Monitoring the Session

SB 1719

Hughes’s bill repealing the Supreme Court’s rulemaking provision

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Bryan HughesRSenate 1

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the rulemaking power of the Texas Supreme Court.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

One provision repealed, a long list of cross-references deleted.

The bill repeals a provision in the Government Code on the Texas Supreme Court's rulemaking power, and it deletes a long list of related cross-references scattered across other codes. It touches judges, lawyers and everyone who goes to court in Texas, because it changes how court rules line up against laws passed by the Legislature. Starting September 1, 2025, any Supreme Court rule adopted under that power that conflicts with a law is invalid in new cases, so the written law controls.

Labels

Labels: GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on Apr 10, 2025. Died in the House: left pending in the Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence committee.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB1719 · 2025-02-27

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the rulemaking power of the Texas Supreme Court.

WHAT IT DOES

One provision repealed, a long list of cross-references deleted.

The bill repeals a provision in the Government Code on the Texas Supreme Court's rulemaking power, and it deletes a long list of related cross-references scattered across other codes. It touches judges, lawyers and everyone who goes to court in Texas, because it changes how court rules line up against laws passed by the Legislature. Starting September 1, 2025, any Supreme Court rule adopted under that power that conflicts with a law is invalid in new cases, so the written law controls.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · April 27, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to State Affairs
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Left pending in committee
  8. Considered in public hearing
  9. Vote taken in committee
  10. Reported favorably as substituted
  11. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  12. Committee report printed and distributed
  13. Placed on local & uncontested calendar
  14. Laid before the Senate
  15. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  16. Vote recorded in Journal
  17. Three day rule suspended
  18. Record vote
  19. Read 3rd time
  20. Passed
  21. Record vote
  22. Reported engrossed
  23. Received from the Senate
  24. Read first time
  25. Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
  26. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  27. Considered in public hearing
  28. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  29. Left pending in committee
  30. Considered in public hearing
  31. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  32. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  33. Committee report distributed
  34. Committee report sent to Calendars
  35. Considered in Calendars
  36. Placed on General State Calendar
  37. Read 2nd time
  38. Passed to 3rd reading
  39. Record vote RV#3640
  40. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  41. Read 3rd time
  42. Postponed 5/28/25 10:00 AM
  43. Record vote RV#3682
  44. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  45. Laid out as postponed business
  46. Point of order sustained Rule 8, Section 1(a)(1)
  47. Returned to committee
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 26 yea · 4 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · Apr 10, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

GOPAC Election Fund$250,000.00

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)$100,000.00

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC$100,000.00

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

×

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

×

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Votes5

House May 27, 2025

Yea
108
Nay
29
Present, not voting
2
Absent
8
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3682

Representative Smithee moved to postpone consideration of SB 1719 until 10 a.m. tomorrow. The motion prevailed by (Record 3682): 108 Yeas, 29 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 108 (published)
  • Nay: 29 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 8 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
89
Nay
48
Present, not voting
1
Absent
11
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3640

SB 1719 was passed to third reading by (Record 3640): 89 Yeas, 48 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 89 (published)
  • Nay: 48 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 11 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Final passage

Yea
26
Nay
4
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to engrossment, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records final passage. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Sources

CSSB 1719 (Hughes) Relating to the rulemaking power of the Texas Supreme Court. (viva voce vote) (26-4) "Nays" Cook, Eckhardt, Gutierrez, Johnson (26-4) "Nays" Cook, Eckhardt, Gutierrez, Johnson

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 4 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Suspension of the three-day rule

Yea
26
Nay
4
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to engrossment, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records suspension of the three-day rule. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Sources

CSSB 1719 (Hughes) Relating to the rulemaking power of the Texas Supreme Court. (viva voce vote) (26-4) "Nays" Cook, Eckhardt, Gutierrez, Johnson (26-4) "Nays" Cook, Eckhardt, Gutierrez, Johnson

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 4 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 10, 2025

Passage to engrossment

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to engrossment, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records passage to engrossment. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

CSSB 1719 (Hughes) Relating to the rulemaking power of the Texas Supreme Court. (viva voce vote) (26-4) "Nays" Cook, Eckhardt, Gutierrez, Johnson (26-4) "Nays" Cook, Eckhardt, Gutierrez, Johnson

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses5
For
3
Against
2
On
0
Names

For

  • Self2 registrations
  • Self; Statutory Probate Judges of Texas1 registration

Against

  • Self2 registrations
Sources

5 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version E · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version E · April 27, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Feb 27, 2025

05/28/2025 H Returned to committee: May 28 2025 6:21PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Sponsors

House committee · Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee

Senate committee · State Affairs · Committee vote 10 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Subjects

Courts--Appellate

Courts--Civil Procedure

SUPREME COURT

Text

The text as introduced · 782 words

89R5436 JTZ-F

By: Hughes
S.B. No. 1719

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the rulemaking power of the Texas Supreme Court.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

ARTICLE 1. RULEMAKING POWER OF TEXAS SUPREME COURT

SECTION 1.01. Section 22.004(c), Government Code, is

repealed.

