Monitoring the Session

SB 1660

labs send prosecutors a yearly list of toxicology evidence

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Joan HuffmanRSenate 17

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the retention and preservation of toxicological evidence of certain intoxication offenses.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Including when each storage period ends.

The bill makes crime labs holding toxicology evidence, such as blood samples from intoxication cases, send the local prosecutor a yearly notice listing that evidence and when its required storage period ends. It also limits the prosecutor's power to make storage holders ask permission before destroying evidence. That power now covers only felony cases, and prosecutors are barred from requiring permission in misdemeanor cases once the retention period has run. Labs gain a new yearly reporting duty, and in misdemeanor cases they can destroy expired samples without a prosecutor's sign-off starting September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: BUZZER BEATER. Final vote Jun 1, 2025: both chambers adopted the conference committee report. 1 day before the session ended Jun 2, 2025.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB1660 · 2025-02-26

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the retention and preservation of toxicological evidence of certain intoxication offenses.

WHAT IT DOES

Including when each storage period ends.

The bill makes crime labs holding toxicology evidence, such as blood samples from intoxication cases, send the local prosecutor a yearly notice listing that evidence and when its required storage period ends. It also limits the prosecutor's power to make storage holders ask permission before destroying evidence. That power now covers only felony cases, and prosecutors are barred from requiring permission in misdemeanor cases once the retention period has run. Labs gain a new yearly reporting duty, and in misdemeanor cases they can destroy expired samples without a prosecutor's sign-off starting September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 31, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Criminal Justice
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Vote taken in committee
  8. Reported favorably as substituted
  9. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  10. Committee report printed and distributed
  11. Placed on intent calendar
  12. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  13. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  14. Vote recorded in Journal
  15. Three day rule suspended
  16. Record vote
  17. Read 3rd time
  18. Passed
  19. Record vote
  20. Reported engrossed
  21. Received from the Senate
  22. Read first time
  23. Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence
  24. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  25. Considered in public hearing
  26. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  27. Left pending in committee
  28. Considered in formal meeting
  29. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  30. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  31. Committee report distributed
  32. Committee report sent to Calendars
  33. Considered in Calendars
  34. Placed on General State Calendar
  35. Read 2nd time
  36. Amended 1-J. Jones
  37. Passed to 3rd reading as amended
  38. Record vote RV#3785
  39. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  40. Read 3rd time
  41. Passed
  42. Record vote RV#3890
  43. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  44. House passage as amended reported
  45. House amendment(s) laid before the Senate
  46. Read
  47. Senate refuses to concur
  48. Senate requests conference committee
  49. Senate appoints conferees
  50. Senate refuses to concur-reported
  51. Senate requests conference committee-reported
  52. Senate appoints conferees-reported
  53. House grants request for conference committee
  54. House appoints conferees
  55. House grants request for conf comm-reported
  56. House appoints conferees-reported
  57. Conference committee report filed
  58. Conf. Comm. Report distributed
  59. Senate adopts conference committee report
  60. Record vote
  61. House adopts conference committee report
  62. Record vote RV#4160
  63. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  64. Senate adopts conf. comm. report-reported
  65. House adopts conf. comm. report-reported
  66. Reported enrolled
  67. Signed in the Senate
  68. Signed in the House
  69. Sent to the Governor
  70. Signed by the Governor
  71. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 113 yea · 23 nay

Senate · 31 yea · 0 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 28, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · May 7, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Donors report through Texans for Joan Huffman.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes7

Senate Jun 1, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

On motion of Senator Huffman, the Conference Committee Report was adopted by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House Jun 1, 2025

Yea
109
Nay
25
Present, not voting
1
Absent
11
Excused
4
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 4160

Representative Cook moved to adopt the conference committee report on SB 1660. The motion to adopt the conference committee report on SB 1660 prevailed by (Record 4160): 109 Yeas, 25 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 109 (published)
  • Nay: 25 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 11 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 4 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 28, 2025

Yea
113
Nay
23
Present, not voting
1
Absent
6
Excused
7
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3890

