Monitoring the Session

SB 2477

Bettencourt Bill Bars Cities Over 150K From Blocking Office Conversions

Became law, effective Sep 1, 2025

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Paul BettencourtRSenate 7

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to certain municipal regulation of conversion of certain office buildings to mixed-use and multifamily residential occupancy.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

No traffic studies, new parking or rezoning votes. Staff approve the permit, and trade groups can sue.

The bill stops larger Texas cities from blocking or adding costs to projects that turn older office buildings into apartments or mixed-use housing. It covers cities over 150,000 people in counties over 300,000, owners and developers of office buildings at least five years old, and housing trade groups and nonprofits, which get the right to sue cities. Cities can no longer require traffic studies, new parking, rezoning votes, stricter design rules, density caps below set floors, or new impact fees on these conversions, and staff must approve permits that meet the rules without a council vote.

Labels

Labels: BUZZER BEATER. Final vote May 30, 2025: the Senate concurred in the House amendments. 3 days before the session ended Jun 2, 2025.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB2477 · 2025-03-13

SOLD BY

+ 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to certain municipal regulation of conversion of certain office buildings to mixed-use and multifamily residential occupancy.

WHAT IT DOES

No traffic studies, new parking or rezoning votes. Staff approve the permit, and trade groups can sue.

The bill stops larger Texas cities from blocking or adding costs to projects that turn older office buildings into apartments or mixed-use housing. It covers cities over 150,000 people in counties over 300,000, owners and developers of office buildings at least five years old, and housing trade groups and nonprofits, which get the right to sue cities. Cities can no longer require traffic studies, new parking, rezoning votes, stricter design rules, density caps below set floors, or new impact fees on these conversions, and staff must approve permits that meet the rules without a council vote.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 28, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Local Government
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably as substituted
  12. Committee report printed and distributed
  13. Placed on intent calendar
  14. Co-author authorized
  15. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  16. Record vote
  17. Read 2nd time
  18. Amendment(s) offered FA1 Bettencourt
  19. Amended
  20. Vote recorded in Journal
  21. Passed to engrossment as amended
  22. Record vote
  23. Three day rule suspended
  24. Record vote
  25. Read 3rd time
  26. Passed
  27. Record vote
  28. Reported engrossed
  29. Received from the Senate
  30. Read first time
  31. Referred to Land & Resource Management
  32. Considered in formal meeting
  33. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  34. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  35. Committee report distributed
  36. Committee report sent to Calendars
  37. Considered in Calendars
  38. Placed on General State Calendar
  39. Rules suspended
  40. Additional sponsor(s) authorized
  41. Read 2nd time
  42. Amended 1-Patterson
  43. Record vote RV#3712
  44. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  45. Amended 2-Patterson
  46. Record vote RV#3713
  47. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  48. Passed to 3rd reading as amended
  49. Record vote RV#3714
  50. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  51. Read 3rd time
  52. Passed
  53. Record vote RV#3848
  54. Statement(s) of vote recorded in Journal
  55. House passage as amended reported
  56. House amendment(s) laid before the Senate
  57. Read
  58. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)
  59. Record vote
  60. Senate concurs in House amendment(s)-reported
  61. Reported enrolled
  62. Signed in the Senate
  63. Signed in the House
  64. Sent to the Governor
  65. Signed by the Governor
  66. Effective on 9/1/25
FILED UNDER

SPEECH AND LAWFARE

THE TEXT

“A court shall award reasonable attorney's fees and court costs to a prevailing claimant in an action brought under this section.”

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill lets housing trade groups and housing advocacy nonprofits sue cities over violations and makes the city pay their lawyers if they win, with appeals sent to the Fifteenth Court of Appeals.

SIGNED FOR BY

House · 112 yea · 26 nay

Senate · 28 yea · 3 nay

Sources

House: Final passage · May 28, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate: Final passage · May 8, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Donors report through Friends of Paul Bettencourt.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes9

Senate May 30, 2025

Yea
28
Nay
3
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved to concur in the House amendments to SB 2477. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 28, Nays 3.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 28 (published)
  • Nay: 3 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 28, 2025

Yea
112
Nay
26
Present, not voting
2
Absent
4
Excused
6
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3848

SB 2477 was passed by (Record 3848): 112 Yeas, 26 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 112 (published)
  • Nay: 26 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 4 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 6 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
123
Nay
18
Present, not voting
1
Absent
4
Excused
4
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3714

