SB 2594
Cities Must Match Downtown District Assessments For A Nonprofit
Died in committee
Verdict: Smells
All 4 charges, and why
Pitch: Taxpayer-funded NGOs
ACTUALLY
“A municipality shall transfer annually to the management organization of an affected district located in the municipality an amount of money equal to the revenue collected through an existing special assessment”…
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill routes city money, county money and possible state money to a nonprofit instead of an agency run by elected officials.
Pitch: Taxpayer-funded NGOsRider: Caption mismatch
THE CAPTION
“relating to the provision of supplemental services by management”…
Caption, introduced version (I)
THE RIDER
“Notwithstanding any other law, an affected district may not be dissolved under Section 372.011 or any other general law, but may be dissolved by special law.”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The caption speaks only of supplemental services by management organizations. The body also strips property owners of their petition right to dissolve the district and makes it permanent unless the Legislature acts, and the caption never mentions this.
Rider: Caption mismatchNew fee, fund, board or appointees
The bill builds a new seven-member governing board with seats filled by state officials and big property owners. That creates new appointed positions over a local district.
New fee, fund, board or appointeesBracket bill
THE TEXT
…“applies only to a municipality that has a population of more than 900,000 and less than two million.”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The population bracket, plus the 'largest operating budget' test, narrows the bill to one downtown district in each of a handful of cities. The caption admits 'certain municipalities,' so the confidence stays moderate.
Bracket billInitial review · graded Oct 21, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade
Caption
relating to the provision of supplemental services by management organizations in certain public improvement districts located in certain municipalities.
Caption from analyzed text · version I.
Summary
The committee analysis cites “calls for reform.” County adds half again. No dissolving by petition.
The bill makes the city and county hand the downtown public improvement district's money to a nonprofit management group, and the city must also pay that group an extra amount equal to the district's yearly assessments, with the county adding half again. It applies only to cities with more than 900,000 and fewer than two million people, and to the single downtown district with the largest budget as of January 1, 2025. That district can no longer be dissolved by property-owner petition, and its nonprofit is run by a seven-member board: three seats appointed by the governor, lieutenant governor and speaker, and two elected by the 10 largest property owners, with the money aimed first at crime and vagrancy.
Labels
Labels: PENDING FOREVER. Heard by the Senate Local Government committee on Apr 28, 2025 and left pending. Never voted out. The bill died.
Receipt
The receipt
89R-SB2594 · 2025-03-13
SOLD BY
ITEM
relating to the provision of supplemental services by management organizations in certain public improvement districts located in certain municipalities.
WHAT IT DOES
The committee analysis cites “calls for reform.” County adds half again. No dissolving by petition.
The bill makes the city and county hand the downtown public improvement district's money to a nonprofit management group, and the city must also pay that group an extra amount equal to the district's yearly assessments, with the county adding half again. It applies only to cities with more than 900,000 and fewer than two million people, and to the single downtown district with the largest budget as of January 1, 2025. That district can no longer be dissolved by property-owner petition, and its nonprofit is run by a seven-member board: three seats appointed by the governor, lieutenant governor and speaker, and two elected by the 10 largest property owners, with the money aimed first at crime and vagrancy.
CHARGES
[x] PITCH: TAXPAYER-FUNDED NGOS
ACTUALLY
“A municipality shall transfer annually to the management organization of an affected district located in the municipality an amount of money equal to the revenue collected through an existing special assessment”…
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill routes city money, county money and possible state money to a nonprofit instead of an agency run by elected officials.
[x] RIDER: CAPTION MISMATCHanalysis confidence 70%
THE CAPTION
“relating to the provision of supplemental services by management”…
Caption, introduced version (I)
THE RIDER
“Notwithstanding any other law, an affected district may not be dissolved under Section 372.011 or any other general law, but may be dissolved by special law.”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The caption speaks only of supplemental services by management organizations. The body also strips property owners of their petition right to dissolve the district and makes it permanent unless the Legislature acts, and the caption never mentions this.
[x] NEW FEE, FUND, BOARD OR APPOINTEESanalysis confidence 80%
The bill builds a new seven-member governing board with seats filled by state officials and big property owners. That creates new appointed positions over a local district.
[x] BRACKET BILLanalysis confidence 60%
THE TEXT
…“applies only to a municipality that has a population of more than 900,000 and less than two million.”
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The population bracket, plus the 'largest operating budget' test, narrows the bill to one downtown district in each of a handful of cities. The caption admits 'certain municipalities,' so the confidence stays moderate.
TOTAL
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source
Sources
Fiscal note · version I · April 27, 2025
No first-year general revenue figure available here.
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
HISTORY
- Received by the Secretary of the Senate
- Filed
- Read first time
- Referred to Local Government
- Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
- Considered in public hearing
- Testimony taken in committee
- Left pending in committee
FILED UNDER
THE TEXT
“A municipality shall transfer annually to the management organization of an affected district located in the municipality an amount of money equal to the revenue collected through an existing special assessment”…
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill routes city money, county money and possible state money to a nonprofit instead of an agency run by elected officials.
THE TEXT
…“an affected district may not be dissolved under Section 372.011 or any other general law”…
Bill text, introduced version (I)
The bill makes one special improvement district permanent and removes property owners' ability to dissolve it locally.
GOVERNMENT GROWTH UNDER A CONSERVATIVE BANNER
The bill creates new appointed board seats filled by statewide officials to run a local district's money.
THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY
Donors
Not tied to this bill.
Sources
The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.
Derived itemized flow · Jul 6, 2024 to Oct 24, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$1,140,000.00
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$1,140,000.00
- Cash
- $1,140,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $1,140,000.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101009502, 101012383, 101061137, 101072395, 101072779.
Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC
$1,140,000.00
- Cash
- $1,140,000.00
- Paid by others
- $0.00
- Total
- $1,140,000.00
Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.
Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
TEC account match.
TeamSources
Derived itemized flow · Dec 12, 2024 to Oct 21, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.
Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.
Report IDs: 101009502, 101012383, 101061137, 101072395, 101072779.
Votes
No floor vote loaded for this bill.
Fiscal
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source
Sources
Fiscal note · version I · April 27, 2025
No first-year general revenue figure available here.
LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.
Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.
How this was graded
Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 21, 2026, against the published rubric.
Sources
Texas Senate · Filed Mar 13, 2025
04/28/2025 S Left pending in committee
Texas Legislature Online · Introduced
Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.
Senate committee · Local Government · Final status: Died in committee
Subjects
Charitable & Nonprofit Organizations
City Government--General
County Government--General
Governor
Special Districts & Authorities--Miscellaneous
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
Text
The text as introduced · 995 words
89R15003 MP-F By: Middleton S.B. No. 2594 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to the provision of supplemental services by management organizations in certain public improvement districts located in certain municipalities. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Section 372.011, Local Government Code, is amended to read as follows: Sec. 372.011. DISSOLUTION. Except as provided by Section 372.203, a [ A ] public hearing may be called and held in the same manner as a hearing under Section 372.009 for the purpose of dissolving a district if a petition requesting dissolution is filed and the petition contains the signatures of at least enough property owners in the district to make a petition sufficient under Section 372.005(b). If the district is dissolved, the district nonetheless shall remain in effect for the purpose of meeting obligations of indebtedness for improvements. SECTION 2. Chapter 372, Local Government Code, is amended by adding Subchapter E to read as follows: SUBCHAPTER E. DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS IN CERTAIN MUNICIPALITIES Sec. 372.201. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter: (1) "Affected district" means a public improvement district that is located in a municipality's central business district and has the largest operating budget of any public improvement district located in the central business district as of January 1, 2025. (2) "Management organization" means a nonprofit organization that a municipality has entered into a contract with to implement supplemental services and improvements in an affected district. (3) "Vagrancy" means the habitual act of loitering, begging, panhandling, scavenging, camping, sleeping, or otherwise remaining idle for extended periods of time in a public place without a lawful purpose. Sec. 372.202. APPLICABILITY OF SUBCHAPTER. This subchapter applies only to a municipality that has a population of more than 900,000 and less than two million. Sec. 372.203. PERPETUAL EXISTENCE. Notwithstanding any other law, an affected district may not be dissolved under Section 372.011 or any other general law, but may be dissolved by special law. Sec. 372.204. CONTRACT WITH MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION. (a) Except as provided by Section 372.205, a municipality shall enter into a contract with a management organization that: (1) implements supplemental services and improvements in an affected district created by the municipality; and (2) is delegated full authority to oversee and manage the implementation of supplemental services and improvements as provided by Section 372.208, including the receipt, handling, and use of money in accordance with this subchapter. (b) A management organization that enters into a contract under this section is considered a governmental body for purposes of Chapter 552, Government Code. Sec. 372.205. GOVERNING BODY OF MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS. (a) A municipality may not enter into a contract with a management organization under this subchapter unless the governing body of the management organization complies with this section. (b) The governing body of a nonprofit organization that may serve as a management organization under this subchapter must be composed of seven directors that serve staggered, four-year terms. Five of the directors must be appointed as provided by Subsection (c) and two of the directors must be elected as provided by Subsection (d). (c) The appointed directors of the governing body of a nonprofit organization that may serve as a management organization under this subchapter must be appointed as follows: (1) one director appointed by the municipality in which the affected district is located; (2) one director appointed by the commissioners court of the county in which the affected district is located; (3) one director appointed by the governor; (4) one director appointed by the lieutenant governor; and (5) one director appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives. (d) The elected directors of the governing body of a nonprofit organization that may serve as a management organization under this subchapter must be elected by the 10 largest owners of taxable real property liable for an assessment in the affected district, as determined by the current roll of the appraisal district in which the property is located. The governing documents of the nonprofit organization must prescribe the means of electing the directors under this subsection. An elected director may not serve consecutive terms. Sec. 372.206. LOCAL FUNDING. (a) A municipality shall transfer annually to the management organization of an affected district located in the municipality an amount of money equal to the revenue collected through an existing special assessment on properties located in the district over the previous municipal fiscal year. (b) A county shall transfer annually to the management organization of an affected district located in the county an amount of money equal to one half of the amount described by Subsection (a). (c) A municipality or county may not change the rate of an assessment in response to a transfer of money under this section. Sec. 372.207. STATE FUNDING. A management organization is eligible to receive state funding for the purpose of implementing supplemental services as described by Section 372.208. Sec. 372.208. USE OF MONEY FOR SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), a management organization may only use money allocated to the management organization under this subchapter for the following supplemental services, in order of priority: (1) eliminating crime; (2) eliminating vagrancy; (3) improving cleanliness; (4) increasing beautification; and (5) implementing other projects to improve the public improvement district. (b) An affected district may only use money appropriated to the management organization under Section 372.207 for: (1) eliminating crime; and (2) eliminating vagrancy. Sec. 372.209. ENFORCEMENT. (a) An owner of real property located in an affected district may bring an action against a management organization to seek injunctive relief or specific performance in a district court to enforce compliance with any applicable law or the governing documents of the management organization. A property owner is not entitled to money damages in an action under this section. (b) A court shall award reasonable attorney's fees and court costs incurred in bringing an action under this section to a prevailing claimant. SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.