Monitoring the Session

SB 2337

Hughes Bill Makes Proxy Advisory Firms Flag Nonfinancial Voting Advice

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Bryan HughesRSenate 1

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the regulation of the provision of proxy advisory services.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Advice resting on ESG gets a warning. Violations count as a deceptive trade practice.

The bill makes firms that are paid to advise shareholders on how to vote post warnings and send notices when their advice rests on nonfinancial factors like ESG or DEI. It also covers advice that opposes the board on a shareholder proposal without a written economic analysis, and advice that tells different clients to vote opposite ways on the same item. A violation counts as a deceptive trade practice the attorney general can pursue, and the advised client, the company, or any of its shareholders can sue for a court order, starting July 1 or September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: BUZZER BEATER. Final vote May 31, 2025: both chambers adopted the conference committee report. 2 days before the session ended Jun 2, 2025.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB2337 · 2025-03-12

SOLD BY

+ 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to the regulation of the provision of proxy advisory services.

WHAT IT DOES

Advice resting on ESG gets a warning. Violations count as a deceptive trade practice.

The bill makes firms that are paid to advise shareholders on how to vote post warnings and send notices when their advice rests on nonfinancial factors like ESG or DEI. It also covers advice that opposes the board on a shareholder proposal without a written economic analysis, and advice that tells different clients to vote opposite ways on the same item. A violation counts as a deceptive trade practice the attorney general can pursue, and the advised client, the company, or any of its shareholders can sue for a court order, starting July 1 or September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 30, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to State Affairs
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably as substituted
  12. Committee report printed and distributed
  13. Placed on intent calendar
  14. Co-author authorized
  15. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  16. Record vote
  17. Read 2nd time
  18. Amendment(s) offered FA1 Hughes
  19. Amended
  20. Record vote
  21. Passed to engrossment as amended
  22. Record vote
  23. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  24. Record vote
  25. Read 3rd time
  26. Passed
  27. Record vote
  28. Reported engrossed
  29. Received from the Senate
  30. Read first time
  31. Referred to Trade, Workforce & Economic Development
  32. Considered in formal meeting
  33. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  34. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  35. Committee report distributed
  36. Committee report sent to Calendars
  37. Considered in Calendars
  38. Placed on General State Calendar
  39. Read 2nd time
  40. Point of order withdrawn Rule 8, Section (1)(a)(1)
  41. Amended 1-Leach
  42. Record vote RV#3741
  43. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  44. Amended 2-Capriglione
  45. Record vote RV#3742
  46. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  47. Amendment tabled 3-Goodwin
  48. Record vote RV#3743
  49. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  50. Passed to 3rd reading as amended
  51. Record vote RV#3744
  52. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  53. Read 3rd time
  54. Passed
  55. Record vote RV#3866
  56. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  57. House passage as amended reported
  58. House amendment(s) laid before the Senate
  59. Read
  60. Senate refuses to concur
  61. Senate requests conference committee
  62. Senate appoints conferees
  63. Senate refuses to concur-reported
  64. Senate requests conference committee-reported
  65. Senate appoints conferees-reported
  66. House grants request for conference committee
  67. House appoints conferees
  68. House grants request for conf comm-reported
  69. House appoints conferees-reported
  70. Conference committee report filed
  71. Conf. Comm. Report distributed
  72. Senate adopts conference committee report
  73. Record vote
  74. House adopts conference committee report
  75. Record vote RV#4121
  76. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  77. Senate adopts conf. comm. report-reported
  78. House adopts conf. comm. report-reported
  79. Reported enrolled
  80. Signed in the Senate
  81. Signed in the House
  82. Sent to the Governor
  83. Signed by the Governor
  84. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

“An affected party may bring an action seeking a declaratory judgment or injunctive relief under Chapter 37, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, against a proxy advisor who violates this chapter.”

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill requires proxy advisors to label and disclose certain voting advice, and it lets companies, clients and any shareholder sue to enforce those disclosure rules.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 92 yea · 50 nay

Senate · 20 yea · 11 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 28, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · May 8, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

GOPAC Election Fund$250,000.00

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)$100,000.00

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC$100,000.00

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

GOPAC Election Fund

$250,000.00

Cash
$250,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$250,000.00

Also funds 2 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Jul 17, 2025 to Oct 15, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101028838, 101071548.

×

CRAFTPAC (Court Reform Action for Texas Families)

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 0 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Sep 4, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101067724.

