Monitoring the Session

SB 2639

bill adding hurdles to historic landmark designations

Died in committee

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Paul BettencourtRSenate 7

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the designation of a property as a historic landmark and the inclusion of a property in a historic district or similar preservation district by certain municipalities.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Cities of 950,000 or more must offer to pay objecting owners first.

The bill makes Texas cities that designate historic landmarks or districts give owners a longer impact statement, including code-violation lists, independent repair-cost estimates and before-and-after appraisals. In cities of 950,000 or more people, a city that designates a property over the owner's objection must first make a written offer to pay the owner for lost value. If the owner refuses, the city must go to court, where special commissioners set the damages and the city pays costs and fees if it lowballed.

Labels

Labels: GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on May 15, 2025. Died in the House: left pending in the Land & Resource Management committee.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB2639 · 2025-03-13

SOLD BY

+ 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to the designation of a property as a historic landmark and the inclusion of a property in a historic district or similar preservation district by certain municipalities.

WHAT IT DOES

Cities of 950,000 or more must offer to pay objecting owners first.

The bill makes Texas cities that designate historic landmarks or districts give owners a longer impact statement, including code-violation lists, independent repair-cost estimates and before-and-after appraisals. In cities of 950,000 or more people, a city that designates a property over the owner's objection must first make a written offer to pay the owner for lost value. If the owner refuses, the city must go to court, where special commissioners set the damages and the city pays costs and fees if it lowballed.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version S · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version S · May 7, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Local Government
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably as substituted
  12. Committee report printed and distributed
  13. Co-author authorized
  14. Placed on intent calendar
  15. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  16. Record vote
  17. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  18. Record vote
  19. Three day rule suspended
  20. Record vote
  21. Read 3rd time
  22. Passed
  23. Record vote
  24. Reported engrossed
  25. Received from the Senate
  26. Read first time
  27. Referred to Land & Resource Management
  28. Posting rule suspended
  29. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  30. Considered in public hearing
  31. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  32. Left pending in committee
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 22 yea · 9 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · May 15, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Donors report through Friends of Paul Bettencourt.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes4

Senate May 15, 2025

Yea
22
Nay
9
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 22, Nays 9.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 22 (published)
  • Nay: 9 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 15, 2025

Yea
26
Nay
5
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 2639 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 26, Nays 5.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 26 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 15, 2025

Yea
22
Nay
9
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 22, Nays 9. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 22 (published)
  • Nay: 9 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 15, 2025

Yea
22
Nay
9
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 2639 at this time on its second reading: CSSB 2639, Relating to the designation of a property as a historic landmark and the inclusion of a property in a historic district or similar preservation district by certain municipalities. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 22, Nays 9.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 22 (published)
  • Nay: 9 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses10
For
5
Against
5
On
0
Names

For

  • 2018 1500-1501 East Austin LP1 registration
  • 2018 1500-1501 East Austin, LP1 registration
  • Self1 registration
  • Self; 2018 1500 - 1501 East Austin LP1 registration
  • Texans for Housing1 registration

Against

  • City of Dallas1 registration
  • City of San Antonio1 registration
  • Preservation Texas1 registration
  • Self1 registration
  • Texas Munciipal League1 registration
Sources

10 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version S · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version S · May 7, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 13, 2025

05/22/2025 H Left pending in committee

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors

House committee · Land & Resource Management · Final status: Died in committee

Senate committee · Local Government · Committee vote 5 aye, 2 nay · Out of committee

Subjects

City Government--Land Use & Zoning

Courts--General

Historic Preservation & Museums

Property Interests--Real Property

Text

The text as introduced · 1,738 words

By: Bettencourt
S.B. No. 2639

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the designation of a property as a historic landmark and

the inclusion of a property in a historic district or similar

preservation district by certain municipalities.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Sections 211.0165(a) and (d), Local Government

Code, are amended to read as follows:

(a) Except as provided by Subsection (b) and subject to

Section 211.01651 , a municipality that has established a process

for designating places or areas of historical, cultural, or

architectural importance and significance through the adoption of

zoning regulations or zoning district boundaries may not designate

a property as a local historic landmark or include a property within

the boundaries of a local historic district unless:

(1) the owner of the property consents to the

designation or inclusion; or

(2) if the owner does not consent, the designation or

inclusion of the owner's property is approved by a three-fourths

vote of:

(A) the governing body of the municipality; and

(B) the zoning, planning, or historical

commission of the municipality, if any.

(d) The historic designation impact statement must include

lists of the:

(1) regulations that may be applied to any structure

on the property after the designation;

(2) procedures for the designation;

(3) tax benefits that may be applied to the property

after the designation; [ and ]

(4) rehabilitation or repair programs that the

municipality offers for a property designated as historic ;

(5) code violations that would be required to bring

the property into compliance if the property was designated as

historic or included in a local historic district;

(6) estimated cost to repair or restore the property

if designated as historic prepared by an independent appraiser,

adjustor, and/or construction expert; and

(7) an independent appraisal of the value of the

property immediately before and immediately after the designation.

SECTION 2. Subchapter A, Chapter 211, Local Government

Code, is amended by adding Section 211.01651 to read as follows:

Sec. 211.01651. DESIGNATION OF HISTORIC LANDMARK OR

DISTRICT IN CERTAIN MUNICIPALITIES. (a) This section applies only

to a property located in a municipality with a population of 950,000

or more.

(b) A municipality may not designate a property as a local

historic landmark or include a property within the boundaries of a

local historic district without the consent of the owner of the

property unless the municipality complies with:

(1) Section 211.0165; and

(2) the procedures in this section for assessing

damages and determining compensation to the property owner.

