Monitoring the Session

SB 1870

Perry’s bill on local drug law enforcement

Did not pass

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Charles PerryRSenate 28

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to municipal and county enforcement of drug laws; providing civil penalties.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Cities, counties and prosecutors can’t keep policies to not fully enforce.

The bill bars cities, counties, sheriffs, constables, police departments and local prosecutors from adopting or keeping any policy, ordinance, charter rule or ballot item under which they will not fully enforce state and federal drug laws. Any Texas resident can file a sworn complaint with the attorney general, who can then sue the local entity in Travis County or nearby counties, with local immunity waived and the appeal fast-tracked. Entities found to have knowingly violated the ban face civil penalties of at least $25,000 for a first violation and $50,000 for each later one, counted per day, with the money going to the crime victims fund.

Labels

Labels: GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on Apr 23, 2025. Died in the House: voted out of the State Affairs committee 9-6, no floor vote.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB1870 · 2025-03-04

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to municipal and county enforcement of drug laws; providing civil penalties.

WHAT IT DOES

Cities, counties and prosecutors can’t keep policies to not fully enforce.

The bill bars cities, counties, sheriffs, constables, police departments and local prosecutors from adopting or keeping any policy, ordinance, charter rule or ballot item under which they will not fully enforce state and federal drug laws. Any Texas resident can file a sworn complaint with the attorney general, who can then sue the local entity in Travis County or nearby counties, with local immunity waived and the appeal fast-tracked. Entities found to have knowingly violated the ban face civil penalties of at least $25,000 for a first violation and $50,000 for each later one, counted per day, with the money going to the crime victims fund.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version S · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version S · April 10, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Criminal Justice
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Vote taken in committee
  8. Reported favorably as substituted
  9. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  10. Committee report printed and distributed
  11. Placed on intent calendar
  12. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  13. Record vote
  14. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  15. Record vote
  16. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  17. Record vote
  18. Read 3rd time
  19. Passed
  20. Record vote
  21. Reported engrossed
  22. Received from the Senate
  23. Read first time
  24. Referred to State Affairs
  25. Considered in public hearing
  26. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  27. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  28. Committee report distributed
  29. Committee report sent to Calendars
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 23 yea · 8 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · Apr 23, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$60,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 13, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100983698, 101007598, 101030579, 101072377.

Ryan Texas PAC$35,000.00

Ryan Texas PAC

$35,000.00

Cash
$35,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$35,000.00

Also funds 25 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 23, 2024 to Oct 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 13, 2024 to Mar 12, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100983698, 101057700.

Fort Stockton Holdings LP$25,000.00

Fort Stockton Holdings LP

$25,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$25,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Nov 23, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Nov 23, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100983698.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 13, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100983698, 101007598, 101030579, 101072377.

×

Ryan Texas PAC

$35,000.00

Cash
$35,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$35,000.00

Also funds 25 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Sep 23, 2024 to Oct 22, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 13, 2024 to Mar 12, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100983698, 101057700.

×

Fort Stockton Holdings LP

$25,000.00

Cash
$25,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$25,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Nov 23, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Nov 23, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100983698.

Votes4

Senate Apr 23, 2025

Yea
23
Nay
8
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 23, Nays 8. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 23 (published)
  • Nay: 8 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 23, 2025

Yea
23
Nay
8
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Perry moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 1870 at this time on its third reading and final passage: CSSB 1870, Relating to municipal and county enforcement of drug and consumable hemp product laws; providing civil penalties. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 23, Nays 8.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 23 (published)
  • Nay: 8 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 22, 2025

Yea
23
Nay
8
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 23, Nays 8. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 23 (published)
  • Nay: 8 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 22, 2025

Yea
23
Nay
8
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Perry moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 1870 at this time on its second reading: CSSB 1870, Relating to municipal and county enforcement of drug and consumable hemp product laws; providing civil penalties. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 23, Nays 8.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 23 (published)
  • Nay: 8 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses7
For
5
Against
2
On
0
Names

For

  • Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas (CLEAT)1 registration
  • Dallas Police Association1 registration
  • Harria County Deputies' Organization FOP #391 registration
  • Self; Houston Police Officers’ Union1 registration
  • Texas Municipal Police Association (TMPA)1 registration

Against

  • Self; Equity Action1 registration
  • Self; Texas Civil Rights Project1 registration
Sources

7 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version S · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version S · April 10, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 4, 2025

05/06/2025 H Committee report sent to Calendars

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Sponsors
Cosponsors

House committee · State Affairs · Committee vote 9 aye, 6 nay · Out of committee

Senate committee · Criminal Justice · Committee vote 5 aye, 0 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Companion

HB 5082 by Leach (identical)

Subjects

City Government--General

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

County Government--General

Crimes--Drugs

Law Enforcement

HEMP

ATTORNEY GENERAL

Text

The text as introduced · 1,212 words

2025S0013-1 12/04/24

By: Perry
S.B. No. 1870

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to municipal and county enforcement of drug laws;

providing civil penalties.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 9.003(a), Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

(a) Except as provided by Sections [ Section ] 9.0045 and

9.0046 , the charter prepared by the charter commission shall be

submitted to the qualified voters of the municipality at an

election to be held on the first authorized uniform election date

prescribed by the Election Code that allows sufficient time to

comply with other requirements of law and that occurs on or after

the 40th day after the date the charter commission completes its

work. The governing body of the municipality shall provide for the

submission of the charter at the election to the extent that the

provisions for submission are not prescribed by general law.