×

Court Reform Action for Families Texas PAC

$100,000.00

Cash
$100,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$100,000.00

Also funds 32 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Feb 20, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · on Oct 13, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101071548.

Votes12

Senate May 31, 2025

Yea
21
Nay
10
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

On motion of Senator Hughes, the Conference Committee Report was adopted by the following vote: Yeas 21, Nays 10.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 21 (published)
  • Nay: 10 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 31, 2025

Yea
82
Nay
41
Present, not voting
3
Absent
10
Excused
14
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 4121

Representative Leach moved to adopt the conference committee report on SB 2337. The motion to adopt the conference committee report on SB 2337 prevailed by (Record 4121): 82 Yeas, 41 Nays, 3 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 82 (published)
  • Nay: 41 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 3 (published)
  • Absent: 10 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 14 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 28, 2025

Yea
92
Nay
50
Present, not voting
2
Absent
0
Excused
6
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3866

SB 2337 was passed by (Record 3866): 92 Yeas, 50 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 92 (published)
  • Nay: 50 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 6 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
92
Nay
47
Present, not voting
3
Absent
5
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3744

SB 2337, as amended, was passed to third reading by (Record 3744): 92 Yeas, 47 Nays, 3 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 92 (published)
  • Nay: 47 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 3 (published)
  • Absent: 5 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
87
Nay
52
Present, not voting
3
Absent
5
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3743

Representative Leach moved to table Amendment No. 3. The motion to table prevailed by (Record 3743): 87 Yeas, 52 Nays, 3 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 87 (published)
  • Nay: 52 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 3 (published)
  • Absent: 5 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
90
Nay
38
Present, not voting
3
Absent
16
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3742

Amendment No. 2 was adopted by (Record 3742): 90 Yeas, 38 Nays, 3 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 90 (published)
  • Nay: 38 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 3 (published)
  • Absent: 16 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
115
Nay
11
Present, not voting
4
Absent
17
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3741

Amendment No. 1 was adopted by (Record 3741): 115 Yeas, 11 Nays, 4 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 115 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 4 (published)
  • Absent: 17 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 8, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 8, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Hughes moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 2337 at this time on its third reading and final passage: CSSB 2337, Relating to the regulation of the provision of proxy advisory services. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 8, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

CSSB 2337 as amended was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 8, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The amendment to CSSB 2337 was read and was adopted by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 8, 2025

Yea
20
Nay
11
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Hughes moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 2337 at this time on its second reading: CSSB 2337, Relating to the regulation of the provision of proxy advisory services. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 20, Nays 11.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 20 (published)
  • Nay: 11 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses17
For
12
Against
4
On
1
Names

For

  • Consumers’ Research1 registration
  • ExxonMobil1 registration
  • Heartland Impact1 registration
  • Heritage Action for America1 registration
  • Self1 registration
  • Self; American Energy Institute1 registration
  • Self; American energy works1 registration
  • Self; Convention of States1 registration
  • Texans for Lawsuit Reform1 registration
  • Texas Association of Manufacturers1 registration
  • Texas Civil Justice League1 registration
  • Texas Oil and Gas Association1 registration

Against

  • Climate Cabinet1 registration
  • Freedom to Invest1 registration
  • Self1 registration
  • Texas AFT1 registration

On

  • Institutional Shareholders Services1 registration
Sources

17 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 30, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 12, 2025

06/20/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Trade, Workforce & Economic Development · Committee vote 6 aye, 2 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · State Affairs · Committee vote 9 aye, 1 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Companion

HB 4079 by Leach (identical)

Subjects

Business & Commerce--General

Business & Commerce--Trade Practices

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

Financial--General

Human Relations

FINANCIAL ADVISORS

Text

The text as introduced · 1,033 words

By: Hughes
S.B. No. 2337

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the provision of proxy advisory services in connection

with certain entities domiciled in this state.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Title 2, Chapter 21, Business Organizations

Code, is amended by adding Subchapter T to read as follows:

SUBCHAPTER T: PROXY ADVISORS

Sec. 21.1001. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter:

(1) "Company" means a publicly traded, for-profit

company organized or created under the laws of this state or having

a principal place of business in this state.

(2) "Company proposal" means any proposal made by a

company that is included in a company's proxy statement, including

but not limited to proposals regarding director elections,

executive compensation, corporate transactions and structure,

auditor selections, and other similar measures.

