Monitoring the Session

SB 1541

bill letting the state oversee any county’s elections

Did not pass

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Paul BettencourtRSenate 7

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to state oversight of county elections following a county election audit.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

After an audit. Not just counties with more than 4 million people.

This bill lets the Texas Secretary of State put any county's election office under state oversight after a state election audit finds a recurring pattern of problems, instead of only counties with more than 4 million people. It touches county election officials and elections administrators statewide, who can now face state oversight, a state-ordered fix-it plan with a year of monitoring, and possible firing by written order if problems are not fixed. On the ground, audit findings must be made public, and the state either recommends oversight or works with the county on a remedy plan, while complaint-triggered oversight stays limited to counties over 4 million.

Labels

Labels: GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on Apr 15, 2025. Died in the House: voted out of the Elections committee 5-4, no floor vote.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB1541 · 2025-02-21

SOLD BY

+ 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to state oversight of county elections following a county election audit.

WHAT IT DOES

After an audit. Not just counties with more than 4 million people.

This bill lets the Texas Secretary of State put any county's election office under state oversight after a state election audit finds a recurring pattern of problems, instead of only counties with more than 4 million people. It touches county election officials and elections administrators statewide, who can now face state oversight, a state-ordered fix-it plan with a year of monitoring, and possible firing by written order if problems are not fixed. On the ground, audit findings must be made public, and the state either recommends oversight or works with the county on a remedy plan, while complaint-triggered oversight stays limited to counties over 4 million.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 9, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to State Affairs
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in public hearing
  9. Vote taken in committee
  10. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  11. Committee report printed and distributed
  12. Placed on intent calendar
  13. Co-author authorized
  14. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  15. Record vote
  16. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  17. Record vote
  18. Three day rule suspended
  19. Record vote
  20. Read 3rd time
  21. Passed
  22. Record vote
  23. Reported engrossed
  24. Received from the Senate
  25. Read first time
  26. Referred to Elections
  27. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  28. Considered in public hearing
  29. Committee substitute considered in committee
  30. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  31. Left pending in committee
  32. Considered in formal meeting
  33. Committee substitute considered in committee
  34. Reported favorably as substituted
  35. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  36. Committee report distributed
  37. Committee report sent to Calendars
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 25 yea · 6 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · Apr 15, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Donors report through Friends of Paul Bettencourt.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes4

Senate Apr 15, 2025

Yea
25
Nay
6
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 25, Nays 6. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 25 (published)
  • Nay: 6 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 15, 2025

Yea
25
Nay
6
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that SB 1541 be placed on its third reading and final passage: SB 1541, Relating to state oversight of county elections following a county election audit. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 25, Nays 6.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 25 (published)
  • Nay: 6 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 15, 2025

Yea
25
Nay
6
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 25, Nays 6. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 25 (published)
  • Nay: 6 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 15, 2025

Yea
25
Nay
6
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration SB 1541 at this time on its second reading: SB 1541, Relating to state oversight of county elections following a county election audit. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 25, Nays 6.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 25 (published)
  • Nay: 6 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses13
For
4
Against
8
On
1
Names

For

  • Self2 registrations
  • Self; Harris county ballot security2 registrations

Against

  • ACLU of Texas2 registrations
  • Common Cause Texas1 registration
  • Self2 registrations
  • Texas Civil Rights Project2 registrations
  • Texas Democratic Party1 registration

On

  • Secretary of State1 registration
Sources

13 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 9, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Feb 21, 2025

05/21/2025 H Committee report sent to Calendars

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 6:51 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Elections · Committee vote 5 aye, 4 nay · Out of committee

Senate committee · State Affairs · Committee vote 10 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Subjects

Elections--Administration

Elections--General

Elections--Registration & Suffrage

SECRETARY OF STATE

Text

The text as introduced · 1,352 words

89R8062 JDK-D

By: Bettencourt
S.B. No. 1541

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to state oversight of county elections following a county

election audit.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 31.017, Election Code, is amended to

read as follows:

Sec. 31.017. IMPLEMENTATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE OVERSIGHT OF

COUNTY ELECTION. (a) The [ In a county with a population of more

than 4 million, the ] secretary of state's office may order

administrative oversight of a county office administering

elections or voter registration in the county :

(1) under Section 127.351; or

(2) if , in a county with a population of more than 4

million :

(A) [ (1) ] an administrative election complaint

is filed with the secretary of state by a person who participated in

the relevant election as:

(i) [ (A) ] a candidate;

(ii) [ (B) ] a county chair or state chair of

a political party;

(iii) [ (C) ] a presiding judge;

(iv) [ (D) ] an alternate presiding judge; or

(v) [ (E) ] the head of a specific-purpose

political committee that supports or opposes a measure;

(B) [ (2) ] the secretary of state has provided

notice to the county election official with authority over election

administration or voter registration under Section 31.018; and

(C) [ (3) ] the secretary of state, after

conducting an investigation under Section 31.019, has good cause to

believe that a recurring pattern of problems with election

administration or voter registration exists in the county,

including any recurring:

(i) [ (A) ] malfunction of voting system

equipment that prevents a voter from casting a vote;

(ii) [ (B) ] carelessness or official

misconduct in the distribution of election supplies;

(iii) [ (C) ] errors in the tabulation of

results that would have affected the outcome of an election;

(iv) [ (D) ] violations of Section 66.053;

(v) [ (E) ] discovery of properly executed

voted ballots after the canvass of an election that were not

counted; or

(vi) [ (F) ] failure to conduct maintenance

activities on the lists of registered voters as required under this

code.