SB 1660 was passed by (Record 3890): 113 Yeas, 23 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 113 (published)
  • Nay: 23 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 6 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 7 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
113
Nay
24
Present, not voting
1
Absent
9
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3785

SB 1660, as amended, was passed to third reading by (Record 3785): 113 Yeas, 24 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 113 (published)
  • Nay: 24 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 9 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 7, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator Huffman moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 1660 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0. The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 7, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator Huffman moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 1660 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 7, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses30
For
26
Against
2
On
2
Names

For

  • City of Austin2 registrations
  • City of Houston2 registrations
  • City of San Antonio2 registrations
  • Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas (CLEAT)2 registrations
  • Dallas Police Assoc1 registration
  • El Paso County1 registration
  • Harris County Commissioners Court2 registrations
  • Harris County Deputies' Organization FOP #392 registrations
  • Houston Forensic Science Center1 registration
  • Self1 registration
  • Self; Chambers County District Attorney’s Office2 registrations
  • Self; Harris County Sheriff’s Office1 registration
  • Self; Houston Police Officers’ Union1 registration
  • Self; Lake Dallas ISD1 registration
  • Self; Prosper ISD Police Department1 registration
  • SHERIFFS’ Association of Texas1 registration
  • Texas Municipal Police Association (TMPA)2 registrations
  • Texas Police Chiefs Association1 registration

Against

  • Self2 registrations

On

  • Texas DPS Crime Laboratory2 registrations
Sources

30 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 31, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Feb 26, 2025

06/20/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Sponsors

House committee · Criminal Jurisprudence · Committee vote 6 aye, 3 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Criminal Justice · Committee vote 7 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Subjects

Criminal Procedure--General

Vehicles & Traffic--DWI & DUID

EVIDENCE

Text

The text as introduced · 479 words

89R8882 LHC-F

By: Huffman
S.B. No. 1660

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the retention and preservation of toxicological

evidence of certain intoxication offenses.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Article 38.50, Code of Criminal Procedure, is

amended by adding Subsections (c-1) and (i) and amending

Subsections (g) and (h) to read as follows:

(c-1) A crime laboratory to which this article applies that

is in possession of toxicological evidence shall annually:

(1) notify the prosecutor's office in the county in

which the alleged offense occurred that the laboratory is in

possession of toxicological evidence for an alleged offense that

occurred in that county; and

(2) provide to the prosecutor's office the date on

which the retention period for the evidence expires as provided by

Subsection (c).

(g) Notice given under this article must be given:

(1) in writing, as soon as practicable, by hand

delivery, e-mail, or first-class [ first class ] mail to the person's

last known e-mail or mailing address; or

(2) if applicable, orally and in writing on requesting

the specimen under Section 724.015, Transportation Code.

(h) This subsection applies only to toxicological evidence

collected for an alleged offense punishable as a felony. A

prosecutor's office may require that an entity or individual

charged with storing toxicological evidence seek written approval

from the prosecutor's office before destroying toxicological

evidence subject to the retention period under Subsection (c)(2) or

(c)(3) for cases in which the prosecutor's office presented the

indictment, information, or petition. If a prosecutor's office

does not provide a written denial of a request to destroy

toxicological evidence before the 60th day after the date the

request is made, the entity or individual charged with storing the

toxicological evidence may destroy the evidence if the retention

period under Subsection (c)(2) or (c)(3) for that evidence has

expired.

(i) This subsection applies only to toxicological evidence

collected for an alleged offense punishable as a misdemeanor. A

prosecutor's office may not require that an entity or individual

charged with storing toxicological evidence request written

approval from the prosecutor's office before destroying

toxicological evidence for cases in which the prosecutor's office

presented the indictment, information, or petition if the retention

period under Subsection (c)(2) or (c)(3) for that evidence has

expired.

SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only

to evidence for which the appropriate retention and preservation

period under Article 38.50, Code of Criminal Procedure, as amended

by this Act, expires on or after the effective date of this Act.

Evidence for which the appropriate retention and preservation

period expired before the effective date of this Act is governed by

the law in effect on the date of expiration of that period, and the

former law is continued in effect for that purpose.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.