Monitoring the Session

SB 2594

Cities Must Match Downtown District Assessments For A Nonprofit

Died in committee

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Sen. Mayes MiddletonRSenate 11
All 4 charges, and why
Pitch: Taxpayer-funded NGOs

ACTUALLY

“A municipality shall transfer annually to the management organization of an affected district located in the municipality an amount of money equal to the revenue collected through an existing special assessment”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill routes city money, county money and possible state money to a nonprofit instead of an agency run by elected officials.

Pitch: Taxpayer-funded NGOs
Rider: Caption mismatch

THE CAPTION

“relating to the provision of supplemental services by management”…

Caption, introduced version (I)

THE RIDER

“Notwithstanding any other law, an affected district may not be dissolved under Section 372.011 or any other general law, but may be dissolved by special law.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption speaks only of supplemental services by management organizations. The body also strips property owners of their petition right to dissolve the district and makes it permanent unless the Legislature acts, and the caption never mentions this.

Rider: Caption mismatch
New fee, fund, board or appointees

THE TEXT

“(3) one director appointed by the governor;”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill builds a new seven-member governing board with seats filled by state officials and big property owners. That creates new appointed positions over a local district.

New fee, fund, board or appointees
Bracket bill

THE TEXT

…“applies only to a municipality that has a population of more than 900,000 and less than two million.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The population bracket, plus the 'largest operating budget' test, narrows the bill to one downtown district in each of a handful of cities. The caption admits 'certain municipalities,' so the confidence stays moderate.

Bracket bill

Initial review · graded Oct 21, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the provision of supplemental services by management organizations in certain public improvement districts located in certain municipalities.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

The committee analysis cites “calls for reform.” County adds half again. No dissolving by petition.

The bill makes the city and county hand the downtown public improvement district's money to a nonprofit management group, and the city must also pay that group an extra amount equal to the district's yearly assessments, with the county adding half again. It applies only to cities with more than 900,000 and fewer than two million people, and to the single downtown district with the largest budget as of January 1, 2025. That district can no longer be dissolved by property-owner petition, and its nonprofit is run by a seven-member board: three seats appointed by the governor, lieutenant governor and speaker, and two elected by the 10 largest property owners, with the money aimed first at crime and vagrancy.

Labels

Labels: PENDING FOREVER. Heard by the Senate Local Government committee on Apr 28, 2025 and left pending. Never voted out. The bill died.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB2594 · 2025-03-13

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to the provision of supplemental services by management organizations in certain public improvement districts located in certain municipalities.

WHAT IT DOES

The committee analysis cites “calls for reform.” County adds half again. No dissolving by petition.

The bill makes the city and county hand the downtown public improvement district's money to a nonprofit management group, and the city must also pay that group an extra amount equal to the district's yearly assessments, with the county adding half again. It applies only to cities with more than 900,000 and fewer than two million people, and to the single downtown district with the largest budget as of January 1, 2025. That district can no longer be dissolved by property-owner petition, and its nonprofit is run by a seven-member board: three seats appointed by the governor, lieutenant governor and speaker, and two elected by the 10 largest property owners, with the money aimed first at crime and vagrancy.

CHARGES

[x] PITCH: TAXPAYER-FUNDED NGOS

ACTUALLY

“A municipality shall transfer annually to the management organization of an affected district located in the municipality an amount of money equal to the revenue collected through an existing special assessment”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill routes city money, county money and possible state money to a nonprofit instead of an agency run by elected officials.

[x] RIDER: CAPTION MISMATCHanalysis confidence 70%

THE CAPTION

“relating to the provision of supplemental services by management”…

Caption, introduced version (I)

THE RIDER

“Notwithstanding any other law, an affected district may not be dissolved under Section 372.011 or any other general law, but may be dissolved by special law.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The caption speaks only of supplemental services by management organizations. The body also strips property owners of their petition right to dissolve the district and makes it permanent unless the Legislature acts, and the caption never mentions this.

[x] NEW FEE, FUND, BOARD OR APPOINTEESanalysis confidence 80%

THE TEXT

“(3) one director appointed by the governor;”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill builds a new seven-member governing board with seats filled by state officials and big property owners. That creates new appointed positions over a local district.

[x] BRACKET BILLanalysis confidence 60%

THE TEXT

…“applies only to a municipality that has a population of more than 900,000 and less than two million.”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The population bracket, plus the 'largest operating budget' test, narrows the bill to one downtown district in each of a handful of cities. The caption admits 'certain municipalities,' so the confidence stays moderate.

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 27, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Local Government
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
FILED UNDER

TAXPAYER-FUNDED NGOS

THE TEXT

“A municipality shall transfer annually to the management organization of an affected district located in the municipality an amount of money equal to the revenue collected through an existing special assessment”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill routes city money, county money and possible state money to a nonprofit instead of an agency run by elected officials.

DEBT AND SPECIAL DISTRICTS

THE TEXT

…“an affected district may not be dissolved under Section 372.011 or any other general law”…

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill makes one special improvement district permanent and removes property owners' ability to dissolve it locally.

GOVERNMENT GROWTH UNDER A CONSERVATIVE BANNER

THE TEXT

“one director appointed by the lieutenant governor;”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

The bill creates new appointed board seats filled by statewide officials to run a local district's money.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$1.14MRussell Gordy$300,000Kenneth Fisher$215,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Jul 6, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$1,140,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$1,140,000.00

Cash
$1,140,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$1,140,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101009502, 101012383, 101061137, 101072395, 101072779.