(3) "Investment manager" means a person or company

who, for compensation, provides professional investment

management services. The term does not include:

(A) an employee or member of an advisory

committee of a public retirement system; or

(b) a seller of security interests.

(4) "Proxy advisor" means a person or entity who, for

compensation, provides proxy advisory services to the shareholders

of a company, or to other interested parties, including but not

limited to investment managers.

(5) "Proxy advisory services" includes the provision

of any of the following services in connection with or relating to

a company:

(A) advice or recommendations on how to vote with

regard to measures under shareholder consideration, including

proxy proposals and company proposals;

(B) proxy statement research and analyses,

including with regard to proxy proposals and company proposals;

(C) corporate governance ratings and research or

other similar services;

(D) proxy voting policy development; or

(E) proxy vote administration, including through

the use pf proxy vote management software or other similar

services.

(6) "Proxy proposal" means any proposal made by a

shareholder to a company that is included in the company's proxy

statement.

(7) "Shareholder" includes a shareholder, unitholder,

limited partner, or other equity owner of a company.

Sec. 21.1002. OBLIGATION TO DISCHARGE DUTY BASED SOLELY ON

CERTAIN FINANCIAL INTERESTS. (a) Except as otherwise provided in

this section, a proxy advisor shall provide proxy advisory services

solely in the best financial interest of the shareholders of a

company, based on quantitative, impartial standards, for the sole

purpose of maximizing financial return and control associated

levels of risk.

(b) For purposes of this section, proxy advisory services

are not provided solely in the best financial interest of the

shareholders if based, all or in part, on non-financial factors,

including any commitments, initiatives, policies, targets, or

subjective or value-based standards pertaining to:

(1) environmental, social, or governance (ESG)

investment principles;

(2) diversity, equity, or inclusion;

(3) social credit or sustainability scores; or

(4) membership in, or association with, any non-profit

organization, coalition, initiative, institution, industry, or

similar organization that bases its evaluation or assessment of a

company's value on non-financial factors.

(c) For any proxy advisory services that are not provided

solely in the best financial interest of the shareholders, the

proxy advisor shall:

(1) include a conspicuous warning with the provision

of each such proxy advisory services that they are not made solely,

and may not be, in the best financial interest of the shareholders;

(2) use best efforts to obtain a prompt, written

acknowledgment of the warning required by subpart (a) herein from

each recipient shareholder or other interested party, as

applicable;

(3) immediately notify the company that is the subject

of such proxy advisory services, including full disclosure of all

related proxy advisory services, the basis of the proxy advisor's

advice and recommendations under this subsection, and all

recipients of each such proxy advisory services; and

(4) publicly and conspicuously disclose on the

homepage or front page of the proxy advisor's website that its proxy

advisory services include advice and recommendations that are not

made solely, and may not be, in the best financial interest of

shareholders.

Sec. 21.1003. VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS; CONFLICTS. (a) If a

proxy advisor provides proxy advisory services regarding a company

to multiple shareholders or other interested parties that include

voting recommendations that differ in any material respect

regarding the same proxy proposal or company proposal, the proxy

advisory services shall be considered not to be in the best

financial interest of the shareholders.

(b) For any proxy advisory services described in Subsection

(a), in addition to complying with the requirements of Section

21.1002(c), the proxy advisor shall immediately:

(1) notify each recipient shareholder or other

interested party in writing of the conflicting advice or

recommendations, including full disclosure of all related advice or

recommendations and the proxy advisor's basis for such advice or

recommendations;

(2) notify the company that is the subject of the proxy

advisory services in writing of the conflicting advice or

recommendations, including disclosure of all related

recommendations, the proxy advisor's basis for the

recommendations, and the recipients of each recommendation; and

(3) publicly and conspicuously disclose on the landing

page or front page of the proxy advisor's website that its proxy

advisory services include advice and recommendations that are in

material conflict with proxy advisory services provided to other

shareholders or interested parties.

Sec. 21.1004. VIOLATIONS; DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. An

affected party, including the company that is the subject of the

proxy advisory services, any shareholders of the company, or other

interested parties, may bring an action under Chapter 37, Civil

Practice and Remedies Code, to determine whether a proxy advisor

has committed a violation of this subchapter.

SECTION 2. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to

proxy advisory services rendered on or after the effective date of

this Act. Proxy advisory services rendered before the effective

date of this Act are governed by the law in effect on the date the

contract or other agreement for the services was entered into, and

the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.