Monitoring the Session

SB 2722

Bettencourt Bill Writes Toll Rules For A Single Four-Million County

Did not pass

Verdict: Smells

SmellsInitial review
Sen. Paul BettencourtRSenate 7
Why it's charged
Bracket bill

THE TEXT

…“a county with a population of four million or more”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

A four-million population floor aims this new Transportation Code section at a single very large county, while the section sits in a chapter that applies to counties statewide. The caption's 'certain counties' signals some narrowness but does not say how tight it is.

Bracket bill

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the use of certain tolls and charges imposed by certain counties; authorizing an administrative penalty.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Leftovers split 30% city, 70% county roads. Repeat misuse caps the county’s tax rate!

The bill limits how a county of four million or more people can spend toll road money, requiring it to go first to running, expanding, maintaining or paying off debt on toll roads. Any leftover money is split, with 30 percent going to the city holding most of the toll lane miles for emergency response costs and 70 percent going to county roads, mostly divided among commissioner precincts by road miles. If the county's outside auditor reports misuse, the state transportation department must fine the county out of its general fund, and a repeat violation also caps the county's next property tax rate.

Labels

Labels: GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on Apr 29, 2025. Died in the House: voted out of the Transportation committee 9-4, no floor vote.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB2722 · 2025-03-13

SOLD BY

+ 1 coauthor

ITEM

relating to the use of certain tolls and charges imposed by certain counties; authorizing an administrative penalty.

WHAT IT DOES

Leftovers split 30% city, 70% county roads. Repeat misuse caps the county’s tax rate!

The bill limits how a county of four million or more people can spend toll road money, requiring it to go first to running, expanding, maintaining or paying off debt on toll roads. Any leftover money is split, with 30 percent going to the city holding most of the toll lane miles for emergency response costs and 70 percent going to county roads, mostly divided among commissioner precincts by road miles. If the county's outside auditor reports misuse, the state transportation department must fine the county out of its general fund, and a repeat violation also caps the county's next property tax rate.

CHARGES

[x] BRACKET BILLanalysis confidence 60%

THE TEXT

…“a county with a population of four million or more”

Bill text, introduced version (I)

A four-million population floor aims this new Transportation Code section at a single very large county, while the section sits in a chapter that applies to counties statewide. The caption's 'certain counties' signals some narrowness but does not say how tight it is.

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 21, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Transportation
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably as substituted
  12. Committee report printed and distributed
  13. Co-author authorized
  14. Placed on intent calendar
  15. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  16. Record vote
  17. Read 2nd time
  18. Amendment(s) offered FA1 Alvarado
  19. Amended
  20. Vote recorded in Journal
  21. Amendment(s) offered FA2 Miles
  22. Amendment fails of adoption
  23. Record vote
  24. Amendment(s) offered FA3 Bettencourt
  25. Amended
  26. Vote recorded in Journal
  27. Amendment(s) offered FA4 Bettencourt
  28. Amended
  29. Vote recorded in Journal
  30. Passed to engrossment as amended
  31. Record vote
  32. Three day rule suspended
  33. Record vote
  34. Read 3rd time
  35. Passed
  36. Record vote
  37. Reported engrossed
  38. Received from the Senate
  39. Read first time
  40. Referred to s/c on Transportation Funding by Speaker
  41. Recalled from subcommittee
  42. Considered in formal meeting
  43. Committee substitute considered in committee
  44. Reported favorably as substituted
  45. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  46. Committee report distributed
  47. Committee report sent to Calendars
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 21 yea · 8 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · Apr 29, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

Smells

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

Donors report through Friends of Paul Bettencourt.

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

Votes7

Senate Apr 29, 2025

Yea
21
Nay
8
Present, not voting
2
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 21, Nays 8, Present-not voting 2.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 21 (published)
  • Nay: 8 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 29, 2025

Yea
24
Nay
5
Present, not voting
2
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that CSSB 2722 be placed on its third reading and final passage: CSSB 2722, Relating to the use of certain tolls and charges imposed by certain counties; authorizing a civil penalty. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 24, Nays 5, Present-not voting 2.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 24 (published)
  • Nay: 5 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 29, 2025

Yea
21
Nay
8
Present, not voting
2
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

CSSB 2722 as amended was passed to engrossment by the following vote: Yeas 21, Nays 8, Present-not voting 2.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 21 (published)
  • Nay: 8 (published)
  • Present, not voting: 2 (published)
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 29, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

The amendment to CSSB 2722 was read and was adopted by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 29, 2025

Yea
11
Nay
20
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

The amendment to CSSB 2722 was read and failed of adoption by the following vote: Yeas 11, Nays 20.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 11 (published)
  • Nay: 20 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 29, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

The amendment to CSSB 2722 was read and was adopted by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate Apr 29, 2025

Yea
22
Nay
9
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
0
Excused
0
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Sources

