Monitoring the Session

SB 2373

Johnson Bill Shields Platforms And Carriers For Others’ Content

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Sen. Nathan JohnsonDSenate 16
Why it's charged
Already a crime

THE TEXT

“A person commits an offense if the person knowingly”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

Analysis prose withheld. Source quote shown.

Already a crime

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to financial exploitation or financial abuse using artificially generated media or phishing communications; providing a civil penalty; creating a criminal offense.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Targets can sue over AI fakes and phishing. Civil penalties up to $1,000 a day.

The bill lets people sue anyone who knowingly spreads AI-made fake media or phishing messages to exploit them financially, and it lets the attorney general seek a civil penalty of up to $1,000 per day. It touches scammers, the people they target, and courts, which must offer the person who is the subject of the suit a pseudonym and keep their identifying records confidential, while online platforms, phone carriers and licensed broadcasters are shielded for content provided by others. It also creates a new Penal Code offense for financial abuse through AI media or digital phishing, graded from a Class B misdemeanor to a first degree felony by dollar amount, starting September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: BUZZER BEATER. Final vote May 31, 2025: the Senate concurred in the House amendments. 2 days before the session ended Jun 2, 2025.CREATES AN OFFENSE. The caption of the graded version (House committee report) reads: “relating to financial exploitation or financial abuse using artificially generated media or phishing communications; providing a civil penalty; creating a criminal offense.”CROSS-PARTY HANDOFF. Lead author Nathan Johnson (D) in the Senate. Lead sponsor Giovanni Capriglione (R) in the House. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB2373 · 2025-03-12

SOLD BY

+ 9 coauthors

ITEM

relating to financial exploitation or financial abuse using artificially generated media or phishing communications; providing a civil penalty; creating a criminal offense.

WHAT IT DOES

Targets can sue over AI fakes and phishing. Civil penalties up to $1,000 a day.

The bill lets people sue anyone who knowingly spreads AI-made fake media or phishing messages to exploit them financially, and it lets the attorney general seek a civil penalty of up to $1,000 per day. It touches scammers, the people they target, and courts, which must offer the person who is the subject of the suit a pseudonym and keep their identifying records confidential, while online platforms, phone carriers and licensed broadcasters are shielded for content provided by others. It also creates a new Penal Code offense for financial abuse through AI media or digital phishing, graded from a Class B misdemeanor to a first degree felony by dollar amount, starting September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[x] ALREADY A CRIMEanalysis confidence 45%

THE TEXT

“A person commits an offense if the person knowingly”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

Analysis prose withheld. Source quote shown.

TOTAL

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 16, 2025

The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to the number of filings resulting from the bill being unknown.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Criminal Justice
  5. Co-author authorized
  6. Co-author authorized
  7. Co-author authorized
  8. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Testimony taken in committee
  11. Vote taken in committee
  12. Reported favorably as substituted
  13. Committee report printed and distributed
  14. Co-author authorized
  15. Co-author authorized
  16. Placed on intent calendar
  17. Co-author authorized
  18. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  19. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  20. Vote recorded in Journal
  21. Three day rule suspended
  22. Record vote
  23. Read 3rd time
  24. Passed
  25. Record vote
  26. Reported engrossed
  27. Received from the Senate
  28. Read first time
  29. Referred to Delivery of Government Efficiency
  30. Posting rule suspended
  31. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  32. Considered in public hearing
  33. Committee substitute considered in committee
  34. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  35. Left pending in committee
  36. Considered in formal meeting
  37. Committee substitute considered in committee
  38. Reported favorably as substituted
  39. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  40. Committee report distributed
  41. Committee report sent to Calendars
  42. Considered in Calendars
  43. Placed on General State Calendar
  44. Read 2nd time
  45. Passed to 3rd reading
  46. Record vote RV#3794
  47. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  48. Rules suspended
  49. Additional sponsor(s) authorized
  50. Read 3rd time
  51. Passed
  52. Record vote RV#3898
  53. House passage as amended reported
  54. House amendment(s) laid before the Senate
  55. Read
  56. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)
  57. Record vote
  58. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)-reported
  59. Reported enrolled
  60. Signed in the Senate
  61. Signed in the House
  62. Sent to the Governor
  63. Signed by the Governor
  64. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

…“for damages resulting from a knowing or intentional dissemination”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill creates a private lawsuit with attorney's fees and injunctions over spreading deceptive media, while shielding platforms, carriers and broadcasters from liability for others' content.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 138 yea · 0 nay

Senate · 31 yea · 0 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 28, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · May 8, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Daniel Cocanougher$250,000Texas Sands PAC$130KMarguerite Hoffman$125,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 1, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Daniel Cocanougher$250,000.00
Texas Sands PAC$129,500.00

Texas Sands PAC

$129,500.00

Cash
$129,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$129,500.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 27, 2024 to May 12, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100990378, 101033698, 101040111, 101052272.

