SB 1794
Suing A City? Middleton Bill Ends Its Automatic Immunity Appeal
Died in committee
Verdict: No flags
Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade
Caption
relating to interlocutory appeal from certain orders by a political subdivision or an officer or employee of a political subdivision.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Summary
Cities and counties must ask the trial judge first, within 30 days. No more automatic freeze.
The bill ends the automatic right of cities, counties and other local governments, and their officers and employees, to appeal right away when a trial judge rejects their immunity defense or their challenge to the court's jurisdiction. They must first ask the trial judge for permission within 30 days, and the judge may grant it only if the case turns on a disputed question of law, an early appeal would help end the case, and pausing the case would not deny the other side a constitutional right. People suing local governments would no longer see their cases frozen for months by automatic appeals, since an approved appeal pauses the trial only if the judge says so, and the change covers lawsuits filed on or after September 1, 2025.
Labels
Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Mar 3, 2025 and referred to the Senate Jurisprudence committee. No public hearing. The bill died.
Receipt
The receipt
89R-SB1794 · 2025-03-03
SOLD BY
ITEM
relating to interlocutory appeal from certain orders by a political subdivision or an officer or employee of a political subdivision.
WHAT IT DOES
Cities and counties must ask the trial judge first, within 30 days. No more automatic freeze.
The bill ends the automatic right of cities, counties and other local governments, and their officers and employees, to appeal right away when a trial judge rejects their immunity defense or their challenge to the court's jurisdiction. They must first ask the trial judge for permission within 30 days, and the judge may grant it only if the case turns on a disputed question of law, an early appeal would help end the case, and pausing the case would not deny the other side a constitutional right. People suing local governments would no longer see their cases frozen for months by automatic appeals, since an approved appeal pauses the trial only if the judge says so, and the change covers lawsuits filed on or after September 1, 2025.
CHARGES
[ ] NONE FOUND
TOTAL
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
HISTORY
- Received by the Secretary of the Senate
- Filed
- Read first time
- Referred to Jurisprudence
FILED UNDER
THE TEXT
…“the trial court that issued the order must approve the appeal in accordance with this section”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill narrows a litigation shield for local governments and their employees by requiring a judge's approval before they can halt a lawsuit with an early immunity appeal.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Jul 6, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$1,140,000.00
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$1,140,000.00
- Cash
- $1,140,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $1,140,000.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101009502, 101012383, 101061137, 101072395, 101072779.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$1,140,000.00
- Cash
- $1,140,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $1,140,000.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101009502, 101012383, 101061137, 101072395, 101072779.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Fiscal
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
How this was graded
Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas Senate · Filed Mar 3, 2025
03/13/2025 S Referred to Jurisprudence
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
Senate committee · Jurisprudence · Final status: Died in committee
Subjects
Civil Remedies & Liabilities
Political Subdivisions
Text
The text as introduced · 966 words
89R14080 SCL-F By: Middleton S.B. No. 1794 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to interlocutory appeal from certain orders by a political subdivision or an officer or employee of a political subdivision. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Sections 51.014(a) and (b), Civil Practice and Remedies Code, are amended to read as follows: (a) Except as provided by Section 51.0145, a [ A ] person may appeal from an interlocutory order of a district court, county court at law, statutory probate court, or county court that: (1) appoints a receiver or trustee; (2) overrules a motion to vacate an order that appoints a receiver or trustee; (3) certifies or refuses to certify a class in a suit brought under Rule 42 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure; (4) grants or refuses a temporary injunction or grants or overrules a motion to dissolve a temporary injunction as provided by Chapter 65; (5) denies a motion for summary judgment that is based on an assertion of immunity by an individual who is an officer or employee of the state or a political subdivision of the state; (6) denies a motion for summary judgment that is based in whole or in part upon a claim against or defense by a member of the electronic or print media, acting in such capacity, or a person whose communication appears in or is published by the electronic or print media, arising under the free speech or free press clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, or Article I, Section 8, of the Texas Constitution, or Chapter 73; (7) grants or denies the special appearance of a defendant under Rule 120a, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, except in a suit brought under the Family Code; (8) grants or denies a plea to the jurisdiction by a governmental unit as that term is defined in Section 101.001; (9) denies all or part of the relief sought by a motion under Section 74.351(b), except that an appeal may not be taken from an order granting an extension under Section 74.351; (10) grants relief sought by a motion under Section 74.351(l); (11) denies a motion to dismiss filed under Section 90.007; (12) denies a motion to dismiss filed under Section 27.003; (13) denies a motion for summary judgment filed by an electric utility regarding liability in a suit subject to Section 75.0022; (14) denies a motion filed by a municipality with a population of 500,000 or more in an action filed under Section 54.012(6) or 214.0012, Local Government Code; (15) makes a preliminary determination on a claim under Section 74.353; (16) overrules an objection filed under Section 148.003(d) or denies all or part of the relief sought by a motion under Section 148.003(f); or (17) grants or denies a motion for summary judgment filed by a contractor based on Section 97.002. (b) An interlocutory appeal under Subsection (a), other than an appeal under Subsection (a)(4) or in a suit brought under the Family Code, stays the commencement of a trial in the trial court pending resolution of the appeal. Except as provided by Section 51.0145, an [ An ] interlocutory appeal under Subsection (a)(3), (5), (8), or (12) also stays all other proceedings in the trial court pending resolution of that appeal. SECTION 2. Subchapter B, Chapter 51, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, is amended by adding Section 51.0145 to read as follows: Sec. 51.0145. PERMISSION REQUIRED FOR CERTAIN INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS. (a) Before an officer or employee of a political subdivision may appeal from an interlocutory order under Section 51.014(a)(5) or a political subdivision may appeal from an interlocutory order under Section 51.014(a)(8), the trial court that issued the order must approve the appeal in accordance with this section. (b) A party seeking an appeal subject to this section must file with the trial court and serve a motion requesting the appeal not later than the 30th day after the date of the order that is the subject of the appeal is entered. An opposing party may file a response to the motion not later than the 14th day after the date the motion is filed. (c) A trial court may authorize an appeal subject to this section only if: (1) the appeal involves a controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion; (2) an immediate appeal from the order that is the subject of the appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of the action; and (3) the issuance of a stay of proceedings during pendency of the appeal will not materially deprive the non-moving party from exercising a right protected by the Texas Constitution or United States Constitution. (d) The trial court's order authorizing an appeal under this section does not stay proceedings in the trial court unless the order expressly states that the proceedings are stayed. (e) During the pendency of an appeal authorized under this section in which the trial court has expressly stayed the proceedings, a party may move the trial court to modify or dissolve a stay of proceedings due to hardship, a change in circumstances, or any other reason. The trial court shall consider and rule on a motion to modify or dissolve a stay of proceedings not later than the 30th day after the date the motion is filed. The trial court retains jurisdiction over consideration of a stay throughout the appeal. (f) It is the intent of the legislature that interlocutory appeals and stays of proceedings under this section be authorized rarely. SECTION 3. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to an action filed on or after the effective date of this Act. SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.