SB 2477, as amended, was passed to third reading by (Record 3714): 123 Yeas, 18 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 123 (published)
  • Nay: 18 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 4 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 4 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
137
Nay
2
Present, not voting
1
Absent
6
Excused
4
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3713

Amendment No. 2 was adopted by (Record 3713): 137 Yeas, 2 Nays, 1 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 137 (published)
  • Nay: 2 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 1 (published)
  • Absent: 6 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 4 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

House May 27, 2025

Yea
128
Nay
4
Present, not voting
2
Absent
12
Excused
4
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

House journal

Sources

Record 3712

Amendment No. 1 was adopted by (Record 3712): 128 Yeas, 4 Nays, 2 Present, not voting.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 128 (published)
  • Nay: 4 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 12 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 4 (derived from named list)

House journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 8, 2025

Yea
28
Nay
3
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 28, Nays 3. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 28 (published)
  • Nay: 3 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 8, 2025

Yea
28
Nay
3
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 2477 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 28, Nays 3.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 28 (published)
  • Nay: 3 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 8, 2025

Yea
28
Nay
3
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

CSSB 2477 as amended was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 28, Nays 3.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 28 (published)
  • Nay: 3 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 8, 2025

Yea
26
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 2477 at this time on its second reading: CSSB 2477, Relating to certain municipal regulation of conversion of certain office buildings to mixed-use and multifamily residential occupancy. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 26, Nays 5.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses39
For
26
Against
8
On
5
Names

For

  • Americans for Prosperity, Texas1 registration
  • Caritas of Austin1 registration
  • El Paso Association of Builders1 registration
  • Greater Edwards Aquifer Alliance1 registration
  • JPMorgan Chase Holdings, LLC1 registration
  • Real Estate Council of Austin1 registration
  • Self1 registration
  • Self; Institute for Justice1 registration
  • Self; TAAHP1 registration
  • Self; Texans for Housing1 registration
  • Self; The Greater Fort Worth Builders Association1 registration
  • Texans for Housing1 registration
  • Texans for Reasonable Solutioms1 registration
  • Texans for reasonable solutions1 registration
  • Texas Affiliation of Affordable Housing Providers1 registration
  • Texas Apartment Association1 registration
  • Texas Association of Builders2 registrations
  • Texas Association of Business1 registration
  • Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops1 registration
  • Texas chapter US Green Building Council1 registration
  • Texas Farm Bureau1 registration
  • Texas Public Policy Foundation1 registration
  • Texas Realtors1 registration
  • Texas Societyof Architects1 registration
  • The Pew Charitable Trusts1 registration

Against

  • Bexar County Commissioners Court1 registration
  • City of Dallas1 registration
  • City of Garland1 registration
  • City of Houston1 registration
  • City of Irving1 registration
  • City of Leander1 registration
  • City of San Antonio1 registration
  • Dallas County Commissioners Court1 registration

On

  • City of Corpus Christi1 registration
  • Conference of Urban Counties1 registration
  • Harris County Commissioners Court1 registration
  • Self; American Planning Association, Texas Chapter1 registration
  • Texas Municipal League1 registration
Sources

39 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version F · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version F · May 28, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 13, 2025

06/20/2025 E Effective on 9/1/25

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report · Enrolled

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors
Cosponsors

House committee · Land & Resource Management · Committee vote 6 aye, 0 nay, 3 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Local Government · Committee vote 5 aye, 1 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Companion

HB 5187 by Patterson (identical)

Subjects

City Government--Land Use & Zoning

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

County Government--Land Use & Zoning

Fees & Other Nontax Revenue--Local

Housing--General

PERMITS

ATTORNEY GENERAL

Text

The text as introduced · 1,792 words

89R17386 DRS-F

By: Bettencourt
S.B. No. 2477

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to certain municipal and county regulation of conversion

of certain office buildings to mixed-use and multifamily

residential occupancy.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subtitle C, Title 7, Local Government Code, is

amended by adding Chapter 249 to read as follows:

CHAPTER 249. REGULATION OF MIXED-USE AND MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL

USE AND DEVELOPMENT IN CERTAIN MUNICIPALITIES AND COUNTIES

SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 249.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

(1) "Heavy industrial use" means a storage,

processing, or manufacturing use:

(A) with processes using flammable or explosive

materials;

(B) with hazardous conditions; or

(C) that is noxious or offensive from odors,

smoke, noise, fumes, or vibrations.