Russell Gordy$300,000.00
Kenneth Fisher$215,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$1,140,000.00

Cash
$1,140,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$1,140,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 101009502, 101012383, 101061137, 101072395, 101072779.

Votes

No floor vote loaded for this bill.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · April 27, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 21, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 13, 2025

04/28/2025 S Left pending in committee

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Senate committee · Local Government · Final status: Died in committee

Subjects

Charitable & Nonprofit Organizations

City Government--General

County Government--General

Governor

Special Districts & Authorities--Miscellaneous

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR

SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE

Text

The text as introduced · 995 words

89R15003 MP-F

By: Middleton
S.B. No. 2594

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the provision of supplemental services by management

organizations in certain public improvement districts located in

certain municipalities.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 372.011, Local Government Code, is

amended to read as follows:

Sec. 372.011. DISSOLUTION. Except as provided by Section

372.203, a [ A ] public hearing may be called and held in the same

manner as a hearing under Section 372.009 for the purpose of

dissolving a district if a petition requesting dissolution is filed

and the petition contains the signatures of at least enough

property owners in the district to make a petition sufficient under

Section 372.005(b). If the district is dissolved, the district

nonetheless shall remain in effect for the purpose of meeting

obligations of indebtedness for improvements.

SECTION 2. Chapter 372, Local Government Code, is amended

by adding Subchapter E to read as follows:

SUBCHAPTER E. DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS IN CERTAIN

MUNICIPALITIES

Sec. 372.201. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter:

(1) "Affected district" means a public improvement

district that is located in a municipality's central business

district and has the largest operating budget of any public

improvement district located in the central business district as of

January 1, 2025.

(2) "Management organization" means a nonprofit

organization that a municipality has entered into a contract with

to implement supplemental services and improvements in an affected

district.

(3) "Vagrancy" means the habitual act of loitering,

begging, panhandling, scavenging, camping, sleeping, or otherwise

remaining idle for extended periods of time in a public place

without a lawful purpose.

Sec. 372.202. APPLICABILITY OF SUBCHAPTER. This subchapter

applies only to a municipality that has a population of more than

900,000 and less than two million.

Sec. 372.203. PERPETUAL EXISTENCE. Notwithstanding any

other law, an affected district may not be dissolved under Section

372.011 or any other general law, but may be dissolved by special

law.

Sec. 372.204. CONTRACT WITH MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION. (a)

Except as provided by Section 372.205, a municipality shall enter

into a contract with a management organization that:

(1) implements supplemental services and improvements

in an affected district created by the municipality; and

(2) is delegated full authority to oversee and manage

the implementation of supplemental services and improvements as

provided by Section 372.208, including the receipt, handling, and

use of money in accordance with this subchapter.

(b) A management organization that enters into a contract

under this section is considered a governmental body for purposes

of Chapter 552, Government Code.

Sec. 372.205. GOVERNING BODY OF MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS.

(a) A municipality may not enter into a contract with a management

organization under this subchapter unless the governing body of the

management organization complies with this section.

(b) The governing body of a nonprofit organization that may

serve as a management organization under this subchapter must be

composed of seven directors that serve staggered, four-year terms.

Five of the directors must be appointed as provided by Subsection

(c) and two of the directors must be elected as provided by

Subsection (d).

(c) The appointed directors of the governing body of a

nonprofit organization that may serve as a management organization

under this subchapter must be appointed as follows:

(1) one director appointed by the municipality in

which the affected district is located;

(2) one director appointed by the commissioners court

of the county in which the affected district is located;

(3) one director appointed by the governor;

(4) one director appointed by the lieutenant governor;

and

(5) one director appointed by the speaker of the house

of representatives.

(d) The elected directors of the governing body of a

nonprofit organization that may serve as a management organization

under this subchapter must be elected by the 10 largest owners of

taxable real property liable for an assessment in the affected

district, as determined by the current roll of the appraisal

district in which the property is located. The governing documents

of the nonprofit organization must prescribe the means of electing

the directors under this subsection. An elected director may not

serve consecutive terms.

Sec. 372.206. LOCAL FUNDING. (a) A municipality shall

transfer annually to the management organization of an affected

district located in the municipality an amount of money equal to the

revenue collected through an existing special assessment on

properties located in the district over the previous municipal

fiscal year.

(b) A county shall transfer annually to the management

organization of an affected district located in the county an

amount of money equal to one half of the amount described by

Subsection (a).

(c) A municipality or county may not change the rate of an

assessment in response to a transfer of money under this section.

Sec. 372.207. STATE FUNDING. A management organization is

eligible to receive state funding for the purpose of implementing

supplemental services as described by Section 372.208.

Sec. 372.208. USE OF MONEY FOR SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES. (a)

Except as provided by Subsection (b), a management organization may

only use money allocated to the management organization under this

subchapter for the following supplemental services, in order of

priority:

(1) eliminating crime;

(2) eliminating vagrancy;

(3) improving cleanliness;

(4) increasing beautification; and

(5) implementing other projects to improve the public

improvement district.

(b) An affected district may only use money appropriated to

the management organization under Section 372.207 for:

(1) eliminating crime; and

(2) eliminating vagrancy.

Sec. 372.209. ENFORCEMENT. (a) An owner of real property

located in an affected district may bring an action against a

management organization to seek injunctive relief or specific

performance in a district court to enforce compliance with any

applicable law or the governing documents of the management

organization. A property owner is not entitled to money damages in

an action under this section.

(b) A court shall award reasonable attorney's fees and court

costs incurred in bringing an action under this section to a

prevailing claimant.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.