ARTICLE 2. CONFORMING CHANGES

SECTION 2.01. Section 30.0035, Civil Practice and Remedies

Code, is amended to read as follows:

Sec. 30.0035. PERSONAL SERVICE OF PROCESS DURING

LEGISLATIVE PROCEEDING PROHIBITED. A person may not serve citation

or other civil process in person on a member, officer, or employee

of the senate or house of representatives during any legislative

proceeding. A court shall quash any service made in violation of

this section. The supreme court shall revoke the certification of a

process server who violates this section. [ This section is not

subject to Section 22.004(c), Government Code. ]

SECTION 2.02. Section 34.041(c), Civil Practice and

Remedies Code, is amended to read as follows:

(c) A sale of real property under this subchapter must take

place between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on the first Tuesday of a month or,

if the first Tuesday of a month occurs on January 1 or July 4,

between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. on the first Wednesday of the month.

[ Notwithstanding Section 22.004, Government Code, the supreme

court may not amend or adopt rules in conflict with this

subsection. ]

SECTION 2.03. Section 1162.007(c), Estates Code, is amended

to read as follows:

(c) An attorney does not violate the attorney-client

privilege solely by complying with a court order to release an

instrument subject to this section and Sections 1162.005 and

1162.006. [ Notwithstanding Section 22.004, Government Code, the

supreme court may not amend or adopt rules in conflict with this

subsection. ]

SECTION 2.04. Section 52.047(g), Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

(g) Notwithstanding the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure,

an official court reporter who is required to prepare a transcript

in a criminal case without charging a fee is not entitled to payment

for the transcript from the state or county if the county paid a

substitute court reporter to perform the official court reporter's

regular duties while the transcript was being prepared. To the

extent that this subsection conflicts with the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure, this subsection controls. [ Notwithstanding

Sections 22.004 and 22.108(b), the supreme court or the court of

criminal appeals may not amend or adopt rules in conflict with this

subsection. ]

SECTION 2.05. Section 171.208(i), Health and Safety Code,

is amended to read as follows:

(i) Notwithstanding any other law, a court may not award

costs or attorney's fees under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure

[ or any other rule adopted by the supreme court under Section

22.004, Government Code, ] to a defendant in an action brought under

this section.

SECTION 2.06. Section 455.351(h), Occupations Code, is

amended to read as follows:

(h) Notwithstanding any other law or rule [ Section 22.004,

Government Code ]:

(1) a person may not continue the enjoined activity

pending appeal or trial on the merits of an injunctive order entered

in a suit brought under this subchapter;

(2) not later than the 90th day after the date of the

injunctive order, the appropriate court of appeals shall hear and

decide an appeal taken by a party enjoined under this subchapter;

and

(3) if an appeal is not taken by a party temporarily

enjoined under this article, the parties are entitled to a full

trial on the merits not later than the 90th day after the date of the

temporary injunctive order.

SECTION 2.07. The following provisions of the Civil

Practice and Remedies Code are repealed:

(1) Section 10.006;

(2) Section 14.013(c);

(3) Section 14.014;

(4) Section 14A.061(c);

(5) Section 14A.062;

(6) Section 15.066;

(7) Section 30.010(d);

(8) Section 30.013(f);

(9) Section 30.018(b);

(10) Section 51.017(b);

(11) Section 52.005(b);

(12) Section 64.091(k);

(13) Section 64.093(k);

(14) Section 65.045(b);

(15) Section 98.007(e);

(16) Section 134A.007(c); and

(17) Section 154.028(m).

SECTION 2.08. The following provisions are repealed:

(1) Section 111.002(b), Family Code;

(2) Section 301.002, Family Code;

(3) Section 276.002(e), Finance Code;

(4) Section 74.1625(b), Government Code; and

(5) Section 410.305(b), Labor Code.

ARTICLE 3. TRANSITION; EFFECTIVE DATE

SECTION 3.01. On the effective date of this Act, a rule

adopted by the Texas Supreme Court under Section 22.004, Government

Code, as it existed before the effective date of this Act, that

conflicts with a provision of law is invalid and has no effect in

any action commenced on or after the effective date of this Act in

any court in this state.

SECTION 3.02. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.