(2) "Mixed-use residential," when used to describe

land use or development, means the use or development, as

applicable, of a site consisting of residential and nonresidential

uses in which the residential uses are at least 65 percent of the

total square footage of the development. The term includes the use

or development of a condominium.

(3) "Multifamily residential," when used to describe

land use or development, means the use or development, as

applicable, of a site for three or more dwelling units within one or

more buildings. The term includes the use or development of a

residential condominium.

(4) "Permit" has the meaning assigned by Section

245.001.

Sec. 249.002. APPLICABILITY OF CHAPTER. This chapter

applies only to:

(1) a municipality with a population greater than

90,000 that is wholly or partly located in a county with a

population greater than 300,000; and

(2) a county with a population greater than 300,000.

Sec. 249.003. NO EFFECT ON OTHER RESTRICTIONS AND RULES.

This chapter does not limit:

(1) a municipality or county from adopting or

enforcing an ordinance, regulation, or other measure:

(A) to protect historic landmarks or include

properties within the boundaries of local historic districts; or

(B) related to the use and occupancy of a

residential property that is rented for a period not longer than 30

consecutive days; or

(2) a property owner from enforcing rules or deed

restrictions imposed by a property owners' association or by other

private agreement.

SUBCHAPTER B. FEES AND REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO CONVERSION OF

CERTAIN USES

Sec. 249.101. APPLICABILITY. (a) This subchapter applies

only to a building or the structural components of a building that:

(1) is being used primarily for office use;

(2) is proposed to be converted from primarily office

use to mixed-use residential or multifamily residential occupancy

for at least 65 percent of the building and at least 65 percent of

each floor of the building that is fit for occupancy; and

(3) was constructed at least five years before the

proposed date to start the conversion.

(b) This subchapter does not apply to a building proposed to

be converted to mixed-use residential or multifamily residential

use that is located:

(1) in an area subject to a zoning classification that

allows heavy industrial use; or

(2) within 1,000 feet of an existing heavy industrial

use or development site, airport, or military base.

Sec. 249.102. FEE WAIVER. Notwithstanding any other law, a

municipality or county may not charge a fee in connection with the

submission, review, or approval of an application for a permit

related to the use, development, or construction of a building

proposed to be converted to mixed-use residential or multifamily

residential use, including any fee for:

(1) acquiring a building permit;

(2) the closure of a street or sidewalk adjacent to the

proposed converted building; or

(3) an expedited permit review for the proposed

converted building if the municipality or county has adopted an

accelerated residential building permit review process.

Sec. 249.103. PARKLAND DEDICATION AND FEE PROHIBITED.

(a) In this section, "parkland," "parkland dedication," and

"parkland dedication fee" have the meanings assigned by Section

212.201.

(b) Notwithstanding Subchapter H, Chapter 212, a

municipality or county may not require the dedication of parkland

or impose a parkland dedication fee in connection with a building

proposed to be converted to mixed-use residential or multifamily

residential use.

Sec. 249.104. CERTAIN REGULATIONS PROHIBITED. (a)

Notwithstanding any other law, a municipality or county may not, in

connection with the use, development, construction, or occupancy of

a building proposed to be converted to mixed-use residential or

multifamily residential use, require:

(1) the preparation of a traffic impact analysis or

other study relating to the effect the proposed converted building

would have on traffic or traffic operations;

(2) the construction of improvements or payment of a

fee in connection with mitigating traffic effects related to the

proposed converted building;

(3) the provision of additional parking spaces, other

than the parking spaces that already exist on the site of the

proposed converted building;

(4) the extension, upgrade, replacement, or

oversizing of a utility facility except as necessary to provide the

minimum capacity needed to serve the proposed converted building;

(5) a limit on density applicable to the site of the

proposed converted building that is more restrictive than the

greater of:

(A) the highest residential density allowed in

the municipality or county; or

(B) 36 units per acre;

(6) a building proposed to be converted to multifamily

residential occupancy not located in an area zoned for mixed-use

residential use to include nonresidential uses;

(7) a design requirement, including a requirement

related to the exterior, windows, internal environment of a

building, or interior space dimensions of an apartment, that is

more restrictive than the applicable minimum standard under the

International Building Code as adopted as a municipal commercial

building code under Section 214.216; or

(8) the change of a zoning district or land use

classification or regulation or an approval of an amendment,

exception, or variance to a zoning district or land use

classification or regulation prior to allowing conversion of a

building to mixed-use residential use or multifamily residential

use.