(b) The secretary of state shall make a determination on

whether to implement administrative oversight under Subsection (a)

not later than the 30th day after the earliest of:

(1) the day a response by the county election official

with authority over election administration or voter registration

is received by the secretary of state under Section 31.018;

(2) the last day the county election official with

authority over election administration or voter registration could

provide a response to the secretary of state under Section 31.018;

[ or ]

(3) the day the report on the findings of an

investigation is provided to the county election official with

authority over election administration or voter registration under

Section 31.019 ; or

(4) the monitoring period under Section 127.351 has

expired .

SECTION 2. Sections 31.018(a) and (c), Election Code, are

amended to read as follows:

(a) In a county with a population of more than 4 million and

not later than the 30th day after receiving an administrative

election complaint under Section 31.017(a)(2)(A) [ 31.017(a)(1) ],

the secretary of state shall provide notice of the complaint to the

applicable county election official with authority over election

administration or voter registration, including the specific

allegations against the election official in the complaint.

(c) If the administrative election complaint filed under

Section 31.017(a)(2)(A) [ 31.017(a)(1) ] concerns an election for

which voting by personal appearance has begun and the final canvass

has not been completed, the county election official with authority

over election administration or voter registration must provide a

response under Subsection (b) not later than 72 hours after

receiving notice of the complaint under Subsection (a).

SECTION 3. Sections 31.019(a) and (c), Election Code, are

amended to read as follows:

(a) In a county with a population of more than 4 million, the

secretary of state may direct personnel in the secretary of state's

office to conduct an investigation on an administrative election

complaint received under Section 31.017(a)(2)(A) [ 31.017(a)(1) ]

and must consider any response or supporting documentation provided

by the county election official with authority over election

administration or voter registration under Section 31.018, if

applicable.

(c) After completing an investigation under this section,

the secretary of state must provide a report on the findings of the

investigation to:

(1) the county election official with authority over

election administration or voter registration; and

(2) the individual who filed the administrative

election complaint under Section 31.017(a)(2)(A) [ 31.017(a)(1) ].

SECTION 4. Sections 31.020(a) and (f), Election Code, are

amended to read as follows:

(a) If the secretary of state implements administrative

oversight under Section 31.017, the secretary shall provide written

notice to the county election official with authority over election

administration or voter registration and the county judge of the

determination by the secretary to implement administrative

oversight in the county. The notice must include the specific

recurring pattern of problems with election administration or voter

registration identified by the secretary and as described by

[ under ] Section 31.017(a)(2)(C) [ 31.017(a)(3) ].

(f) The secretary of state shall conduct the administrative

oversight of a county until the earlier of:

(1) December 31 of the even-numbered year following

the first anniversary of the date the complaint was received under

Section 31.017(a)(2)(1) [ 31.017(a)(1) ];

(2) December 31 of the even-numbered year following

the first anniversary of the secretary of state's decision to

administer administrative oversight under Section 127.351; or

(3) [ (2) ] the date on which the secretary of state

determines that the recurring pattern of problems with election

administration or voter registration is rectified.

SECTION 5. Section 31.037(b), Election Code, is amended to

read as follows:

(b) The [ In a county with a population of more than 4

million, the ] secretary of state may enter a written order to

terminate the employment of a county elections administrator at the

conclusion of administrative oversight of the county elections

administrator's office under this subchapter [ Subchapter A ] if the

recurring pattern of problems with election administration or voter

registration is not rectified or continues to impede the free

exercise of a citizen's voting rights in the county.

SECTION 6. Section 127.351, Election Code, is amended by

amending Subsection (e) and adding Subsection (e-1) to read as

follows:

(e) If [ not later than July 31 of the first odd-numbered

year following the commencement of an audit under this section, ]

the audit findings demonstrate to the secretary of state that a

recurring pattern of problems with election administration or voter

registration, as described under Section 31.017(a)(2)(C)

[ 31.017(a)(3) ], exists in an audited county and the problems impede

the free exercise of a citizen's voting rights, the secretary:

(1) shall[ :

[ (A) ] publicly release the [ preliminary ]

findings of the audit[ ; ] and either:

(A) [ (B) ] recommend the county for

administrative oversight under Subchapter A, Chapter 31 ; or

(B) coordinate with the applicable county

election official to develop a plan to remedy the identified

problems ; and

(2) may conduct , as determined necessary by the

secretary:

(A) an audit of other elections held in the

county in the previous two years ; or

(B) an audit of other elections held within 12

months of the completion of an audit under this section [ , as

determined necessary by the secretary ].

(e-1) The secretary of state may monitor compliance with a

plan developed under Subsection (e)(1)(B) for a year following the

creation of the plan. If the secretary of state determines the

county has failed to adequately implement the plan developed, the

secretary of state may order administrative oversight in accordance

with Subsection (e).

SECTION 7. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.