Monitoring the Session

SB 2344

Zaffirini Bill Lets Counties Under 75,000 Make Phone Companies Move

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Sen. Judith ZaffiriniDSenate 21
Why it's charged
Bracket bill

THE TEXT

…“a county with a population of less than 75,000 that is located in a standard metropolitan statistical area with a population of more than 1.5 million”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

A two-part population bracket aims a Utilities Code section at a small set of fringe counties in large metro areas. The caption only says "certain county roads" and never says which counties.

Bracket bill

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the placement of telephone corporation facilities in the right-of-way of certain county roads.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Only small counties in metros over 1.5M. The caption just says “certain county roads.”

The bill lets certain counties require phone companies to apply and get commissioners court approval before putting equipment in county road right-of-way, with fixed deadlines for the county to approve or ask for changes. It applies only to counties under 75,000 people that sit inside a metro area of more than 1.5 million people. Those counties can also make phone companies move their equipment at company expense for road widening, with 45 days' written notice, and the company must pay to fix any road damage from the move.

Labels

Labels: GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on May 13, 2025. Died in the House: never got out of the State Affairs committee.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB2344 · 2025-03-12

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the placement of telephone corporation facilities in the right-of-way of certain county roads.

WHAT IT DOES

Only small counties in metros over 1.5M. The caption just says “certain county roads.”

The bill lets certain counties require phone companies to apply and get commissioners court approval before putting equipment in county road right-of-way, with fixed deadlines for the county to approve or ask for changes. It applies only to counties under 75,000 people that sit inside a metro area of more than 1.5 million people. Those counties can also make phone companies move their equipment at company expense for road widening, with 45 days' written notice, and the company must pay to fix any road damage from the move.

CHARGES

[x] BRACKET BILLanalysis confidence 55%

THE TEXT

…“a county with a population of less than 75,000 that is located in a standard metropolitan statistical area with a population of more than 1.5 million”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

A two-part population bracket aims a Utilities Code section at a small set of fringe counties in large metro areas. The caption only says "certain county roads" and never says which counties.

TOTAL

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 30, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Business & Commerce
  5. Posting rule suspended
  6. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  7. Considered in public hearing
  8. Testimony taken in committee
  9. Left pending in committee
  10. Considered in public hearing
  11. Vote taken in committee
  12. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  13. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  14. Committee report printed and distributed
  15. Placed on intent calendar
  16. Placed on local & uncontested calendar
  17. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  18. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  19. Vote recorded in Journal
  20. Three day rule suspended
  21. Record vote
  22. Read 3rd time
  23. Passed
  24. Record vote
  25. Reported engrossed
  26. Received from the Senate
  27. Read first time
  28. Referred to State Affairs
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 31 yea · 0 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · May 13, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Carlos M. Zaffirini Jr$110,000.00
Killam Development Ltd.$72,700.00

Killam Development Ltd.

$72,700.00

Cash
$10,000.00
Paid by others
$62,700.00
Total
$72,700.00
advertising $33,000.00media $29,700.00

Also funds 3 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Dec 9, 2024 to Sep 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 16, 2025 to Aug 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101011018, 101057658.

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC$60,000.00

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 11, 2024 to Aug 31, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100959783, 100987492, 101011018, 101035338, 101057658.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Killam Development Ltd.

$72,700.00

Cash
$10,000.00
Paid by others
$62,700.00
Total
$72,700.00
advertising $33,000.00media $29,700.00

Also funds 3 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Dec 9, 2024 to Sep 28, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Name match, not a verified identity: normalized filed name and state.

Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 16, 2025 to Aug 20, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101011018, 101057658.

×

Texas Trial Lawyers Association PAC

$60,000.00

Cash
$60,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$60,000.00

Also funds 137 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 24, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 11, 2024 to Aug 31, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100959783, 100987492, 101011018, 101035338, 101057658.

Votes3

Senate May 13, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator Zaffirini moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that SB 2344 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0. The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 13, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator Zaffirini moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that SB 2344 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 13, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses3
For
3
Against
0
On
0
Names

For

  • Caldwell County1 registration
  • El Paso County1 registration
  • Self; Caldwell County1 registration
Sources

3 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 30, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 12, 2025

05/14/2025 H Referred to State Affairs: May 14 2025 9:51PM

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

House committee · State Affairs · Final status: Died in committee

Senate committee · Business & Commerce · Committee vote 11 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Subjects

County Government--Roads

Utilities--General

Utilities--Telecommunications

Text

The text as introduced · 464 words

89R16324 CXP-F

By: Zaffirini
S.B. No. 2344

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the placement of telephone corporation facilities in

the right-of-way of certain county roads.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subchapter E, Chapter 181, Utilities Code, is

amended by adding Section 181.0821 to read as follows:

Sec. 181.0821. REGULATION BY CERTAIN COUNTIES. (a) This

section applies only to a county with a population of less than

75,000 that is located in a standard metropolitan statistical area

with a population of more than 1.5 million.

(b) A telephone corporation may install a facility of the

corporation in the right-of-way of a county road under Section

181.082 only after the corporation submits to the county and the

commissioners court of the county approves an application to use

the right-of-way for the facility, according to procedures provided

by an order adopted by the commissioners court of the county.

(c) The procedures adopted by the commissioners court of the

county:

(1) may not include procedures or forms that are

substantially different from the application procedures and forms

used for locating other utility facilities in the right-of-way of a

county road;

(2) must provide that the county, not later than the

10th business day after the date an application for use of the

right-of-way is submitted, will provide notice to the telephone

corporation that the application:

(A) is approved as filed; or

(B) must be modified to comply with location or

construction schedule requirements to reduce conflicts with county

road construction projects;

(3) must allow for resubmission of an application for

which a modification is requested under Subdivision (2)(B) not

later than the 15th day after the date the corporation receives

notice under that paragraph; and

(4) must provide that an application resubmitted under

Subdivision (3) is considered to be approved if the county does not

deny the application before the sixth business day after the date

the resubmitted application is submitted.

(d) The commissioners court of the county may require a

telephone corporation that has installed a facility in the

right-of-way of a county road under Section 181.082 to relocate the

facility at the corporation's expense to allow for the widening or

other modification of a traffic lane.

(e) To impose a requirement under Subsection (d), the

commissioners court of the county must give the telephone

corporation written notice of the requirement not later than the

45th day before the date the relocation is to be made. The notice

must identify the facility to be relocated and indicate the

location in the right-of-way where the corporation may reinstall

the facility.

(f) The telephone corporation shall pay the cost of

repairing a county road damaged by the relocation.

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.