(b) For the purposes of Subsection (a)(8), an amendment,

exception, or variance to a zoning district or land use

classification or regulation includes a special exception, zoning

variance, site development variance, subdivision variance,

conditional use approval, special use permit, comprehensive plan

amendment, or other discretionary approval to allow conversion of a

building to mixed-use residential use or multifamily residential

use.

Sec. 249.105. IMPACT FEE PROHIBITED. A municipality or

county may not impose an impact fee, as defined by Section 395.001,

on land where a building has been converted to mixed-use

residential or multifamily residential use unless the land on which

the building is located was already subject to an impact fee before

a building permit related to the conversion was filed with the

municipality or county.

Sec. 249.106. ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL REQUIRED.

Notwithstanding any other law, if a municipal or county authority

responsible for approving a building permit or other authorization

required for the conversion of a building to mixed-use residential

use or multifamily residential use determines that a proposed

conversion meets municipal or county regulations in accordance with

this subchapter, the municipal or county authority:

(1) shall administratively approve the permit or other

authorization; and

(2) may not require further action by the governing

body of the municipality or county for the approval to take effect.

SUBCHAPTER C. ENFORCEMENT

Sec. 249.201. CIVIL ACTION. (a) In this section, "housing

organization" means a:

(1) trade or industry group organized under the laws

of this state consisting of local members primarily engaged in the

construction or management of housing units;

(2) nonprofit organization organized under the laws of

this state that:

(A) provides or advocates for increased access or

reduced barriers to housing; and

(B) has filed written or oral comments with the

legislature; or

(3) nonprofit organization that is engaged in public

policy research, education, and outreach that includes housing

policy-related issues and advocacy.

(b) Except as provided by Subsection (c), a person adversely

affected or aggrieved by a violation of Section 249.102, 249.103,

249.104, 249.105, or 249.106 may bring an action for economic

damages or declaratory or injunctive relief against a municipality

or county or an officer of a municipality or county in the officer's

official capacity.

(c) A housing organization may bring an action for

declaratory or injunctive relief for a violation of Section

249.102, 249.103, 249.104, 249.105, or 249.106 against a

municipality or county or an officer of a municipality or county in

the officer's official capacity.

(d) A claimant who prevails in an action brought under

Subsection (b) or (c) is entitled to recover court costs and

reasonable attorney's fees.

(e) Notwithstanding any other law, including Chapter 15,

Civil Practice and Remedies Code, an action brought under this

section must be brought in a county in which all or part of the real

property that is the subject of the action is located.

(f) Notwithstanding any other law, the Fifteenth Court of

Appeals has exclusive intermediate appellate jurisdiction over an

action brought under this section.

(g) Governmental immunity of a municipality or county to

suit and from liability is waived to the extent of liability created

by this section. Official immunity of a municipal or county officer

or employee is waived to the extent of liability created by this

section.

Sec. 249.202. ATTORNEY GENERAL ENFORCEMENT. (a) In this

section:

(1) "No-new-revenue tax rate" means the

no-new-revenue tax rate calculated under Chapter 26, Tax Code.

(2) "Tax year" has the meaning assigned by Section

1.04, Tax Code.

(b) A person may submit a complaint to the attorney general

of a suspected violation of Section 249.102, 249.103, 249.104,

249.105, or 249.106.

(c) Notwithstanding any other law, if the attorney general

determines that a municipality or county has violated Section

249.102, 249.103, 249.104, 249.105, or 249.106, the municipality or

county may not adopt an ad valorem tax rate that exceeds the

municipality's or county's no-new-revenue tax rate for the three

tax years that begin on or after the date of the determination.

SECTION 2. Section 395.011, Local Government Code, is

amended by amending Subsection (b) and adding Subsection (b-1) to

read as follows:

(b) Except as provided by Section 249.105 and Subsection

(b-1), political [ Political ] subdivisions may enact or impose

impact fees on land within their corporate boundaries or

extraterritorial jurisdictions only by complying with this

chapter .

(b-1) A political subdivision may not enact or impose an

impact fee on land within its [ , except that impact fees may not be

enacted or imposed in the ] extraterritorial jurisdiction for

roadway facilities.

SECTION 3. Chapter 249, Local Government Code, as added by

this Act, applies only to a building proposed to be converted to

mixed-use residential or multifamily residential use in which a

building permit was submitted to a municipality or county on or

after the effective date of this Act.

SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.