SB 2535
bill tilting appraisal fights toward property owners
Died in committee
Verdict: No flags
Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade
Caption
relating to the appraisal of property for ad valorem tax purposes, including protests, arbitrations, and appeals regarding appraisals.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Summary
Won a protest last year? The district must prove any increase.
The bill shifts several property tax appraisal fights in favor of property owners. If a value was lowered on protest or appeal, the appraisal district must prove any increase the next year by clear and convincing evidence, and it carries the burden in a court appeal after a prior-year lowering. If an arbitrator finds the appraisal board or chief appraiser broke a procedural rule, the appraisal district must also pay the owner's reasonable attorney's fees and costs, starting September 1, 2025.
Labels
Labels: NEVER GOT A HEARING. Filed Mar 13, 2025 and referred to the Senate Local Government committee. No public hearing. The bill died.
Receipt
The receipt
89R-SB2535 · 2025-03-13
SOLD BY
ITEM
relating to the appraisal of property for ad valorem tax purposes, including protests, arbitrations, and appeals regarding appraisals.
WHAT IT DOES
Won a protest last year? The district must prove any increase.
The bill shifts several property tax appraisal fights in favor of property owners. If a value was lowered on protest or appeal, the appraisal district must prove any increase the next year by clear and convincing evidence, and it carries the burden in a court appeal after a prior-year lowering. If an arbitrator finds the appraisal board or chief appraiser broke a procedural rule, the appraisal district must also pay the owner's reasonable attorney's fees and costs, starting September 1, 2025.
CHARGES
[ ] NONE FOUND
TOTAL
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
HISTORY
- Received by the Secretary of the Senate
- Filed
- Read first time
- Referred to Local Government
FILED UNDER
No verified beat found.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Jul 6, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$1,140,000.00
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$1,140,000.00
- Cash
- $1,140,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $1,140,000.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101009502, 101012383, 101061137, 101072395, 101072779.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$1,140,000.00
- Cash
- $1,140,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $1,140,000.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101009502, 101012383, 101061137, 101072395, 101072779.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Fiscal
No fiscal note in the loaded record.
How this was graded
Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas Senate · Filed Mar 13, 2025
04/03/2025 S Referred to Local Government
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
Senate committee · Local Government · Final status: Died in committee
Subjects
Taxation--Property-Appeal of Tax Decisions
Taxation--Property-Appraisals & Appraisal Districts
Text
The text as introduced · 453 words
89R16288 CS-F By: Middleton S.B. No. 2535 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to the appraisal of property for ad valorem tax purposes, including protests, arbitrations, and appeals regarding appraisals. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Section 23.01(e), Tax Code, is amended to read as follows: (e) Notwithstanding any provision of this subchapter to the contrary, if the appraised value of property in a tax year is lowered under Subtitle F, the appraised value of the property as finally determined under that subtitle is considered to be the appraised value of the property for that tax year. In the next tax year in which the property is appraised, the appraisal district [ chief appraiser ] may not increase the appraised value of the property unless the increase by the appraisal district [ chief appraiser ] is reasonably supported by clear and convincing evidence when all of the reliable and probative evidence in the record is considered as a whole. If the appraised value is finally determined in a protest under Section 41.41(a)(2) or an appeal under Section 42.26, the appraisal district [ chief appraiser ] may satisfy the requirement to reasonably support by clear and convincing evidence an increase in the appraised value of the property in the next tax year in which the property is appraised by presenting evidence showing that the inequality in the appraisal of property has been corrected with regard to the properties that were considered in determining the value of the subject property. The burden of proof is on the appraisal district [ chief appraiser ] to support an increase in the appraised value of property under the circumstances described by this subsection. SECTION 2. Section 41A.015(k), Tax Code, is amended to read as follows: (k) If the arbitrator determines that the appraisal review board or chief appraiser failed to comply with the procedural requirement that was the subject of the limited binding arbitration: (1) the comptroller, on receipt of a copy of the award, shall refund the property owner's arbitration deposit, less the amount retained by the comptroller under Section 41A.05(b); and (2) the appraisal district shall pay : (A) the arbitrator's fee ; and (B) the property owner's reasonable attorney's fees and costs in the amounts determined by the arbitrator . SECTION 3. Section 42.23, Tax Code, is amended by adding Subsection (b-1) to read as follows: (b-1) The appraisal district has the burden of establishing the value of the property by clear and convincing evidence if the appraised value of the property was lowered under this subtitle in the preceding year in an appeal under Section 42.01(a)(1)(A). SECTION 4. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.