Senator Bettencourt moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration CSSB 2722 at this time on its second reading: CSSB 2722, Relating to the use of certain tolls and charges imposed by certain counties; authorizing a civil penalty. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 22, Nays 9.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 22 (published)
  • Nay: 9 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: 0 (derived from named list)
  • Excused: 0 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses34
For
11
Against
22
On
1
Names

For

  • AAA Texas1 registration
  • City of Houston1 registration
  • Dolcefino Media1 registration
  • Houston Fire1 registration
  • Houston Police Department1 registration
  • Houston Professional Firefighters Association1 registration
  • Houston Region Business Coalition1 registration
  • HPOU1 registration
  • Self1 registration
  • Sheriff's Association of Texas1 registration
  • TMPA1 registration

Against

  • American Council of Engineering Companies of Texas1 registration
  • Conference of Urban Counties1 registration
  • County Judges and Commissioners Association of Texas1 registration
  • Dallas County1 registration
  • Farm & City1 registration
  • Harris County Commissioner Precinct 21 registration
  • Harris County Precinct 21 registration
  • Harris County Precinct 41 registration
  • Harris County Toll Road Authority (HCTRA) - Commissioner Court1 registration
  • Lindsay Williams1 registration
  • Self6 registrations
  • Self; Resident of HC1 registration
  • Sterling Green CIA1 registration
  • Super Neighborhoods 65/821 registration
  • The Regional Hispanic Contractors Association1 registration
  • Vision Zero Texas1 registration
  • Wise County1 registration

On

  • Self1 registration
Sources

34 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version H · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version H · May 21, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 13, 2025

05/22/2025 H Committee report sent to Calendars

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Transportation · Committee vote 9 aye, 4 nay · Out of committee

Senate committee · Transportation · Committee vote 6 aye, 3 nay · Out of committee

Companion

HB 5177 by DeAyala (identical)

Subjects

County Government--Finance

County Government--Roads

Highways

AUDITS & AUDITORS

TOLL ROADS & TOLL BRIDGES

TRANSPORTATION, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF

Text

The text as introduced · 647 words

By: Bettencourt
S.B. No. 2722

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the use of certain tolls and charges imposed by certain

counties; authorizing an administrative penalty.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subchapter A, Chapter 284, Transportation Code,

is amended by adding Section 284.014 to read as follows:

Sec. 284.014. RESTRICTION ON USE OF REVENUE FROM TOLLS AND

OTHER CHARGES IN CERTAIN COUNTIES. (a) This section applies only to

a county with a population of four million or more.

(b) Except as provided by Subsection (c), a county that

imposes tolls or charges as otherwise authorized by this chapter

may only use the revenues collected from the tolls or charges to pay

the costs of operating, expanding, maintaining, or administering a

toll project or system or to retire debt related to a toll project

or system. This subsection applies to any fees received by a county

for operating a toll project of another entity but does not apply to

any other revenue of a toll project that is collected by the county

on behalf of another entity under an agreement with the entity.

(c) Of the revenues collected from tolls and charges that

remain after paying the costs described by Subsection (b):

(1) 30 percent of the amount remaining shall be

distributed to the municipality that contains more than 40 percent

of the number of lane miles of the toll project and may be used only

to reimburse the municipality for the costs of providing law

enforcement and other emergency services during accidents and

disasters affecting a project of the county; and

(2) 70 percent of surplus revenue shall be distributed

to the county for use on county owned and maintained roads. A

minimum of 95% of the surplus revenue received by the county shall

be allocated to the commissioner precincts based on the percentage

of roads owned and maintained by the County in each precinct per the

County's Road Log excluding toll roads and freeways as of September

1st before the beginning of the next fiscal year.

(3) The County may allocate up to 5% of the funds to

other County Departments or projects with countywide impact, as

determined by the county, for state, county, or municipal

facilities, the funds are restricted to roads, streets, highways

and related facilities.

(d) An independent auditor hired by a county to audit the

county's annual financial report made to the commissioners court

and to the district judges of the county under Section 114.025,

Local Government Code, shall report any violation of Subsection (b)

to the department.

(e) The department shall promptly investigate a report

received under Subsection (d). If the department determines that

the county violated Subsection (b) and the violation is:

(1) a first violation of Subsection (b), the

department shall impose an administrative penalty against the

county in an amount equal to 110 percent of the amount of revenues

used by the county in violation of Subsection (b); or

(2) a second or subsequent violation of Subsection

(b), the department shall impose an administrative penalty against

the county in an amount equal to 100 percent of the amount of

revenues used by the county in violation of Subsection (b).

(f) A county for which an administrative penalty is imposed

under Subsection (e) shall pay the penalty out of the general fund

of the county. An administrative penalty may only be used as

provided by Subsection (b).

(g) Notwithstanding any other law, a county for which an

administrative penalty is imposed under Subsection (e)(2) may not

adopt a tax rate for the tax year following the tax year in which the

penalty was imposed that exceeds the lesser of the county's

no-new-revenue tax rate or voter-approval tax rate, as determined

under Section 26.04, Tax Code, for that tax year.

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.