SECTION 2. Section 9.004(a), Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

(a) Except as provided by Sections [ Section ] 9.0045 and

9.0046 , the governing body of a municipality on its own motion may

submit a proposed charter amendment to the municipality's qualified

voters for their approval at an election. The governing body shall

submit a proposed charter amendment to the voters for their

approval at an election if the submission is supported by a petition

signed by a number of qualified voters of the municipality equal to

at least five percent of the number of qualified voters of the

municipality or 20,000, whichever number is the smaller.

SECTION 3. Chapter 9, Local Government Code, is amended by

adding Section 9.0046 to read as follows:

Sec. 9.0046. CHARTER PROVISION INCONSISTENT WITH STATE OR

FEDERAL DRUG LAW. A municipality may not hold an election for voter

approval of a proposed charter or an amendment to a charter that

violates Section 370.003.

SECTION 4. Subchapter A, Chapter 51, Local Government Code,

is amended by adding Section 51.0021 to read as follows:

Sec. 51.0021. PROVISION INCONSISTENT WITH STATE OR FEDERAL

DRUG LAW. Notwithstanding Section 51.001, the governing body of a

municipality may not adopt, publish, enforce, repeal, maintain, or

amend an ordinance, order, policy, rule, or regulation that

violates Section 370.003.

SECTION 5. Chapter 370, Local Government Code, is amended

by adding Section 370.002 to read as follows:

Sec. 370.002. COMPLAINT; EQUITABLE RELIEF. (a) A citizen

residing in this state may file a complaint with the attorney

general if the citizen asserts facts supporting an allegation that

an entity described by Section 370.003 has violated that section.

The citizen must include a sworn statement with the complaint

stating that to the best of the citizen's knowledge all of the facts

asserted in the complaint are true and correct.

(b) If the attorney general determines that a complaint

filed under Subsection (a) against an entity is valid, the attorney

general may file a petition for a writ of mandamus or apply for

other appropriate equitable relief in a district court in Travis

County, in a county that is represented by or is served in whole or

in part by the entity, or in a county that borders a county that is

represented by or is served in whole or in part by the entity to

compel the entity that is suspected of violating Section 370.003 to

comply with that section.

(c) If the action is brought by the attorney general in a

venue authorized by this section, the action may not be transferred

to a different venue without the written consent of the attorney

general.

(d) The attorney general shall develop a form that a citizen

residing in this state may use for the submission of a complaint

under Subsection (a) and shall post the complaint form on the

attorney general's website.

(e) An appeal of a suit brought under Subsection (b) is

governed by the procedures for accelerated appeals in civil cases

under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The appellate court

shall render its final order or judgment with the least possible

delay.

SECTION 6. Section 370.003, Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

Sec. 370.003. MUNICIPAL OR COUNTY PROVISION [ POLICY ]

REGARDING ENFORCEMENT OF DRUG LAWS. (a) The governing body of a

municipality, the commissioners court of a county, or a sheriff,

constable, municipal police department, municipal attorney, county

attorney, district attorney, or criminal district attorney may not

adopt , publish, enforce, repeal, maintain, or amend a policy ,

ordinance, order, rule, regulation, charter, or charter amendment

under which the entity will not fully enforce laws relating to

drugs, including Chapters 481 and 483, Health and Safety Code, and

federal law.

(b) An entity described by Subsection (a) may not place an

item on a ballot or vote on an item if the item provides that the

entity will not fully enforce laws relating to drugs.

(c) An entity that is found by a court to have knowingly

violated Subsection (a) is subject to a civil penalty in an amount:

(1) not less than $25,000 for the first violation; and

(2) not less than $50,000 for each subsequent

violation.

(d) An entity that is found by a court to have knowingly

placed an item on a ballot in violation of Subsection (b) is subject

to a civil penalty for each day the item appears on the ballot in an

amount:

(1) not less than $25,000 for the first violation; and

(2) not less than $50,000 for each subsequent

violation.

(e) Each day of a continuing violation of Subsection (a) or

(b) constitutes a separate violation for the civil penalty under

this section. An entity that violates this section may incur a

penalty under both Subsections (a) and (b). A violation continues

unless an entity proves by clear and convincing evidence that the

violation has been remedied.

(f) The court that hears an action under this section shall

determine the amount of any civil penalty in the action.

(g) A civil penalty collected under this section shall be

deposited to the credit of the compensation to victims of crime fund

established under Subchapter J, Chapter 56B, Code of Criminal

Procedure.

(h) Sovereign immunity and governmental immunity of a

county and municipality to a suit are waived and abolished to the

extent of liability created by this section.

(i) In addition to any civil penalty awarded under this

section, the attorney general is entitled to recover court costs

and attorney's fees from an entity found civilly liable under this

section.

(j) The attorney general may seek a civil penalty for a

violation of this section regardless of whether a citizen submitted

a complaint to the attorney general under Section 370.002.

SECTION 7. Section 370.002, Local Government Code, as added

by this Act, and Section 370.003, Local Government Code, as amended

by this Act, apply only to a cause of action that accrues on or after

the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 8. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.