Monitoring the Session

SB 2747

Paxton Bill Bars Rebates That Lure Retailers From Other Cities

Did not pass

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Angela PaxtonRSenate 8

Initial review · graded Oct 22, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to limitations applicable to certain agreements providing for a rebate of municipal sales and use taxes or a grant or loan based on those taxes.

Caption from analyzed text · version H.

Summary

Deals need a real business purpose beyond the tax benefit. If not, the comptroller revokes the permit.

The bill bars Texas cities, and the corporations they create, from signing sales tax rebate, grant or loan deals that pull a retailer's place of business from another Texas city unless the deal has a real business purpose beyond the tax benefit. It touches cities, city economic development corporations, retailers and their affiliated companies, and anyone the retailer names to receive the money. If the comptroller finds a city broke the rule, the comptroller ignores that location when deciding where sales happen and revokes the retailer's sales tax permit there, starting September 1, 2025.

Labels

Labels: GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on May 14, 2025. Died in the House: voted out of the Ways & Means committee 12-0, no floor vote.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB2747 · 2025-03-13

SOLD BY

ITEM

relating to limitations applicable to certain agreements providing for a rebate of municipal sales and use taxes or a grant or loan based on those taxes.

WHAT IT DOES

Deals need a real business purpose beyond the tax benefit. If not, the comptroller revokes the permit.

The bill bars Texas cities, and the corporations they create, from signing sales tax rebate, grant or loan deals that pull a retailer's place of business from another Texas city unless the deal has a real business purpose beyond the tax benefit. It touches cities, city economic development corporations, retailers and their affiliated companies, and anyone the retailer names to receive the money. If the comptroller finds a city broke the rule, the comptroller ignores that location when deciding where sales happen and revokes the retailer's sales tax permit there, starting September 1, 2025.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version S · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version S · May 1, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Economic Development
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Left pending in committee
  9. Considered in public hearing
  10. Vote taken in committee
  11. Reported favorably as substituted
  12. Recommended for local & uncontested calendar
  13. Committee report printed and distributed
  14. Placed on local & uncontested calendar
  15. Placed on intent calendar
  16. Laid before the Senate
  17. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  18. Vote recorded in Journal
  19. Three day rule suspended
  20. Record vote
  21. Read 3rd time
  22. Passed
  23. Record vote
  24. Reported engrossed
  25. Received from the Senate
  26. Read first time
  27. Referred to Ways & Means
  28. Considered in formal meeting
  29. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  30. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  31. Committee report distributed
  32. Committee report sent to Calendars
  33. Considered in Calendars
  34. Placed on General State Calendar
FILED UNDER

CORPORATE WELFARE

THE TEXT

…“may not enter into an agreement to which this section applies with a”…

Bill text, House committee report version (H)

The bill limits city sales tax rebates, grants and loans to retailers that only move where tax is booked from one Texas city to another.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 31 yea · 0 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · May 14, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

James Stanton$47,500Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$40KGary Blake$30,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

James Stanton$47,500.00
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$40,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$40,000.00

Cash
$40,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$40,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 11, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982305, 101012314.

Gary Blake$30,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$40,000.00

Cash
$40,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$40,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 11, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982305, 101012314.

Votes3

Senate May 14, 2025

Final passage

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to engrossment, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records final passage. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Sources

CSSB 2747 (Paxton) Relating to limitations applicable to certain agreements providing for a rebate of municipal sales and use taxes or a grant or loan based on those taxes. (viva voce vote) (31-0) (31-0)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 14, 2025

Suspension of the three-day rule

Yea
31
Nay
0
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to engrossment, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records suspension of the three-day rule. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Sources

CSSB 2747 (Paxton) Relating to limitations applicable to certain agreements providing for a rebate of municipal sales and use taxes or a grant or loan based on those taxes. (viva voce vote) (31-0) (31-0)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 31 (published)
  • Nay: 0 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 14, 2025

Passage to engrossment

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
Not printed
Names

Senate journal

Names were not printed. No individual positions are inferred.

The journal row lists three votes in order: passage to engrossment, suspension of the three-day rule, and final passage. This entry records passage to engrossment. Repeated tallies belong to separate votes.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

CSSB 2747 (Paxton) Relating to limitations applicable to certain agreements providing for a rebate of municipal sales and use taxes or a grant or loan based on those taxes. (viva voce vote) (31-0) (31-0)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: Not printed

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses3
For
3
Against
0
On
0
Names

For

  • City of Georgetown1 registration
  • Town of Prosper2 registrations
Sources

3 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version S · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version S · May 1, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version H by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 22, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 13, 2025

05/26/2025 H Placed on General State Calendar

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Sponsors

House committee · Ways & Means · Committee vote 12 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Economic Development · Committee vote 4 aye, 0 nay, 1 absent · Out of committee

Companion

HB 5169 by Shaheen (identical)

Subjects

Business & Commerce--General

Taxation--Sales

COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS

Text

The text as introduced · 496 words

89R10878 CJD-F

By: Paxton
S.B. No. 2747

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to limitations applicable to certain agreements providing

for a rebate of municipal sales and use taxes or a grant or loan

based on those taxes.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Subchapter A, Chapter 321, Tax Code, is amended

by adding Section 321.006 to read as follows:

Sec. 321.006. MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF CERTAIN TAX INCENTIVES.

(a) This section applies to an agreement between a municipality or

a local government corporation or other entity created by a

municipality and a business under which:

(1) the business agrees to relocate to the

municipality from one or more other municipalities in this state;

and

(2) the municipality, corporation, or other entity

agrees to:

(A) rebate to the business an amount of tax

imposed by the municipality under this chapter or an amount of

revenue derived from that tax; or

(B) provide a grant or loan to the business in an

amount that is based on an amount of tax imposed by the municipality

under this chapter or based on an amount of revenue derived from

that tax.

(b) Notwithstanding any other law, if a business is

relocating from one municipality in this state to another

municipality pursuant to an agreement described by Subsection (a):

(1) the amount of a rebate, grant, or loan described by

Subsection (a) may not exceed the amount of any similar rebate,

grant, or loan provided by the municipality from which the business

is relocating; and

(2) the duration of an agreement described by

Subsection (a) may not exceed the duration of any similar agreement

between the business and the municipality from which the business

is relocating.

(c) Notwithstanding any other law, if a business is

relocating from more than one municipality in this state to another

municipality pursuant to an agreement described by Subsection (a):

(1) the amount of a rebate, grant, or loan described by

Subsection (a) may not exceed the weighted average amount of any

similar rebates, grants, and loans provided by the municipalities

from which the business is relocating, weighted according to the

amount of taxes under this chapter collected by the business in each

of those municipalities; and

(2) the duration of an agreement described by

Subsection (a) may not exceed the weighted average duration of any

similar agreements between the business and the municipalities from

which the business is relocating, weighted according to the amount

of taxes under this chapter collected by the business in each of

those municipalities.

SECTION 2. Section 321.006, Tax Code, as added by this Act,

does not apply to an agreement entered into before the effective

date of this Act, except that Section 321.006, Tax Code, as added by

this Act, does apply to any renewal, modification, or extension of

the agreement that occurs on or after the effective date of this

Act.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.