(c) If the governing body of a municipality approves the

designation of a property as a local historic landmark or inclusion

of the property within the boundaries of a local historic district

as provided by Section 211.0165(a) and the owner of the property

does not consent, the municipality must make a bona fide offer to

compensate the property owner for damages attributable to the

designation or inclusion. A municipality has made a bona fide offer

if the municipality:

(1) provides to the property owner in writing:

(A) an initial offer of compensation for damages

equal to or greater than the amount detailed in the historic

designation impact statement; and

(B) a final offer of compensation for damages,

equal to or greater than the amount detailed in the historic

designation impact statement, on or after the 30th day after the

date the municipality makes a written initial offer to the property

owner; and

(2) provides the property owner with at least 14 days

to respond to the final offer and the property owner does not agree

to the terms of the final offer within that period.

(d) If a municipality is unable to agree with a property

owner on the amount of damages under Subsection (c), the

municipality may bring an action to authorize the municipality to

designate a property as a local historic landmark or include a

property within the boundaries of a local historic district without

the consent of the property owner by filing in the proper court a

petition that includes:

(1) a description of the property;

(2) the name of the property owner if the owner is

known; and

(3) a statement:

(A) specifying the designation or inclusion that

the municipality seeks to authorize;

(B) that the municipality and the property owner

are unable to agree on the damages; and

(C) that the municipality made a bona fide offer

to compensate the property owner for damages as provided by

Subsection (c).

(e) A municipality that files a petition under Subsection

(d) shall provide a copy of the petition to the property owner by

certified mail, return receipt requested, and first class mail. If

the municipality has received written notice that the property

owner is represented by counsel, the municipality shall provide a

copy of the petition to the property owner's attorney by first class

mail, commercial delivery service, or e-mail.

(f) The court in which a petition is filed under this

section not later than the 30th day after the date the petition is

filed shall appoint three special commissioners, as provided by

Section 21.014, Property Code, to assess the damages of the owner of

the property that the municipality seeks to designate as a local

historic landmark or include within the boundaries of a local

historic district.

(g) The special commissioners appointed under Subsection

(f) shall:

(1) as soon as practicable but not later than the 20th

day after the date the special commissioners are appointed hold a

hearing to assess damages; and

(2) provide written notice of the hearing to the

municipality and the property owner as provided by Section 21.016,

Property Code.

(h) A municipality or property owner may:

(1) appeal the findings from the special commissioners

as provided by Section 21.018, Property Code; or

(2) move to dismiss the proceedings in an action filed

under Subsection (d), as provided by Section 21.019, Property Code.

(i) As the basis for assessing actual damages to a property

owner from a designation of a property as a local historic landmark

or inclusion of a property within the boundaries of a local historic

district, the special commissioners shall admit evidence on:

(1) the value of the property;

(2) the injury to the property owner;

(3) the benefit to the property owner's property;

(4) the use of the property for the purpose of the

designation or inclusion;

(5) the cost to repair the property; and

(6) any diminution in the value of the property due to

the designation or inclusion, including from restrictions on the

property owner's ability to demolish or develop the property.

(j) The special commissioners shall assess damages in a

proceeding under this section according to the evidence presented

at the hearing and as provided by Section 21.042, Property Code, as

applicable.

(k) The special commissioners in a proceeding under this

section shall adjudge the costs of the proceeding against a party as

follows:

(i) If the commissioners award greater damages than the

municipality offered to pay or a court on appeal awards greater

damages than the commissioners awarded, the municipality shall pay

all costs; including attorneys fees, expert fees, and costs of

court.

(ii) If the commissioners' award or the

court's determination of the damages is less than or equal to the

amount the municipality offered before proceedings began, the

property owner shall pay the costs of court.

(l) A municipality shall pay the initial cost of serving a

property owner with notice of a condemnation proceeding. If the

property owner is ordered to pay the costs of the proceeding, the

municipality may recover the expense of notice from the property

owner as part of the costs of court.

(m) If a court hearing a suit under this section determines

that a municipality did not make a bona fide offer to compensate the

property owner for damages as required by Subsection (c), the court

shall abate the suit, order the municipality to make a bona fide

offer, and order the municipality to pay:

(1) all costs as provided by Subsection (k); and

(2) any reasonable attorney's fees and other

professional fees incurred by the property owner that are directly

related to the violation.

(n) The special commissioners in a proceeding under this

section shall file with the court a written statement of damages and

costs as provided by Section 21.048, Property Code.

(o) The court in a proceeding under this section shall:

(1) send notice of a decision by the special

commissioners to the parties as provided by Section 21.049,

Property Code; and

(2) if no party files timely objections to the

findings of the special commissioners, adopt the commissioners'

findings as the judgment of the court, record the judgment in the

minutes of the court, and issue the process necessary to:

(A) enforce any judgment of damages awarded to

the property owner; and

(B) authorize the municipality to designate the

property owner's property as a local historic landmark or include

the property within the boundaries of a local historic district

under Section 211.0165.

SECTION 3. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b) of this

section, the changes in law made by this Act apply only to a

designation of a property as a local historic landmark or inclusion

of a property within the boundaries of a local historic district

that is approved by the governing body of a municipality on or after

the effective date of this Act. A designation or inclusion approved

before the effective date of this Act is governed by the law as it

existed immediately before the effective date of this Act, and that

law is continued in effect for that purpose.

(b) If a property owner filed an action to challenge the

designation of the property owner's property as a local historic

landmark or the inclusion of the property within the boundaries of a

local historic district before the effective date of this Act and

the action is pending on the effective date of this Act, the

property owner may elect to dismiss the action and seek relief as

provided by Section 211.01651, Local Government Code, as added by

this Act.

SECTION 4. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives

a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as

provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this

Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this

Act takes effect September 1, 2025.