Monitoring the Session

SB 2535

bill tilting appraisal fights toward property owners

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Mayes MiddletonRSenate 11

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the appraisal of property for ad valorem tax purposes, including protests, arbitrations, and appeals regarding appraisals.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Won a protest last year? The district must prove any increase.

The bill shifts several property tax appraisal fights in favor of property owners. If a value was lowered on protest or appeal, the appraisal district must prove any increase the next year by clear and convincing evidence, and it carries the burden in a court appeal after a prior-year lowering. If an arbitrator finds the appraisal board or chief appraiser broke a procedural rule, the appraisal district must also pay the owner's reasonable attorney's fees and costs, starting September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Mar 13, 2025 and referred to the Senate Local Government committee. No public hearing. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB2535 · 2025-03-13

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the appraisal of property for ad valorem tax purposes, including protests, arbitrations, and appeals regarding appraisals.

WHAT IT DOES

Won a protest last year? The district must prove any increase.

The bill shifts several property tax appraisal fights in favor of property owners. If a value was lowered on protest or appeal, the appraisal district must prove any increase the next year by clear and convincing evidence, and it carries the burden in a court appeal after a prior-year lowering. If an arbitrator finds the appraisal board or chief appraiser broke a procedural rule, the appraisal district must also pay the owner's reasonable attorney's fees and costs, starting September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Local Government
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$1.14MRussell Gordy$300,000Kenneth Fisher$215,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 6, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$1,140,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$1,140,000.00

Cash
$1,140,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$1,140,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101009502, 101012383, 101061137, 101072395, 101072779.

Russell Gordy$300,000.00
Kenneth Fisher$215,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$1,140,000.00

Cash
$1,140,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$1,140,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101009502, 101012383, 101061137, 101072395, 101072779.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No fiscal note in the loaded record.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 13, 2025

04/03/2025 S Referred to Local Government

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Senate committee · Local Government · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Taxation--Property-Appeal of Tax Decisions

Taxation--Property-Appraisals & Appraisal Districts

Text

The text as introduced · 453 words

89R16288 CS-F

By: Middleton
S.B. No. 2535

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the appraisal of property for ad valorem tax purposes,

including protests, arbitrations, and appeals regarding

appraisals.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 23.01(e), Tax Code, is amended to read as

follows:

(e) Notwithstanding any provision of this subchapter to the

contrary, if the appraised value of property in a tax year is

lowered under Subtitle F, the appraised value of the property as

finally determined under that subtitle is considered to be the

appraised value of the property for that tax year. In the next tax

year in which the property is appraised, the appraisal district

[ chief appraiser ] may not increase the appraised value of the

property unless the increase by the appraisal district [ chief

appraiser ] is reasonably supported by clear and convincing evidence

when all of the reliable and probative evidence in the record is

considered as a whole. If the appraised value is finally determined

in a protest under Section 41.41(a)(2) or an appeal under Section

42.26, the appraisal district [ chief appraiser ] may satisfy the

requirement to reasonably support by clear and convincing evidence

an increase in the appraised value of the property in the next tax

year in which the property is appraised by presenting evidence

showing that the inequality in the appraisal of property has been

corrected with regard to the properties that were considered in

determining the value of the subject property. The burden of proof

is on the appraisal district [ chief appraiser ] to support an

increase in the appraised value of property under the circumstances

described by this subsection.

SECTION 2. Section 41A.015(k), Tax Code, is amended to read

as follows:

(k) If the arbitrator determines that the appraisal review

board or chief appraiser failed to comply with the procedural

requirement that was the subject of the limited binding

arbitration:

(1) the comptroller, on receipt of a copy of the award,

shall refund the property owner's arbitration deposit, less the

amount retained by the comptroller under Section 41A.05(b); and

(2) the appraisal district shall pay :

(A) the arbitrator's fee ; and

(B) the property owner's reasonable attorney's

fees and costs in the amounts determined by the arbitrator .

SECTION 3. Section 42.23, Tax Code, is amended by adding

Subsection (b-1) to read as follows:

(b-1) The appraisal district has the burden of establishing

the value of the property by clear and convincing evidence if the

appraised value of the property was lowered under this subtitle in

the preceding year in an appeal under Section 42.01(a)(1)(A).

SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.