Marguerite Hoffman$125,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texas Sands PAC

$129,500.00

Cash
$129,500.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$129,500.00

Also funds 121 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 3, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Nov 27, 2024 to May 12, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100990378, 101033698, 101040111, 101052272.

Votes6

Senate May 31, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator Johnson moved to concur in the House amendment to SB 2373. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 28, 2025

Yea
138
Nay
0
Present, not voting
2
Absent
3
Excused
7
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3898

SB 2373 was passed by (Record 3898): 138 Yeas, 0 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 138 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 3 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 7 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
131
Nay
0
Present, not voting
1
Absent
15
Excused
3
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3794

CSSB 2373 was passed to third reading by (Record 3794): 131 Yeas, 0 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 131 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 15 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 3 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 8, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator Johnson moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 2373 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0. The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 8, 2025

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Sources

Senator Johnson moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 2373 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 31, Nays 0.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 8, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses21
For
21
Against
0
On
0
Names

For

  • AARP Texas1 registration
  • AARP TX1 registration
  • City of Dallas1 registration
  • City of Houston1 registration
  • Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas (CLEAT)1 registration
  • Crime Stoppers of Houston1 registration
  • Dallas Criminal District Attorney John Creuzot1 registration
  • Dallas Police Association1 registration
  • Dallas Police Department1 registration
  • Disability Rights Texas1 registration
  • Harris County Deputies Organization FOP #391 registration
  • Harris County District Attorney’s Office1 registration
  • Houston Police Department2 registrations
  • Self2 registrations
  • SHERIFFS’ Association of Texas1 registration
  • Texas Association of Broadcasters1 registration
  • Texas Credit Union Association1 registration
  • Texas Municipal Police Association (TMPA)1 registration
  • Texas Police Chiefs Association1 registration
Sources

21 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 16, 2025

The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to the number of filings resulting from the bill being unknown.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 12, 2025

06/20/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 6:51 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors
Cosponsors

House committee · Delivery of Government Efficiency · Committee vote 11 aye, 0 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Criminal Justice · Committee vote 7 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Subjects

Artificial Intelligence (IQ7C5)

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

Courts--General

Crimes--Against Persons--General

Financial--General

Protection of Personal Information

EMAIL & ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS

Text

The text as introduced · 1,336 words

2025S0218-1 03/12/25

By: Johnson
S.B. No. 2373

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the financial exploitation or abuse of persons using

artificially generated media or phishing communications; providing

a civil penalty; creating a criminal offense.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Title 4, Civil Practice and Remedies Code, is

amended by adding Chapter 100B to read as follows:

CHAPTER 100B. LIABILITY FOR FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION OF PERSONS

Sec. 100B.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Artificial intelligence" means a machine-based

system that can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, make

predictions, recommendations, or decisions that influence real or

virtual environments.

(2) "Artificially generated media" means an image, an

audio recording, a video recording, a radio broadcast, or written

text created or modified using artificial intelligence or other

computer software with the intent to deceive.

(3) "Exploitation" and "financial exploitation" have

the meanings assigned by Section 281.001, Finance Code.

(4) "Phishing communication" means an attempt to

deceive or manipulate a person into providing personal, financial,

or identifying information through e-mail, electronic

communication, or other digital means.

Sec. 100B.002. CAUSE OF ACTION FOR DISSEMINATION OF CERTAIN

COMMUNICATIONS FOR FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION. (a) A person is liable

for damages resulting from a knowing dissemination of artificially

generated media or a phishing communication for the purpose of

financial exploitation.

(b) A court shall award a claimant who prevails in an action

brought under this section:

(1) actual damages, including damages for mental

anguish and the defendant's profits attributable to the

dissemination of the artificially generated media or phishing

communication; and

(2) court costs and reasonable attorney's fees

incurred in bringing the action.

(c) A court in which an action is brought under this

section, on a motion of a claimant, may issue a temporary

restraining order or a temporary or permanent injunction to

restrain and prevent the further dissemination of artificially

generated media or a phishing communication to the claimant.

(d) It is a defense to liability under this section that:

(1) the dissemination occurred as part of a lawful

criminal investigation; or

(2) the artificially generated media contains a

disclosure that:

(A) states that the media has been altered using

artificial intelligence or other computer software;

(B) for a recording or broadcast, occurs at the

beginning of or reasonably within the recording or broadcast; and

(C) for an image or written text, is clearly

legible.

