Monitoring the Session

SB 2794

bill extending custody interference offense to any parent

Did not pass

Verdict: No flags

No flagsInitial review
Sen. Angela PaxtonRSenate 8

Initial review · graded Oct 20, 2026 · Headline, summary and grade are analysis of the bill text, not a finding about any person · How we grade

Caption

relating to the criminal offense of interference with child custody.

Caption from analyzed text · version I.

Summary

Custodial parents are covered now, not just noncustodial ones.

The bill rewrites the Texas offense of a parent enticing or persuading a child away from lawful custody so that it covers any parent, not only a noncustodial parent, when the child is taken from the other parent, a guardian, or someone standing in their place. It touches parents in custody disputes, including custodial parents who were not covered before. It also lowers the usual penalty for this parental-enticement offense from a state jail felony to a Class C misdemeanor with a $500 fine, keeping the felony level only for a parent with two or more prior convictions or one who took the child out of the state.

Labels

Labels: CROSS-PARTY HANDOFF. Lead author Angela Paxton (R) in the Senate. Lead sponsor Harold V. Dutton Jr. (D) in the House. Party as the Legislative Reference Library lists it for the 89th Legislature.GOT HALFWAY. Passed the Senate on May 12, 2025. Died in the House: voted out of the Criminal Jurisprudence committee 9-0, no floor vote.

Receipt

The receipt

89R-SB2794 · 2025-03-14

SOLD BY

+ 2 coauthors

ITEM

relating to the criminal offense of interference with child custody.

WHAT IT DOES

Custodial parents are covered now, not just noncustodial ones.

The bill rewrites the Texas offense of a parent enticing or persuading a child away from lawful custody so that it covers any parent, not only a noncustodial parent, when the child is taken from the other parent, a guardian, or someone standing in their place. It touches parents in custody disputes, including custodial parents who were not covered before. It also lowers the usual penalty for this parental-enticement offense from a state jail felony to a Class C misdemeanor with a $500 fine, keeping the felony level only for a parent with two or more prior convictions or one who took the child out of the state.

CHARGES

[ ] NONE FOUND

TOTAL

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · May 5, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

HISTORY

  1. Received by the Secretary of the Senate
  2. Filed
  3. Read first time
  4. Referred to Criminal Justice
  5. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  6. Considered in public hearing
  7. Testimony taken in committee
  8. Vote taken in committee
  9. Reported favorably w/o amendments
  10. Committee report printed and distributed
  11. Co-author authorized
  12. Placed on intent calendar
  13. Co-author authorized
  14. Rules suspended-Regular order of business
  15. Vote recorded in Journal
  16. Read 2nd time & passed to engrossment
  17. Vote recorded in Journal
  18. Three day rule suspended
  19. Record vote
  20. Read 3rd time
  21. Passed
  22. Record vote
  23. Reported engrossed
  24. Received from the Senate
  25. Read first time
  26. Referred to Criminal Jurisprudence
  27. Scheduled for public hearing on . . .
  28. Considered in public hearing
  29. Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
  30. Left pending in committee
  31. Considered in formal meeting
  32. Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
  33. Comte report filed with Committee Coordinator
  34. Committee report distributed
  35. Committee report sent to Calendars
FILED UNDER

No verified beat found.

SIGNED FOR BY

Senate · 29 yea · 1 nay

Sources

Senate: Final passage · May 12, 2025. Journal. Published stock for this vote. Snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

All floor motions and other positions below.

No flags

THANK YOU FOR CHECKING THE RECEIPT

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

CAMPAIGN PAID FOR BY

Donors

James Stanton$47,500Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$40KGary Blake$30,000

Not tied to this bill.

Sources

The author's campaign account only. Own money and internal transfers are separate on the member page.

Derived itemized flow · Oct 27, 2024 to Jun 30, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

James Stanton$47,500.00
Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC$40,000.00

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$40,000.00

Cash
$40,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$40,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 11, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982305, 101012314.

Gary Blake$30,000.00
Money

Missing data does not establish zero giving. Display amounts are rounded.

×

Texans for Lawsuit Reform PAC

$40,000.00

Cash
$40,000.00
Paid by others
$0.00
Total
$40,000.00

Also funds 124 other sitting lawmakers.

Derived recipient stock · Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

TEC account match.

Team
Sources

Derived itemized flow · Dec 11, 2024 to Jun 30, 2025. State data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Derived itemized contributions on live regular reports and uncovered special-session dates. Internal account transfers and daily reports are excluded.

Report IDs: 100982305, 101012314.

