SB 2136
Hinojosa Water Bill Lets One Border City Share Utility Turf
Died in committee
Verdict: Smells
Why it's charged
Bracket bill
THE TEXT
“Subsection (o) applies only to the most populous municipality in a county that:”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The new power is limited to the largest city in a county that sits on an international border, has more than 800,000 people, and holds at least two cities of 100,000 or more. That stacked bracket points a general Water Code change at what reads as a single city, though the caption does say "certain municipalities."
Bracket billInitial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade
Caption
relating to dual certification for water or sewer service in an area incorporated or annexed by certain municipalities.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Summary
Biggest city in a border county over 800,000. Hearing first, then the commission must grant it.
The bill lets one city, the largest city in a large border county with at least two cities of 100,000 or more, ask the state utility commission for dual certification. That city can then serve water or sewer customers in areas it annexed or incorporated even where another utility already holds the service rights. The commission must hold a hearing and then grant the dual certification, so the existing utility keeps its territory but now shares it with the city or the city's franchised utility.
Labels
Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Mar 10, 2025 and referred to the Senate Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs committee. No public hearing. The bill died.
Receipt
The receipt
89R-SB2136 · 2025-03-10
SOLD BY
ITEM
relating to dual certification for water or sewer service in an area incorporated or annexed by certain municipalities.
WHAT IT DOES
Biggest city in a border county over 800,000. Hearing first, then the commission must grant it.
The bill lets one city, the largest city in a large border county with at least two cities of 100,000 or more, ask the state utility commission for dual certification. That city can then serve water or sewer customers in areas it annexed or incorporated even where another utility already holds the service rights. The commission must hold a hearing and then grant the dual certification, so the existing utility keeps its territory but now shares it with the city or the city's franchised utility.
CHARGES
[x] BRACKET BILLanalysis confidence 75%
THE TEXT
“Subsection (o) applies only to the most populous municipality in a county that:”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The new power is limited to the largest city in a county that sits on an international border, has more than 800,000 people, and holds at least two cities of 100,000 or more. That stacked bracket points a general Water Code change at what reads as a single city, though the caption does say "certain municipalities."
TOTAL
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
HISTORY
- Received by the Secretary of the Senate
- Filed
- Read first time
- Referred to Water, Agriculture, & Rural Affairs
FILED UNDER
No verified beat found.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Jul 23, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$17,500.00
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$17,500.00
- Cash
- $17,500.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $17,500.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Sep 3, 2024 to Jun 27, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100977616, 101009664.
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$15,000.00
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC
$15,000.00
- Cash
- $15,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $15,000.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Jul 24, 2024 to Nov 25, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100977616.
Associated General Contractors of Texas PAC$15,000.00
Associated General Contractors of Texas PAC
$15,000.00
- Cash
- $15,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $15,000.00
Also funds 120 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 19, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Oct 25, 2024 to Jun 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100977616, 101059341.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$17,500.00
- Cash
- $17,500.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $17,500.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Sep 3, 2024 to Jun 27, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100977616, 101009664.
Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC
$15,000.00
- Cash
- $15,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $15,000.00
Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Jul 24, 2024 to Nov 25, 2024. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100977616.
Associated General Contractors of Texas PAC
$15,000.00
- Cash
- $15,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $15,000.00
Also funds 120 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 19, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Oct 25, 2024 to Jun 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 100977616, 101059341.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Fiscal
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
How this was graded
Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas Senate · Filed Mar 10, 2025
03/24/2025 S Referred to Water, Agriculture, & Rural Affairs
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
Senate committee · Water, Agriculture and Rural Affairs · Final status: Died in committee
Subjects
City Government--Annexation
City Government--Utilities
Utilities--Water & Sewer
BORDER
Text
The text as introduced · 401 words
2025S0190-1 03/06/25 By: Hinojosa of Hidalgo S.B. No. 2136 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to dual certification for water or sewer service in an area incorporated or annexed by certain municipalities. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. The heading to Section 13.255, Water Code, is amended to read as follows: Sec. 13.255. SINGLE OR DUAL CERTIFICATION IN INCORPORATED OR ANNEXED AREAS. SECTION 2. Section 13.255, Water Code, is amended by adding Subsections (n) and (o) to read as follows: (n) Subsection (o) applies only to the most populous municipality in a county that: (1) is located on an international border; (2) has a population of more than 800,000; and (3) contains at least two municipalities each of which has a population of 100,000 or more. (o) As an alternative to single certification, a municipality to which this subsection applies may provide to a retail public utility that provides water or sewer service to all or part of an area annexed or incorporated by the municipality pursuant to a certificate of convenience and necessity notice that the municipality intends to seek dual certification in the area as provided under this subsection. The notice must indicate whether the municipality intends to provide service through a municipally owned utility or a franchised utility. The municipality and the retail public utility may enter into an agreement for the purchase of retail public utility facilities or property or that has other terms on which the parties agree. If the municipality intends that a franchised utility is to serve the area, the franchised utility must be a party to the agreement. A municipality that delivers a notice under this subsection may file an application with the utility commission for dual certification that includes the notice and any related agreement with the retail public utility. The utility commission shall fix a time and place for a hearing on the application and give notice of the hearing to the municipality and, if any, the franchised utility and give notice of the application and hearing to the retail public utility. The utility commission shall grant dual certification to the municipality and amend certificates of convenience and necessity as needed to authorize the dual certification. Subsections (c)-(m), other than Subsections (c-3) and (k), apply to a dual certification proceeding under this subsection. SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.