Sec. 100B.003. CIVIL PENALTY FOR DISSEMINATION OF CERTAIN

COMMUNICATIONS FOR FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION. (a) A person who

knowingly disseminates artificially generated media or a phishing

communication for purposes of financial exploitation is subject to

a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000 per day the media or

communication is disseminated. The attorney general may bring an

action to collect the civil penalty.

(b) It is a defense to liability for a civil penalty imposed

under this section that:

(1) the dissemination occurred as part of a lawful

criminal investigation; or

(2) the artificially generated media contains a

disclosure that:

(A) states that the media has been altered using

artificial intelligence or other computer software;

(B) for a recording or broadcast, occurs at the

beginning of or reasonably within the recording or broadcast; and

(C) for an image or written text, is clearly

legible.

Sec. 100B.004. CONFIDENTIAL IDENTITY IN ACTION FOR

DISSEMINATION OF CERTAIN COMMUNICATIONS. (a) In this section,

"confidential identity" means:

(1) the use of a pseudonym; and

(2) the absence of any other identifying information,

including address, telephone number, and social security number.

(b) In an action brought under Section 100B.002 or 100B.003,

the court shall:

(1) notify the person who is the subject of the action

as early as possible in the action that the person may use a

confidential identity in relation to the action;

(2) allow a person who is the subject of the action to

use a confidential identity in all petitions, filings, and other

documents presented to the court;

(3) use the person's confidential identity in all of

the court's proceedings and records relating to the action,

including any appellate proceedings; and

(4) maintain the records relating to the action in a

manner that protects the person's confidentiality.

(c) In an action brought under Section 100B.002 or 100B.003,

only the following persons are entitled to know the true

identifying information about the person who is the subject of the

action:

(1) the court;

(2) a party to the action;

(3) an attorney representing a party to the action;

and

(4) a person authorized by a written order of the court

specific to that person.

(d) The court shall order that a person entitled to know the

true identifying information under Subsection (c) may not divulge

that information to anyone without a written order of the court.

The court shall hold a person who violates the order in contempt.

(e) Notwithstanding Section 22.004, Government Code, the

supreme court may not amend or adopt rules in conflict with this

section.

(f) A person is not required to use a confidential identity

as provided by this section.

SECTION 2. Section 32.55(e), Penal Code, is amended to read

as follows:

(e) A person who is subject to prosecution under both this

section and another section of this code may be prosecuted under

either section or both sections , except that the actor may not be

prosecuted under both this section and Section 32.56 .

SECTION 3. Subchapter D, Chapter 32, Penal Code, is amended

by adding Section 32.56 to read as follows:

Sec. 32.56. FINANCIAL ABUSE USING ARTIFICIALLY GENERATED

MEDIA OR PHISHING. (a) In this section:

(1) "Artificially generated media" and "artificial

intelligence" have the meanings assigned by Section 100B.001, Civil

Practice and Remedies Code.

(2) "Financial abuse" has the meaning assigned by

Section 32.55.

(b) A person commits an offense if the person knowingly

engages in financial abuse:

(1) through the use of artificially generated media

disseminated to another person; or

(2) by deceiving or manipulating another person into

providing personal, financial, or identifying information through

e-mail, electronic communication, or other digital means.

(c) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:

(1) the conduct was performed by an officer or

employee of a law enforcement agency in the course and scope of a

criminal investigation; or

(2) the artificially generated media contains a

disclosure that:

(A) states that the media has been altered using

artificial intelligence or other computer software;

(B) for a video or audio recording, occurs at the

beginning of the recording; and

(C) for an image or written text, appears in an

easily readable font size.

(d) An offense under this section is:

(1) a Class B misdemeanor if the value of the property

taken, appropriated, obtained, retained, or used is less than $100;

(2) a Class A misdemeanor if the value of the property

taken, appropriated, obtained, retained, or used is $100 or more

but less than $750;

(3) a state jail felony if the value of the property

taken, appropriated, obtained, retained, or used is $750 or more

but less than $2,500;

(4) a felony of the third degree if the value of the

property taken, appropriated, obtained, retained, or used is $2,500

or more but less than $30,000;

(5) a felony of the second degree if the value of the

property taken, appropriated, obtained, retained, or used is

$30,000 or more but less than $150,000; and

(6) a felony of the first degree if the value of the

property taken, appropriated, obtained, retained, or used is

$150,000 or more.

(e) If conduct constituting an offense under this section

also constitutes an offense under another section of this code, the

actor may be prosecuted under either section or under both

sections, except that the actor may not be prosecuted under both

this section and Section 32.55.

SECTION 4. Section 100B.002, Civil Practice and Remedies

Code, as added by this Act, applies only to a cause of action that

accrues on or after the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.