Votes3

Senate May 12, 2025

Yea
29
Nay
1
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Sources

The bill was read third time and was passed by the following vote: Yeas 29, Nays 1. (Same as previous roll call)

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 12, 2025

Yea
29
Nay
1
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Sources

Senator Paxton moved that Senate Rule 7.18 and the Constitutional Rule requiring bills to be read on three several days be suspended and that SB 2794 be placed on its third reading and final passage. The motion prevailed by the following vote: Yeas 29, Nays 1.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: 29 (published)
  • Nay: 1 (published)
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Senate May 12, 2025

Yea
Not printed
Nay
Not printed
Present, not voting
Not printed
Absent
Not printed
Excused
1
Names

Named positions matched to lawmakers. See the journal for unmatched names.

Senate journal

Names were not printed for yea. Only the named positions are included in member records.

Voice vote. No numeric tally or individual yeas are inferred.

Sources

Senator Paxton moved to suspend the regular order of business to take up for consideration SB 2794 at this time on its second reading: SB 2794, Relating to the criminal offense of interference with child custody. The motion prevailed. Senator Eckhardt asked to be recorded as voting "Nay" on suspension of the regular order of business. The bill was read second time and was passed to engrossment by a viva voce vote.

Published stock of positions for this vote, except where marked derived.

  • Yea: Not printed
  • Nay: Not printed
  • Present, not voting: Not printed
  • Absent: Not printed
  • Excused: 1 (derived from named list)

Senate journal. Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

Witnesses40
For
34
Against
2
On
4
Names

For

  • Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas (CLEAT)1 registration
  • Dallas Police Assoc1 registration
  • Harris County Deputies' Organization FOP #392 registrations
  • San Antonio police officers association1 registration
  • San antonio police officers association1 registration
  • SAPOA2 registrations
  • Self13 registrations
  • Self; Dallas county Constable pct 51 registration
  • Self; El Paso County1 registration
  • Self; Houston Police Officers’ Union2 registrations
  • Self; Lake Dallas ISD1 registration
  • Self; Prosper ISD Police Department1 registration
  • Self; Sheriffs Association of Texas1 registration
  • Self; Texas Interference with Child Custody Group1 registration
  • Self; Texas ISD School District Police Chiefs Association1 registration
  • Texas Family Law Foundation2 registrations
  • Texas Municipal Police Association (TMPA)2 registrations

Against

  • Self2 registrations

On

  • Self2 registrations
  • Self; Interference with child custody group texas1 registration
  • Texas council on family violence1 registration
Sources

40 parsed registrations across the loaded witness lists.

Derived stock of witness registrations. Repeated appearances count separately. Organizations and self-representation appear as printed.

House witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Senate witness list. Source snapshot 2026-10-20, Central time.

Fiscal

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

LBB estimate · fiscal note version I · source

Sources

Fiscal note · version I · May 5, 2025

No first-year general revenue figure available here.

LBB published estimates · flow over the stated periods.

Source snapshot 2026-10-19, Central time.

How this was graded

Analysis of text version I by claude-opus-5-5, Oct 20, 2026, against the published rubric.

Sources

Texas Senate · Filed Mar 14, 2025

05/23/2025 H Committee report sent to Calendars

Texas Legislature Online · Introduced · Senate Committee Report · Engrossed · House Committee Report

Data snapshot Oct 26, 2026 at 4:20 AM CDT. Grades, charges, quotes and corrections follow the published record.

Coauthors
Sponsors

House committee · Criminal Jurisprudence · Committee vote 9 aye, 0 nay, 2 absent · Out of committee

Senate committee · Criminal Justice · Committee vote 7 aye, 0 nay · Out of committee

Subjects

Civil Remedies & Liabilities

Crimes--Against Persons--General

Family--Parent & Child

CHILD CUSTODY

Text

The text as introduced · 310 words

89R8658 MLH-F

By: Paxton
S.B. No. 2794

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT

relating to the criminal offense of interference with child

custody.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Sections 25.03(b) and (d), Penal Code, are

amended to read as follows:

(b) A [ noncustodial ] parent commits an offense if, with the

intent to interfere with the lawful custody of a child younger than

18 years, the [ noncustodial ] parent knowingly entices or persuades

the child to leave the custody of :

(1) the other [ the custodial ] parent or a [ , ] guardian

of the child; [ , ] or

(2) a person standing in the stead of the [ custodial ]

parent or guardian of the child described by Subdivision (1) .

(d) An offense under Subsection (a) [ this section ] is a

state jail felony. An offense under Subsection (b) is a Class C

misdemeanor punishable by a fine of $500, except that the offense is

a state jail felony if it is shown on the trial of the offense that

the defendant:

(1) has previously been convicted two or more times of

an offense under that subsection; or

(2) enticed or persuaded the child to leave the state.

SECTION 2. The change in law made by this Act applies only

to an offense committed on or after the effective date of this

Act. An offense committed before the effective date of this Act is

governed by the law in effect on the date the offense was committed,

and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose. For

purposes of this section, an offense was committed before the

effective date of this Act if any element of the offense occurred

before that date.

SECTION 3. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.